Download presentation
Published byLaurence Melton Modified over 9 years ago
2
INDUS RIVER SYSTEM AUTHORITY (IRSA) “Water Apportionment Accord 1991, Indus River System Authority”
University of Agriculture Faisalabad January 10, 2011
3
Indus Waters Treaty 1960 Water Apportionment Accord 1991
The Water Agreements Indus Waters Treaty 1960 Water Apportionment Accord 1991
4
Inter-provincial Water Dispute
The Inter-provincial dispute on Water Distribution was initiated during the construction of two mega Irrigation Projects i.e. Sutlej Valley Canal Project 1932 Sukkur Barrage
5
Committees / commissions
1937 Anderson Committee 1945 Rau Commission 1968 Akhtar Hussain Committee 1970 Fazal-e-Akbar Committee 1976 Indus Waters Commission (Anwar-ul-Haq Commission) 1983 Haleem Commission 1991 Water Accord
6
Indus Tarbela Jhelum Chenab Mangla Kabul Ravi Sutlej C-J Chashma T-P
NWFP CRBC C-J Chashma T-P Balochistan Canals Legend Rim Stations: Tarbela Nowshera Mangla Marala Sindh Barrages Punjab Barrages Reservoirs Major Rivers 6 6
7
Water Apportionment Accord (WAA) was signed amongst the Provinces on and approved by the Council of Common Interests (CCI) on Total Paras 14 Paras on distribution 03 Development Paras 06 Escapages d/s Kotri 01 Others 04 Under Clause 13 of the WAA ’91, the need to establish an Indus River System Authority was recognized and accepted for the implementation of the Accord. Contd.....
8
IRSA was established vide Act No
IRSA was established vide Act No. XXII of 1992 passed by the Parliament and approved by the President of Pakistan on, the 6th December 1992; One of the prime responsibilities of IRSA is the regulation and distribution of surface waters amongst the Provinces according to the allocation and policies spelt out in the Water Accord 1991; To Settle any question that may arise between two or more Provinces in respect of distribution of river and reservoir waters; Contd…
9
Any question in respect of. implementation of Water Accord shall
Any question in respect of implementation of Water Accord shall be settled by the Authority by the votes of the majority of members and in case of an equality of votes the Chairman shall have a casting vote ; A Provincial Government or the Water and Power Development Authority may, if aggrieved by any decision of the Authority, make a reference to the Council of Common Interests (CCI). 9
10
PROVISIONS OF WATER ACCORD 1991 PERTAINING TO DISTRIBUTION OF WATER
11
Para 14 (b) The record of actual average system uses for the period , would form the guide line for developing a future regulation pattern. These ten daily uses would be adjusted pro-rata to correspond to the indicated seasonal allocations of the different canal systems and would form the basis for sharing shortages and surpluses on all Pakistan basis.
12
Para 14 (b) (MAF) Province MAF % Punjab 54.51 53.06 Sindh 43.53 42.37
Balochistan 1.63 1.59 KPK 3.06 2.98 Total 102.73 100.00
13
Para 2 Province Kharif Rabi Total Punjab 37.07 18.87 55.94 Sindh *
In the light of the accepted water distributional principles, the following apportionment was agreed to: (MAF) Province Kharif Rabi Total Punjab 37.07 18.87 55.94 Sindh * 33.94 14.82 48.76 NWFP (a) 3.48 2.30 5.78 (b) Civil Canals ** 1.80 1.20 3.00 Balochistan 2.85 1.02 3.87 77.34 37.01 114.35 + * Including already sanctioned Urban and Industrial uses for Metropolitan Karachi. ** Un-gauged Civil Canals above the rim stations.
