Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byTodd Bennett Modified over 9 years ago
1
Core Banking System Recommendation for Board Approval
2
Agenda List of Vendors Selection Process Why CoreB Implementation Risks The Cost Factors Future Course of Action Conclusion Questions and Answers
3
Vendors VendorSolution TempestCoreB InfoPartSysA CliveCreditBank WavelliMultiple MountainGreenField
4
Selection Process Short-listing based on Local Presence Supportability Market Repute of the Solution internationally as well as locally. RFP (Request for Proposal) Sent to Short-listed Vendors Responses to RFPs were Evaluated and Scored Workshops held for CoreB, SysA & AutoSoft. Feedback of JSBL functional experts gathered SysA and CoreB scored highest and selected as finalists.
5
Acceptance The Charts Show How JSBL Personnel have Evaluated SysA and CoreB Acceptance Results (Average of Submitted Responses) SysA: 80% CoreB: 87%
6
Gaps Gaps are the Features Not Readily Available in a Solution Gaps in CoreB are Less than SysA
7
Clientele (Local) Tempest CoreBSystem Access SysA ClientStatusClientStatus Allied BankGap AnalysisMCB Bank100+ Branches Live Bank AlfalahWork in ProcessFaysal Bank20+ Branches Live Meezan BankTreasury Live; CBS Signed First Dawood IslamicImplemented NIB BankCBS Signed
8
Clientele (Global) Tempest CoreBSystem Access SysA BAAC, Bansefi, Industrial Bank of Korea Retail BankingPunjab and Sind Bank of India Core Banking System Lloyds TSBPrivate BankingErste Bank (Austria)CBS Credit SuissePrivate BankingICICI BankeLending, eLC Dresdner BankWholesale BankingUnibanka (Latvia) UBSWholesale BankingBurqan Bank (Kuwait)CBS Amex BankUniversal BankingSKB (Societe Generale Group, Slovenia) CBS, Retail Banking Mashreq BankUniversal BankingChina Development BankCBS Saudi HollandiUniversal BankingAEB Bank (Hungary)Retail & Wholesale
9
Why CoreB Scored Highest Amongst all Vendors An Average Acceptance of 87% vs. 80% for SysA. 49 Gaps vs. 163 for SysA. Unanimous decision of the Steering Committee. Lower Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) Compared with SysA International Repute and Second Best Selling Core Banking product Supports better Interoperation
10
Implementation Risks Aggressive Timeline (Risk) Need to completely migrate off AMEX systems by Dec 31 2007 (Mitigation) Implementer promise to deliver by Oct 30 th CoreB with AMEX system functionality (Mitigation) Add penalty clause for late delivery (Fallback) Ask AMEX to make their system (SBS) available beyond Dec 31 2007
11
Implementation Risks Resource Shortage (Risk) There is only one local partner who is tasked to implement at various Banks (Mitigation) Develop technical resource pool, independent of the local partner (Mitigation) Incentive plans for the team to help meet the deadline, and increased retention (Mitigation) Have Tempest promise international resources in case of default of local partner (Fallback) Ask AMEX to make their system (SBS) available beyond Dec 31 2007
12
Cost Factors Core Banking Solution License Maintenance and Support Implementation Hardware Other Software ATM Middleware Oracle Financials Middleware Database
13
Pricing All prices are in US Dollars Prices can vary +/- 10% in hardware, middleware and database
14
Pricing All prices are in US Dollars Prices can vary +/- 10% in hardware, middleware and database
15
Pricing All prices are in US Dollars Prices can vary +/- 10% in hardware, middleware and database
16
Pricing All prices are in US Dollars Prices can vary +/- 10% in hardware, middleware and database
17
Board Approval Tempest CoreB 600 Users licenses option costs less over a 5 year period
18
Future Course of Action Contract Terms and Conditions Operational Definitions Delivery Dates Penalty Clauses Signing Project Office Preparation Team Induction Project Kick-off
19
Thank You We can take your questions
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.