1. Invitations to Linguistics
Chapter One
Invitations to Linguistics
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

2. 1. Why Study Language?
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

3. 1.1 Some myths about language
Language is only a means of communication.
Language has a form-meaning correspondence.
The function of language is to exchange information.
English is more difficult to learn than Chinese.
Black English is not standard and should be reformed.
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

4. 1.2 Some fundamental views about L
Children learn their native language swiftly, efficiently and without instruction.
Language operates by rules.
All languages have three major components: a sound system, a system of lexicogrammar and a system of semantics.
Everyone speaks a dialect.
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

5. Language slowly changes.
Speakers of all languages employ a range of styles and a set of jargons.
Languages are intimately related to the societies and individuals who use them.
Writing is derivative of speech.
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

6. 2. What is Language?
Language “is not to be confused with human speech, of which it is only a definite part, though certainly an essential one. It is both a social product of the faculty of speech and a collection of necessary conventions that have been adopted by a social body to permit individuals to exercise that faculty”.
--Ferdinand de Saussure ( ): Course in General Linguistics (1916)
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

7. Language: An Introduction to the Study of Speech (1921)
“Language is a purely human and non-instinctive method of communicating ideas, emotions and desires by means of voluntarily produced symbols.”
--Edward Sapir ( ):
Language: An Introduction to the
Study of Speech (1921)
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

8. “A language is a system of arbitrary vocal symbols by means of which a social group co-operates.”
--Bernard Bloch ( ) & George Trager ( ): Outline of Linguistic Analysis (1942)
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

9. --George Trager: The Field of Linguistics (1949)
“A language is a system of arbitrary vocal symbols by means of which the members of a society interact in terms of their total culture.”
--George Trager: The Field of Linguistics (1949)
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

10. --Noam Chomsky (1928- ): Syntactic Structures (1957)
“From now on I will consider language to be a set (finite or infinite) of sentences, each finite in length and constructed out of a finite set of elements.”
--Noam Chomsky (1928- ): Syntactic Structures (1957)
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

11. --Robert A. Hall (1911-1997): Introductory Linguistics (1964)
Language is “the institution whereby humans communicate and interact with each other by means of habitually used oral-auditory arbitrary symbols.”
--Robert A. Hall ( ): Introductory Linguistics (1964)
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

12. --Ronald Wardhaugh: Introduction to Linguistics (1977)
“Language is a system of arbitrary vocal symbols used for human communication.”
--Ronald Wardhaugh: Introduction to Linguistics (1977)
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

13. “The question ‘What is language
“The question ‘What is language?’ is comparable with -- and, some would say, hardly less profound than -- ‘What is life?’, the presuppositions of which circumscribe and unify the biological sciences...
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

14. --John Lyons (1932- ): Language and Linguistics (1981)
it is not so much the question itself as the particular interpretation that the biologist puts upon it and the unravelling of its more detailed implications within some currently accepted theoretical framework that nourish the biologist's day-to-day speculations and research. So it is for the linguist in relation to the question ‘What is language?’”
--John Lyons (1932- ): Language and Linguistics (1981)
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

15. --R. H. Robins (1921-2000): General Linguistics (1989)
“... in a sense all definitions [of language] are, by themselves, inadequate, since, if they are to be more than trivial and uninformative, they must presuppose ... some general theory of language and of linguistic analysis.”
--R. H. Robins ( ): General Linguistics (1989)
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

16. --Stuart C. Poole: An Introduction to Linguistics (1999)
“Language is a form of human communication by means of a system of symbols principally transmitted by vocal sounds.”
--Stuart C. Poole: An Introduction to Linguistics (1999)
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

17. “Language is a means of verbal communication.”
It is instrumental in that communicating
by speaking or writing is a purposeful act.
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

18. It is social and conventional in that language is a social semiotic and communication can only take place effectively if all the users share a broad understanding of human interaction including such associated factors as nonverbal cues, motivation, and socio-cultural roles.
-- Our textbook (2006)
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

19. 3. Design Features of Language
Language distinguishes human beings from animals in that it is far more sophisticated than any animal communication system.
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

20. Human language is ‘unique’
Arbitrariness
Duality
Creativity
Displacement
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

