Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byMary Ward Modified over 9 years ago
1
Taxing wealth Student introduction April 9th 2010 Andreas Tveitereid ant@fin.dep.no
2
Finansdepartementet Taxing wealth – main topics International trends Basic economic arguments Current Norwegian rules Recent amendments in Norway Equality, fairness and politics
3
Finansdepartementet International trends Norway, Canada, France, Luxembourg and Switzerland issue wealth tax in the OECD Several countries have abolished the wealth tax in recent years – among others Spain and Sweden The wealth tax is normally associated with generous basic allowance The wealth tax must be seen in relation to the property tax In Norway, the combined tax on property and wealth is 2 pct. OECD average is 5,5 pct US and Canada have ~10 pct. on properties
4
Finansdepartementet Basic economic arguments PRO Wealth is just as suitable as taxbase as income Nice distributional effects Fills a fiscal need Additional tax on capital income Tax on gently taxed items (property – profit not taxed) Tax on profit can contribute to ineffective capital lock-in effects - the wealth tax counteracts this Residential tax – must move to avoid the tax Based on net wealth - property tax on gross value CONTRA Difficult to value all wealth objects at market value creates distortions Weakens access to capital for small firms, specially in a non-efficient capital market (retained earnings) Differs between nationality – different demand for return on capital after tax – can result in capital owners moving abroad Does not depend on income, require cash-flow. Political demand for exceptions (pensioners in large villas)
5
Finansdepartementet Current wealth tax rules (Norway) Tax rate 1,1 pct. of net taxable wealth (individuals) Local government 0,7 pct. Central government 0,4 pct. Basic allowance 700 000 NOK No wealth tax for the business sector (a few exceptions) Estimated government take 12,8 billion NOK in 2010 (1,5 pct. of total) Main weakness: undervaluation of property Consequence: the tax system contributes to overinvestment in property
6
Finansdepartementet Recent wealth tax amendments Stocks valued at market prices (up from 65 pct.) Considerably increased basic allowance (almost fivefold) Removed “80-per cent” rule Commercial property values based on rent/market value Private property (homes) values based on estimated market value
7
Finansdepartementet Wealth tax amendment – illustration Large apartment Frogner/Oslo (1916) Large apartment Frogner/Oslo (1916 Price 17,5 mill. NOK Taxable value 650 000 NOK (3,7 pct.) 284 sqm, new taxable value 3,5 mill. NOK (20 pct.) Basic house Rjukan (1976) Price 1 050 000 NOK Taxable value 532 000 NOK (51 pct.) 148 sqm, new taxable value 262 500 NOK (25 pct.) 2 bedroom flat Grorud/Oslo (1955) Price 1 750 000 NOK Taxable value 165 00 (9,5 pst) 64 sqm, new taxable value 430 000 NOK (24,5 pct.)
8
Finansdepartementet Equality, fairness and politics
9
Finansdepartementet Summary and conclusion Few OECD countries issue a tax wealth Uniform valuation principles essential Wealth tax is an effective redistribution tool Still room for improvement in the Norwegian system Property is undervalued compared to market price Vacation properties are not valued based on market value Politically challenging to tax wealth in the form of property
10
Finansdepartementet THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION!
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.