Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byCory Garrett Modified over 9 years ago
1
Public Education Funding By Ted Lewis and David Marino
2
Overview of Education Funding Public schools funded by local property taxes Managed at the district level
3
Arguments For Equitable Funding Lower income school districts would receive more money (Funding gap 2005) True equity of opportunity The quality of the average education would increase
4
Arguments against Equitable Funding Taxes paid should go to the districts those people live in If money is equally distributed, the highest quality schools would lose quality
5
No Child Left Behind Passed in 2001 Sets academic standards for schools, measured by standardized tests Incentives for school that meet requirements Schools required to provide for students when standards not met
6
Pros/Cons of NCLB Pros Encourages schools to improve and perform well Sets national standards for educational quality Requires lagging schools to reach standards cons Less funding for struggling schools Does not provide funding to carry out the bills provisions Federal intrusion into a “state issue”
7
Race to the Top Part of American Recovery and Reinvestment act of 2009 Sets criteria to measure improvement in education quality Offers additional funding to states that can display a significant improvement
8
Pros/cons of Race to the Top Pros Sets comprehensive list of requirements for improvement Sets incentives for improvement Cannot lose funding if standards are not met Cons Not all states are eligible for the extra funding (opt-in) Does not focus on improving low achieving schools Does not require schools to increase performance
9
Interest Groups KNEA (Kansas National Education Association) Increased investment in public education Adequate funding for all public schools
10
Interest Groups The Heritage Foundation Returning education authority to the states Belief that steps to equity of education will lead to mediocre education
11
Statistics The U.S. spent $562.3 billion in the 2006-2007 school year. (NECS) In the 2006-07 school year, the government spent $10,041 per student on average (NECS)
12
Statistics In the long term, Reading and Mathematics scores have increased over the past 30 years.
13
Recent Developments The start of the Race to the Top Program (July 24, 2009) Phase 2 decisions announced on August 24, 2010
14
Republican Party Positions High Standards Giving Parents the option to choose schools
15
Democratic Party Positions Democrats cite Race to the Top as their position on education
16
Green Party Opinion The Green Party supports choice in the type of education Green Party supports an equitable distribution of state and national funding
17
Works Cited "Current Political Issues | RNC: Republican National Committee | GOP." RNC: Republican National Committee | RNC: Republican National Committee | GOP. Web. 17 Nov. 2010.. "DPI Seeks Changes to Public School Funding - JSOnline." Milwaukee Journal Sentinel - Breaking News, Sports, Business, Watchdog Journalism, Multimedia in Wisconsin. Web. 17 Nov. 2010.. "Education | The Heritage Foundation." Conservative Policy Research and Analysis | The Heritage Foundation. Web. 17 Nov. 2010.. "Education Reform | The Heritage Foundation." Conservative Policy Research and Analysis | The Heritage Foundation. Web. 17 Nov. 2010.. "Full Rank." Philly Mag. Philadelphia Magazine. Web. 17 Nov. 2010.. "Green Party on Education." OnTheIssues.org - Candidates on the Issues. Web. 17 Nov. 2010.. "Inequality in Funding of Public Education Raises Justice Issues: Quality Often Depends on Where Students Live - Cover Story - Page 2 | National Catholic Reporter." Find Articles at BNET | News Articles, Magazine Back Issues & Reference Articles on All Topics. Web. 17 Nov. 2010.. "Obama Offers 'Race to the Top' Contest for Schools | World News | Guardian.co.uk." Latest News, Comment and Reviews from the Guardian | Guardian.co.uk. Web. 17 Nov. 2010.. "School Funding Central Menu." KNEA Tools. Web. 17 Nov. 2010.. Subject, By. "Archived: Executive Summary of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001." U.S. Department of Education. Web. 17 Nov. 2010.. Subject, By. "The Elementary and Secondary Education Act (The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001)." U.S. Department of Education. Web. 17 Nov. 2010.. United States. US Department of Education. Www2,ed,gov. Web. 17 Nov. 2010.. "What We Stand For: Education." Democrats.org. Web. 17 Nov. 2010.. "The Funding Gap 2005." The Education Trust, 2005. Web. 18 Nov. 2010..
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.