21. 3.1 Arbitrarines
Saussure: the forms of linguistic signs bear no natural relationship to their meaning
Arbitrary relationship between the sound of a morpheme and its meaning, even with onomatopoeic words :
The dog barks wow wow in English but “汪汪汪” in Chinese.
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

22. (a) He came in and sat down. (b) He sat down and came in.
Arbitrariness at the syntactic level: language is not arbitrary at the syntactic level.
(a) He came in and sat down.
(b) He sat down and came in.
(c) He sat down after he came in.
The link between a linguistic sign and its meaning is a matter of convention.
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

23. 3.2 Duality
The property of having two levels of structures, such that units of the primary level are composed of elements of the secondary level and each of the two levels has its own principles of organization.
Primary units ‘words’ (meaningful) consist of secondary units ‘sounds’ (meaningless).
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

24. Hierarchy of language: stratification as ‘the infinite use of finite means’.
Sounds > syllables > morphemes > words > phrases > clauses > sentences/utterances > texts/discourses
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

25. 3.3 Creativity
Language is resourceful because of its duality and its recursiveness. We can use it to create new meanings.
Words can be used in new ways to mean new things, and can be instantly understood by people who have never come across that usage before.
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

26. Birds, bees, crabs, spiders, and most other creatures communicate in some way, but the information imparted is severely limited and confined to a small set of messages.
Because of duality the human speaker is able to combine the basic linguistic units to form an infinite set of sentences, most of which are never before produced or heard.
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

27. The recursive nature of language provides a potential to create an infinite number of sentences. For instance:
He bought a book which was written by a teacher who taught in a school which was known for its graduates who ...
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

28. 3.4 Displacement
Human languages enable their users to symbolize objects, events and concepts which are not present (in time and space) at the moment of communication.
Thus, we can refer to Confucius, or the North Pole, even though the first has been dead for over 2550 years and the second is situated far away from us.
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

29. Animal communication is normally under “immediate stimulus control”
Animal communication is normally under “immediate stimulus control”. For instance, a warning cry of a bird instantly announces danger.
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

30. Human language is stimulus-free
Human language is stimulus-free. What we are talking about need not be triggered by any external stimulus in the world or any internal state.
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

31. A dog cannot tell people that its master will be home in a few days.
The honeybee's dance exhibits displacement a little bit: he can refer to a source of food, which is remote in time and space when he reports on it.
A dog cannot tell people that its master will be home in a few days.
Our language enables us to communicate about things that do not exist or do not yet exist.
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

32. Displacement benefits human beings by giving us the power to handle generalizations and abstractions. Once we can talk about physically distant thing, we acquire the ability to understand concepts which denote “non-things”, such as truth and beauty.
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

33. 4. Origin of language The ‘Divine’ origin: “In the beginning was the
Word, and the Word was with
God, and the Word was God.”
(Gospel, John 1:1)
“And the Lord said, Behold, the people is one, and they have all one language; and this they begin to do; and now nothing will be restrained from them, which they have imagined to do.” (Genesis, 11:6)
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

34. 4.1 The “bow-wow” theory
In primitive times people imitated the sounds of the animal calls in the wild environment they lived and speech developed from that.
Onomatopoeic words seem to be a convenient evidence for this theory. But they are very different in the degree of resemblance they express with the natural sounds.
This theory lacks supportive evidence.
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

35. 4.2 The “pooh-pooh” theory
In the hard life of our primitive ancestors, they utter instinctive sounds of pain, anger and joy. As for evidence, we can only cite the universal use of sounds as interjections.
What makes the theory problematic is that there is only a limited number of interjections in almost all languages.
Besides, interjections such as Oh, Ah, Oops bear little relationship with the sound system of a language and therefore are not good evidence.
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

36. 4.3 The “yo-he-ho” theory
As primitive people worked together, they produced some rhythmic grunts which gradually developed into chants and then into language.
We do have prosodic use of rhythms in languages, but rhythmic grunts are far different from language in its present sense. The theory is again at most a speculation.
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

37. The by-now fruitless search for the origin of languages reflects people's concern with the origin of humanity and may come up with enlightening findings in future.
One thing we can say for certain is that language evolves within specific historical, social and cultural contexts.
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

