1. Learning Technology MENTORS Research project Carmel Taddeo...University of South Australia Harry Postema...Glenunga International High School

2. “Excellent teaching of an ‘old school’, explicit kind has been transformed with sophisticated use of new technologies and the shift to a more paperless learning ecosystem.” ‘Quality Teaching for Personalised Learning: Leveraging Technology for Exceptional Results’ Telstra White Paper 2012 Glenunga International High School public secondary school 1500 students years 8 - 12 Context

3. University Research 2007 - 2012 University of South Australia Flinders University What should high quality contemporary learning look like for our students? What technology and particularly ICT would support this? What knowledge and skills of educators need to be developed to achieve this? Glenunga International High School as a DECD Learning Technology Focus School

4. Learning Technology Training Time = LT3 Late start for students once a week. Teachers use this time to learn and develop new skills that combine technology and pedagogy. Build teacher capacity to deliver 21st century learning outcomes key strategy

5. University data used to guide school strategies

6. 1st phase: Technology - laptops, internet, smartboards, moodle, software 2nd phase: Pedagogy - using technology to present curriculum content 3rd phase: Collaboration - mentors and teaching teams working together 4th phase: De-privatisation - reduce between class differences 5th phase: Knowledge Construction - personalised, ‘flipped’ classroom, vodcasts, ‘un-googlable’ learning task design key leadership phases of LT3 mentors

7. Mentor Program In response to identified issues of - sustainability, induction, progression of pedagogy, alignment with school strategies, identification of and response to 21 st century learning. Mentors nominated by each Learning Area (faculty) in key technology/pedagogy focus areas: MOODLE Smartboard Daymap

8. How effective is a mentor program in developing enhanced technology skills and understandings that enable 21 st century pedagogies to be developed amongst teaching teams? Innovative practices Research Question

9. Why we engaged with the practitioner research process? Opportunity to be part of a participatory research process to facilitate change by evaluating an existing initiative in the school Validate the evaluation process by working collaboratively with a researcher to employ rigorous research methodologies

10. What did the participatory research process look like at Glenunga? Researcher and practitioner worked together to: o Develop and refine research questions o Identify suitable research methodologies o Identify sample o Address some of the practical challenges e.g., timing of interviews o Disseminate findings

11. What were the advantages of the practitioner research process? Researcher able to provide big picture perspective Researcher provided an independent evaluation Practitioner able to support data collection process Staff were able to learn about the process in a meaningful & relevant way Provided opportunities to foster mutual respect and trust between practitioner and researcher

12. Learnings Important to have trust and respect between all parties involved (particularly important during data collection phase, where staff are involved in interviews) Important to share the findings in different ways to cater for different audiences o Presentation to staff- both leadership team and the whole staff o Written report: For formal documentation o Conference presentation: For wider dissemination of findings Important to celebrate the process o Acknowledgement at whole staff meeting

13. research method In order to obtain perspectives from a cross section of teachers at GIHS who had been involved in the Mentor Model intervention, nine staff in various roles were interviewed. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with: 3 Learning Area Mentors 3 Learning Area Leaders 3 Mentees

14. data analysis To facilitate the identification of key themes a thematic analysis as outlined by Braun and Clarke (2006) was conducted. Specifically the phases include: Familiarizing yourself with your data Generating initial codes Searching for themes Reviewing themes Defining and naming themes Write up stage

17. Is practical, accessible, useful & relevant

18. Mentor Role Statement The Mentor model provides professional learning opportunities for staff through access to knowledgeable individuals, within their faculty, who are able to offer relevant, practical, accessible and useful technology related support. The Mentor will … Enthusiastically support the school ethos of building teacher capacity in a collaborative environment as an active member of a school based LT Team Undertake a personal skills development program Participate in specialized training provided by the school Work with individuals and small groups towards building skills and understandings of technology in teaching practice Work with Learning Area Leader to provide a learning program as per agreed team objectives Conduct specialist short courses during LT3 Represent the school in professional learning environments from recommendations