1. Work Load Design for NFV performance evaluation Intel Mobile Communications SG1 NIP#29 1

2. Background NFV enables use of high- volume servers to reduce TCO NFV is under standardization within ETSI technology cluster NFV evaluation is a crucial business need Multiple Stakeholders in the Telecom Ecosystem that are involved in the evaluation 2 Service Providers EPC Vendors IaaS Vendors Compute Element Vendors

3. NFV as an Active Research Topic Active Research to study multiple aspects of virtualization Characterizing performance of NFV [2] Understanding bottlenecks in NFV [3] Evaluation of architecture and infrastructures using NFV [4] References [2] Hirschman B., Mehta P., et.al., “High-performance evolved packet core signaling and bearer processing on general-purpose processors”, IEEE Network, Pages 6-14, 2015, Vol. 29, Issue. 3. [3] Rajan A.S., Gobriel S., et.al., “ Understanding the bottlenecks in virtualizing cellular core network functions”, In Proceedings of IEEE International Workshop on Local and Metropolitan Area Networks (LANMAN), Pages 1-6, April 2015. [4] Technical Brief, “Supporting Evolved Packet Core for One Million Mobile Subscribers with Four Intel® Xeon® Processor-Based Servers” https://networkbuilders.intel.com/docs/MESH_Group_Intel_EPC_TB_FINAL.pdf 3

4. Importance Performance on virtualized cores vary for different workloads Important to evaluate performance for – Planning infrastructure deployment – Network roll-out – Business decisions There is no standardized framework for exchange of work- load descriptions between the various stakeholders to enable an effective performance evaluation 4

5. Work Load Design 5 Information Exchange Standardization Service Provider 1 Service Provider 2 Service Provider N vEPC OEM 1 vEPC OEM 2 vEPC OEM M Common Work Load Design Description

6. Impact Enables fair comparison of multiple NFV platforms that comply with a similar scope network vendors to develop and compare solutions that satisfy trade-offs of features v/s performance v/s cost software vendors an integrators to develop solutions for different deployments 6 Evaluation WorkLoad L WorkLoad 2 WorkLoad 1

7. Summary vEPC work-load design for NFV performance evaluation This NIP complements – 3GPP TS 32.455 : Telecommunication Management; Key Performance Indicators (KPI) for the Evolved Packet Core (EPC); Definitions 7

8. 8 Backup

9. ETSI NFV Work GS NFV-INF 001 NFV; Infrastructure Overview GS NFV-INF 004 NFV; Infrastructure; Hypervisor Domain GS NFV-REL 001 NFV; Resiliency Requirements GS NFV 002 NFV; Architectural Framework GS NFV 003 NFV; Terminology for Main Concepts in NFV GS NFV-INF 003 NFV; Infrastructure; Compute Domain GS NFV-INF 005 NFV; Infrastructure; Network Domain GS NFV-INF 010 NFV; Service Quality Metrics GS NFV-MAN 001 NFV; Management and Orchestration GS NFV-SWA 001 NFV; Virtual Network Functions Architecture GS NFV-SEC 003 NFV; NFV Security; Security and Trust Guidance GS NFV-PER 001 NFV; NFV Performance & Portability Best Practises GS NFV-PER 002 NFV; Proofs of Concept; Framework GS NFV-INF 007 NFV; Infrastructure; Methodology to describe Interfaces and Abstractions GS NFV-SEC 001 NFV; NFV Security; Problem Statement GS NFV 001 NFV; Use Cases 9

10. ETSI GS NFV-INF 010 (Service Quality Metrics) Purpose of NFV Service Quality Metrics 10

11. ETSI GS NFV-INF 010 (Service Quality Metrics) Service Quality Metrics in context of NFV Reference Architecture 11

12. ETSI GS NFV-INF 010 (Service Quality Metrics) Taxonomy of Service Quality Metrics 12