38. 5. Functions of language
Linguists talk about the functions of language in an abstract sense, that is, not in terms of using language to chat, to think, to buy and sell, to read and write, to greet, praise and condemn people, etc.
They summarize these practical functions and attempt some broad classifications of the basic functions of language.
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

39. For Jakobson, language is above all for communication.
While for many people, the purpose of communication is referential, for him (and the Prague school structuralists), reference is not the only, not even the primary goal of communication.
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

40. speaker, addressee, context, message, code, contact.
In his famous article, Linguistics and Poetics, he defined six primary factors of any speech event, namely:
speaker, addressee, context, message, code, contact.
In conjunction with these, Jakobson established a well-known framework of language functions based on the six key elements of communication, namely:
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

41. referential (to convey message and information),
poetic (to indulge in language for its own sake),
emotive (to express attitudes, feelings and emotions),
conative (to persuade and influence others through commands and requests),
phatic (to establish communion with others)
metalingual (to clear up intentions and meanings).
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

42. They correspond to such communication elements as context, message, addresser, addressee, contact and code respectively.
Jakobson's views of the functions of language are still of great importance.
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

43. (e.g. intonation showing anger) Message POETIC (e.g. poetry) Addressee
Context
REFERENTIAL
Addresser
EMOTIVE
(e.g. intonation showing anger)
Message
POETIC
(e.g. poetry)
Addressee
CONATIVE
(e.g. imperatives and vocatives)
Contact
PHATIC
(e.g. Good morning!)
Code
METALINGUAL
(e.g. Hello, do you hear me?)
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

44. Halliday proposes a theory of metafunctions of language, that is, language has ideational, interpersonal and textual functions.
Ideational function constructs a model of experience as well as logical relations, interpersonal function enacts social relationships and textual function creates relevance to context.
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

45. In his earlier works, Halliday proposed seven categories of language functions by observing child language development:
Instrumental
Regulatory
Representational
Interactional
Personal
Heuristic
Imaginative
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

46. Still other classifications employ different categories and use different terms, but all share a lot in common about the basic functions of language.
Our list below is a summary for the convenience of presentation. The categories can still be somewhat overlapping.
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

47. 5.1 Informative function
Language is the instrument of thought and people often feel need to speak their thoughts aloud. The use of language to record the facts is a prerequisite of social development. This is indeed a crucial function of language.
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

48. It is also called ideational function in the framework of functional grammar.
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

49. Halliday notes that “Language serves for the expression of ‘content’: that is, of the speaker's experience of the real world, including the inner world of his own consciousness. ... In serving this function, language also gives structure to experience, and helps to determine our way of looking at things, so that it requires some intellectual effort to see them in any other way than that which our language suggests to us”.
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

50. 5.2 Interpersonal function
By far the most important sociological use of language, and by which people establish and maintain their status in a society.
In the framework of functional grammar, it is concerned with interaction between the addresser and addressee in the discourse situation and the addresser's attitude toward what he speaks or writes about.
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

51. For example, the ways in which people address others and refer to themselves (e.g. Dear Sir, Dear Professor, Johnny, yours, your obedient servant) indicate the various grades of interpersonal relations.
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

52. Attached to the interpersonal function is its function of expressing identity. For example, the chanting of a crowd at a football match, the shouting of names or slogans at public meetings, the stage-managed audience reactions to TV game shows all signal who we are and where we belong.
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

53. Language marks our identity, physically in terms of age, sex, and voiceprints; psychologically in terms of language, personality and intelligence; geographically in terms of accents and dialects; ethnically and socially in terms of social stratification, class, status, role, solidarity and distance.
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

54. The interpersonal function is such a broad category that it is often discussed under various other terms as in the following performative, emotive, expressive and phatic function of language. They seem to emphasize different aspects of the interpersonal function.
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

55. 5.3 Performative function
This concept originates from the philosophical study of language represented by Austin and Searle, whose theory now forms the back-bone of pragmatics. (Chapter 8)
For example, I now declare the meeting open, I bet you two pounds it will rain tomorrow.
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

56. The performative function of language is primarily to change the social status of persons, as in marriage ceremonies, the sentencing of criminals, the blessing of children, the naming of a ship at a launching ceremony, and the cursing of enemies.
The kind of language employed in performative verbal acts is usually quite formal and even ritualized.
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

