Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byClarence Brooks Modified over 9 years ago
1
2 nd Conference of the African Health Economics and Policy Association (AfHEA) Saly – Senegal, 15 th - 17 th March 2011 Eugenia Amporfu Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology The Progressivity of the Ghanaian National Health Insurance Scheme and the Implications for Achieving Universal Coverage
2
2 nd Conference of the African Health Economics and Policy Association (AfHEA) Saly – Senegal, 15 th - 17 th March 2011 Universal coverage is achieved in a health system when all residents of an economy are able to have access to adequate healthcare at affordable prices (Currin and James, 2004). Requirements: adequate healthcare healthcare financing system that ensures affordability to care regardless of ability to pay. **
3
2 nd Conference of the African Health Economics and Policy Association (AfHEA) Saly – Senegal, 15 th - 17 th March 2011 Horizontal Equity: people of the same ability to pay make the same contribution Vertical equity: People of unequal ability to pay make appropriately dissimilar payment for health care – progressivity of HC financing Types of equity in HC financing
4
2 nd Conference of the African Health Economics and Policy Association (AfHEA) Saly – Senegal, 15 th - 17 th March 2011 The ethical justification for equalizing access to health care is health equalizing Why is health equalizing important? Necessary for individual to flourish as a human being (Wagstaff and Doorslaer, 2000) Why Equity of healthcare?
5
2 nd Conference of the African Health Economics and Policy Association (AfHEA) Saly – Senegal, 15 th - 17 th March 2011 Policy makers find it justifiable to link payment of healthcare with its ability to pay because Healthcare payments are involuntary item of expenditure which is caused by an unwanted health shock and that society as a whole is willing to share in absorbing the burden (Wagstaff, ___).
6
2 nd Conference of the African Health Economics and Policy Association (AfHEA) Saly – Senegal, 15 th - 17 th March 2011 The Ghanaian National Insurance Scheme (NHIS) was introduced in 2003 to make healthcare affordable to all regardless of ability to pay Premium range: 7.20 – 48.00 GHc to ensure equity Vertical equity The purpose of this study is to measure the progressivity of the NHIS
7
2 nd Conference of the African Health Economics and Policy Association (AfHEA) Saly – Senegal, 15 th - 17 th March 2011 Informal adults – 29.4 SSNIT contributors – 6.1 SSNIT pensioners – 0.5 Pregnant women 5.5 Indigents – 2.3 Children less than 18 – 49.4 Adults aged 70 and above – 6.75 NHIS registered members 2009
8
2 nd Conference of the African Health Economics and Policy Association (AfHEA) Saly – Senegal, 15 th - 17 th March 2011 Ashanti region – 70.77 Greater Accra region 40.3 – lowest in the country Coverage by region
9
2 nd Conference of the African Health Economics and Policy Association (AfHEA) Saly – Senegal, 15 th - 17 th March 2011 There are five sources: 2009 Premium 19.4% Non SSNIT contributors: 15.6% SSNIT contributors 3.8% NHI levy 61.0% Investment income 17% Sector budget support 2.3% Other income 0.2% Sources of financing in the NHIS
10
2 nd Conference of the African Health Economics and Policy Association (AfHEA) Saly – Senegal, 15 th - 17 th March 2011 NHI levy – borne by all residents: registered and unregistered Premium – out of pocket payment, important for universal coverage.
11
2 nd Conference of the African Health Economics and Policy Association (AfHEA) Saly – Senegal, 15 th - 17 th March 2011 1. Examine the share of premium in ATP 2. Compare shares of premiums payments of proportions of the members ranked by ATP with their share of ATP: i.e. compare concentration curves with the Lorenz curve. Criterion: if L(p) = L(ATP) -> equity if L(p) Progressive if L(p) > L(ATP) -> Regressive Assessing the Progressivity
12
2 nd Conference of the African Health Economics and Policy Association (AfHEA) Saly – Senegal, 15 th - 17 th March 2011 The Kakwani Index – measures the degree of proportionality (progressivity). The computation: π K = C – G Simpler method: Measuring Progressivity
13
2 nd Conference of the African Health Economics and Policy Association (AfHEA) Saly – Senegal, 15 th - 17 th March 2011 Where σ R 2 = the variance of R R = the fractional ranking of premium h i = the premium paid ɳ = the mean of premiums paid y i = the ATP µ = the mean of ATP
14
2 nd Conference of the African Health Economics and Policy Association (AfHEA) Saly – Senegal, 15 th - 17 th March 2011 Useful for comparison Gender Location Education Marital Status
15
2 nd Conference of the African Health Economics and Policy Association (AfHEA) Saly – Senegal, 15 th - 17 th March 2011 Survey data used: Kumasi and Accra Sample size 1080 Data Description Age Females Kumasi Tertiary Education Secondary Education Primary Education Illiterates Premium Consumption Expenditure Income 41.4 43.2 14.9 40.2 41.2 15 3.6 GH¢21.5 (mean) GH¢5002 (mean) GH¢775 (mean)
16
2 nd Conference of the African Health Economics and Policy Association (AfHEA) Saly – Senegal, 15 th - 17 th March 2011 Results
17
2 nd Conference of the African Health Economics and Policy Association (AfHEA) Saly – Senegal, 15 th - 17 th March 2011 Results: L(p) vs L(ATP)
18
2 nd Conference of the African Health Economics and Policy Association (AfHEA) Saly – Senegal, 15 th - 17 th March 2011 Results: L(p), L(oop) vs L(ATP)
19
2 nd Conference of the African Health Economics and Policy Association (AfHEA) Saly – Senegal, 15 th - 17 th March 2011 P-value Kakwani index for regression without dummies -0.3630.000 Coefficient for control group Kumasi Tertiary Secondary Female Married -.031 -.451 -.196 -.166 -.042 -.104.000.001.004.323.035 Regression Results
20
2 nd Conference of the African Health Economics and Policy Association (AfHEA) Saly – Senegal, 15 th - 17 th March 2011 Premiums are regressive Disproportionate contribution by the poor The degree of regressivity is higher in Kumasi than Accra HH with tertiary education HH with Secondary education HH is married Not affected by gender of HH Conclusion
21
2 nd Conference of the African Health Economics and Policy Association (AfHEA) Saly – Senegal, 15 th - 17 th March 2011 Kumasi has a higher patronage than Accra The educated are more likely to value health and hence less likely to drop out. The married? Implication for universal coverage
22
2 nd Conference of the African Health Economics and Policy Association (AfHEA) Saly – Senegal, 15 th - 17 th March 2011 Need to increase the cap on premium to increase the amount paid by the rich. Marital status could be taken into account when setting premiums Minimize the variation of progressivity across regions. Policy recommendations
23
2 nd Conference of the African Health Economics and Policy Association (AfHEA) Saly – Senegal, 15 th - 17 th March 2011 Thank you for your attention
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.