1. BKCASE: Body of Knowledge and Curriculum to Advance Systems Engineering Status Update Dave Olwell, Department of Systems Engineering, NPS IEEE Systems Conference

2. What is BKCASE? Project led by Stevens Institute of Technology and Naval Postgraduate School to create two primary products: – Body of Knowledge in systems engineering (SEBoK) – Graduate Reference Curriculum in Systems Engineering (GRCSE) Started in September 2009 and will run through 2012 Intended for world-wide use Not intended to be used directly for accreditation 201/27/2010

3. BKCASE Vision and Objectives 3 “Systems Engineering competency models, certification programs, textbooks, graduate programs, and related workforce development initiatives around the world align with BKCASE.” Vision 1.Create a SEBoK that is globally recognized by the SE community as the authoritative BoK for the SE discipline. 2.Create a graduate reference curriculum for SE (GRCSE – pronounced “Gracie”) that is globally recognized by the SE community as the authoritative guidance for graduate programs in SE. 3.Facilitate the global alignment of related workforce development initiatives with SEBoK and GRCSE. 4.Transfer stewardship of SE BoK and GRCSE to INCOSE and the IEEE after BKCASE publishes version 1.0 of those products, including possible integration into their certification, accreditation, and other workforce development and education initiatives. Objectives 01/27/20103

4. 4 Rick Adcock, Cranfield University and INCOSE, UKBud Lawson, Lawson Konsult AB, Sweden Johann Amsenga, Eclipse RDC, South Africa Alex Lee, Defence Science and Technology Agency, Singapore Erik Aslaksen, Sinclair Knight Merz, Australia Ray Madachy, Naval Postgraduate School, US John Baras, IEEE Systems Council and University of Maryland, US Andrew McGettrick, Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) Education Board and Education Council Barry Boehm, University of Southern California, US Ken Nidiffer, Software Engineering Institute and IEEE Systems Council, US Cihan Dagli, Missouri University of Science and Technology, US Dave Olwell, Naval Postgraduate School and BKCASE Co-Principal Investigator, US J. Ekstrom, Brigham Young University, US Art Pyster, Stevens Institute of Technology and BKCASE Principal Investigator, US Alain Faisandier, Map Systeme, France Garry Roedler, Lockheed Martin and National Defense Industrial Association Systems Engineering Division, US Tim Ferris, University of South Australia and INCOSE, AustraliaJean-Claude Roussel, EADS, France Kevin Forsberg, Center for Systems Management and INCOSE, US Sven-Olaf Schulze, Berner & Mattner Systemtechnik GmbH, Germany Richard Freeman, Air Force Center for Systems Engineering, USJon Gye Shin, Seoul National University, South Korea Sandy Friedenthal, Lockheed Martin, USHillary Sillitto, Thales Group and INCOSE, UK Richard Frost, General Motors, USJohn Snoderly, Defense Acquisition University, US Edward Ghafari, ICES Corporation and Defense Information Systems Agency, US Alice Squires, Stevens Institute of Technology, US Richard Grzybowski, Corning Incorporated, USMassood Towhidnejad, Embry-Riddle University, US Tom Hilburn, IEEE Computer Society and Embry-Riddle University, US Guilherme Travassos, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro and Brazilian Computer Society, Brazil Scott Jackson, University of Southern California, USMary VanLeer, Arkansas Scholarship Lottery, US Michael Krueger, ASE Consulting, USBrian Wells, Raytheon, US 37 Authors as of April 2010 4 30-31 March 2010

5. Our Partners 30-31 March 20105

6. SEBoK Value Proposition 6 1.There is no authoritative source that defines and organizes the knowledge of the SE discipline, including its methods, processes, practices, and tools. The resulting knowledge gap creates unnecessary inconsistency and confusion in understanding the role of SE in projects and programs; and in defining SE products and processes. SEBOK will fill that gap, becoming the “go to” SE reference. 2.The process of creating the SEBoK will help to build community consensus on the boundaries and context of SE thinking and to use this to help understand and improve the ability of management, science and engineering disciplines to work together. 3.Having a common way to refer to SE knowledge will facilitate communication among systems engineers and provide a baseline for competency models, certification programs, educational programs, and other workforce development initiatives around the world. Having common ways to identify metadata about SE knowledge will facilitate search and other automated actions on SE knowledge. 01/27/20106

7. 7 GRCSE Value Proposition 01/27/20107 There is no authoritative source to guide universities in establishing the outcomes graduating students should achieve with a master’s degree in SE, nor a guidance source on reasonable entrance expectations, curriculum architecture, or curriculum content. This gap in guidance creates unnecessary inconsistency in student proficiency at graduation, makes it harder for students to select where to attend, and makes it harder for employers to evaluate prospective new graduates. GRCSE will fill that gap, becoming the “go to” reference to develop, modify, and evaluate graduate programs in SE. – Initial focus is on systems engineering centric programs. – Approach to Domain centric programs is still under discussion.