57. The performative function can extend to the control of reality as on some magical or religious occasions.
For example, in Chinese when someone breaks a bowl or a plate the host or the people present are likely to say 岁岁平安 as a means of controlling the invisible forces which the believers feel might affect their lives adversely.
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

58. 5.4 Emotive function
The emotive function of language is one of the most powerful uses of language because it is crucial in changing the emotional status of an audience for or against someone or something.
It is a means of getting rid of our nervous energy when we are under stress, e.g. swear words, obscenities, involuntary verbal reactions to a piece of art or scenery; conventional words/phrases, e.g.
God, My, Damn it, What a sight, Wow, Ugh, Oh.
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

59. It is also discussed under the term expressive function
It is also discussed under the term expressive function. The expressive function can often be entirely personal and totally without any implication of communication to others.
For example, a man may say Ouch! after striking a fingernail with a hammer, or he may mutter Damn when realizing that he has forgotten an appointment.
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

60. Exclamations such as Man. Oh boy. and Hurrah
Exclamations such as Man! Oh boy! and Hurrah! are usually uttered without any purpose of communicating to others, but as essentially a verbal response to a person's own feelings.
Such expressive utterances can also be a communal response of a group of people who reinforce one another's expressive use of language to show their solidarity.
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

61. 5.5 Phatic communion
It refers to the social interaction of language, originating from Malinowski's study of the functions of language performed by Trobriand Islanders. For example,
Mrs. P sneezes violently.
Mrs. Q: Bless you.
Mrs. P: Thank you.
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

62. We all use such small, seemingly meaningless expressions to maintain a comfortable relationship between people without involving any factual content.
Ritual exchanges about health or weather such as Good morning, God bless you, Nice day often state the obvious. Yet they indicate that a channel of communication is open if it should be needed.
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

63. Different cultures have different topics of phatic communion.
According to Crystal, the weather is not a universal conversation filler as the English might like to think.
Rundi women (in Burundi, Central Africa), upon taking leave, routinely and politely say “I must go home now，or my husband will beat me.”
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

64. Broadly speaking, this function refers to expressions that help define and maintain interpersonal relations, such as slang, jokes, jargons, ritualistic exchanges, switches to social and regional dialects.
We have to learn a large repertoire of such usages if we are to interact comfortably with different people.
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

65. 5.6 Recreational function
The recreational function of a language is often overlooked because it seems so restrictive in purpose and supposedly so limited in usefulness.
However, no one will deny the use of language for the sheer joy of using it, such as a baby's babbling or a chanter's chanting.
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

66. In the Latin and Islamic worlds as well as in some areas of China, there is widespread use of verbal dueling, in which one singer begins a song of usually few lines and challenges his opponent to continue the content or provide a rejoinder in a similar rhythm and rhyme scheme. Such verbal duels may last for a few hours and is performed for the sheer joy of playing on language.
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

67. To take one example, the well-known movie《刘三姐》features a scene of “对歌” (song dueling) mostly for the sheer joy of playing on language.
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

68. We are getting very close here to Jakobson's poetic function.
If you observe a children’s play, you will find the power of sound. Sometimes even nonsensical lyrics perform a recreational function in the game: the repetitive rhythms help to control the game, and the children plainly take great delight in it. Adults also have their way to appreciate language for its own sake.
For instance, poetry writing gives them the pleasure of using language for its sheer beauty.
We are getting very close here to Jakobson's poetic function.
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

69. 5.7 Metalingual function
Our language can be used to talk about itself.
To organize any written text into a coherent whole, writers employ certain expressions to keep their readers informed about where they are and where they are going.
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

70. A unicorn For instance, instead of saying
The lion chased the unicorn all round the town,
they say
All around the town the lion chased the unicorn.
A unicorn
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

71. This is the metalingual function of language and meshes with the thematic function of language in functional grammar.
It makes the language infinitely self-reflexive: We human beings can talk about talk and think about thinking, and thus only humans can ask what it means to communicate, to think, to be human.
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

72. 6. What is Linguistics? The scientific study of human language
Aims of linguistic theory:
1. What is knowledge of language?
(Competence)
2. How is knowledge of language acquired?
(Acquisition)
3. How is knowledge of language put to use?
(Performance/language processing)
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

