1. Standards Showcase: PREMIS (Preservation metadata) Rebecca Guenther, Library of Congress ALA Annual 2006 LC booth presentation June 24-25, 2006

2. Overview  What is preservation metadata?  Background  PREMIS work Survey Data dictionary  Features of the data dictionary  Implementing PREMIS  Future

3. Digital preservation: advances & remaining challenges  Groups around the world and conferences continue to make significant progress in raising awareness about digital preservation imperative  Gradual shift in focus from articulating problem to solving it … Not so much “Why is digital preservation important” anymore; rather, “What must be done to achieve preservation objectives?”  Many practical challenges in implementing reliable, sustainable digital preservation programs  One key implementation challenge: preservation metadata

4. Preservation metadata includes:  Provenance: Who has had custody/ownership of the digital object?  Authenticity: Is the digital object what it purports to be?  Preservation Activity: What has been done to preserve the digital object?  Technical Environment: What is needed to render and use the digital object?  Rights Management: What IPR must be observed?  Makes digital objects self-documenting across time Content Preservation Metadata 10 years on 50 years on Forever!

5. PREMIS background …  Pre-2002: various preservation metadata element sets released Different scopes, purposes, underlying models/assumptions No international standard; little consolidation of expertise/best practice  June 2002: Preservation Metadata Framework International working group (jointly sponsored by OCLC, RLG) Comprehensive, high-level description of types of information constituting preservation metadata Used OAIS reference model as starting point Set of “prototype” preservation metadata elements Consensus-based foundation for developing formal preservation metadata specifications … but not an “off-the-shelf, ready to implement” solution  Post-2002: Needed implementable preservation metadata, with guidelines for application and use, relevant to a wide range of digital preservation systems and contexts Motivated formation of PREMIS Working Group

6. PREMIS Working Group  Preservation metadata: key component of sustainable digital preservation  June 2003: OCLC, RLG sponsored international working group: PREMIS: Preservation Metadata: Implementation Strategies  Objective: Define implementable, core preservation metadata, with guidelines/recommendations for management and use  Membership: > 30 experts from 5 countries, libraries, museums, archives, government agencies, private sector Co-Chairs: Priscilla Caplan (FCLA), Rebecca Guenther (LC)

7. Membership  Priscilla Caplan, FCLA (Chair)  Rebecca Guenther, LC (Chair)  Michael Alexander, British Library  George Barnum, GPO  Charles Blair, U. of Chicago  Olaf Brandt, U. of Göttingen  Adam Farquhar, British Library  David Gewirtz, Yale  Kevin Glavash, MIT/Dspace  Cathy Hartman, U. of N. Texas  Helen Hodgart, British Library  Nancy Hoebelheinrich, Stanford  Roger Howard/Sally Hubbard, Getty Museum  Pam Kircher, OCLC  John Kunze, Calif. Digital Library  Brian Lavoie, OCLC liaison  Robin Dale, RLG liaison  Vicky McCarger, LA Times  Jerry McDonough, NYU/METS  Evan Owens, JSTOR  Erin Rhodes, NARA  Madi Solomon, Walt Disney Co.  Angela Spinazze, ATSPIN  Gunter Waibel, RLG  Lisa Weber, NARA  Robin Wendler, Harvard  Hilde van Wijngaarden, KB  Andrew Wilson, NAA

8. Advisory Committee  Howard Besser, UCLA  Liz Bishoff, OCLC (via Colorado Digitization Program)  Gerard Clifton, National Library of Australia  Gail Hodge, CENDI  Steve Knight, National Library of New Zealand  Maggie Jones, Digital Preservation Coalition  Nancy McGovern, Cornell  Cliff Morgan, Wiley UK  Richard Rinehart, U. of California, Berkeley

9. Survey Report  September 2004: Implementing Preservation Repositories for Digital Materials: Current Practice and Emerging Trends in the Cultural Heritage Community  Survey of existing and planned digital repositories: Mission, content, funding, preservation policies/strategies, take up of OAIS, access mechanisms, and more … Use of metadata to support repository processes, functions, policies; types of metadata collected; metadata storage/management practices  ~50 responses: 28 libraries, 7 archives, 3 museums, and 11 other 13 different countries; 45% from U.S. 38% in planning; 33% development; 46% production  Snapshot of current practices and emerging trends related to managing preservation metadata in digital archiving systems Variety of preservation contexts, institution types, and domains

10. Survey findings  Little experience with digital preservation Most didn’t have active preservation strategy Many not yet in production Cannot assess adequacy of metadata  Lack of common vocabulary and conceptual framework Informed by OAIS reference model Difference of opinion as to meaning of OAIS compliance  Metadata Many recording rights, provenance, technical, administrative, descriptive and structural  Most repositories serve goals of both preservation and access

11. PREMIS Data Dictionary  May 2005: Data Dictionary for Preservation Metadata: Final Report of the PREMIS Working Group  237-page report includes: PREMIS Data Dictionary 1.0 Accompanying report (context, data model, assumptions) Special topics, glossary, usage examples Set of XML schema to support implementation  Data Dictionary: comprehensive, practical resource for implementing preservation metadata in digital archiving systems Comprehensive view of information requirements needed to support digital preservation Based on deep pool of institutional experiences in setting up and managing operational capacity for digital preservation Builds on previous work

