1. Texas Forest Service Tennessee Kentucky Wildlife Mgt Institute The Nature Conservancy US Geological Survey Ducks Unlimited Mississippi Arkansas Louisiana Oklahoma Missouri The Conservation Fund USFWS Continue to refine the Joint Venture concept as a model for collaborative conservation at ecoregional scales. Our Challenge

2. The 1986 NAWMP – New Directions New standards for measuring success Population response at a continental scale. Landscape sustainability at ecoregional scales.

3. The 1986 NAWMP – New Directions New standards for measuring success Iterative cycle of refining goals and objectives 1994 Update 1998 Update 2004 Update 2005 Assessment

4. The 1986 NAWMP – New Directions New standards for measuring success Iterative cycle of refining goals and objectives A new model for coordination and collaboration – “joint ventures”

5. joint venture – Two or more "parent" companies agreeing to share capital, technology, human resources, risks and rewards in the formation of a new entity under shared control.

6. joint ventures? – Guidance from the NAWMP Geographically specific Functionally comprehensive Coordinate “the planning, funding, and implementation of projects…” “to monitor population trends…” “to determine through research the important factors influencing population status and dynamics…” “to monitor the status and productivity…”

7. joint ventures? – Guidance from the NAWMP Geographically specific Functionally comprehensive Organized and guided by “joint venture action groups” Guided by formal plans Vehicle for translating the Plan’s vision into concrete action

8. Partners in FlightNorth American Waterbird Plan U.S. Shorebird Conservation Plan North American Waterfowl Management Plan Northern Bobwhite Quail Conservation Initiative N orth A merican B ird C onservation I nitiative NABCI Vision Regionally-based… Biologically-driven… Landscape-oriented partnerships… Delivering the full spectrum of bird conservation across the entirety of North America.

10. Continue to refine the Joint Venture concept as a model for collaborative conservation at ecoregional scales. Our Challenge Responsive to: The biological needs of the taxonomic groups represented by the suite of national and international conservation plans. The concept of “integrated” bird conservation. The goals and objectives of CWCS’s and the need to demonstrate biological accountability.

11. Continue to refine the Joint Venture concept as a model for collaborative conservation at ecoregional scales. Our Challenge model – A written or diagrammatic simplification of complex relationships or processes generally developed for the purpose of understanding, explaining, analyzing, or refining such relationships or processes.

12. Conservation Delivery Geomatics Network The LMV Joint Venture Operating Framework Biological Foundation Conservation Design

13. Identify Species of Concern Establish Population Targets Discern Limiting Factors Develop Biological Models Set Objectives to Reduce Limiting Factors Develop Biological Foundation Measure Existing Conditions Apportion Habitat Objectives Establish Programmatic Objectives Implement Conservation Projects Design Conservation Strategies Monitor Habitat Change Monitor Population Response Evaluate Biological Assumptions Monitor Effectiveness LMVJV Biological Planning Process

14. Population/Habitat Modeling Landscape Characterization and Assessment Conservation Design and Conservation Tracking Decision-Based Population and Habitat Monitoring Assumption-Driven Research Functional Elements of a Population-Based, Multi-Scale Conservation Framework

15. To the extent we have been successful in meeting the challenge of developing a model for collaborative conservation at ecoregional scales, Internally, to the staff and leadership of our respective agencies and organizations. Externally, to our peers within the conservation community at large. we have created two communication needs:

16. As a partnership, we should synthesize and communicate the LMV model in a way that can provide clarification and guidance on the LMVJV approach to business internally within our respective organizations and externally to the conservation community at large. My Bottom line…

17. Two Concepts from the Business World That Can Strengthen the Joint Venture Model “Business Ecosystems” as a means of leveraging assets and relationships among conservation partners.

18. Iansiti, M. and R. Levien. 2004. Strategy as Ecology. Harvard Business Review, March 2004, pp. 1-10. Business Ecosystem… Iansiti, M. and R. Levien. 2004. The Keystone Advantage: What the New Dynamics of Business Ecosystems Mean for Strategy, Innovation, and Sustainability. Harvard Business School Press, Boston. 253 pp. “Strategy is becoming, to an increasing extent, the art of managing assets that one does not own.” p. 1

19. Business Ecosystem… The 21 st Century business environment is a networked environment with businesses functionally allied through supply chains, distribution chains, manufacturing processes, technology development. Organizational effectiveness relies increasingly on leveraging and managing assets external to the business. “Like species in biological ecosystems, firms interact in complex ways, and the health and performance of each firm is dependent on the health and performance of the whole.” Sustained performance requires operating decisions focused externally on maintaining the health of the firm’s business ecosystem.

