1. Overview of International Financial Reporting Differences and Inflation Revsine/Collins/Johnson: Chapter 18

2. RCJ: Chapter 18 © 2005 2 Learning objectives 1.Why financial reporting philosophies and detailed GAAP procedures have differed across countries in the past. 2.How globalization has relaxed cross-border barriers and prompted convergence of reporting standards across countries. 3.Why the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) has become important. 4.Efforts by the FASB and IASB to converge their respective standards and facilitate cross-border securities transactions. 5.How to cope with reporting differences that persist.

3. RCJ: Chapter 18 © 2005 3 Learning objectives: Concluded 6.Whether or not the SEC will ease rules that require foreign companies listed on U.S. exchanges to reconcile their reporting methods to U.S. GAAP. 7.Whether compliance with GAAP is carefully monitored in different companies. 8.That companies in foreign countries with high inflation rates depart from the historical cost reporting model. 9.The two major approaches for adjusting financial reports for changing prices—current cost accounting and general price level accounting.

4. RCJ: Chapter 18 © 2005 4 Overview: Growth in cross-border securities transactions

5. RCJ: Chapter 18 © 2005 5 Overview: Growth in international investment

6. RCJ: Chapter 18 © 2005 6 Overview: Largest companies

7. RCJ: Chapter 18 © 2005 7 Overview: Why international accounting is important  U.S. companies do not dominate the global economy.  The growth in global investing has been fueled by several factors: Relaxed security market regulatory rules have made it easier for foreign firms to meet listing requirements. Improvements in telecommunications and computer technology have given investors access to information on a global scale. Investors understand that portfolios based on a global investment strategy are less risky than are those composed exclusively of domestic companies.

8. RCJ: Chapter 18 © 2005 8 International financial reporting: Two approaches  Before the early 1990s, two widely divergent financial reporting approaches existed.  Differences in financial reporting standards have been greatly reduced in recent years. Intended to capture the underlying economic performance of the business entity. Examples include the United Kingdom and U.S. Intended to conform to mandated laws or detailed tax rules. Examples include France, Italy and Belgium. Economic performance approach Commercial and tax law approach

9. RCJ: Chapter 18 © 2005 9 International financial reporting: Why reporting philosophies differ  Financial reporting objectives evolve from the specific legal, political, and financial institutions within a country, as well as from social customs and systems. Germany developed ultraconservative accounting rules and dividend guidelines to protect companies’ survival prospects and protect jobs. Canada and the United Kingdom developed financial reporting rules intended to help the many outside debt and equity investors make informed decisions (the economic performance approach). In Japan, financial reporting standards conformed to income tax rules and other commercial laws (an arbitrary legal format) because outside investors were unimportant to how Japanese companies were financed.

10. RCJ: Chapter 18 © 2005 10 International financial reporting: Convergence of standards across countries  The “relaxation” of cross-border barriers in markets for goods, labor, and capital has increased international competitiveness.  Many companies in countries that used the commercial and tax law approach felt compelled to provide supplemental U.S. GAAP or IFRS financial statements. Daimler-Benz began issuing U.S. GAAP reports in 1996.  A two-tiered financial reporting system emerged: Parent Company “Group” Tax-paying and statutory entities comprising the firm. Statements conform to tax or commercial law. Consolidated statements directed at investors. Statements conform to U.S. GAAP or IFRS

11. RCJ: Chapter 18 © 2005 11 International Financial Reporting: The IASC and the IASB International Accounting Standards Committee (IASC) Formed in 1973. Included professional accounting organizations in 10 countries. Establishes high quality, understandable and enforceable global accounting standards. Works to achieve convergence throughout the world. Includes more than 121 countries. Has issued 41 International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). International Accounting Standards Board (IASB)

12. RCJ: Chapter 18 © 2005 12 International Financial Reporting: U.S. GAAP vs. IFRS  Compared to U.S. GAAP, IASB standards allow firms more latitude.  IFRS often permit different accounting treatments for similar economic events.  IFRS frequently follow a more “broad brush” approach than does U.S. GAAP.  Existing differences between U.S. GAAP and IFRS will be narrowed in the future. Benchmark treatment Allowed treatment PreferredMay be used

