Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Socrates - Minerva PEDAGOGICAL QUALITY OF ODL : criteria for assessment Joergen Bang, Aarhus University, Denmark.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Socrates - Minerva PEDAGOGICAL QUALITY OF ODL : criteria for assessment Joergen Bang, Aarhus University, Denmark."— Presentation transcript:

1 Socrates - Minerva PEDAGOGICAL QUALITY OF ODL : criteria for assessment Joergen Bang, Aarhus University, Denmark

2 BOLDIC Riga Conference J. Bang2 Presentation Quality assurance on the European agenda Focusing on the relation between quality and pedagogy Quality and the BOLDIC pedagogical model of blended learning

3 BOLDIC Riga Conference J. Bang3 Why focus on quality assurance A goal in itself to provide good education A road to accreditation of courses, programmes, educations at other institutions and in other countries A basis for collaboration among institutions/universities

4 BOLDIC Riga Conference J. Bang4 Bologna 1999 mobility; course and curriculum co-operation; international competitiveness and attractiveness; broad access to higher education and competence development in a context of lifelong learning. diversity of courses and programmes, responsive to the diversity of needs transparency, readable degrees and certificates, ECTS quality assurance international accreditation

5 BOLDIC Riga Conference J. Bang5 Bergen 2005 Ministers call upon ENQA through its members, in co-operation with EUA, EURASHE and ESIB: –to develop an agreed set of standards, procedures and guidelines on quality assurance, –to explore ways of ensuring an adequate peer review system for quality assurance and/or accreditation agencies or bodies, –to report to Ministers of education in Bergen 2005.

6 BOLDIC Riga Conference J. Bang6 National quality assurance A definition of the responsibilities of the bodies and institutions involved Evaluation of programmes and institutions, including internal assessment, external review, participation of students and the publication of results A system of accreditation, certification and comparable procedures Guidelines for international participation, co- operation and networking

7 BOLDIC Riga Conference J. Bang7 EUA principles and goals PRINCIPLES : Mutual trust among the main stakeholders Respect of diversity of national contexts, subject areas and other factors Transparency: clear architecture and clear procedures

8 BOLDIC Riga Conference J. Bang8 EUA principles and goals GOALS: To strengthen universities’ capacity to monitor their quality internally To promote institutional audits and good practice in programme evaluations To develop a European perspective, i.e. to create transparency for mutual recognition

9 BOLDIC Riga Conference J. Bang9 Pedagogical focus "Technology alone does not deliver educational success. It only becomes valuable in education if learners and teachers can do something useful with it. (…) … just having the pipes in place with little or no educational software available generates disappointment and puts many teachers and learners off the online experiences altogether. (…) What is appropriate and works in one culture does not necessarily translate to another. (…) (…) educational content and e-learning services (…) need to be tailored to local needs and cultures.” ( E-Learning. The Partnership Challenge (2001), 24-25).

10 BOLDIC Riga Conference J. Bang10 VET-report Nov. 2004 “e-Learning clearly has the potential to stimulate learning networks and new forms of training organisation. The basic principle of good pedagogy remains that the design of the whole learning process (possible supported by e-learning) is the decisive factor for the learner’s success. Therefore, European countries’ e-learning related measures should not be limited to questions of hard- and software, but rather focus on the pedagogy and e-learning in work processes.” Achieving the Lisbon goal: The contribution of vocational education and training (VET), Executive Summary, November 4, 2004 (p. 17)

11 BOLDIC Riga Conference J. Bang11 From technology to pedagogy Most people (…) think that the Internet, itself, is the key factor in the success of e-learning. However, a vast amount of research provides evidence for the proposition that it is not the medium (Internet), itself, which is accountable for the accomplishment of these promises, but the pedagogical design used in conjunction with the features of the medium. ( Rob Koper: Modeling units of study from az pedagogical perspektive. The pedagogical meta-model behind EML, 2001, p.3)