8. 01/27/2010 http://www.BKCASE.org/about-bkcase/bkcase-story/ 8

9. What Has Software Engineering Done to Address Similar Challenges? 9 01/27/2010

10. SWEBOK and GSwE2009 1001/27/2010

11. SWEBOK SWEBOK is a way of organizing all the knowledge that is within the software engineering (SwE) discipline It is a hierarchical structure for the knowledge and references to key documents stating the knowledge as of 2004 It was developed by a community of authors and reviewers from around the world It is static – it has not changed since it was published A refresh project is underway to produce a new version in 2010 11 www.SWEBOK.org 01/27/2010

12. 11 Knowledge Areas, First 5 1201/27/2010

13. 13 11 Knowledge Areas, Last 6 01/27/2010

14. SWEBOK Example 01/27/201014

15. SWEBOK Topic Text 01/27/201015

16. What is GSwE2009? Recommendations for faculty who are creating or updating a graduate program in software engineering (SwE) Secondarily, it can be used by employers selecting new SwE graduates, and students selecting graduate programs Intended for world-wide use Not intended to be used directly for accreditation Two companion documents released in November 2009 1601/27/2010

17. GSwE2009 Structure Guidance for Constructing and Maintaining GSwE2009: the fundamental principles, assumptions, and context for the GSwE2009 authors Entrance Expectations: what students should be capable of and have experienced before they enter a graduate program Outcomes: what students should achieve by graduation Architecture: the structure of a curriculum to accommodate core material, university-specific material, and elective material Core Body of Knowledge (CBOK): material that all students should master in a graduate SwE program 1701/27/2010

18. GSwE2009 Operational Concept For a program that fully satisfies the GSwE2009 recommendations: Each student should arrive meeting all entrance expectations, participate in a program that follows the architecture, master the entire CBOK, and achieve all the outcomes HOWEVER, because this is a reference curriculum, actual programs will likely choose to deviate from some GSwE2009 recommendations – this is both expected and reasonable 1801/27/2010

19. Project History and Process 1.Project to create Graduate Software Engineering Reference Curriculum (GSwERC) started in July 2007 at Stevens Institute of Technology with Department of Defense funding (GSwERC renamed in August to GSwE2009) 2.DoD agreed at beginning of project to take a “hands off” approach to technical content – critical to achieving primary objective 3.Formed Early Start Team of about 15 authors who met in August 2007 to shape project 4.Early Start Team gradually expanded and became Curriculum Author Team (CAT) 5.Workshop held every 3 months to synchronize work, adjust plan, and approve interim products – workshop minutes posted on website 6.Email, WebEx, and teleconferences to conduct business between workshops 7.Teams formed to work on specific sections of GSwE2009 8.Open and transparent operations at all times 1901/27/2010

20. More History and Process 9.Built GSwE2009 on foundation documents, primarily SWEBOK, SE2004, and INCOSE Handbook 10.Created GSwE2009 incrementally and iteratively – Version 0.25 in February 2008, Version 0.5 in October 2008, Version 1.0 in September 2009 11.Invited reviewers for Version 0.25, unlimited review for Version 0.5 12.More than 100 reviewers from 23 countries: Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Egypt, France, Germany, Greece, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, Latvia, Mexico, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Singapore, Sweden, Thailand, UK, US 13.About 800 review comments for Version 0.5, each adjudicated 14.Numerous presentations and workshops to obtain feedback, and to generate awareness and demand: – NDIA SE 2007, NDIA SE 2008, SIGCSE 2008, INCOSE IS 2008, ASEE 2008; APCOSE 2008;INCOSE IS 2009, CSEET 2009, ICSE 2009, SIGCSE 2009, CSEET 2010, ICSE 2010, INCOSE IS 2010, SSTC 2010, ASEE 2010 2001/27/2010

21. Curriculum Architecture 21 Baseline: Expected capability of CS and SE Graduates BSEE and BSCE graduates BSSE and BSCS graduates BS + extensive experience Other degree, some experience Old degree, recent experience Business graduates Prep Material Core Materials University-Specific Materials Elective Materials Capstone Experience 01/27/2010

