Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byAllyson Jordan Modified over 9 years ago
1
Open Archives for Library and Information Science: an international experience Antonella de Robbio and Paula Sequeiros IV EBIB Conference: Open Access - Internet in libraries 7th December 2007 Torun, Poland 7th December 2007
2
2 underlying concepts Open Access (OA) as the motivation
3
3 underlying concepts Open Access (OA) as the motivation global effort to redefine the mechanisms of scholarly communication to make LIS research more visible and accessible
4
4 underlying concepts Open Access (OA) as the motivation global effort to redefine the mechanisms of scholarly communication to make LIS research more visible and accessible Trend towards digital libraries and self- archiving
5
5 E-LIS e-prints in Library and Information Science http://eprints.rclis.org
6
6 E-LIS established in 2003
7
7 E-LIS established in 2003 GNU ePrints software, OAI/PMH compliant
8
8 E-LIS established in 2003 GNU ePrints software, OAI/PMH compliant first international Open Archive for Library and Information Science
9
9 E-LIS established in 2003 GNU ePrints software, OAI/PMH compliant first international Open Archive for Library and Information Science a part of the RCLIS project
10
10 E-LIS established in 2003 GNU ePrints software, OAI/PMH compliant first international Open Archive for Library and Information Science a part of the RCLIS project international team of voluntary librarians
11
11 E-LIS established in 2003 GNU ePrints software, OAI/PMH compliant first international Open Archive for Library and Information Science a part of the RCLIS project international team of voluntary librarians not-for-profit project
12
12 E-LIS established in 2003 GNU ePrints software, OAI/PMH compliant first international Open Archive for Library and Information Science a part of the RCLIS project international team of voluntary librarians not-for-profit project freely accessible to users (search and full-text)
13
13 the archive: documents preprints (6%) postprints (35%) unpublished (59%)
14
14 the archive: documents articles (25%) 200 journals papers (9%) 250 conferences unpublished (59%) other (7%)
15
15 the archive: documents reviewed (62%)
16
16 growth of records in archive (Oct. 2007)
17
17 growth of records in archive (Oct. 2007)
18
18 what goes in and how LIS topics and interrelated disciplines, scientific or technical
19
19 what goes in and how LIS topics and interrelated disciplines, scientific or technical finished documents, published or unpublished, any language or format
20
20 what goes in and how LIS topics and interrelated disciplines, scientific or technical finished documents, published or unpublished, any language or format authors self-archive
21
21 what goes in and how LIS topics and interrelated disciplines, scientific or technical finished documents, published or unpublished, any language or format authors self-archive and agreements with institutions and library associations
22
22 submissions and authors 60% of submissions mediated by E-LIS editors 30% self-archived 2540 authors
23
23
24
24
25
25
26
26 value-added tools for editors and for users automatic alerts for editors
27
27 value-added tools for editors and for users automatic alerts for editors full metadata display
28
28 value-added tools for editors and for users automatic alerts for editors full metadata display full-text search
29
29 value-added tools for editors and for users automatic alerts for editors full metadata display full-text search counter in homepage
30
30 value-added tools for editors and for users automatic alerts for editors full metadata display full-text search counter in homepage statistics from Webalizer
31
31 value-added tools for editors and for users reference linking with ParaTools
32
32
33
33 organisational model: E-LIS teams initiative's strategic issues
34
34 organisational model: E-LIS teams initiative's strategic issues future direction
35
35 organisational model: E-LIS teams initiative's strategic issues future direction policies and impact on the user community
36
36 organisational model: E-LIS teams initiative's strategic issues future direction policies and impact on the user community connection with other scientific communities
37
37 organisational model: E-LIS administration archive’s international and future vision
38
38 organisational model: E-LIS administration archive’s international and future vision understanding of national and international needs
39
39 organisational model: E-LIS administration archive’s international and future vision understanding of national and international needs world framework of Open Access strategic issues
40
40 international & local 5 continents
41
41 international & local 5 continents 42 countries
42
42 international & local 5 continents 42 countries common vision
43
43 international & local 5 continents 42 countries common vision & cultural individuality
44
44 international context similar initiatives (LIS domain) E-LIS
45
45 international context similar initiatives (LIS domain) E-LIS clearly international
46
46 international context similar initiatives (LIS domain) E-LIS clearly international not commercially-driven (no external funding; no profit)