12 BOLDIC Riga Conference J. Bang12 From learning objects to events (…) a lot of learning does not come from knowledge resources at all, but stems from the activities of learners solving problems, interacting with real devices, interacting in their social and work situation. A lot of research about learning processes provides evidence for this stance that learning doesn't come from the provision of knowledge solely, but that it is the activities of the learners into the learning environment which are accountable for the learning. (…) the smallest unit providing learning events for learners, satisfying one or more interrelated learning objectives. This means that a unit of study can not be broken down to its component parts without loosing its semantic and pragmatic meaning and its effectiveness towards the attainment of learning objectives. (Koper, 2001, p. 3)

13 BOLDIC Riga Conference J. Bang13 BOLDIC pedagogical tradition The five central concepts: –student-centred approach –communication –group or teamwork –active participation –face-to-face. –a blended approach

14 BOLDIC Riga Conference J. Bang14 Learning as construction DECODING (reception) KNOWLEDGE (reciever)

15 BOLDIC Riga Conference J. Bang15 Knowledge vs. know-how DECODING (reception) KNOWLEDGE (reciever) KNOW HOW

16 BOLDIC Riga Conference J. Bang16 Bloom’s Taxonomy 1) knowledge 2) understanding 3) application INSTRUCTIVISM 4) analysis 5) synthesis 6) evaluation CONSTRUCTIVISM

17 BOLDIC Riga Conference J. Bang17 Dialogue and Learning Dialogue offers an opportunity for the learner to go beyond the boundaries of the learning material though discussions with fellow learners and with teachers/tutors. Dialogue enhances the learning process by stimulating the 'negotiation' with the learning material through the formulation of ideas and view points

18 BOLDIC Riga Conference J. Bang18 Open discussion fora Discussion fora: –respect the close integration of education in everyday life –take advantages of these differences in local/national cultures –make the differences the starting point for exchange of ideas and discussion of viewpoints.

19 BOLDIC Riga Conference J. Bang19 Acquiring knowledge through dialogue open dialogue is a challenge to chauvinism and narrowness the best of the old qualities from universitas litterarum is carried into the digital age. new technologies reanimate the old university tradition in which dialogue is the proper way to acquire knowledge.

20 BOLDIC Riga Conference J. Bang20 Virtual learning environments the challenge is pedagogical rather than technological (economical) the potentials of ICT are especially their ability to support co-operation and collaborative learning via the Internet

21 BOLDIC Riga Conference J. Bang21 Deployment of technology the closer ODL methodologies and new technology can mesh with standard mainstream teaching provision the greater their chance of success if new technologies are seen as a means of challenging rather than supporting existing arrangements then resistance will be the order of the day

22 BOLDIC Riga Conference J. Bang22 Trans-national collaboration Communication among students and tutors via electronic technologies is an appropriate teaching/ learning strategy to deploy in trans-national exchange (Virtual mobility) Open discussion fora (CMC) enable students –to expose their knowledge and beliefs to those in other national/cultural groups, and to challenge one another, –to transform their understanding of the subject.

23 BOLDIC Riga Conference J. Bang23 Qualities of virtual seminars The virtual seminar model is based on joint collaboration on equal terms among European academics and institutions, –rather than on export of already produced courses or course units. The autonomy of the institutions and the characteristics of national curricula are respected, –but also challenged in academic discussions

24 BOLDIC Riga Conference J. Bang24 Qualities for the learner The real beneficiaries of the ODL integration in conventional teaching institutions are the learners. they will obtain a flexibility in the learning process, not previously known to them; they will get access to courses and educational materials outside their own institution, not previously within their reach; they will be presented for cross-cultural viewpoints and given possibilities to discuss these viewpoints with fellow learners from other countries. In short, they become part of a European learning environment.

25 BOLDIC Riga Conference J. Bang25 Joergen Bang Head of Department Department of Information and Media Studies Aarhus University Denmark Tel. 0045 8942 9228 E-mail: jbang@imv.au.dk


Download ppt "Socrates - Minerva PEDAGOGICAL QUALITY OF ODL : criteria for assessment Joergen Bang, Aarhus University, Denmark."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google