Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

From Cradle to College and Career Education Results Network Meeting June 7, 2012.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "From Cradle to College and Career Education Results Network Meeting June 7, 2012."— Presentation transcript:

1 From Cradle to College and Career Education Results Network Meeting June 7, 2012

2 The Road Map Project Team

3 Strong Data Results Reporting Powerful Parent and Community Voice Aligned Funding Early learning providers Youth development organizations School districts Place-based projects Community colleges 4-year institutions Improved Outcomes across Road Map Indicators 2020 Goal Aligned Action In School and Out System Building Strategies and Actions

4 Strong Data Results Reporting Powerful Parent and Community Voice Aligned Funding Early learning providers Youth development organizations School districts Place-based projects Community colleges 4-year institutions Improved Outcomes across Road Map Indicators 2020 Goal Aligned Action In School and Out System Building Strategies and Actions

5 P ARENT E NGAGEMENT 2012 A T -A-G LANCE JUNE JULYAUG SEPT DECAPRILMAYJAN ‘13 E NVIRONMENTAL S CAN National – promising models & best practices School District – state of parent/family engagement Local/CBO-level – capacity, activity and landscape (CBOs & parents)

6 P ARENT E NGAGEMENT 2012 A T -A-G LANCE JUNE JULYAUG SEPT DECAPRILMAYJAN ‘13 C ONVENINGS OF P ARENT E NGAGEMENT O RGANIZATIONS June 5 th │ 12:00 – 2:00pm │ 2100 Building June 28 th │ 1:15 – 3:15pm │ Puget Sound ESD July 24 th │ 12:00 – 2:00pm │ 2100 Building

7 P ARENT E NGAGEMENT 2012 A T -A-G LANCE JUNE JULYAUG SEPT DECAPRILMAYJAN ‘13 D EVELOPMENT OF M ULTI -Y EAR W ORK P LAN Synthesis and analysis Vet recommendations *Reconvene key stakeholders

8 P ARENT E NGAGEMENT 2012 A T -A-G LANCE JUNE JULYAUG SEPT OCT/NOV/DECAPRILMAYJAN ‘13 L OGISTICAL P REPARATION : P ARENT C ONFERENCE Parents as primary audience Accessible, understandable, actionable Co-designed with community partners

9 Road Map Small Grants Fund Campana Quetzal was awarded a Small Grants Award in December 2011. Jessica Salvador is here to talk about how their organization utilized the award.

10 Road Map Small Grants Fund Recent Awards: Backpack Academy Community and Parents for Public Schools (CPPS) Service Learning Seattle Community Network Council Alpac Elementary School Culturally Appropriate and Responsive Education Center (CARE Center)

11 Strong Data Results Reporting Powerful Parent and Community Voice Aligned Funding Early learning providers Youth development organizations School districts Place-based projects Community colleges 4-year institutions Improved Outcomes across Road Map Indicators 2020 Goal Aligned Action In School and Out System Building Strategies and Actions

12 Aligned Funders Road Map Aligned Funders Network—Ways to Be Involved 1: Funders Align Education Investments With Road Map Goal and the Indicators of Student Success 2: Funders Invest in System Building Actions and Strategies Recommended by Road Map Work Group Action Plans 3. Funders Invest in Cross-Cutting Activities such as Data, Advocacy, and Parent and Community Engagement Road Map Aligned Funders Network Meeting Thursday, June 21, 10am – Noon; 2100 Building

13 Strong Data Results Reporting Powerful Parent and Community Voice Aligned Funding Early learning providers Youth development organizations School districts Place-based projects Community colleges 4-year institutions Improved Outcomes across Road Map Indicators 2020 Goal Aligned Action In School and Out System Building Strategies and Actions

14 Aligned Action Renton School District Strategic Improvement Plan School Board Resolutions

15 Treehouse is aligning its indicators with The Road Map Project to leverage collective impact for middle and high school students in foster care

16 Road Map ProjectTreehouse Meet WA State Graduation requirements% of students accruing appropriate and sufficient credits for their year % of students meeting graduation requirements (sr. project, HSPE, service learning, WA history) % of students with greater than 2.0 GPA % of students passing all core courses with 2.0 or greater GPA % of students in cohort graduating on-time and extended % of students graduating on-time and extended % of students with 4 or fewer absences% of students with 5 or fewer absences % of students without suspensions/ expulsions No measure% of students remaining in same school for entire year % of students whose parents actively support education % of students experiencing 3 early warning indicators

