1. Characters of the development programms Chemistry in Context and SINUS October 27th, Lisboa Dr. Martin Lindner, IPN

3. Charakters of the Programms Nation-wide Biggest programms ever run (1.000 Schools and ca. 8.000 teachers) Funded by central + regional governments Schools are grouped in sets Coordination on national + on regional level Researched by IPN Focussing the national standards

4. 2002 - 2005 (12 Sets) Inventing Units Development Reflection Optimisation Tranings for other Teachers 2003 - 2005 (9 Sets) Coordinator Teacher-Trainer Creating learning communities

5. 2005 – 2008 Transfer More Länder New Themes Other types of schools

6. Development Conceptual framework Discussion, goals exchange, reflection, (inservice training and evaluation learning) (formative, summative) development of classroom teaching units experience

7. Professional Development through Hospitation Planning together Visit at school (Hospitation / Video) Discussion in the teams

8. Erwünschte Verbrennungen- unerwünschte Folgen Brandkarten Tabelle mit Fragen Wann brennt etwas? Sauerstoff -entzug Chemische Reaktion Feuerwehr -Aktion Rosten Explosion Klima Müllverbrennung Wasserstoffauto Erarbeitung Motivation, Einstieg Vertiefung und Vernetzung

9. What has changed in the classrooms? Students work self- organized in Teams Changes in the type of tasks lead to: - independent and autonomic learning - domininating of practical work and experiments

10. Changing the role of teachers Teacher is central point in the classroom Entertainer Teacher as a coach

11. The role of Intervention School University Teacher-Training School-Practice Sceme of teaching: The own teachers Intervention Internal script New internal script Intervention

12. Internet www.sinus-sh.de Necessary: Not at all less to a small to a great extend Internet Meetings

13. Development since 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 5 Mio / y 17 Mio / y 0.8 Mio / y Participants in SINUS Participants in CHiK

14. What does Teamwork mean?

15. What do the particpants say? Results of evaluation Rate of relevance in a 1-4 scale: 1. Cooparation in the team 2. Cooperation in preparing lessons 3. Atmosphere in the team 1 2 3 4141 1.We found significant correlation between the relevance of set-cooperation and estimation of practicability as well as estimation of development in competence. 2. The intensity of cooperation is the main determinant for increase in methodological variety.

16. Conclusions: 5 main factors for success Small Teams with common aims (Team-orientated) Regular meetings (Process-orientated) Directly related to classroom practice Aknowledgement (free conferences, reduction in work load) Professional Coordination (Motivation / Controlling) Creating networks including administration, professional development centers and universities

17. Research Results show the success of our work in different fields, e.g. –Students interest – grade of collaboration