47
47 international context similar initiatives (LIS domain) E-LIS clearly international not commercially-driven (no external funding; no profit) based on voluntary work
48
48 E-LIS policies policy concerns are discussed and democratically agreed upon by the editorial staff
49
49 E-LIS policies policy concerns are discussed and democratically agreed upon by the editorial staff mission, aims and objectives; target audience and communities involved
50
50 E-LIS policies policy concerns are discussed and democratically agreed upon by the editorial staff mission, aims and objectives; target audience and communities involved submission policies: who can deposit and how
51
51 E-LIS policies policy concerns are discussed and democratically agreed upon by the editorial staff mission, aims and objectives; target audience and communities involved submission policies: who can deposit and how metadata quality
52
52 E-LIS policies policy concerns are discussed and democratically agreed upon by the editorial staff mission, aims and objectives; target audience and communities involved submission policies: who can deposit and how metadata quality copyright policies
53
53 E-LIS policies policy concerns are discussed and democratically agreed upon by the editorial staff mission, aims and objectives; target audience and communities involved submission policies: who can deposit and how metadata quality copyright policies organisational model
54
54 copyright policies RoMEO Project recommendations concerning the self-archiving of documents Know your rights!Know your rights! of Project RomeoProject Romeo www.lboro.ac.uk/departments/ls/disresear ch/romeo/Know-your-rights.doc
55
55 copyright policies author retains property after deposit authors responsible for ensuring that documents have no restrictions on electronic distribution pre-refereed preprints - author holds copyright (no need for permission) refereed postprints, author can try to modify the copyright transfer agreement to allow self- archiving failing that, can append a link to published paper
56
56 copyright policies author retains property after deposit authors responsible for ensuring that documents have no restrictions on electronic distribution pre-refereed preprints - author holds copyright (no need for permission) refereed postprints, author can try to modify the copyright transfer agreement to allow self- archiving failing that, can append a link to published paper
57
57 copyright policies author retains property after deposit authors responsible for ensuring that documents have no restrictions on electronic distribution pre-refereed preprints - author holds copyright (no need for permission) refereed postprints, author can try to modify the copyright transfer agreement to allow self- archiving failing that, can append a link to published paper
58
58 copyright policies author retains property after deposit authors responsible for ensuring that documents have no restrictions on electronic distribution pre-refereed preprints - author holds copyright (no need for permission) refereed postprints, author can try to modify the copyright transfer agreement to allow self- archiving failing that, can append a link to published paper
59
59 copyright policies author retains property after deposit authors responsible for ensuring that documents have no restrictions on electronic distribution pre-refereed preprints - author holds copyright (no need for permission) refereed postprints, author can try to modify the copyright transfer agreement to allow self- archiving failing that, can link to published paper
60
60 organisational model over 60 editors – sharing a common vision – contributing to E-LIS with their own experience and competence
61
61 organisational model over 60 editors – sharing a common vision – contributing to E-LIS with their own experience and competence administration team
62
62 national metadata undergoing debate - launching of a service provider to harvest and gather national metadata from national LIS archives which could become a part of the RCLIS infrastructure
63
63 E-LIS policies preservation issues preservation metadata - designed for identifying and managing digital content over a long period of time
64
64 preservation JISC Circular 4/04, note 10 no «formal preservation policy» was being followed «de facto rules on file formats and transformations but no provision for acquiring the source versions» «strategy for preservation should be determined by the nature and need of the repository, and should be driven by repository policy rather than the other way around»
65
65 preservation JISC Circular 4/04, note 10 no «formal preservation policy» was being followed «de facto rules on file formats and transformations but no provision for acquiring the source versions» «strategy for preservation should be determined by the nature and need of the repository, and should be driven by repository policy rather than the other way around»
66
66 preservation JISC Circular 4/04, note 10 no «formal preservation policy» was being followed «de facto rules on file formats and transformations but no provision for acquiring the source versions» «strategy for preservation should be determined by the nature and need of the repository, and should be driven by repository policy rather than the other way around»