14
Comparison of Para 2 vs Para 14 (b) (MAF)
Province Para 2 Para 14 (b) Difference MAF % MAF (2-4) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Punjab 55.94 48.92 54.51 53.06 1.43 12 Sindh 48.76 42.64 43.53 42.37 5.23 45 Baloch: 3.87 3.38 1.63 1.59 2.24 19 KPK 5.78 5.06 3.06 2.98 2.72 24 Total 114.35 100.00 102.73 11.62 100
15
Para 4 Balance river supplies (including flood supplies and future storages) shall be distributed as below: Punjab 37 % Sindh 37 % KPK 14 % Balochistan 12 % Total % 15
16
Present Distribution Mechanism of IRSA (THREE TIER FORMULA SINCE 2003)
Scenario I Water Availability < Actual Average System Uses 77-82 Distributed as per 14 (b) of the WAA 1991 Scenario II Water Availability > Actual Average System Uses but < Para 2 of WAA 1991 Actual Average System Uses are protected Balance available as per Para 2 i.e. 10-daily approved by CCI Scenario III Water Availability > Para 2 of WAA 1991 Para 2 i.e. 10-daily approved by CCI are protected Balance as per Para 4 of the WAA 1991 Note: KPK & Balochistan are exempted from shortages 16
17
Para 6 The need for storages, wherever feasible on the Indus and other rivers was admitted and recognised by the participants for planned future agricultural development. 17
18
Total Western & Eastern River
Western & Eastern Inflows & D/S Kotri Post Tarbela Average ( to ) (MAF) Max Min Avg Western River Kalabagh 112.18 66.81 89.71 Jhelum + Chenab 64.69 29.70 48.68 Total 176.87 96.51 138.39 Eastern River Balloki 10.95 0.29 4.23 Sulemanki 10.62 0.01 2.59 21.57 0.30 6.82 Total Western & Eastern River 198.44 96.81 145.21 D/S Kotri 91.86 30.67 D/S Kotri (Apr 1, 2010 to Jan 6, 2011)
19
Provincial Canal Head Wdls (Post Independence to to-date)
Year Canal Withdrawals (MAF) 1947 69.1 1965 88.4 (Post-Mangla) 96.0 (Post-Tarbela) 105.0 107.0 93.5 19
20
Reservoir Sedimentation (MAF)
Designed Live Storage Present Live Storage Sedimentation % Tarbela 9.68 6.77 2.91 30 Mangla 5.34 *4.54 0.80 15 Chashma 0.77 0.263 0.51 66 Total 15.79 11.573 4.22 27 20 * Excluding raising component. After raising additional 2.99 MAF would be available
21
Historical vis-à-vis Present Peaks at Different Rivers/Barrages Since 1947 (Cs)
Reservoir/ Barrage Designed Capacity Historical Peak /Year Present Peak /Date Remarks Tarbela 15,00,000 510,000 (89) 607,000/(30/07) Exceptional Nowshera 138,000 (06) 400,000 (30/07) Attock 6,70,000 (58) 11,94,600 (30/07) Kalabagh 9,50,000 8,62,000 (76) 9,36,000 (30/07) Chashma 7,86,600 (76) 10,38,874 (1/8) Taunsa 11,00,000 7,89,000 (58) 9,60,000 (2/8) Guddu 12,00,000 11,99,672 (76) 11,48,200 (8/8) Sukkur 11,66,574 (86) 11,24,720 (9/8) Kotri 8,75,000 9,80,329 (56) 9,39,442 (27/8) 21
22
Issues 22
23
Presently, due to sedimentation heavy shortages are being faced by the provinces during Late Rabi (March) as well as Early Kharif (Apr – Jun) periods (Creating provincial disharmony); Reservoirs normally touch the dead level in Late February & March (Critical period for Wheat maturity); Lean flows / erratic flows are being experienced in Early Kharif (Disturbing the sowing of Cotton Crops); The present storage component does not cater for the requirements of Existing Irrigation Infrastructure; Storage, as envisaged under Para 6 of the Accord, should be constructed on war footing basis; No feasible site at Chenab; Mangla has already been raised; Only Indus waters can be stored at different locations Contd…
24
Storages are required to reverse the 70 – 30 % ratio;
Pakistan Hydel Generation Potential is 65,000 MW Storage for managing the floods; India total storage of 81 reservoirs is BCM; (123 MAF) Indian Hydel Generation 37,000 MW (Potential MW) Period Hydel Thermal & Others 80’s 70 % 30 % 90’s to to-date
25
THANK YOU
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.