1. Distributed Digital Preservation ETD Workshop 15 th International Symposium on ETDs Lima, Peru Tuesday, September 11, 2012 Dr. Martin Halbert Dr. Guillermo Oyarce

2. Workshop Overview  The move to digital theses and dissertations greatly enhances the accessibility and sharing of graduate student research, but it also raises grave concerns about the potential ephemerality of these digital resources.  How can institutions best ensure that the electronic theses and dissertations that they acquire from students today will be available to both current and future researchers?  This workshop will provide attendees with a foundation in ETD lifecycle management, focusing on both workflow design and technology approaches.  It will also discuss the growing role of international collaboration in the preservation of these digital assets, with a special focus on the approach of members of the international MetaArchive Cooperative which has been in operation for nine years. 9/11/2012DDP Workshop for ETDsSlide 2

3. Presenters  Martin Halbert  Dean of Libraries, University of North Texas  President, MetaArchive Cooperative  Guillermo Oyarce  Professor, College of Information, University of North Texas 9/11/2012DDP Workshop for ETDsSlide 3

4. Attendees We would like to have a shared understanding of who is attending the workshop. Very briefly (1 min or less), would each person say: 1.Please state your name and institution. 2.Does your university either currently accept ETDs, or are you considering an ETD program? 3.Do you have any specific things you want to hear about? 9/11/2012DDP Workshop for ETDsSlide 4

5. Agenda 9:00 – 9:15Welcome, introductions, overview of workshop 9:15 – 10:00 ETD lifecycle management and the need for distributed digital preservation 10:00 – 10:45 Collaboration between NDLTD and MetaArchive for preservation of ETDs 10:45 – 11:00 Break 11:00 – 12:00ETD lifecycle management best practices project 12:00 – 12:30Discussion, questions, and answers 9/11/2012DDP Workshop for ETDsSlide 5

6. ETD Lifecycle Management and the need for Digital Preservation Programs

7. Estimating the Growth of ETD Institutional Programs Worldwide 9/11/2012DDP Workshop for ETDsSlide 7  Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (NDLTD) announced in 2010 that there are now more than one million ETDs available worldwide  The NDLTD further notes that institutions worldwide are rapidly adopting ETD programs for many reasons, but especially to improve graduate education and access to research findings Source: 2010 NDLTD Announcement: http://www.ndltd.org/find/ndltd-union-catalog-surpasses-one-million-electronic-theses-and-dissertations/

8. CNI 2010 North American Survey 9/11/2012DDP Workshop for ETDsSlide 8 Source: 2010 Report of the Coalition for Networked Information http://www.arl.org/bm~doc/rli-270-etds.pdf  The Coalition of Networked Information conducted a study of North American institutions in 2010  Findings showed that most institutions already have an ETD program, and that ETD programs are still being adopted  The survey indicated that institutions are now considering updating their institutional ETD policies, especially regarding embargoes

9. Growing ETD Associations 2/24/129 101 international members U.S. Associations

10. Growth of ETDs in South America  Many new ETD repositories throughout South America  New projects to index ETDs at multiple institutions  Growing adoption at universities 9/11/2012DDP Workshop for ETDsSlide 10

11. However, Digital Information can be Ephemeral  Web URLs have a lifecycle, and are ephemeral due to many reasons; studies estimate that the average lifespan of a webpage is only 44-75 days  Digital information can be replicated indefinitely, but only as long as systematic procedures and policies are in place for the entire lifecycle  Unlike print theses and dissertations, ETDs therefore require the implementation of new digital preservation procedures to survive in the long term 9/11/2012DDP Workshop for ETDsSlide 11

12. Key Challenges  Can we ensure that ETDs acquired from students today will be available to future researchers? In 10 years? In a century?  How will institutions address the entire life cycle of ETDs?  How will libraries identify and institutionalize the best long-term curatorial practices for this important genre of digital content? 2/24/1212

13. What is Digital Preservation? Definitions:  The series of managed activities necessary to ensure continued access to digital materials for as long as necessary. – UK Digital Preservation Coalition  Digital preservation combines policies, strategies and actions that ensure access to digital content over time. – American Library Association 9/11/2012DDP Workshop for ETDsSlide 13