67
67 preservation PRESERV (PReservation Eprint SERVices) a JISC project researching and developing infrastructural digital preservation services for institutional repositories
68
68 preservation PRESERV (PReservation Eprint SERVices) a JISC project researching and developing infrastructural digital preservation services for institutional repositories offering a tool integrated into ROAR (Registry of Open Access Repositories http://roar.eprints.org/http://roar.eprints.org/
69
69 preservation PRESERV (PReservation Eprint SERVices) a JISC project researching and developing infrastructural digital preservation services for institutional repositories offering a tool integrated into ROAR (Registry of Open Access Repositories http://roar.eprints.org/http://roar.eprints.org/ E-LIS responded to survey and «is working to allow for a Preserv profile within ROAR
70
70 preservation PRONOM-DROID The National Archives - database of file formats, PRONOM, to identify repositories content using DROID (Digital Record Object Identification) open source software PRONOMDigital Record Object Identification) file format identification service applied to data collected by the Celestial harvester graphical view of a repository is broken down by file formats through ROAR’s user interface
71
71 preservation PRONOM-DROID The National Archives - database of file formats, PRONOM, to identify repositories content using DROID (Digital Record Object Identification) open source software PRONOMDigital Record Object Identification) file format identification service applied to data collected by the Celestial harvester graphical view of a repository is broken down by file formats through ROAR’s user interface
72
72 preservation OpenDOAR (The Directory of Open Access Repositories http://www.opendoar.org/
73
73 preservation OpenDOAR (The Directory of Open Access Repositories http://www.opendoar.org/ tool that supports preservation policy
74
74 preservation OpenDOAR (The Directory of Open Access Repositories http://www.opendoar.org/ tool that supports preservation policy preservation policy definition form allows for external partnerships
75
75 preservation GNU EPrints v.3 (Jan. 2007), supports the preservation of digital objects
76
76 preservation GNU EPrints v.3 (Jan. 2007), supports the preservation of digital objects records the history of changes to a document
77
77 preservation GNU EPrints v.3 (Jan. 2007), supports the preservation of digital objects records the history of changes to a document preserves rights declarations
78
78 preservation E-LIS (Morrisson et al., 2007) (then a) total of 5077 records
79
79 preservation E-LIS (Morrisson et al., 2007) (then a) total of 5077 records 86% were found to be PDF/MS-Word
80
80 preservation August 2007, E-LIS project DRAMBORA (Digital Repository Audit Method Based on Risk Assessment)
81
81 preservation purpose of the DRAMBORA toolkit […] identifying the risks and vulnerabilities associated with the mandate, activities and assets assessing and calculating the risks defining risk management measures […]
82
82 preservation results of auditing: E-LIS needs to improve at technical management level, while at content level it showed to be well-prepared
83
83 conclusions 1. LIS computing science and technology - bibliometric and citation analysis an interesting reference case to other communities
84
84 conclusions 2.diversification of nationalities and languages – 82 countries – 36 languages
85
85 conclusions 2.diversification of nationalities and languages intensive collaboration from Polish librarians:
86
86 conclusions 2.diversification of nationalities and languages intensive collaboration from Polish librarians: – quality papers in E-LIS
87
87 conclusions 2.diversification of nationalities and languages intensive collaboration from Polish librarians: – quality papers in E-LIS – very high bibliometric skills
88
88 conclusions 2.diversification of nationalities and languages intensive collaboration from Polish librarians: – quality papers in E-LIS – very high bibliometric skills – excellent editors Bozena Bednarek- Michalska and Lidia Derfert-WolfBozena Bednarek- MichalskaLidia Derfert-Wolf
89
89 conclusions 3.international LIS network stimulated by –extension of OA concept to LIS
90
90 conclusions 3.international LIS network stimulated by –extension of OA concept to LIS facilitated by –dissemination of material within the community
91
91 conclusions 4.E-LIS contributing to outline global vision of LIS domain challenges and opportunities motivation to engage in such a venture and to further develop international research activities
92
92 conclusions 4.E-LIS contributing to outline global vision of LIS domain challenges and opportunities motivation to engage in such a venture and to further develop international research activities
93
93 conclusions 4.E-LIS contributing to outline global vision of LIS domain challenges and opportunities motivation to engage and to further develop international research activities
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.