1. SELECTION OF TECHNOLOGY IN COPING WITH THE MSW PROBLEM IN MALAYSIA S.L. Tong Association of Environmental Consultants & Contractors of Malaysia (AECCOM) www.aeccom.org.mywww.aeccom.org.my; sltong@pd.jaring.mysltong@pd.jaring.my Seminar Municipal Solid Waste Management Asia-Pacific Experience Sharing 26 November 2005, Hong Kong

2. CONTENTS I.Current Status of MSW Management in Malaysia II.Approach of the Government of Malaysia for MSW Management III.Selection of Thermal Treatment Technology IV.Operations & Maintenance Consideration

3. I. Current Status of MSW Management in Malaysia & MSW Characteristics

4. ROLE OF FEDERAL, STATE & LOCAL GOVERNMENT IN MSW MANAGEMENT Federal Government: –Ministry of Housing and Local Government Solid waste management funding and policy development –Department of Environment Environmental management and control –Ministry of Health Developing programmes and guidance on MSW in rural areas

5. State Government: –Policy and financial matters pertaining to Local Authorities functions Local Authorities: –Implementation agencies directly responsible over solid waste collection, treatment and disposal; –Provided services direct by the Local authorities or sub-contracted to the public

6. LEGISLATION RELATED TO MSW MANAGEMENT No Federal and State Legislation that deals specifically with all aspects of MSW Current legislations used to manage solid waste nationwide: –Local Government Act 1976 By-laws: Refuse Collection, Removal and disposal By-Laws to regulate the service –Street Drainage and Building Act 1974 Currently in process of new MSW legislation

7. PRESSING NEEDS OF SUITABLE FACILITIES TO TREAT AND DISPOSE MSW Most acute in the capital city, the Federal Territory of Kuala Lumpur (FTKL) and the surrounding state of Selangor Waste generation estimates for 2004: –For FTKL: 2,538 t/d –For Selangor state: 3,600 t/d

9. Beroga Present TTP Site (Beroga) Solid Waste Management within the Federal Territory of Kuala Lumpur (FTKL) and the state of Selangor

10. District/Municipal Council LocationArea ha Remaining Capacity, tons

12. Factors Contributing to the Problem in MSW Management in FTKL Relatively low level of allocation of funds for upgrading and expanding MSW treatment and disposal infrastructure; Delay in the federalisation and privatisation of MSW services on a national scale due to delay in appropriate legislations; and Problems faced in acquiring land to site treatment plants and disposal sites.

13. II. Approach of the Government of Malaysia for Efficient MSW Management

14. The Principles

15. The Approach Direct participation of Federal Government (through the Ministry of Housing & Local Government, MHLG) - regionalisation and privatisation of MSW management services Reducing waste generation at source, recycling and reuse of latent resources prevailing with the discarded “waste” – projected to achieve 16% by 2025 Multi-faceted treatment and disposal strategy: –Sanitary landfill; –Incineration; and –Composting

16. Regional Multi-strategy MSW Plan for FTKL and the State of Selangor (~ 1999/2000) An incineration facility (Thermal Treatment Plant, TTP) to treat: –MSW from FTKL A regional, large scale sanitary landfill as: –Repository for remaining MSW generated from FTKL; –Certain developed part of Selangor state; –Residue produced by the TTP A transfer station to be built: –To economise transportation of MSW generated from FTKL to the regional TTP & landfill facility

17. Transfer Station for FTKL Built & owned by the City Hall of KL at the northern part of FTKL, Taman Beringin Started operation: April 2002 Capacity: 1,700 t/d Operated & maintained by: private company – Alam Flora Sdn Bhd

18. A New Sanitary Landfill Delay in finalisation of location of the site for more than 3 years Two sites were abandoned after Detailed Environmental Impact Assessment (DEIA) were carried out Final selection in early 2005: at Bukit Tagar, northern Selangor state, ~ 70 km from Transfer station

19. III. Selection of MSW Thermal Treatment Technology in Malaysia

20. Project Management Consultant for the Thermal Treatment Plant Project Appointment by the Government of Malaysia under the coordination of MHLG, since 1999/2000 Project Management Consultant (PMC) team comprising: –Yachiyo Engineering Co. Ltd, Japan as leader –Minconsult Sdn Bhd –HSS Integrated Sdn Bhd –Engineering and Environmental Consultants Sdn Bhd

21. Conceptual Design Study by PMC for the Thermal Treatment Plant for FTKL Conceptual Design Study Report completed in December 2000 Planning framework: –Target year: 2025 –Total waste generation: 3,433 t/d –Recycling rate: 16% –Waste for treatment & disposal: 2,900 t/d Thermal treatment plant: 1,200 t/d Regional Landfill site: >1,700 t/d

22. Selection of Technology Criteria of treatment requirements: –Maximum utilisation of resources and by-products, namely recovery of useful metals, waste heat and bottom ash utilisation –Minimise the amount of final disposal materials in safe manners –To apply the most advanced and proven satisfactorily treatment technology fulfilling the environmental standards Two stage thermal treatment technology: –Conventional technology + ash-melting furnace –Gasification + ash-melting furnace

23. Important Features of Gasification & Ash-melting Furnace Identified in Selection 1.It generates syngas with high calorific value to melt residue produced 2.Less dioxin produced because of lower temperature in gasification and higher temperature in the melting furnace 3.No hazardous substance (dioxins and heavy metals) would be leached from the molten slag 4.The slag can be used as construction material

24. 5.Some TTP types can treat not only MSW, but also liquids & sludge 6.Higher efficiency of heat recovery 7.Useful metals can be recovered 8.Energy consumption efficiency is less compared to conventional incinerators

25. Comparison Study of Thermal Treatment Technology Three types studied: –Stoker furnace –Stoker + ash-melting furnace –Gasification + ash-melting furnace See Table:

28. Selection of Gasification & Ash-melting Furnace System See Table

30. Fluidized-bed Gasification furnace Circular type ash melting furnace gasification-Ash Melting Technology Gasifier Ash Melter Flue gas 1350°C 550°C- 600°C Sand Material Air Slag Waste Air

32. Detailed EIA for Proposed TTP for FTKL (Main Channel of Public Participation) First DEIA for TTP to be located at Kampong Bohol, FTKL – 2001/2002 –For MSW from FTKL only –Decided to shift location in late 2002 Second DEIA for TTP to be located at Beroga, Selangor state – 2003/2004 –For 900 t/d of MSW from southern part of FTKL + 300 t/d of MSW from south-eastern part of Selangor state –DEIA approved in mid 2004 and this clears the way for implementation

33. Highlights of System to Be Built Fully under the responsibility of the Federal government To treat 1,200 t/d MSW To reduce the weight of as-received MSW by 95% To recover and recycle steel and aluminum components To make use of the latent heat for power generation:

34. IV. Operations & Maintenance Consideration Management, operations and maintenance of the TTP likely to be under priviatisation arrangement to be undertaken by private company Sources of income: –Tipping fees –Sales of electricity to the grid (up to RM0.17/kWh) Reference rate of tipping fees: –Current rates for disposal to landfills: RM 35-50/t

35. Thank You!