14. What is “Life-Cycle Management” A concept closely related to Digital Preservation: “…the progressive technology and workflow requirements needed to ensure long-term sustainability of and accessibility to digital objects and/or metadata.” - U.S. Library of Congress Definition of Life-Cycle Management” - http://www.loc.gov/preservation/about/prd/presdig/preslifecycle.html http://www.loc.gov/preservation/about/prd/presdig/preslifecycle.html 2/24/1214

15. Digital Preservation Coalition (DPC) Definition of “Life-Cycle Management” “…the need actively to manage the resource at each stage of its life-cycle and to recognise the inter-dependencies between each stage and commence preservation activities as early as practicable.” http://www.dpconline.org/advice/preservationhandbook/introduction/defini tions-and-concepts 2/24/1215

16. 2/24/1216

17. What is the difference between a schedule for tape backups and a digital preservation program?  Backups are tactical operations. Backups are typically stored in a single location (often nearby or collocated with the servers backed up) and are performed only periodically. Backups are designed to address short-term data loss via minimal investment of money and staff time resources. Backups are better than nothing, but not a comprehensive solution to the problem of preserving information over time.  Digital preservation is a strategic program. Preserving digital information over long periods requires systematic attention and planning rather than benign neglect or simple reactive daily operations. 9/11/2012DDP Workshop for ETDs

18. Two Historical Strategies for Long- Term Survival of Information 9/11/2012DDP Workshop for ETDsSlide 18 Single Central Vault Coordinated Distribution of Multiple Secure Copies

19. Distributed Digital Preservation (DDP) Programs Engage in three main activities that distinguish them from other preservation approaches: 1. Replication of content, 2. Distribution of these replicated copies to distinct geographical locations, and 3. Network organization to connect these replicated copies through routine operations, including checksum comparisons and repair activities 9/11/2012DDP Workshop for ETDsSlide 19

20. Secure and Distributed Caches of Replicated Information Why are the characteristics of geographically distribution and security so important? Because this strategy maximizes survivability of content in both individual and collective terms:  Security reduces the likelihood that any single cache will be compromised.  Distribution reduces the likelihood that the loss of any single cache will lead to a loss of the preserved content. By creating collaborative networks of secure and distributed preservation caches, cooperative groups can also work together on more complex issues such as format migration 9/11/2012DDP Workshop for ETDsSlide 20

21. Motivations for DDP 9/11/2012DDP Workshop for ETDsSlide 21 Cooperative digital preservation efforts are one answer to a study jointly prepared by the US National Science Foundation (NSF) and the UK Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC) that found: …new collaborative relationships that cross institutional and sector boundaries could provide important and promising ways to deal with the data preservation challenge. These collaborations could potentially help spread the burden of preservation, create economies of scale needed to support it, and mitigate the risks of data loss. - Berman, F. and B. Schottlaender, “The Need for Formalized Trust in Digital Repository Collaborative Infrastructure, NSF/JISC Repositories Workshop (April 16, 2007) http://www.sis.pitt.edu/~repwkshop/papers/berman_schottlaender.html http://www.sis.pitt.edu/~repwkshop/papers/berman_schottlaender.html

22. 9/11/2012DDP Workshop for ETDsSlide 22 Examples of Major DDP Collaborative Alliances

23. What is the difference between an IR and a distributed digital preservation program?  The purpose of the IR is a local means of managing information. The IR is an institutional approach aimed at operationally managing information flow within the institution and providing access. It typically does not attempt to securely cache prioritized content at multiple geographically dispersed sites.  DDP Alliances mobilize efforts of multiple institutions. A digital preservation program entails a geographically dispersed set of secure caches of critical information. A true digital preservation program will require multi-institutional collaboration and at least some ongoing investment to realistically address the issues involved in preserving information over time. 9/11/2012DDP Workshop for ETDs

24. Collaboration Between NDLTD and MetaArchive for Preservation of ETDs

25. NDLTD Digital Preservation Initiative  In 2007 the NDLTD board of directors became concerned about the need for digital preservation of ETDs  Surveys were conducted to assess the status of ETD programs and preservation  Informed by these surveys, the NDLTD leadership approached the MetaArchive Cooperative for digital preservation services 9/11/2012DDP Workshop for ETDsSlide 25