12. From theory to practice … OAIS Digital Archiving Systems Framework PREMIS Data Dictionary PREMIS Data Dictionary Preservation Metadata Requirements

13. Winner: 2005 Digital Preservation Award

14. Some guiding principles and assumptions …  “Implementable, core, preservation metadata”: “Preservation metadata”: maintain viability, renderability, understandability, authenticity, identity in a preservation context “Core”: What most preservation repositories need to know to preserve digital materials over the long-term “Implementable”: rigorously defined; supported by usage guidelines/recommendations; emphasis on automated workflows  Implementation neutral: No assumptions on specific implementation Promote flexibility/interoperability Focus on semantic units: what you need to know (implementation-neutral) vs. metadata elements: how you record it (implementation-specific) Information that needs to be “recoverable” from the digital archiving system, independent of local implementation

15. Scope of data dictionary  Implementation independent  Descriptive metadata out of scope  Technical metadata applying to all or most format types  Media or hardware details are limited  Business rules are essential for working repositories, but not covered  Rights information for preservation actions, not access

16. PREMIS data model Intellectual Entities Objects Rights Agents Events

17. Sample Data Dictionary entry

18. Semantic units pertaining to objects  objectIdentifier  preservationLevel  objectCategory  objectCharacteristics  creatingApplication  originalName  Storage  environment  signatureInformation  relationship  linkingEventIdentifier  linkingIntellectual Entity Identifier  linkingPermission StatementIdentifier

19. Semantic units pertaining to Events  eventIdentifier  eventType  eventDateTime  eventDetail  eventOutcome  eventOutcomeDetail  linkingAgentIdentifier  linkingObjectIdentifier

20. Semantic units pertaining to Agents  agentIdentifier  agentName  agentType

21. Semantic units pertaining to Rights  permissionStatement  permissionStatementIdentifier  relatedObject  grantingAgent  grantingAgreement  permissionGranted  act  restriction  termOfGrant  permissionNote

22. Community interest  As of March 2006: ~25,000 “hits” on Data Dictionary More than 100 subscribers to the PREMIS Implementers’ Group discussion list  PREMIS Data Dictionary product of collaboration and consensus PREMIS membership reflects variety of institutions, domains, countries Multiplicity of perspectives promotes applicability in multiplicity of contexts Digital preservation is a shared problem; this invites shared solutions  Data Dictionary useful to any institution or organization committed to the long-term preservation of digital materials

23. PREMIS Maintenance Activity http://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/ Permanent Web presence, hosted by Library of Congress Centralized destination for information, announcements, and other PREMIS-related resources Discussion list for PREMIS implementers (PIG list) Coordinate future revisions of Data Dictionary and XML schema Editorial committee being established to guide development and revisions

24. Current activities  Documenting errata and proposed revisions to Data Dictionary (feedback through PIG list) http://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/changes.html  PREMIS Implementers’ Registry http://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/premis-registry.html  Consultancies, etc.: Rights issues for digital preservation (Karen Coyle) PREMIS implementation guidelines and recommendations (Deborah Woodyard-Robinson) PREMIS-to-OAIS mapping (Brian Lavoie)  PREMIS on the road: Digital Curation Center PREMIS workshop (July 17-18 Glasgow) Repository workshop at National Library of Australia (Aug. 31) Investigating workshops in US

25. Going forward …  Establish Editorial committee  First revision of Data Dictionary  Work with other initiatives (e.g., METS, Z39.87) to integrate PREMIS with existing standards, technologies, best practices (e.g. METS)  Contribute preservation metadata resources to digital preservation community that are: Openly available Oriented toward practical implementation Supported by a long-term commitment Tools

26. Some implementers …  MathArc (Germany): A joint project funded by NSF (Cornell) and SUB Göttingen (DFG) to build a distributed archive for mathematical journals distributed between two archives to keep information redundant.  DAITTSS (Florida): a preservation repository for the use of the libraries of the public universities of Florida. Uses a locally- developed software application (DAITSS), which implements most of the PREMIS data elements.  Ex Libris (DigiTool): an enterprise solution for the management of digital assets in libraries and academic environments consisting of a number of modules, each designed to address different needs, functions, and workflows pertaining to the life cycle of a digital object  For more information see: http://www.loc.gov/premis/premis-registry.html

27. Conclusion  PREMIS Data Dictionary provides critical piece of reliable digital preservation infrastructure comprised of technology, standards, and best practice  PREMIS Data Dictionary is a building block with which effective, sustainable digital preservation strategies can be implemented  PREMIS Data Dictionary tightly focused on implementation: Practical implementation was guiding principle in all discussions Developed tools to support implementation; released with Data Dictionary Further work with encouragement for international participation and tools development is ongoing  Unglamorous but necessary infrastructure!

28. URLs, etc.  PREMIS Maintenance Activity: http://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/  PREMIS Working Group: http://www.oclc.org/research/projects/pmwg/  Data Dictionary for Preservation Metadata: Final Report of the PREMIS Working Group: http://www.oclc.org/research/projects/pmwg/premis-final.pdf  Please send project information to Implementers’ Registry and join the PIG list!