Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byNathan Ford Modified over 9 years ago
1
Indiana’s Major Moves Projects Asphalt Pavement Association of Indiana Michael B. Cline, P.E., PTOE Commissioner INDOT December 13, 2012
2
Six district offices 3,630 employees 1,600 Highway Technicians 800 Managers/Supervisors 300 Engineers $389 million/annual operating budget $1 billion/annual capital expenditures 28,400 total roadway lane miles 5,300 INDOT-owned bridges INDOT Profile
3
Customer Satisfaction Survey Items that residents thought were critical for INDOT.
4
Contractor Satisfaction Survey Satisfaction Levels with INDOT’s Performance Regarding Communication & Cooperation.
5
Contractor Satisfaction Survey Satisfaction levels with INDOT’s performance regarding communication & cooperation.
6
2012 INDOT Awards MonthOrganization / AwardProject/Program FebruaryAASHTO / Project of the WeekSherman Minton Bridge AugustITE / Public Agency Achievement AwardNew Management Philosophy & Strategy September Council of State Community Development Agencies (COSCDA) / Presidential Award for InnovationStellar Communities OctoberAASHTO / Performance Excellence AwardDamageWise OctoberAASHTO / Performance Excellence Award – Gold AwardPropane Vehicle Program OctoberPopular Science Magazine / 25 th Annual Best of What’s NewMilton-Madison Bridge Project October Construction Management Association of America (CMAA) / CMAA AwardSherman Minton Bridge OctoberCG/LA / Strategic Project of the YearOhio River Bridges - East End Crossing NovemberACEC / Engineering Excellence Award Honor AwardI-69 Sections 2-3
7
INDOT Investment FY 2006-15
8
Interstate Truck Trends
9
Pavement & Bridge Preservation
10
Major Moves Projects Project Miles % Miles Let Est. $ CN Cost (m) Final Letting Open to Traffic I-80/94 Interchange-100$197 2009 Aug. 2011 Accelerate 46511100$423 2010 Dec. 2012 US 24 Fort to Port11100$93 2010 Nov. 2012 I-69 Evansville to Crane67100$6202011Nov. 2012 Milton-Madison Bridge1100$104 2010 April 2013 US 31 Kokomo13100$155 May 2012 Dec. 2013 SR 25 Hoosier Heartland36100$327 July 2012 Dec. 2013 US 31 Plymouth to South Bend2092$223 April 2013 Dec. 2014 I-69 Crane to Bloomington2779$400March 2013Dec. 2014 US 31 Hamilton County1316$320Spring 2013Dec. 2015 Total 199 $2.9B
11
Hoosier Heartland (SR 25) 36 miles Ribbon cuttings: Oct. 24, 2012: 12 miles – I-65 to US 421 December 2013: 24 miles – US 421 to US 24 Open to traffic: Dec. 2013 CN Cost: $327 million Major Moves – Ribbon Cutting Hoosier Heartland at Clymers, Cass County.
12
Fort to Port (US 24) 11 miles Open to traffic: Nov. 14, 2012 CN Cost: $93 million Major Moves – Ribbon Cutting US 24/Fort to Port at Webster Road, Allen County.
13
Interstate 69 Sections 1-3: 67 miles Evansville to Crane Open to traffic: Nov. 19, 2012 CN Cost: $620 million Major Moves – Ribbon Cutting I-69, Daviess County.
14
US 31 Hamilton County 13 miles 16% let Final letting: Spring 2013 Open to traffic: Dec. 2015 CN Cost: $320 million US 31 at SR 38, Hamilton County. Major Moves
15
Interstate 69 Section 4: 27 miles Crane to Bloomington 79% let Bid openings: Segment 3: Dec. 12, 2012 Segment 2: March 2013 Open to traffic: Dec. 2014 Est. CN Cost: $400 million Major Moves
16
Interstate 69 Section 5: 21 miles Bloomington to Martinsville DEIS published: Oct. 26, 2012 RFI issued: Dec. 4, 2012 Public hearing: Dec. 6, 2012 ROD anticipated: Spring 2013 Construction to start: FY 2014 Est. CN Cost: $350 million Major Moves
17
Total Cost: $2.6 billion Federal ROD approval: June 20, 2012 Kentucky: Downtown Crossing Indiana: East End Crossing East End Groundbreaking: Aug. 30, 2012 Public Hearing: Dec. 1, 2012 IFA Determination: Dec. 3, 2012 Open to Traffic: October 2016 P3 Projects - Ohio River Bridges
18
P3 Projects - East End Crossing Indiana Sections
19
48 miles from I-55 to I-65 Tolled expressway Environmental Impact Study Preferred Route B3 announced Oct. 18, 2012 Tier One ROD anticipated in January 2013 Tier Two ROD anticipated in July 2014 P3 Projects - Illiana Corridor
20
Pavement Conditions Pavement Condition Ratings are measured by Road Roughness, using the International Roughness Index (IRI). In 2011, 3,060 of INDOT’s Lane Miles were in Fair or Poor Condition. If Preservation Spending Levels Remain Constant, it is Estimated that 4,445 Lane Miles will be Rated Fair or Poor by 2022, an Increase of 1,385 Miles (45%). 16 Projected
21
Federal Highway Bill (MAP-21) Indiana Impact: FY 2013: $923M FY 2014: $931M Effective Date: October 1, 2012 Increased TIFIA program Increased tolling ability for new & added capacity projects New performance measures & asset management requirements
22
Pavement Selection Process Based on appropriate pavement treatment design Existing pavement type, thickness & distress level Ability of possible solutions to address the problem, situation or pavement distresses present Near-term and long-term cost effectiveness Construction costs Least cost of ownership Right treatment, right time, right cost Engineering feasibility 1&1/2” resurface vs. 8” resurface vs. reconstruct, etc. Business case suitability Interstate vs. minor state highway Budgetary impacts acceptability
23
Pavement Selection Process Considers not just HMA or PCCP, but also possible & feasible treatment levels of intensity Basic levels of intensity are: Routine or preventive maintenance Surface treatment Chip-seal, PPI, mill-&-fill, etc. Minor structural treatment 2-lift overlay Major structural treatment Rubberize, thick HMA or PCCP overlay Pavement construction or replacement
24
Pavement Peer Group Pavement Steering Committee Successor District pavement engineers & pavement area engineers are pavement owners Everyone else works to support them Forum for broad discussion of pavement issues so pavement owners can make decisions To include agency, engineering consultants, construction industry, etc.
25
Chapter 304 Revisions Incorporate new agency pavement organization, i.e., district pavement engineers, pavement area engineers, etc. Incorporate new Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG) philosophy & methodology (Darwin M-E software) More clearly delineate pavement treatment, selection expectations for internal & external designers Reflect increase reliance on pavement design engineers’ professional judgment
26
Alternate Bidding HMA & PCCP options considered Best results when alternate pavement type considerations determined early in project development 9% (+/-) construction savings typically No longer FHWA experiment, Pavement Selection Process Continued discussion on lower limit Future looking into alternate treatments at PPI level?
27
Thank You
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.