1. Scientific Writing for Peer Reviewed Publications for Public Health Professionals MCH Epidemiology / CityMatch Conference Dec. 11, 2012 Michael Kogan, Ph.D. Director U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Maternal and Child Health Bureau (MCHB) Office of Epidemiology and Research Donna J. Petersen, ScD, MHS Dean, School of Public Health, University of South Florida and Editor in Chief, Maternal and Child Health Journal

2. Schedule for Today 8-8:15 -- Introduction of speakers and Dream Team 8:15-8:45 – Why write & preparation needed to begin 8:45-9:15 – What does an editor look for in a paper, tips on writing, and how to get started 9:15-9:45 – How to write an introduction 9:45-10:15 – Working with class on your introductions 10:15-10:30 – Break 10:30-11 – How to write a methods section 11-11:30 – Working with class on your methods sections 11:30-12 – How to write a results section 12-1:00 – Lunch

3. Schedule for Today (continued) 1-1:30--Working with class on your results section 1:30-2--How to write a discussion section 2-2:30--Working with class on your discussion section 2:30-3--How to write an abstract and titles 3-3:15--Break 3:15-3:45--Working with class on abstract and titles 3:45-4:15--How to submit a paper to a journal 4:15-4:45--Questions, additional work on papers

4. The Scientific Writing Dream Team Debbie Klein Walker, EdD, Abt Associates Martha Wingate, PhD, University of Alabama at Birmingham Pat O’Campo, PhD, University of Toronto Reem Ghandour, DrPH, Maternal and Child Health Bureau Laura Schieve, PhD, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Stephen Blumberg, PhD, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

5. Acknowledgements Russ Kirby, PhD, University of South Florida Paul Z. Siegel, MD, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Elena Kallestinova, Yale University

6. Why Should You Write for Publication? It will help you to clarify your thinking on a topic It is one of the main methods of communicating your work to other scientists It carries the weight of being peer-reviewed It can be more easily found and referenced by other scientists and public health professionals Publications can be a determinant in hiring and promotions It helps build the evidence base in MCH

7. Laying the Groundwork before Writing

8. Deciding Where to Send Your Paper Does the journal employ blind peer-reviewing? (AJPH – yes, JAMA – no, MCHJ – yes, Pediatrics – no, NEJM - no) How often do articles appearing in the journal get cited? (Look up the Journal Impact Factor) Are there a large number of subscribers? Is the journal listed in Index Medicus?

9. Deciding Where to Send Your Paper Does the journal process manuscripts in a reasonable amount of time? Is there a long lag from acceptance to publication? How many of their articles are published online ahead of print? Is the journal’s subject matter, methodological, and theoretical orientation appropriate? What is the journal’s acceptance rate?

10. Selected Impact Factors NEJM 53 Nature 36 Lancet 34 Cell 32 Science 31 JAMA 30 BMJ 13 American Journal of Epidemiology 5.75 Pediatrics 5.4 Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine 4.1 American Journal of Public Health 3.9

11. Resource for Investigating these Questions http://mulford.meduohio.edu/instr/ This is a listing of “Instructions for Authors” from over 3500 journals in the health sciences NOTE: ALWAYS FOLLOW THE SPECIFIC GUIDELINES FOR EACH JOURNAL

12. Common Mistakes in Laying the Groundwork before Writing

13. Has the journal published papers in your subject area? For example, submitting a paper on child injury to the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Does the journal have predetermined criteria that would eliminate your paper? The Journal of the American Medical Association will not accept papers from any studies with response rates below 60%.

14. Brevity is the sister of talent. - - Chekhov

15. The best writing has no lace on its sleeves – Whitman