13. RCJ: Chapter 18 © 2005 13 International Financial Reporting: Some difference between U.S. GAAP and IFRS U.S. GAAPIFRS Long-lived assets Historical cost minus depreciation and impairment loss Permits upward revaluation when replacement cost is above original cost Reversal of impairment losses ProhibitedPermitted Joint ventures Equity method when ownership is not more than 50% Proportionate consolidation Research & development Expensed as incurredSeparate rules for “research” phase and “development” phase Capitalized interest Requires capitalization in certain instances Benchmark treatment is to expense all interest

14. RCJ: Chapter 18 © 2005 14 International Financial Reporting: Coping with differences that persist  There are at least four different approaches that regulatory commissions in a country can use to deal with foreign issuers of securities: 1. Compel the use of the host country’s reporting rules. 2. Create a bilateral arrangement that allows the host to accept statements prepared under the foreign country’s reporting rules. 3. Allow every foreign issuer to use it home country reporting rules without a requirement to reconcile to host country GAAP. 4. Require the use of International Financial Reporting Standards.

15. RCJ: Chapter 18 © 2005 15 International Financial Reporting: Compel the use of host country GAAP  The U.S. SEC requires foreign companies that wish to have securities traded on U.S. exchanges to reconcile their own reporting methods to U.S. GAAP.  The reconciliation is called a Form 20-F.  There are two reasons this approach is controversial: Competitive disadvantages that reconciliation may impose on U.S. capital markets. Concerns that the reconciliation may not really overcome differences between U.S. and foreign GAAP.

16. RCJ: Chapter 18 © 2005 16 International Financial Reporting: Form 20-F example Home company GAAP U.S. GAAP

17. RCJ: Chapter 18 © 2005 17 International Financial Reporting: Making bilateral agreements  The U.S. and Canada allow each other’s companies to use foreign GAAP when seeking to issue debt or preferred stock.  The company avoids the cost of reformulating its financial statements.  However, this cost is tempered by the fact that U.S. and Canadian GAAP are somewhat similar.  A reconciliation to host country GAAP is required when the company seeks to issue common stock.

18. RCJ: Chapter 18 © 2005 18 International Financial Reporting: Allowing foreign GAAP  This approach imposes no costs on the reporting company.  However, it does impose burdens on analysts in the host country who need to be knowledgeable about a wide range of foreign financial reporting practices.  It is the practice on the London Stock Exchange where foreign listed companies from other EU countries may use their national GAAP, or IFRS, or U.S. GAAP.  The London Stock Exchange does not require a reconciliation to U.K. GAAP.

19. RCJ: Chapter 18 © 2005 19 International Financial Reporting: Using international financial reporting standards  The IOSCO has given a “qualified acceptance” to IASB standards.  Individual countries’ securities commissions may choose to: Accept statements prepared under IASB standards without adjustment. Require a reconciliation between IASB statements and local GAAP. Require supplemental disclosures that contain more information than the IASB standards must provide. Disallow certain IASB accounting treatments.  The U.S. SEC appears willing to consider dropping the Form 20-F reconciliation procedure for firms using improved IFRS. International Organization Of Securities Commissions (IOSCO)

20. RCJ: Chapter 18 © 2005 20 International Financial Reporting: Monitoring compliance  Not only do financial reporting rules differ across countries, but also do the mechanisms for monitoring compliance with those rules.  Different countries have different structures for determining whether the stated principles are actually being followed. External auditor Securities commission Accounting court Competence Independence SEC can challenge financial reports Adequate staff and budget remains an issue Enterprise chartered in the Netherlands

21. RCJ: Chapter 18 © 2005 21 Inflation accounting  Inflation—a decline in the purchasing power of a country’s currency— complicates the analysis of international financial reports.  Financial reporting standards in countries with high rates of inflation (e.g., Mexico) mandate some form of inflation accounting for both tax and financial statement reporting.  Two forms of inflation accounting are required by Mexican GAAP: Specific price-change adjustments General price-level adjustments Rate of price change for specific items like electronic components, coffee beans, or natural gas. Current cost accounting approach. General rate of inflation for the economy as a whole. General price-level accounting approach

22. RCJ: Chapter 18 © 2005 22 Inflation accounting: Current cost approach  Current cost refers to the market price that an individual firm would have to pay in order to replace the specific assets it owns.  Current cost accounting is designed to accomplish two things: 1. Reflect all nonmonetary assets (inventory, buildings, and equipment) at their current replacement cost as of the balance sheet date. 2. Differentiate between: (a) current cost income from continuing operations, and (b) increases or decreases in current cost amounts (holding gains or losses).

