Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byBriana Townsend Modified over 9 years ago
1
Prof. G. de Manzoni “Recenti acquisizioni fisiopatologiche post chirurgia digestiva maggiore” STOMACO Bari, November 8th University of Verona Department of Surgery Division of Upper G.I. Surgery Prof. G. de Manzoni
2
Gastric Physiology LES His Angle Pacemaker region Pyloric sphincter Allow: o bolous transit o Mix of the bolous Avoid: o acid reflux o biliary reflux o quick passage in the duodenum
3
Gastric Physiology Parietal cells Mucus cells HCl production Protection
4
Gastric Physiology Vagus nerve Celiac plexus o Motility o Secretions
5
Gastric Pathology Peptic Ulcer Cancer Obesity Main V Cancer of gastric stump
6
Surgical goals Resection Reconstruction o Resection margins (T0) o Nodal dissection (N0) o Acid-Biliary reflux o Good emptying o Number of meals o Body weight o QOL
7
Surgical goals The importance of QOL… Cunningham D, et al. (2006) N Engl J Med CT group: 36% Surgery alone: 23% 5 y OS for advanced gastric cancer
8
“cutting less does not always lead to better results…” Surgical goals
9
Gastric resections Total Gastrectomy JGCA (2011) Gastric Cancer
10
Distal Gastrectomy JGCA (2011) Gastric Cancer o Distal gastric tumors o ≥ 3 or 5 cm proximal margin (according to growth pattern) Gastric resections
11
Pylorus Preserving JGCA (2011) Gastric Cancer o Middle gastric tumors o ≥ 4 cm from pylorus Gastric resections
12
Proximal Gastrectomy JGCA (2011) Gastric Cancer o Proximal tumors o ≥ ½ distal stomach preserved Gastric resections
13
Gastric reconstructions Total Gastrectomy Roux-en-Y Longmire interposition o Less biliary reflux o Preservation of physiological route o Improved absorption o Reduced weight loss
14
Gastric reconstructions Total Gastrectomy o Review of 9 RCT (1985-2009) o Roux-en-Y VS Longmire interposition Body weight No Differences QOL Esophagitis Mariette, et al.(2010) J Visc Surg
15
Gastric reconstructions Total Gastrectomy o Multicenter RCT (105 pz) o Roux-en-Y VS Longmire interposition QOL No Differences Ishigami, et al.(2011) Am J Surg
16
Gastric reconstructions Pouch or not? Principles: o Increase food intake at each meal o Prevent dumping syndrome o Prevent reflux esophagitis (?) Better QOL?
17
Gastric reconstructions Pouch or not? Dumping syndrome o 9 RCT Roux-en-Y (474 pz) Eating capability Body weight Long term better QOL… Gertler, et al.(2009) Am J Gastroenterol Pouch is better in…
18
Total Gastrectomy… In Japan Kumagai, et al.(2012) Surg Today o 145 Japanese institutions o 138 use Roux-en-Y reconstruction o 26 institutions performs Pouch 95% Roux-en-Y reconstruction Gastric reconstructions
19
Mariette, et al. (2010) J Visc Surg Distal Gastrectomy Roux-en-Y Billroth I Billroth II (+ Braun) o Restore physiologic path o Always possible without tension o Less biliary reflux Gastric reconstructions
20
Csendes, et al. (2009) Ann Surg Distal Gastrectomy Roux-en-Y Billroth II VS o 75 pz (mean fu 182-193 months) o Surgery for peptic ulcer Less reflux for Roux in long term follow-up Gastric reconstructions
21
Lee, et al. (2012) Surg Endosc Distal Gastrectomy Roux-en-Y Billroth II + Braun VS o 159 pz (12 months fu) o Prospective randomized trial Endoscopic findings Biliary reflux 3.7% Roux vs 75% BII Hepatobiliary scan Gastric reconstructions
22
Distal Gastrectomy Roux-en-Y Billroth I Billroth II (+ Braun) o High biliary reflux Gastric reconstructions
23
Inokuchi, et al. (2012) Gastric Cancer Nunobe, et al. (2007) Int J Clin Oncol Distal Gastrectomy Roux-en-Y Billroth I VS Gastritis Esophagitis Food residue Biliary reflux Endoscopic findings Better for Roux Gastric reconstructions
24
Inokuchi, et al. (2012) Gastric Cancer Sano, et al. (2007) Int J Clin Oncol Distal Gastrectomy Roux-en-Y Billroth I VS Endoscopic findings Gastric reconstructions o Esophagitis o Gastritis o Food residue o Bile reflux P<0.05 Better for Roux
25
Lee, et al. (2012) Surg Endosc Distal Gastrectomy Roux3.7% Biliary Reflux Roux-en-Y Billroth I VS o 159 pz (12 months fu) o Prospective randomized trial Hepatobiliary scan Billroth I 56.3% Gastric reconstructions
26
Takiguchi, et al. (2012) Gastric Cancer Distal Gastrectomy Roux-en-Y Billroth I VS o 268 pz (21 months median fu) o Multicenter randomized phase II EORTC QLQ-C30 NO differences in QOL Gastric reconstructions
27
