Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Paint Heat Lamp Power and Control System Team Members: Sui Kwan Ng Vincent Ong Raymond Sidharta Joseph L. Vetter September 18, 2003 Client: H & S Autoshot.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Paint Heat Lamp Power and Control System Team Members: Sui Kwan Ng Vincent Ong Raymond Sidharta Joseph L. Vetter September 18, 2003 Client: H & S Autoshot."— Presentation transcript:

1 Paint Heat Lamp Power and Control System Team Members: Sui Kwan Ng Vincent Ong Raymond Sidharta Joseph L. Vetter September 18, 2003 Client: H & S Autoshot Dec 03-03 Faculty Advisors: Dr. John W. Lamont Prof. Ralph E. Patterson Prof. Glenn G. Hillesland

2 Presentation Outline Project Overview  Acknowledgement  Problem Statement  Operating Environment  Intended Uses/Users  Assumptions and Limitations  Expected End Product Project Activities  Accomplishments  Approaches  Project Definition  Research Activities  Design Activities  Implementation Activities Resources and Schedules  Resource Requirements  Schedules Closing Materials  Project Evaluation  Commercialization  Recommendations for Additional Work  Lessons Learned  Risk and Risk Management  Closing Summary

3 Definitions  Curing –To preserve or finish a surface by a chemical or physical process  Ultraviolet (UV) –Light radiation with a wavelength shorter than visible light but longer than X rays  UV LED (Light Emitting Diode) –A type of diode that emits ultraviolet light  UV Lasers –A device that emits highly amplified and coherent radiation light

4 Acknowledgement  Craig Poolman, H&S Autoshot General Manager  Dr. Vikram Dalal, Iowa State University Professor  Randy Freeman, Howard Industries engineer  Advisors: Hillesland, Lamont, and Patterson

5 Problem Statement  Goal: An automotive paint UV Curing system with the following properties: –UV light within 320 nm – 360 nm range –Expand curing area (from 4” by 6” to 3’ by 4’) –Portable –Increased number of UV lamps used with a single transformer

6 Operating Environment -Operated in a sheltered environment -Run by an auto body shop -Temperature range of 60 -120 Fahrenheit -No personal contact with the device during operation

7 Intended Users and Uses  Intended users –Auto body repair shop personnel  Intended uses –To cure an automobile’s body paint

8 Assumptions  The system operator is familiar with the device  The device cures 3 X 4 feet or smaller area of the automobile’s body  Moveable device to cure desired area  2 minutes curing process

9 Limitations  The device works with the 60 Hz/120 V/20 Amp standard electrical systems  320 nm – 360 nm range of UV light is a must  Wavelength higher than 380 nm cannot be used due to health reason  Portability must be maintained

10 Expected End Product  Increased curing area  Use of a single transformer for multiple UV lamps  Portable  Economical

11 Present Accomplishments  Defined the Problem  Researched Alternatives  Testing –UV Filter Glass –Transformer Voltage and Current –UV Intensity  Ordered Parts

12 Approaches Considered  UV LEDs  UV Lasers  Alternative Reflectors, Lens, and Filter Glass  Additional Lights Using Existing Transformer

13 Approached Used  Expansion on Existing System  Limit Number of Bulky Transformers Used  Ensure No Overloading of Customer’s Electrical Circuit

14 Project Definition  Increase Area Cured –From 4” x 6” to approx 3’ x 4’  Increase Number of Lamps per Transformer  Keep Unit Size Reasonable  Use on Customer’s Existing Power Supply

15 Research Activities  UV LED

16 Research Activities (cont.)  UV LEDs –Pros  Cheap, efficient, and small per LED  Long life with no maintenance necessary –Cons  No LED exists for desired wavelength  Intensity too low for curing purposes –Result: Not feasible at this time

17 Research Activities (cont.)  UV Laser

18 Research Activities (cont.)  UV Lasers –Pros  Very specific wavelength output  High Intensity –Cons  Small curing area  Large, expensive equipment needed  Safety training necessary for operation –Result: Price exceeds budget constraints

19 Research Activities (cont.)  Reflector  UV Lamp

20 Research Activities (cont.)  Reflector –Cone-shaped currently used –Circular output, desirable for curing –Result: Continue using current reflector

21 Research Activities (cont.)  UV Lamp –Medium Pressure Mercury-Arc (MPMA) lamp –300 Watts –UV light and other light wavelengths –Result: Best light solution at this time

22 Research Activities (cont.)  Filter Glass

23 Research Activities (cont.)  Filter Glass –Filters out non-UV wavelengths –Tested at Applied Sciences Complex  by Dr. Vikram Dalal –Approximately 15% of energy lost –Result: Current filter glass will continue to be used

24 Research Activities (cont.) Transfer Rate of UV Light

25 Research Activities (cont.)  Transformer

26 Research Activities (cont.)  Transformer –Currently use Howard Industries autotransformer –120 VAC input, 120 VAC output –Capacitor used for power factor correction/voltage stability –Ignitor used for starting lamp operation –Voltages and currents tested  Both input and output –Result: Current transformer will continue to be used

27 Technical Design

28 Implementation Activities  Order Additional Lamps –From H&S Autoshot –Exact same as Lamp Currently Used  Alternative Lenses –Testing Continues  Design Switching for New Lamps –Mechanical Switches Selected

29 Testing Activities  Test 1: UV Filter Glass –Dr. Dalal, Ames Laboratory  Test 2: UV Intensity –Spectrometer courtesy ISU Physics Dept.  Test 3: Alternative Lens –Fresnel Lens –Convex Lens  Test 4: Transformer Voltages and Currents –Input and Output

30 Intensity Test Results

31 Personnel Efforts

32 Financial Requirements Materials (Stand, Case, etc.) Materials (Stand, Case, etc.)$275.00 Lamps Lamps$69.76 Transformer Transformer$30.50 Miscellaneous parts Miscellaneous parts$25.00 Project poster Project poster$47.69 Total$448.22

33 Other Resources

34 Schedules Schedule Gantt Chart

35 Project Evaluation  Research of All Possible Alternatives 100%  Testing of Existing Components 65%  New Parts Ordering55%  Testing of New System40%  Final Design Documentation25%

36 Commercialization Cost of Existing Curing Unit Cost of Existing Curing Unit$374.00 Additional Lamp and Parts Additional Lamp and Parts$102.88 Total for New System Total for New System$476.88 Estimated Resale Price $565.02

37 Additional Work  Adapt Alternative Devices (LEDs or Lasers) as They Become Available on the Market  Research Alternative Reflectors  Additional Testing for Increasing Device to Surface Distance  Research Alternative Power Supplies

38 Lessons Learned  Time Management  Communication  Organization  Major Specific Information –Power Consumption –Basic Circuit Devices (Lamps, Transformers, Capacitors, LEDs, etc.)  Non-major Specific Information –UV Lasers –UV Light Safety

39 Risk and Risk Management  Loss of Team Member(s) –Central Location for all Documents  Late Arrival of Parts and Equipment –Order in Advance –Select Alternatives  Equipment Damage –Keep Back Up Equipment on Hand

40 Closing Summary  New UV Curing System will: –Increase Curing Area vs. Current System –Be Portable and Easily Shipped –Economical for Auto Body Shops to Purchase and Use

41 Questions?


Download ppt "Paint Heat Lamp Power and Control System Team Members: Sui Kwan Ng Vincent Ong Raymond Sidharta Joseph L. Vetter September 18, 2003 Client: H & S Autoshot."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google