17 DEFINING MOTIVATION & ENGAGEMENT Future Orientation & Self-Management: I have goals & will overcome barriers that get in my way Self-Efficacy & Growth Mindset I can be successful in school and school is relevant to me Sense of Belonging & Connectedness I belong in, and can contribute to, this school and community Interpersonal Skills I can communicate and work with others, and ask for help when I need it YOUTH DEVELOPMENT FOR EDUCATION RESULTS WORKGROUP

18 YD FOR ED RESULTS WORK (Summer & Fall 2012) Pilot “Student Success Skills & Dispositions” section on CEE’s Educational Effectiveness Survey in Middle & High Schools in Road Map Region Continued focus on defining and measuring 21 st Century Skills (Critical Thinking, Creativity, etc.) with STEM, arts and others Pursue “Survey Builder” and aligning youth development CBOs to measure same constructs + broader list of youth outcomes Focus Groups with Youth about Student Success Skills - Are these the right constructs? How are they built? WHY? To increase strategies and practices to improve these “non-academic” - but critical to success - indicators YOUTH DEVELOPMENT FOR EDUCATION RESULTS WORKGROUP

19 Strong Data Results Reporting Powerful Parent and Community Voice Aligned Funding Early learning providers Youth development organizations School districts Place-based projects Community colleges 4-year institutions Improved Outcomes across Road Map Indicators 2020 Goal Aligned Action In School and Out System Building Strategies and Actions

20 Original Road Map Healthy and ready for Kindergarten Supported and successful in school Graduate from high school -- college and career-ready Earn a college degree or career credential We will set targets and report our progress for on-track indicators across the continuum: 1 Readiness AttainmentAchievement % of children meeting kindergarten readiness standards 2 Pre-K indicator TBD % of students graduating high school meeting HEC minimum entrance requirements % of high school graduates who completed a career/technical education program % of students graduating from high school on time % of high school graduates who take developmental education courses in college % of students who earn a postsecondary credential by age 26 % of students who enroll in postsecondary education % of students who persist year to year We will set 2014, 2017 and 2020 targets for the following on-track indicators. 1 % of students proficient in: - 3 rd grade reading - 4 th grade math - 5 th grade science - 6 th grade reading - 7 th grade math - 8 th grade science % of 9 th graders who pass end of course algebra exam % of students triggering Early Warning Indicator #1 3 % of students triggering Early Warning Indicator #2 4 1 These indicators represent those the “on-track” indicators for the Road Map Project, and have associated targets for 2014, 2017, and 2020 against which the Road Map Project will track progress. We will also track progress for a longer set of indicators (see reverse side) where associated targets have not been set. Wherever possible we will disaggregate by race, ethnicity, income, and gender. 2 Measured by WaKIDS = Washington Kindergarten Inventory of Developing Skills and/or DIBELS = Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy. 3 Triggering Early Warning #1 would entail having 6 or more absences and at least one course failure in the 9th grade. 4 Triggering Early Warning #2 would entail having a Suspension and/or Expulsion in the 9th grade.

21 Indicator Revision Process Directions for Live Survey: “On-track” indicators are the core measures representing the Road Map Project. They will be reported annually and have defined targets. “Reported” indicators are monitored and included in the annual report without defined targets. “Tracked” indicators are monitored and may be used in topical or special analyses but are not included in regular reports. “Not collected” measures are beyond the scope of interest of the Road Map Project OR data is problematic or unavailable.

22 Please Fill Out The Survey Online https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/RoadMapIndicators Deadline: June 15th

23 Pause for a Special Recognition… Tom “On-Track” Tierney Thank you for everything..

24 Pause for a Special Recognition… Monte Bridges Thank you, and..

25 Strong Data Results Reporting Powerful Parent and Community Voice Aligned Funding Early learning providers Youth development organizations School districts Place-based projects Community colleges 4-year institutions Improved Outcomes across Road Map Indicators 2020 Goal Aligned Action In School and Out System Building Strategies and Actions

26 System Building Actions: ELL Workgroups Report Roxana will have slides

27 System Building Actions: STEM Business Plan Josh will have a slide

28 High School to College Completion Work Group Work Group Charge Develop a Strategic Action Plan to improve college readiness and postsecondary completion throughout the Road Map region. Middle

29 Action Planning Process Review research and Road Map data Use criteria, and focus on indicators and targets Draft strategies Vet May 2011May 2012 Revise Action Plan strategies Work Group Meetings

30 Who has been involved in the vetting? Youth Development Organizations for Education Results Work Group Seattle College Access Network Community Network ELL Policy and Data Work Groups Superintendents and Community College Presidents High School to College Completion Work Group High School to College Completion Educator Advisory Team To-date, the Action Plan has been vetted by over 180 Road Map Stakeholders Project Sponsors Note: ERN attendees also gave input on ideas around parent and family engagement that will be used in implementation.