Distal Gastrectomy Roux-en-Y Billroth I o High biliary reflux o High gastritit o High esophagitis o High food residue NO differences in QOL… but Gastric reconstructions
28
Roux-en-Y o Less biliary reflux o Less gastritis o Less esophagitis o Less food residue o Roux stasis syndrome o Difficult endoscopic management of bile ducts Gastric reconstructions
29
Distal Gastrectomy… In Japan Kumagai, et al.(2012) Surg Today o 145 Japanese institutions o 112 (77%) use B1 reconstruction as first choice o 30 (21%) use Roux reconstruction as first choice 77% B1 21% Roux Gastric reconstructions
30
Pylorus Preserving Billroth I Evolution o Less dumping syndrome o Less gastritis o Less reflux esophagitis o Less gallbladder stones o More delayed gastric emptying o (Limited oncological dissection) Pros Cons
31
Morita, et al.(2008) Br J Surg Preservation of hepatich and pyloric branchs Preservation of coeliach branch Preservation of infrapyloric vessels o 611 pz (50 months median fu) Gastric reconstructions
32
Pylorus Preserving o 39 pz (40 months mean fu) o Pylorus preserving VS Billroth I Park, et al.(2008) World J Surg But… Better Symptom score Delayed Gastric emptying for solids Scintigraphic system Gastric reconstructions
33
Proximal Gastrectomy ProsCons Reflux esophagitis Improved nutrition Anastomotic stricture Theoretically better for early stages proximal cancer and Siewert III because of better QOL… Gastric reconstructions
34
Proximal Gastrectomy Kim, et al.(2012) Gastric Cancer Laparoscopy assisted proximal gastrectomy VS total gastrectomy o 131 pz o Endoscopic evaluation for stenosis o Modified Visick score for GERD High Stenosis High GERD Gastric reconstructions
35
Proximal Gastrectomy Kim, et al.(2012) Gastric Cancer Same nutritional status No advantages for PG instead of TG… Gastric reconstructions
36
Our experience (2000-2010) 50 pz Siewert II 24 pz Siewert III 26 pz o Short gastric conduit reconstruction o T-T mediastinal anastomosis
37
Our experience (2000-2010) Endoscopic diagnosis
38
Cardias adenocarcinoma Ivor Lewis Siewert III Total gastrectomy Proximal gastrectomy Siewert II Siewert I Total gastrectomy Ivor Lewis
39
Ivor Lewis – Personal Tecnique o Narrow gastric conduit o Intramediastinical conduit position o GERD reduction
40
Termino-Terminal Anastomosis o Better vascularization o Avoids the “could de sac” o Without weaknesses
41
Prefer intrathoracic anastomosis o Eases the venous outflow o Less tension on the anastomosis o Over-azygos for GERD reduction o Shorter conduit with better vascularization
42
Our experience until 2010 o Ivor Lewis o EAC + SCC o PPI for 12 months post-op
43
Velanovich, et al.(2007) Dis Esophagus QOL questionnaire o Good reliability o Good responsiveness o Good praticality (2 minutes)
44
...2011 results o Ivor Lewis o EAC + SCC o PPI for 12 months post-op
45
Prophylactic Cholecistectomy? Rationale o Higher risk of gallstones formation Vagal denervation Postoperative fasting Extent of lymphadenectomy Extent of gastric resection Digestive reconstruction o Difficult endoscopic management (Roux-en-Y) o Higher morbi-mortality for subsequent cholecistectomy
46
hepatich branch of vagus nerve Alteration in hormons production: cholecystokinin and secretin Altered motility Altered secretions Physiophatology
47
Cholelythiasis In general population 10% Symptomatic in 30% 15-25% develop cholelythiasis …5 y after gastric surgery
48
Gillen, et al.(2010) World J Surg o 16 studies (retrospective and prospective) o 3735 pz CCE: cholecistectomy High morbidity in delayed CCE Low additional morbidity for the whole cohort
49
Gillen, et al.(2010) World J Surg o 16 studies (retrospective and prospective) o 3735 pz Simultaneous cholecystectomy seems not to be necessary
50
Bernini, et al.(2012) Gastric Cancer o RCT – end of recruitment analysis o Propylactic cholecystectomy (PC) VS standard surgery (SS) o Roux-en-Y and Billroth II Perioperative complications Biliary: PC 1.5% vs SS 0% N.S. Overall: PC 25% vs SS 17% N.S. 1 pz: Bile from drainage: Conservative management (desappear in a few days)
51
Giacopuzzi S, de Manzoni G…Cordiano C, et al.(2008) Biliary Lithiasis Prophylactic cholecystectomy Extended lymphadenectomy (D2-D3) Total Gastrectomy Early stage (long survivor) PC
52
Nothing is perfect… but everything can be improved… but everything can be improved…
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.