26. 2008 ETD Preservation Survey  Survey by Virginia Tech was designed to assess whether or not there was a need for an ETD preservation alliance  Received 95 responses from research universities, primarily in North America  Survey indicated great variation in repository infrastructures and formats accepted  Most surprising finding: 72% of responding institutions reported that they had no preservation plan for the ETDs they were collecting  Survey responses indicated widespread interest in participating in a collaborative digital preservation initiative Survey: http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/staff/gailmac/ETDs2008PreservPaper.pdfhttp://scholar.lib.vt.edu/staff/gailmac/ETDs2008PreservPaper.pdf 9/11/2012DDP Workshop for ETDsSlide 26

27. NDLTD/MetaArchive Alliance  Based on 2008 survey responses, NDLTD leadership negotiated a strategic alliance with the MetaArchive Cooperative for digital preservation purposes  A follow-up survey jointly conducted in 2009 by MetaArchive and NDLTD identified more specific needs for collaborative distributed digital preservation (DDP) efforts  Based on the findings of these two surveys, a DDP network for ETDs from NDLTD members was created by MetaArchive starting in 2008-2009 9/11/2012DDP Workshop for ETDsSlide 27

28.  The MetaArchive Cooperative arose from planning meetings by librarians and archivists in 2002-2003 discussing concerns about preserving digital archives  There was a feeling then that we needed to do something practical to help each other preserve our digital collections  Funding was sought from the U.S. Library of Congress for a national-scale digital preservation cooperative 9/11/2012DDP Workshop for ETDs

29. An international distributed digital preservation cooperative for digital archives  A functioning DDP network for libraries and other cultural memory organizations  Established under the auspices of and with funding from the National Digital Information and Infrastructure Preservation Program (NDIIPP) of the U.S. Library of Congress  Provides training and models for other groups to establish similar distributed digital preservation networks  Fosters broader awareness of digital preservation issues  Sustained by cooperative fee memberships, LC contracts, and other sponsored funding 9/11/2012DDP Workshop for ETDs

30. MetaArchive Home Page 9/11/2012DDP Workshop for ETDs

31. MetaArchive Membership (and examples of members)  50+ institutions in 3 continents  United States (US Library of Congress, Indiana State University, University of North Texas, Folger Shakespeare Library, etc.)  United Kingdom (University of Hull)  Spain (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitaries de Catalunya)  Brazil (Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro) 9/11/2012DDP Workshop for ETDsSlide 31

32. MetaArchive Costs  Three membership levels:  Preservation members: USD$3,000/year  Sustaining members: USD$5,500/year  Collaborative members: USD$2,500/year plus $100/year per participating institution  Server cost: USD$4,600 /3 years  Storage cost: USD$1/GB/year ($1k/TB/year) 9/11/2012DDP Workshop for ETDsSlide 32

33. MetaArchive DDP Network 9/11/2012DDP Workshop for ETDs  A distributed digital preservation network for digital archives, based on LOCKSS software  286 TB network with 24 secure caches  950+ Archival Units preserved  Preserving collections of 21 members and more than 50 institutions in 4 countries  Provide preservation consulting and training

34. LOCKSS E-Journal Preservation Network Software  Developed at Stanford University by Vicky Reich and David Rosenthal  Enables libraries to preserve subscribed electronic journal content  Used by hundreds of libraries worldwide  MetaArchive adapted this software to use for preserving digital archives, including ETDs 9/11/2012DDP Workshop for ETDs

35.  Format agnostic  Collections include:  ETDs  Newspapers  Images  Multimedia files  Datasets  etc 9/11/2012DDP Workshop for ETDs

36. NDLTD/MetaArchive ETD Preservation Network  NDLTD members can preserve ETDs in the MetaArchive DDP network through this strategic alliance  MetaArchive provides coordination mechanism for ETDs to be safely stored in six locations on different continents  Low cost solution for ETD digital preservation 9/11/2012DDP Workshop for ETDsSlide 36

37. Examples of NDLTD/MetaArchive Work on ETD Preservation  Studied lifecycle management problems that arise in ETD programs  Analyzed a range of ETD repository structures and developed network exchange mechanisms (IR examples: Dspace, CONTENTdm, ETD-db)  Provided simple addition mechanisms so that as new and embargoed ETDs are added, members are able to easily add them to the archive  Developed mechanisms to version content, so that if ETDs are changed/replaced, reflected in preservation copies  Determined the need for documented best practices for ETD preservation readiness, leading to new project 9/11/2012DDP Workshop for ETDs