31 Examples of Feedback This work needs to start in middle school Incorporate “nontraditional” students, including students on alternative pathways Importance of parent/family involvement in ALL of this work Where do specific strategies for ELL students and undocumented students fit in? Help students connect education to career, students need to see the purpose Get more specific on policies, and identify policies that address the “tracking” of students Incorporate out-of-school time; community-based organizations play an important role and need to be more visible in the Action Plan We need to support College Bound students once they are enrolled in postsecondary Need to include universities too, not just community colleges

32 Action Planning Process Review research and Road Map data Use criteria, and focus on indicators and targets Draft strategies Vet Revisit the research and effect modeling May 2011May 2012 Revise Action Plan strategies Work Group Meetings Approved Action Plan! Begin detailed implementation planning

33 High School to College Completion Action Plan 33

34 Strategy Implementation

35 Road Map Transcript Follow-Up Study Does math course-taking matter for college enrollment and persistence?

36 Agenda Study Purpose Guiding Questions Study Demographics Types of Findings Available in the Report Summary/Discussion

37 Study’s Purpose Study designed to further analyze 2010 graduates’ high school transcripts from the Road Map schools to provide additional information about math course-taking patterns in relation to college enrollment.

38 Guiding Questions  What is the highest level of math students are taking in high school and middle school? When do students take their last math course?  Does math course-taking matter for whether students attend college and what type of college (2-year or 4-year college)?  Does math course-taking matter for whether students persist in college?

39 Study Definitions College Enrollment: –Not-College Direct - high school graduates who did not attend either a two- or four-year college any time in the academic year immediately following their high school graduation –College Direct - high school graduates who attended either a two- or four-year college any time in the academic year immediately following their high school graduation College Path: –2-year college –4-year college

40 What is the highest level of math students are taking in high school? By District: DistrictMean of Most Advanced Math Course Auburn4.37 (4.22) Federal Way4.54 (4.00) Highline4.55 (4.34) Kent4.67 (4.25) Seattle4.80 (3.98) Renton3.83 (3.42) Tukwila4.17 (3.31) LevelCourse 1Pre-Algebra 2Algebra 3Geometry 4Algebra 2 5Pre-Calculus 6Calculus 7Calculus 2 or above

41 What level of math are students taking in middle school? 36% of students took algebra or beyond in middle school

42 What percentage of students take algebra or beyond in middle school (by ethnicity)?

43 What percentage of students take algebra or beyond in middle school (by district)?

44 When do students take a math course?

45 Does math course-taking matter for whether students attend college and what type of college? Set of logistic regressions to predict college enrollment and college path Findings: Entry level and Exit level math course significantly related to college enrollment and to college path Taking middle school algebra significantly related to college enrollment and to college path Last year of math important for college enrollment and college path GPA also an important predictor

46 Does math course-taking matter for whether students persist in college? College persistence: students attending college during 2010-2011 school year and then returned for 2011-2012 school year Performed set of logistic regressions to determine factors predicting college persistence GPA + MS Algebra = College Persistence GPA + MS Algebra + Entry Level Math = College Persistence GPA + MS Algebra + Entry Level Math + Exit Level Math = College Persistence

47 Summary of Findings College direct students took more rigorous math College direct students more likely to have taken a math class senior year and more likely to attend 4-year college Both courses and grades (GPA) important in predicting college enrollment Students taking higher levels of math at entry and exit have better chance of being college direct and of attending a 4-year college GPA and exit level math associated with increased likelihood of persisting in college

48 Full Report Read more soon when the Final Report is available

49 Meeting Scholarship Criteria Source: Data reported by high school Building Champions or District Coordinators as of May 4, 2012. 1,508 Eligible Seniors