22. Lessons Learned: GSwE2009 22 1. Involve professional societies from the very beginning 2. Build a highly diverse author team from the start 3. Create a sense of camaraderie among the author team 4. Actively seek reviewers from global stakeholders 5. Hold face-to-face workshops at least once every 3 months 6. Establish a project plan early but expect it to evolve – most of the labor is voluntary and reviewers will throw curve balls 01/27/2010

23. BKCASE Revisited Project led by Stevens Institute of Technology and Naval Postgraduate School that is creating two primary products: – Body of Knowledge in systems engineering (SEBoK) – Graduate Reference Curriculum in Systems Engineering (GRCSE) Started in September 2009 and will run through 2012 Intended for world-wide use Not intended to be used directly for accreditation 2301/27/2010

24. BKCASE Staffing 24 1. BKCASE is an open, collaborative project with international participation sought from academia, industry, government, related projects, and professional societies. 2. Art Pyster (Stevens) is Principal Investigator (PI); Dave Olwell (NPS) is Co-Principal Investigator. Alice Squires, Stephanie Enck and Nicole Hutchinson are key researchers. 3. BKCASE sought 30-40 active volunteer authors + several hundred volunteer reviewers. Nearly 40 authors have already signed up. 01/27/2010

25. More BKCASE Staffing 25 4. Each participating professional society will provide at least one active author. (INCOSE has agreed to participate and fund 3 authors. IEEE Systems Council has 2: John Baras and Ken Nidiffer.) 5. Authors are invited onto the project by the Principal Investigators (PI); anyone is welcome to be a reviewer. 6. BKCASE will pay for authors to attend workshops to the extent possible, analogous to GSwE2009. First workshop took place December 8-9 at Naval Postgraduate School. Second Workshop took place 30-31 March at ERAU. 7. BKCASE will generally not pay for the labor of authors or reviewers. 01/27/2010

26. Tentative line-up 01/27/201026 Section/Knowledge AreaResponsible SEBoK Version 0.25Art Pyster/Dave Olwell 1. Executive SummaryDave Olwell 2. Introduction (Overview)Barry Boehm/Art Pyster 3. System ConceptsBud Lawson (lead); Johann Amsenga, Erik Aslaksen, Sandy Friedenthal, Alice Squires, Scott Jackson 4. FundamentalsRick Adcock (lead); Johann Amsenga, Alain Faisandier, Scott Jackson 5. SE Approach and Practices 5.1 Life CyclesKevin Forsberg (lead) 5.2 OrganizationNo Lead yet 5.3 ManagementRay Madachy (lead); Garry Roedler, Mike Krueger 5.4 TechnicalJohn Snoderly (lead); Jean-Claude Roussel, Alain Faisandier, Garry Roedler, Mike Krueger 5.5 AgreementNo Lead yet 5.6 Specialty Engineering/Design ConsiderationsNo Lead yet 6. SE Applications/Case Studies (introduction only)Sandy Friedenthal (lead) 7. SE Competency (ethics, statistical modeling, etc.)Brian Wells (lead); Ken Nidifer, Rick Adcock, Don Gelosh, Alice Squires 8. Glossary 9. Other Closing Matter

27. BKCASE Products 27 1. BKCASE will iteratively deliver a SE BoK and a reference curriculum for a master’s degree in SE together with supplementary material (i.e., case studies) to facilitate their dissemination and adoption. 2. Products freely available without charge provided credit is given. 3. Ideally, any other SE BoK or curriculum effort would merge with BKCASE and efforts to create or evolve SE competency models and certification programs would closely coordinate with BKCASE. 4. Nominal schedule is: a. SE BoK: Version 0.25 June 2010, Version 0.5 June 2011, Version 1.0 June 2012 b. Reference Curriculum: Version 0.25 September 2010, Version 0.5 September 2011, Version 1.0 September 2012 01/27/2010

28. 28 1.Publish incrementally/iteratively with GRCSE trailing SEBoK 2.Create common vocabulary to facilitate communications among the team 3.Throughout the project, involve professional societies to facilitate quality, acceptance, and their eventual role as stewards 4.Build early consensus and maintain it throughout the lifetime of the project 5.Rely on and include academia, industry, and government from multiple fields for authors and reviewers 6.Extensively leverage volunteer labor for both authoring and review 7.Rely on existing source material wherever possible and involve principals from efforts that created source material wherever possible 8.Leverage the processes used to create GSwE2009 and the NPS Modeling and Simulation Acquisition Curriculum 9.Keep completely open and collaborative at a global level – but authors make content decisions 10.Hold physical workshops every 3 months to synchronize teams and build team relationships – rely on virtual meetings, email, and other collaboration technology at other times 11.Keep the team focused on the value propositions when conflicts arise. Strategy 01/27/201028