38. Considerations for Prospective ETD Preservation Sites  Working partnership between college and libraries must be established with clear roles and responsibilities.  Quality metadata must be created. A problem is that many ETD programs have untrained students assign metadata using ad hoc metadata formats  Folder and file structure in which ETD collections are stored is important, especially since preservation will be ongoing. There will be a need to ingest ETD files each new graduation cycle. This is easiest if the storage structure is built around the graduation cycle. Grouping by year may be a simple first step. 9/11/2012DDP Workshop for ETDs

39. Considerations for Prospective ETD Preservation Sites (cont.)  Issues of rights management and embargo must be managed well. Many institutions require the possibility of selective embargoed access, because they cannot immediately provide open access to all ETDs.  Choice of institutional repository software solution is important. This determines much functionality. Outsourcing to commercial vendors is sometimes tempting, but limits your control.  Collaboration with other institutional partners can be helpful, as the work of digital preservation can be divided among multiple partners. Taking an active collaborative role (like members in MetaArchive do) helps to ensure you are driving the solution of your problems. 9/11/2012DDP Workshop for ETDs

40.  Conspectus Database (Original) Curators enter collection level entries for collections Meant to be used for cooperative prioritization in DDP selection and decision- making activities  Second Generation Conspectus Database Integrates operation of all network functions Designed in concert with guidance from other private LOCKSS networks (PLNs) in ways that enable re-use  SAFE Audit Toolkit  Designed by Data-PASS with feedback from MetaArchive  Audit/monitoring framework  Designed to work with LOCKSS and other systems (iRODS, etc) 9/11/2012DDP Workshop for ETDs

41.  Electronic Theses and Dissertations (inter- consortia strategic alliance with NDLTD)  Newspapers (digitized and born-digital)  Early Modern Literature (broad area, with Folger Shakespeare Library as cornerstone)  Transatlantic Slave Trade Historical Data Additional archives regularly added 9/11/2012DDP Workshop for ETDs

42.  NDLTD (IMLS-funded ETD project)  U.S. Library of Congress (national assessment of U.S. digital preservation projects)  Chronicles in Preservation (digital newspaper preservation project)  Data-PASS Alliance (developing in-common standard and tools for Private LOCKSS Network interoperation)  San Diego Supercomputer Center Chronopolis (PLN/ SRB interoperation testing and bridges)  UNT CODA Microservices (UNT interoperation testing and bridges) 9/11/2012DDP Workshop for ETDs

43.  Preservation Members are the basic members, organizations responsible for the ongoing activity of preserving digital content. Preservation sites collectively comprise a preservation network.  Sustaining Members are preservation sites that wish to participate as leaders of the cooperative, and serve on the Steering Committee  Collaborative Members are large consortia members which preserve digital archives for groups of smaller institutions (example: Consorci de Biblioteques Universitaries de Catalunya) 9/11/2012DDP Workshop for ETDs

44.  Workshops (examples)  Policy and Planning workshop at iPres 2012  US Library of Congress Digital Preservation Outreach & Education (DPOE) workshops  Assisted in creation of other DDP networks  Alabama, Arizona, UK LOCKSS, etc  Hosting the international DDP Frameworks working group 9/11/2012DDP Workshop for ETDs

45. ETD Lifecycle Management Best Practices Project

46. IMLS ETD Lifecycle Management Project  There is a need to better understand, document, and address the lifecycle management challenges presented by ETDs to ensure that colleges and universities have the requisite knowledge to properly curate these new collections permanently.  A project to identify and document these best practices has been funded by the U.S. Institute of Museum and Library Services.  The project is now underway, and will be complete in October 2013. Early project findings will be shared in this section of the workshop. We would like your advice on how to best share this information with the international community. 9/11/2012DDP Workshop for ETDsSlide 46

47. IMLS ETD Lifecycle Management Project Partners 1.University of North Texas 2.Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (NDLTD) 3.Educopia Institute/MetaArchive Cooperative 4.Virginia Tech 5.Rice University 6.Boston College 7.Indiana State University 8.Pennsylvania State University 9.University of Arizona 9/11/2012DDP Workshop for ETDsSlide 47

48. IMLS ETD Lifecycle Management Project Goals A.Dissemination of Guidance Documents for Lifecycle Management of ETDs B.Production of ETD Lifecycle Management Tools C.Creation of Educational Materials and Associated Workshop 9/11/2012DDP Workshop for ETDsSlide 48

