2. This course introduces students on how to write and prepare a research proposal in a systematic manner. A student proposes or selects a project after discussion and approval of his or her supervisor. Usually, a project is based on a core subject of a program. Although projects may differ between students, students get the same exposure and training when they plan and prepare their research proposal. Discussions with supervisor, presentation of research proposal and writing a research proposal are methods used to meet the learning objectives of this course.

3. By the end of this course, students will be able to: 1. Produce a research proposal which include Chapters One, Two and Three for a topic area in Cognitive Science, with clear discussions about sections of the chapters such as background, problem statements, research questions, hypotheses, conceptual framework, theories and models, previous research, research articles, research designs, techniques of data collection, sampling, validity and reliability issues and data analysis. 2. Explain and communicate with lecturers and relevant parties about the study, and search at libraries, resource centers, on- line and other sources for relevant information in order to plan about instrument, module, system design or product design that will be developed. 3. Demonstrate the previous research and methodology through individual presentation

4. 1. Common research  Quantitative, qualitative or mix 2. System Design and Development 3. Prototype/Product Design 4. Other project type approved by supervisor

5.  Early literature survey and review in related field of research  Early meeting and discussion with potential supervisor  In a respective semester, at least 6 meetings with supervisor  log book  Individual time management  At least 3 hours/week  Data collection  Public/private  Supervisor’s responsible (letter, communication, etc.)

6.  Report (Chap 1,2,3) = 80%  Presentation = 15%  Aptitude = 5% + log book  Grading (A… C), Above 50%

7. NoCriteria%Descriptors 1Adherence to Format & Layout  Citation & References  Language  Coherence 10 Impressive (10) Good (7 – 9) Satisfactory (5 – 6) Fair (3 – 4) Weak (0 – 2) 2Introduction (Chapter 1)  Background/Context  Problem Statement  Objectives & Research Questions (Hypotheses)  Conceptual Framework  Conceptual & Operational Definitions of Key Terms/Concepts  Significance of Study 30 Impressive (25 - 30) Good (18 – 24) Satisfactory (12– 17) Fair (6 – 11) Weak (0 – 5) 3Review of Related Literature (Chapter 2)  Coverage (Breadth & Depth)  Quality of Review (Relevance, Logical Argument)  Theoretical Framework 30 Impressive (25 - 30) Good (18 – 24) Satisfactory (12– 17) Fair (6 – 11) Weak (0 – 5) 4Research Design (Chapter 3)  Conceptual Framework  Sampling Procedure  Instrumentation  Reliability & Validity  Procedures for Data Collection & Analysis  Limitations/Delimitations 30 Impressive (25 - 30) Good (18 – 24) Satisfactory (12– 17) Fair (6 – 11) Weak (0 – 5) ImpressiveGoodSatisfactoryFairWeak Exceptionally clear presentation; all major points sufficiently addressed; very thorough and comprehensive; exemplary work Clear presentation; almost all major points sufficiently addressed; generally thorough and comprehensive Generally acceptable, some points sufficiently addressed and some need minor improvement. May require major revision; include substantial and consistent errors. Require major revision in almost all major points; include very substantial and consistent error; fail to provide clear presentation.

8. No CriteriaPoints Descriptors 1Background of Study/Project Proposed  Introduction to topic/area of investigation (i.e. problem statement, scope of study/project)  Explanation of the purpose of the study/project (i.e. objectives, research questions, hypotheses, potential findings/significance of study, conceptual framework, etc)  Definition of Key Terms/Constructs 9 Impressive (9) Good (6-8) Satisfactory (4-5) Fair (2-3) Weak (0 – 1) 2Related Literature  Review of related studies/literature on area of study/project proposed (i.e. theoretical framework) 9 Impressive (9) Good (6-8) Satisfactory (4-5) Fair (2-3) Weak (0 – 1) 3Methodology*  Explanation on method & methodology proposed to achieve purpose/objective of study (i.e. research design, sampling, instrumentation, methods of data collection, data analysis, etc) (* Based on type of FYP proposed) 9 Impressive (9) Good (6-8) Satisfactory (4-5) Fair (2-3) Weak (0 – 1) 4Oral Presentation  Engages attention throughout  Well-paced, clear articulation  Exhibit confidence, enthusiasm 3 Impressive (3) Satisfactory (2) Weak (0 – 1)

9. Criteria  Exhibit understanding of and capability to undertake the FYP process  Demonstrate commitment and determination to complete the FYP successfully  Demonstrate capacity for higher order thinking when articulating ideas during consultation sessions  Demonstrate good progress from the beginning of the PTA process

10. Minggu/TarikhAktiviti Tindakan  Pembahagian Pelajar-Penyelia  Taklimat tentang Prosedur PTA & Tanggungjawab Pelajar Penyelaras PTA Program Minggu 1-13  Sesi Penyeliaan: Perjumpaan secara berkala bersama Penyelia  Penulisan Draf PTA 1: Bab 1,2 & 3 Pelajar & Penyelia Minggu 13-14  Seminar Pembentangan PTA 1: Bab 1, 2 & 3 Penyelaras PTA Program, Pelajar & Penyelia Minggu 13-16  Penambahbaikan Penulisan PTA 1 (berdasarkan maklumbalas semasa Seminar)  Penulisan Draf Akhir PTA 1 mengikut format yang telah ditetapkan Pelajar & Penyelia Minggu 17  Penghantaran PTA 1 ke Pejabat AM FSKPM (jumlah Bab bagi PTA 1 bergantung kepada jenis projek yang dipilih) *PTA 1 yang dihantar selepas tarikh ini akan diberikan Gred F Pelajar Pejabat Am (PP) Minggu 18  Pemberian Gred kepada Penyelaras PTA Program  Pemaparan Gred pada Papan Notis dan laman web Fakulti (e-markah)Penyelia

11.  What?  How?  When?  Where?

12. COGNITIVE SCIENCE Cognitive Psychology Intelligent System Human Factors Learning Sciences Cognitive Neuroscience Artificial Intelligence Cognitive Ergonomic Design-Based Research Philosophy of Mind Augmented Reality Physical Ergonomic Novice vs Expert learning processors Virtual RealityHuman Computer Interaction Design Development 21 st Century learning Integration of Teaching to support learning

13.  MORPHEUS  Manual Penyediaan Projek Tahun Akhir FSKPM  Key  PTA @FSKPM  List of title/area according to cluster  Title/research area Submission date of title/research area  before 5PM, 2 MAY 2013 (SELASA)  FYP title/research area form  FYP 2 presentation (13 May – 16 May 2013)  Please refer to the schedule at Morpheus/faculty website

14.  Wan Norizan Wan Hashim  Email : whnoriza@fcs.unimas.mywhnoriza@fcs.unimas.my  Ext : 1508 THANK YOU