20. Conservation Partner Ecosystem… The 21 st Century conservation environment is a networked environment with organizations functionally allied in assessing landscapes, setting objectives, coordinating delivery, and evaluating biological outcomes. Organizational effectiveness relies increasingly on leveraging and managing assets external to the business. “Like species in biological ecosystems, firms interact in complex ways, and the health and performance of each firm is dependent on the health and performance of the whole.” Sustained performance requires operating decisions focused externally on maintaining the health of the firm’s business ecosystem.

21. Conservation Partner Ecosystem… The 21 st Century conservation environment is a networked environment with organizations functionally allied in assessing landscapes, setting objectives, coordinating delivery, and evaluating outcomes. Organizational effectiveness relies increasingly on leveraging and managing assets external to the business. “Like species in biological ecosystems, conservation organizations interact in complex ways, and the health and performance of each is dependent on the health and performance of the whole.” Sustained performance requires operating decisions focused externally on maintaining the health of the firm’s business ecosystem.

22. Conservation Partner Ecosystem… The 21 st Century conservation environment is a networked environment with organizations functionally allied in assessing landscapes, setting objectives, coordinating delivery, and evaluating outcomes. “Like species in biological ecosystems, conservation organizations interact in complex ways, and the health and performance of each is dependent on the health and performance of the whole.” The effectiveness of a conservation organization hinges increasingly on leveraging and managing assets external to the organization. Sustained performance requires operating decisions focused externally on maintaining the health of the firm’s business ecosystem.

23. Conservation Partner Ecosystem… The 21 st Century conservation environment is a networked environment with organizations functionally allied in assessing landscapes, setting objectives, coordinating delivery, and evaluating outcomes. “Like species in biological ecosystems, conservation organizations interact in complex ways, and the health and performance of each is dependent on the health and performance of the whole.” The effectiveness of a conservation organization hinges increasingly on operating decisions focused on maintaining the health of its “partner ecosystem.” The effectiveness of a conservation organization hinges increasingly on leveraging and managing assets external to the organization.

24. As a partnership, we should synthesize and communicate the LMV model in a way that can provide clarification and guidance on the LMVJV approach to business internally within our respective organizations and externally to the conservation community at large. Action Item?…

25. “Business Ecosystems” as a means of leveraging assets and relationships among conservation partners. The “Theory of the Business” as a means of articulating the underlying assumptions that are guiding the partnership’s actions. Two Concepts from the Business World That Can Strengthen the Joint Venture Model

26. “The Theory of the Business” Drucker, P.F. 1994. “The Theory of the Business” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 70 no. 5 “These are the assumptions that shape any organization’s behavior, dictate its decisions about what to do and not to do, and define what the organization considers meaningful results.” Assumptions about the external environment within which the organization operates. Assumptions about the specific mission of the organization. Assumptions about the core competencies needed to accomplish the mission.

27. “The Theory of the Business” Drucker, P.F. 1994. “The Theory of the Business” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 70 no. 5 “These are the assumptions that shape any organization’s behavior, dictate its decisions about what to do and not to do, and define what the organization considers meaningful results.” Every organization has one, though rarely is it explicitly stated. Assumptions are seldom made explicit. Reassessing assumptions is essential to managing change.

28. “The Theory of the Business” Drucker, P.F. 1994. “The Theory of the Business” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 70 no. 5 “These are the assumptions that shape any organization’s behavior, dictate its decisions about what to do and not to do, and define what the organization considers meaningful results.” Assumptions about the external environment within which the organization operates. Assumptions about the specific mission of the organization. Assumptions about the core competencies needed to accomplish the mission.

29. Characterizing, monitoring, and predicting habitat suitability at broad spatial scales are core functions of a Joint Venture. Maintaining a partnership infrastructure that allows planning, implementation, and evaluation to operate iteratively is a responsibility shared by all partners. Coordinated application of information management technologies is requisite to achieving biological outcomes at ecoregional scales. Key Assumptions An ability to coordinate and leverage conservation delivery is a core competence of an effective partnership. of the LMVJV Conservation Model Translating the goals and objectives of national and international plans into on-the-ground objectives is a primary responsibility of Joint Ventures.

30. Texas Forest Service Tennessee Kentucky Wildlife Mgt Institute The Nature Conservancy US Geological Survey Ducks Unlimited Mississippi Arkansas Louisiana Oklahoma Missouri The Conservation Fund USFWS Continue to refine the Joint Venture concept as a model for collaborative conservation at ecoregional scales. Our Challenge