29. 29 Primary Technical Decisions 1-2 01/27/201029 1.The SEBoK organizes domain independent SE knowledge. It provides a structure for that knowledge, defines important terms, summarizes important topics, selectively helps users choose among popular alternative methods, facilitates search, printing, and application by its intended users, and identifies references which elaborate more fully on all topics. For Version 0.25, the SEBoK will include a set of primary references based on the expert opinion of the SEBoK authors. For subsequent versions, secondary references may be added. 2.The BKCASE Project will develop recommendations on how INCOSE and the IEEE will maintain and evolve SEBoK in accordance with the BKCASE charter, assuming those organizations become stewards of SEBoK after Version 1.0 is released. Version 1.0 of SEBoK itself will include features to facilitate its maintenance and evolution, including the ability for SEBoK users to readily propose new references and evaluate existing references, as well as readily propose changes to all other aspects of the SEBoK.

30. 30 Primary Technical Decisions 3-4 01/27/201030 3.Primary direct SEBoK users will be (a) practicing systems engineers ranging from novices up through senior experts, (b) those responsible for defining and implementing SE processes within organizations, projects, and programs; (c) those responsible for certifying systems engineers and developing certification programs; (d) customers of SE organizations to help them better select and evaluate those organizations; (e) any project manager, engineer, technologist, researcher, or scientist who needs to know about SE; (f) those who educate and train systems engineers; and (g) the GRCSE author team. The SEBoK will facilitate easy access and use by these different types of users. 4.Secondary SEBoK users will be human resource professionals and other workforce development professionals, senior non-technical managers, and lawyers who will use the SEBoK with the support of systems engineers. The SEBoK will facilitate easy access and use by these users.

31. 31 Primary Technical Decisions 5-6 01/27/201031 5.The ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288 process structure will be the initial architecture for the SEBoK. The authors will divide into several teams. Each team will be assigned non-overlapping subsets of 15288 processes. Each team will independently develop initial SEBoK content for their process subset, including methods, techniques, and primary references, taking into account primary and secondary SEBoK users. At Workshop 2, the results of the individual team efforts will be jointly evaluated by the entire author team leading to a revised architecture. 6.Version 0.25 of the SEBoK will be domain independent. Domain dependent knowledge will be captured through case studies of individual systems within specific domains. Those case studies will be companion documents to Version 0.25. After Version 0.25 is complete, the decision to use case studies as the only means to capture domain specific knowledge will be revisited.

32. Table of Contents as of April 2010 1.Executive Summary 2. Introduction (Overview) Purpose of BoK Scope 3.System Concepts a.System Definition – what is a system b.Systems Thinking 4.Fundamentals a. Value/Quality b. Principles of SE c.Integration of other disciplines such as software engineering and project management d.Socio-technical Issues (Context) e.SE Standards f.Application domains (describes each) 5.SE Approach and Practices a.Life Cycles b.Organization c.Management d.Technical e.Agreement f.Specialty Engineering/Design Considerations 6.SE Artifacts 7.SE Applications/Case Studies 8.SE Competency (ethics, statistical modeling, …) 9.Glossary 10.Other Closing Matter 30-31 March 201032

33. Representation of Evolved INCOSE Graduate Reference Curriculum 01/27/201033

34. GRCSE Outline as of April 2010 Intro/front matter Curricular Objectives Curricular Outcomes Entrance expectations Curriculum architecture Common Body Of Knowledge (CBOK) Assessment Maintenance / refresh Closing matter Appendix: catalog of programs / benchmarks 30-31 March 201034

35. Tim Ferris (lead) Alice Squires* J.J. Ekstrom Mary van Leer Dave Olwell Tom Hilburn* Massood Towhidnejad* Guilherme Travassos* Rick Adcock* Eric Bonjour * means participated in GSwE2009 Tentative Line-up for GRCSE 3501/27/2010

36. State of BKCASE Significant funding support from US Department of Defense INCOSE, IEEE Systems Council, IEEE Computer Society Educational Activities Board, ACM, and the NDIA Systems Engineering Division are all participants Seeking participation from Brazilian Computer Society Seeking authors from medical, power, and transportation industries. Explicitly seek INCOSE and the IEEE to become sponsors and assume maintenance and revision responsibilities after Version 1.0 is published First two workshops complete; initial teams formed to create Version 0.25, due out this summer; next 4 workshops scheduled; special events at INCOSE IW and EuSEC scheduled; presentation scheduled at SSTC 3601/27/2010

37. We are working it! Questions? 01/27/201037

38. 3801/27/2010 www.BKCASE.org bkcase@stevens.edu