49. Guidance Documents for Lifecycle Management of ETDs 1.Briefing on Access Levels and Embargoes of ETDs 2.Briefing on ETD Copyright Issues and Fair Use 3.Guidelines for Implementing ETD Programs - Roles & Responsibilities 4.Guidelines for Collecting Usage Metrics & Demonstrations of Value for ETD Programs 5.Overview of Formats, Complex Content Objects, and Format Migration Scenarios for ETDs 6.Overview of ETD Metadata & Lifecycle Event Record-Keeping for ETDs 7.Guide to ETD Program Cost Estimation and Planning 8.Guide to Options for ETD Programs 9/11/2012DDP Workshop for ETDsSlide 49

50. Software Micro-Services The project will develop and disseminate a set of software tools to address specific needs in managing ETDs throughout their lifecycle.  ETD format recognition  PREMIS metadata event record-keeping  Virus checking  Digital drop box with metadata submission functionality 9/11/2012DDP Workshop for ETDsSlide 50

51. Educational Materials and Associated Workshop Educational Materials  Workshop Syllabi  Training Handouts and Exercises  PowerPoint presentations Full Workshop on ETD Lifecycle Best Practices  Will use these educational materials  Will be held in 2013, perhaps in conjunction with ETD 2013 2/24/1251

52. Implementing ETD Programs - Roles & Responsibilities  Like any other project, implementing an ETD program requires that various stakeholders be identified, and the role and responsibility of each player be specified throughout the entire course of ETD management.  Effectively engaging stakeholders in project management, and successfully coordinating participants’ roles and responsibilities, are the keys that enable an ETD program to thrive over time. Without these crucial components, an ETD program could fail at the initial planning stage, or lack continued support for further development.  Different types of stakeholders have different interests and concerns:  Graduate schools  Academic libraries  University IT Office  Students  Carefully consider how to engage all stakeholders from the beginning. 9/11/2012DDP Workshop for ETDsSlide 52

53. Access Levels and Embargoes  One of the most contested topics in ETD program planning is the question of ETD embargoes and levels of access restriction (as evidenced by both the NDLTD/MetaArchive surveys and the 2010 CNI survey previously cited).  An “embargo” of an ETD means delaying public access to the ETD, either temporarily or permanently.  Different stakeholders are particularly concerned about embargoes. There is concern by some academic fields (notably the humanities) that depositing a thesis or dissertation in a public repository somehow constitutes publication and prevents students from subsequently developing their work into a book. (A recent NDLTD survey of publishers indicates that publishers do not consider this to be the case.)  Options for embargo of ETDs can range from extremes of none to all ETDs stored in the repository. This is one of the most important policy decisions for ETD program developers. 9/11/2012DDP Workshop for ETDsSlide 53

54. Copyright Issues and Fair Use  What understanding or agreement is in place at your institution? What rights does the university/college exert on student work? When does research belong to the university, and when does it not?  Will ETD, as a type of student work, incorporate sponsored research? Is there an obligation to sign University Intellectual Property (IP) agreement or need for embargo?  Issues of plagiarism and intellectual property rights of others  Who on the campus can provide guidance about ETD copyright and fair use?  ETD program may introduce students to notion of themselves as authors, and their rights as authors, experience with licenses, fair use, commercial publishers, etc.  ETD program does disservice to both students and institution if we don’t provide information to make informed decisions on copyright 9/11/2012DDP Workshop for ETDsSlide 54

55. Collecting Usage Metrics & Demonstrations of Value for ETD Programs  Libraries have a long history of evaluating and studying use of library resources and collections, and ETDs should be no exception.  Quantitative approaches are the most frequently used evaluation methods, and most often focus on download statistics. Numerical evidence of ETD usage is a very compelling indication of the utility of an ETD program.  Qualitative evaluation of ETD usage is less commonly performed, but can provide more nuanced information. These techniques involve studying and collecting a variety of empirical information such as case study and interviews, along with interactional and visual observations.  Usage reports of all kinds should be prominently featured on the ETD program website, and easily reviewed by all users of the service.  Usage data can make a strong case for ETD program support to university administrations. 9/11/2012DDP Workshop for ETDsSlide 55