23. RCJ: Chapter 18 © 2005 23 Inflation accounting: Current cost example

24. RCJ: Chapter 18 © 2005 24 Inflation accounting: Current cost example—journal entries  One unit of inventory is purchased for $100: DR Inventory $100 CR Cash $100  Current cost increases by $15: DR Inventory $15 CR Owners’ equity $15 Inventory is now shown at current cost  The inventory is sold for $180 DR Cash $180 DR Cost of goods sold 115 CR Sales $180 CR Inventory 115 Now shown at current cost

25. RCJ: Chapter 18 © 2005 25 Inflation accounting: A representative current cost disclosure

26. RCJ: Chapter 18 © 2005 26 Inflation accounting: SFAS No. 33  Only nonmonetary assets like inventory, buildings, and equipment were adjusted.  Actual market replacement costs were used where available.  Price-level indices were used if replacement costs were not available.  All monetary assets and liabilities (e.g., cash, receivables, accounts payable) were reported at their face value without adjustment.  Stockholders’ equity was increased as a balancing item:

27. RCJ: Chapter 18 © 2005 27 Inflation accounting: SFAS No. 33 (continued)  Current cost adjustments on the income statement were limited to cost of goods sold and depreciation.  Here’s an example:

28. RCJ: Chapter 18 © 2005 28 Inflation accounting: Union Carbide’s realized holding gains

29. RCJ: Chapter 18 © 2005 29 Inflation accounting: Historical cost income can overstate true profits

30. RCJ: Chapter 18 © 2005 30 Inflation accounting: Teléfonos de México’s Form 20-F note

31. RCJ: Chapter 18 © 2005 31 Inflation accounting: General price-level accounting  The real amount of goods and services that can be acquired at any moment is what determines the purchasing power of a currency like the U.S. dollar.  General price-level accounting measures changes in purchasing power using a price index for a broad market basket of goods and services. Current cost accounting General price-level accounting Purchasing powers changes linked to special nonmonetary assets (e.g. computer chips inventory). Purchasing powers changes linked to general price index and broad market basket.

32. RCJ: Chapter 18 © 2005 32 Inflation accounting: General price-level accounting illustration  The goal is to adjust all historical amounts into common purchasing power units.  Here’s an example:

33. RCJ: Chapter 18 © 2005 33 Inflation accounting: General price-level accounting  To restate historical amounts into current purchasing power units, the nominal dollar amount is multiplied by a restatement factor:  General price-level accounting is not intended to reflect current market values of assets and liabilities.  SFAS No. 33 required firms to use the “Consumer Price Index (CPI) for all urban consumers” as the price-level index. Monetary items Nonmonetary items Cash, receivables, notes payable are fixed dollar claims Unaffected by price-level changes Inventory, buildings, and equipment Price will change with price-level changes

34. RCJ: Chapter 18 © 2005 34 Inflation accounting: GPLA for nonmonetary items  Suppose a firm’s only asset is land, which was purchased for $1,000 on January 1, 2005:  Assume that the general level of prices rose by 4% during 2005. The constant dollar basic accounting equation would look like: The upward adjustment to owners’ equity is not considered to be income

35. RCJ: Chapter 18 © 2005 35 Inflation accounting: GPLA for monetary items  Suppose a firm’s only asset is cash of $1,000 on January 1, 2005 and that the general level of prices again rose by 4% during 2005.  At the end of 2005, the constant dollar basic accounting equation would look like:

36. RCJ: Chapter 18 © 2005 36 Summary  The financial reporting rules in some countries like the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom strive to reflect firms’ underlying economic performance.  But reporting rules in many other countries—Germany, France, and Japan—merely complied with taxation or other statutory requirements.  “Globalization” forced many countries using a commercial or tax law approach to seek foreign capital, and to move toward an economic performance approach to reporting.  International reporting differences have narrowed, but differences still exist.

37. RCJ: Chapter 18 © 2005 37 Summary concluded  Various mechanisms for coping with cross-border reporting diversity have evolved—reconciliation to host country GAAP, required use of IASB standards, and so on.  Mechanisms for monitoring compliance with GAAP also differ significantly from one country to another—both in terms of the form of monitoring and in its effectiveness.  When inflation is a serious problem, historical cost accounting becomes less meaningful and inflation accounting is used.  Current cost accounting measures changes in specific purchasing power.  By contrast, general price-level accounting strives to reflect overall, average changes in purchasing power.