1. 11:35 Sponsoring project: STASIS Aims and Innovations STASIS: Universal Semantic Interoperability Stuart Campbell Chief Technology Officer TIE STASIS Project Manager

2. STASIS What Stuart Campbell TIE CTO & STASIS Project Manager project-manager@stasis-project.net www.stasis-project.net project-manager@stasis-project.net “Research, Development and Validation of an open webservice based distributed semantic software and services for SME eEmpowerment in the Automotive, Furniture and Generic Sectors” Type of instrument: STREP An FP6 Call 5 STREP (FP6-2004-IST-5) proposal for: 2.5.5 Software and Services 3 Year Project 3.8M€ Cost 2.7M€ EU Grant 13 Partners Keywords: Semantics, Software technology, eBusiness

3. Partners WHO Auto Furniture SHANGHAI SUNLINE STASIS is providing a generic semantic software and service platform using service oriented architectures to guarantee interoperability among industries and organisations Academia Industry Providers SHANGHAI SUNLINE Auto Furn- iture

4. `The Challenge different ways, different schemas, different format and with different levels of definitions Language Difference: –Stock:Inventory, Good, Manufactured or in transit –Stock:Financial bond or instrument Wording differences (of “123456-7x”:): –Product Number –Product Reference Number –Article Number Structure Differences: –EDI:ORDERS/LIN/C1001/1256=IT+[Article Identifier] –XML: … –XML:

5. Industrial concerns How can I keep my own semantics without being forced to use those of others? Why do I need to invest and keep track of standards when I have neither the time nor money? How can I link the semantics of my messages with that of my customers without paying huge consultancy fees? How can I create new data structures which are based on real world use rather than standards theory? How is it possible I can trade with any party with minimal reconfiguration no matter what their country, language? Can you present me something whereby I can utilise any data structure (EDI, XML…) yet the semantic knowledge is retained? How can i easily access and share all the information in the network

6. Practical Demo Basic Principles Todays World

7. Application Hamzeh Jordanian Application Ioannis Greek Subtle (English) Technique 1 LOUDER 10 Packets of Biscuits for Delivery tomorrow Hello Subtle (English) Technique 2 SLOWER

8. Practical Demo Standards

9. Application Hamzeh Jordanian Standard Gash Application Ioannis Greek Unsubtle Technique 3 Read the standard Understand it Implement it Subtle (English) Technique 1 LOUDER Hello Subtle (English) Technique 2 SLOWER Hello

10. Industrial concerns How can I keep my own semantics without being forced to use those of others? Why do I need to invest and keep track of standards when I have neither the time nor money? How can I link the semantics of my messages with that of my customers without paying huge consultancy fees? How can I create new data structures which are based on real world use rather than standards theory? How is it possible I can trade with any party with minimal reconfiguration no matter what their country, language? Can you present me something whereby I can utilise any data structure (EDI, XML…) yet the semantic knowledge is retained? How can i easily access and share all the information in the network       

11. Practical Demo Federated and Competitive Semantics STASIS World

13. Application Hamzeh Jordanian / Dutch Application Nikolai German Primary Link? 

14. Application Hamzeh Jordanian / Dutch Application Nikolai German Application Sven German/Dutch Network Knowledge Secondary Link? KNOWLEDGE

15. Application Hamzeh Jordanian / Dutch Application Nikolai German Next Time

16. Application Hamzeh Jordanian / Dutch Next Time 2 KNOWLEDGE Application Stuart English KNOWLEDGE Application Nikolai German

17. Existing Standards form sets of inputs but they are not a reference but IF good enough they can be Standards which arnt used by the market arnt standards If you feel lost and isolated search the existing STASIS community for semantics/structures you do know The more links you have the more certainty you have of making semantic pathways Semantics become Competitive – The more people use you...the more people that will use you

18. Industrial concerns How can I keep my own semantics without being forced to use those of other partners? Why do I need to invest and keep track of standards when I have neither the time nor money? How can I link the semantics of my messages with that of my customers without paying huge consultancy fees? How can I create new data structures which are based on real world use rather than standards theory? How is it possible I can trade with any party with minimal reconfiguration no matter what their country, language? Can you present me something whereby I can utilise any data structure (EDI, XML…) yet the semantic knowledge is retained? How can i easily access and share all the information in the network

19. Syntax Semantic ‘Document Translator