56. Formats, Complex Content Objects, and Format Migration Scenarios for ETDs  Many institutions may wish to mandate which formats are to be used for ETD deposits. For example, many ETD programs mandate that the primary item deposited be some form of PDF, sometimes with format checking of the specific characteristics of the PDF.  For any files that are included as supplementary files to the ETD itself, while some flexibility is necessary, the institution should consider providing guidelines to the students.  Both primary and supplementary files should be checked for format validity and viruses upon deposit. Ideally, a fixity check should be performed at some point in the deposit process (MetaArchive does this).  Format migrations are anticipated by many ETD repositories. Format migrations may be manually batched or automated, depending upon how the institution wishes to structure trigger events. 9/11/2012DDP Workshop for ETDsSlide 56

57. ETD Metadata & Lifecycle Event Record-Keeping for ETDs  Responsibility for assigning metadata to ETDs is a critically important responsibility, and structures much of the ongoing management of ETDs.  Metadata may be assigned by librarians, student authors, student workers, or a mix of all of these. Recommendation is for librarians to provide quality control.  Process and nature of ETD metadata creation may be heavily influenced by the repository tool. Metadata should always accompany item if it is replicated (MetaArchive best practice)  An ETD specific metadata scheme has been developed by NDLTD and is being updated on an ongoing basis for use by ETD repositories. Metadata for deposited ETDs should be as thorough as possible.  PREMIS is a metadata standard for tracking transitions in the lifecycle of digital objects. It can be used to update ETD records (project is experimenting with this). 9/11/2012DDP Workshop for ETDsSlide 57

58. ETD Program Options and Cost Planning  There are a large number of options to consider in planning an ETD program, and costs of the program will depend on these many decisions.  Some institutions have completely outsourced the ETD program to external vendors. This may or may not be an attractive option; while it reduces the work required locally it has significant costs and requires relinquishing some control to the vendor.  Many institutions manage ETDs as part of their larger institutional repositories, thereby combining infrastructures. Digital preservation programs for ETDs can be accomplished by partnering with other institutions, either international alliances (like MetaArchive) or consortia.  Under any circumstance, a careful plan should be prepared in advance, with staffing, system, and other costs identified. There will undoubtedly be unexpected changes, but it gives you a place to start. 9/11/2012DDP Workshop for ETDsSlide 58

59. International Information Exchange  The NDLTD is interested in fostering international exchange of information on ETD best practices through events like this workshop  We are interested in hearing from you about what kinds of information would be most useful, whether the items discussed today or other topics.  If you would be interested in contributing to this international information exchange in some way (information about programs in your country, translation, etc.), please let us know and we will convey this to the NDLTD board. 9/11/2012DDP Workshop for ETDsSlide 59

60. Aligning National Approaches to Digital Preservation (ANADP) – Edited Volume  On May 23-25 2011, more than 125 delegates from more than 20 countries gathered in Tallinn, Estonia, for the “Aligning National Approaches to Digital Preservation” conference.  This event explored how to create and sustain international collaborations to support the preservation of our collective digital cultural memory.  Organized and hosted by the US Library of Congress and others, this gathering established a strong foundation for future collaborative efforts in digital preservation.  This publication contains a collection of peer-reviewed essays that were developed by conference panels and attendees in the months following ANADP.  Above all, it highlights the need for strategic international collaborations to support the preservation of our collective cultural memory.  URL: http://educopia.org/publications/ANADPhttp://educopia.org/publications/ANADP 9/11/2012DDP Workshop for ETDsSlide 60

61. Workshop Summary  ETD programs are being implemented by most universities  Effective ETD programs require attention to the entire lifecycle of the ETDs from creation to long term preservation  Digital preservation programs are strategic commitments to long term survival of ETDs; collaboration with peer institutions is often helpful in this activity  As part of such collaborations, many institutions have found it useful to share information on the most successful practices noted in establishing ETD programs.  This workshop is one such effort to share best practices; the NDLTD and MetaArchive would like to assist in other such endeavors. 9/11/2012DDP Workshop for ETDsSlide 61

62. Discussion, Questions, and Answers

63. Contact information:  Martin Halbert (martin.halbert@unt.edu)martin.halbert@unt.edu  Guillermo Oyarce (guillermo.oyarce@unt.edu)guillermo.oyarce@unt.edu  Katherine Skinner, Educopia/MetaArchive Director (katherine.skinner@metaarchive.org)katherine.skinner@metaarchive.org 9/11/2012DDP Workshop for ETDsSlide 63