Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byEmery Stokes Modified over 9 years ago
1
PROFESSIONAL ETHICS IN A SOCIAL WORK AND HEALTH CONTEXT David Anderson-Ford Chair: Brunel University Research Ethics Committee Brunel University 2009
2
Ethics is concerned with how men and women ought to live their lives Morality concerns the process of deliberation about right and wrong. MoralImmoral (Right)(Wrong) Seedhouse D Ethical Issues in Health Care Brunel University 2009
3
Two Forms: Everyday Ethics Everyday Ethics Technical Ethics: Technical Ethics: i.e. the attempt to design a theory which is internally coherent and which enables a person to “act morally” (according to the particular theory) whatever the situation in life which confronts her/him. Brunel University 2009
4
Aspects of Technical Ethics 1. Moral philosophy as a quest to understand ‘good’ 2. Moral philosophy based on either consequences or duties Consequences (Teleology) Utilitarianism (JS Mill) Utilitarianism (JS Mill) Consequentialism Consequentialism Duties (Deontology) Right/wrong Right/wrong Duty/obligation – the Moral Imperative (Kant) Duty/obligation – the Moral Imperative (Kant) 3. Moral philosophy as a process of deliberation – Aristotle Brunel University 2009
5
Principles of Ethics Jacques Thiroux (1980) – 5 Principles: The Value of Life The Value of Life At all costs? Abortion; Euthanasia; killing in self-defence; war; capital punishment; suicide; moral dilemmas: e.g. ‘quality adjusted life years’ – quantity rather than quality. Brunel University 2009
6
Goodness or Rightness Goodness or Rightness Do no harm:- beneficence - non-malfeasance - malfeasance Justice or Fairness Justice or Fairness Dilemmas e.g. kidney transplants Truth-telling or Honesty – fraud/plagiarism Truth-telling or Honesty – fraud/plagiarism Individual Freedom Individual Freedom Respect for the autonomy of the individual Brunel University 2009
7
Human Rights Act 1998 Convention Rights Convention Rights –Article 2: A right to life –Article 3: Inhuman or degrading treatment –Article 5: A right to liberty and security –Article 6: A right to a fair trial –Article 8: A right to respect for family life and private life –Article 14: Prohibits discrimination NB: Any interference with convention rights must be lawful, necessary and proportionate Brunel University 2009
8
LEGAL ASPECTS OF PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY Professional Negligence Professional Negligence Confidentiality Confidentiality Consent Consent Brunel University 2009
9
LIABILITY IN NEGLIGENCE Based on concept of duty of care Brunel University 2009
10
3 ingredients The defendant owed the claimant a duty of care The defendant owed the claimant a duty of care The defendant was in breach of that duty by negligent conduct – i.e. a failure to act with reasonable care (+ concept of foreseeability) The defendant was in breach of that duty by negligent conduct – i.e. a failure to act with reasonable care (+ concept of foreseeability) The defendant’s negligent conduct caused damage to the claimant (concept of causation) The defendant’s negligent conduct caused damage to the claimant (concept of causation) Brunel University 2009
11
Bolam v Friern Barnet Hospital Management Committee (1957) See now:Bolitho v City and Hackney Heath Authority (1997) Brunel University 2009
12
THE STANDARD OF CARE The test is the standard of the ordinary skilled [social worker/health professional] exercising and professing to have that special skill. A professional need not possess the highest expert skill…. It is sufficient if s/he exercises the ordinary skill of the ordinary competent person exercising that particular art….” Brunel University 2009
13
“A [social worker/health professional] will not be negligent if s/he acted in accordance with the practice accepted by a responsible body of [health professionals] skilled in that particular art.” “A [social worker/health professional] will not be negligent if s/he acted in accordance with the practice accepted by a responsible body of [health professionals] skilled in that particular art.” Brunel University 2009
14
VICARIOUS LIABILITY The Local Authority/NHS Trust or employer has two forms of liability in negligence: Direct liability, i.e. the Local Authority/Trust itself is at fault. Direct liability, i.e. the Local Authority/Trust itself is at fault. Vicarious liability (indirect liability), i.e. the Local Authority/Trust is responsible for the faults of others – mainly employees, providing they were acting in the course of employment. Vicarious liability (indirect liability), i.e. the Local Authority/Trust is responsible for the faults of others – mainly employees, providing they were acting in the course of employment. Brunel University 2009
15
COMPETENCE, CONSENT & COMPULSION AUTONOMY v PATERNALISM Brunel University 2009
16
The Competent Adult/Child The Nature of Consent -Express -Implied ('need to know' basis) Brunel University 2009
17
3 issues: Was the consent voluntarily given? Was the consent voluntarily given? Was the person giving consent appropriately informed beforehand? – issue of informed consent. Was the person giving consent appropriately informed beforehand? – issue of informed consent. Did the patient/client have capacity in law? Did the patient/client have capacity in law? -i.e. was the patient/client competent to give consent? -i.e. was the patient/client competent to give consent? Brunel University 2009
18
Children Gillick v West Norfolk & Wisbech Area Health Authority (1986) Children Act 1989 Test of 'Gillick competence' ? But see: Re R (1992) Re W (1992) Re W (1992) Brunel University 2009
19
Incapacity: Adults/Children Meaning of 'incompetence? Lack of capacity/ ‘decisionally incapable’/intellectually challenged Meaning of 'incompetence? Lack of capacity/ ‘decisionally incapable’/intellectually challenged Mental Health Acts 1983/2007 Mental Health Acts 1983/2007 Test of Competence: Test of Competence: Re C (1993) 1. Comprehension and retention of information 2. Believing such information 3. Weighing the information and balancing the risks. See now: B v An NHS Hospital Trust (2002) Mental Capacity Act 2005 Brunel University 2009
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.