50 Realize the Dream Scholarship Realize the Dream Scholarship is available Washington State high school graduates who: Are undocumented residents of the United States and do not qualify to apply for federal or state financial aid programs. Must be able to file the House Bill (HB) 1079 affidavit. Must receive their high school diploma from a Washington State high school in 2012. Application deadline - 5 p.m. June 18, 2012 Visit: www.collegesuccessfoundation.org/realizethedream or call 1-877-655-4097.www.collegesuccessfoundation.org/realizethedream

51 4,831 Eligible Students* *FRLP data reported by School Districts March 2012, sign-ups include 8 th grade students that signed-up in their 7 th grade year. College Bound Scholarship Sign-up Campaign (as of June 5th, 2012) STUDENTS WILL BE IN SCHOOL FOR 10 MORE DAYS 1,241 eligible 8 th grade students (26%) have yet to apply for the College Bound Scholarship. Deadline: June 30, 2012 District Coordinator have access to the College Bound HECB secure portal and the FRLP list. By reconciling the lists, schools can have quick access to the names of students who still need to apply.

52 714173 913 847 514 1070 600 Eligible Students* *FRLP data reported by School Districts March 2012, sign-ups include 8 th grade students that signed-up in their 7 th grade year. **Complete denotes that a student has a “complete” application (student/ parent signature is included, one or more of the income standards box is checked). For an updated list of students that have complete College Bound Scholarship applications for your school visit the secure HECB College Bound portal. College Bound Scholarship Sign-up Campaign (as of June 5th, 2012)

53 Top Schools To Watch Data as of June 4 th, 2012 School DistrictMiddle School% Signed upRemaining students to sign up KentMill Creek Middle School46%166 AuburnOlympic Middle School37%112 South SeattleMercer Middle School59%90 AuburnCascade Middle School40%90 Federal WayKilo Middle School32%84 Federal WayLakota Middle School36%81 RentonNelsen Middle School63%72 AuburnRainer Middle School43%68 South SeattleDenny Middle School61%66 HighlineChinook Middle School71%63 South SeattleAki Kurose Middle School61%55 HighlineSylvester Middle School75%48 AuburnMt. Baker Middle School71%44 HighlinePacific Middle School80%40 TukwilaShowalter Middle School79%37 Total 1116 Road Map Region74%1241 Top Schools on the College Bound Sign-up Radar Middle Schools with the highest remaining number of complete sign ups

54 CALL TO ACTION How you can best support the sign-up efforts We have specific last push asks on the horizon: Federal Way: planning small group work at Kilo, Lakota, Totem Nelsen MS: phone bank to families McKnight MS: small group work Mill Creek MS: phone bank to families Involved with a school last year? Check-in! If you are interested in participating– gives us your card Or contact: Marina Espinoza mespinoza@collegesuccessfoundation.org

55 ROAD MAP BIRTH TO THIRD GRADE ACTION PLAN FRAMEWORK Parent & family engagement Quality expanded learning opportunities (birth – 3rd grade) Quality teaching (early learning – 3rd grade) FOCUS AREAS INDICATORS % of children born with low birth weight (less than 5.5 pounds) % of eligible children enrolled in formal early learning programs Pre – K indicator TBD % of students meeting kindergarten readiness standards (TBD) % of students enrolled in full-day kindergarten % of students meeting 3rd grade reading standards % of ELL students who gain one or more levels of English proficiency each year 2014 interim targets (pre-K indicator TBD, kindergarten readiness: TBD, 3rd grade reading: 74%) 2017 interim targets (pre-K indicator TBD, kindergarten readiness: TBD, 3rd grade reading: 80%) 2020 GOAL (pre-K indicator TBD, kindergarten readiness: TBD, 3rd grade reading: 87%) OUTCOMES Build strong program & system data capability for continuous improvement

56

57 Key Partners: King County Library System Seattle Public Libraries United Way of King County King County’s 2012 Summer Reading Campaign Key Activities: Targeted summer programming Key messages targeting parents Let’s Read! website Posters PSAs Broad flyer distribution 7 School Districts 8 Cities Place-Based Projects Housing Authorities

58 Up Next! Convening of Parent Engagement Organizations: June 28 th ; 1:15pm-3:15pm – PSESD July 24 th ; 12pm-2pm – 2100 Building Education Results Network Meeting: September 13 th ; 10am-1pm – Location TBD Results Report Meeting: December 13 th ; 10am-1pm – PSESD Parent Conference: First Quarter 2013

59 Thank You For Attending!


Download ppt "From Cradle to College and Career Education Results Network Meeting June 7, 2012."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google