73. Lexicon (the words or vocabulary in the mental dictionary)
A grammar includes everything one knows about the structure of one’s language:
Lexicon (the words or vocabulary in the mental dictionary)
Morphology (the structure of words)
Syntax (the structure of phrases and sentences and the constraints on well-formedness of sentences)
Semantics (the meaning of words and sentences)
Phonetics and Phonology (the sounds and the sound system or patterns)
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

74. 7. Main branches of linguistics
Phonetics
Phonology
Morphology
Syntax
Semantics
Pragmatics
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

75. 7.1 Phonetics
Phonetics studies speech sounds, including the production of speech, that is how speech sounds are actually made, transmitted and received, the description and classification of speech sounds, words and connected speech, etc.
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

76. We can approach it on various levels.
At one level, speech is a matter of anatomy and physiology. We can study organs such as tongue and larynx and their functions in the production of speech.
At another level, we can focus on the speech sounds produced by these organs by identifying and classifying the individual sounds. This is the domain of articulatory phonetics.
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

77. We can also investigate the properties of the sound waves—acoustic phonetics.
As speech is intended to be heard or perceived, it is therefore possible to focus on the way in which a listener analyses or processes a sound wave—auditory phonetics.
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

78. 7.2 Phonology
Phonology studies the rules governing the structure, distribution, and sequencing of speech sounds and the shape of syllables. It deals with the sound system of a language by treating phoneme as the point of departure.
A phoneme is the smallest linguistic unit of sound that can signal a difference in meaning.
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

79. 7.3 Morphology
Morphology is concerned with the internal organization of words. It studies the minimal units of meaning—morphemes and word-formation processes.
Although many people think of words as the basic meaningful elements of a language，many words can be broken down into still smaller units, called morphemes.
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

80. Morphemes serve different purposes
Morphemes serve different purposes. Some derive new words by changing the meaning or the part of speech, others only refine and give extra grammatical information about the already existing meaning of a word.
As morphemes are pairings of sounds with meanings, there are many complexities involved, forming a new field by the name morphophonology.
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

81. 7.4 Syntax
Syntax is about principles of forming and understanding correct sentences.
The form or structure of a sentence is governed by the rules of syntax, which specify word order, sentence organization, and the relationships between words, word classes and other sentence elements.
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

82. a. The children watched [the firework from the hill ].
We know that words are organized into structures more than just word order.
a. The children watched [the firework from the hill ].
b. The children watched [the firework ] [from the hill ].
The chicken is too hot to eat.
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

83. 7.5 Semantics Semantics examines how meaning is encoded in a language.
It is not only concerned with meanings of words as lexical items, but also with levels of language below the word and above it, e.g. meaning of morphemes and sentences.
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

84. The following are what the key concepts look like: semantic components, denotation of words, sense relations between words such as antonymy and synonymy, sense relations between sentences such as entailment and presupposition and more.
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

85. 7.6 Pragmatics
Pragmatics is the study of meaning in context. It deals with particular utterances in particular situations and is especially concerned with the various ways in which the many social contexts of language performance can influence interpretation.
In other words, pragmatics is concerned with the way language is used to communicate rather than with the way language is internally structured.
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

86. It regards speech performance as primarily a social act ruled by various social conventions. Some key concepts such as reference, force, effect, and cooperative principles may appear commonsensical, yet pragmatics is just about one of the most promising fields of linguistic studies.
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

87. Take conversation for example.
Since language is transmitted primarily via the speech mode, pragmatic rules govern a number of conversational interactions, such as sequential organization, repair of errors, role and speech acts.
Organization of conversations includes taking turns, opening, maintaining and closing a conversation, establishing and maintaining a topic etc.
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

88. 8. Macrolinguistics
Linguistics is not the only field concerned with language.
Other disciplines such as psychology, sociology, ethnography, the science of law and artificial intelligence etc. are also preoccupied with language.
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

89. Although “Saussure's goal was to establish the autonomy of linguistics, giving it a well-defined subject of study and freeing it from reliance on other disciplines, with its coming of age linguistics is developing interactive links with other sciences.
The central goal of describing the underlying system remains; this is the province of general, descriptive linguistics.
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

90. But since language has both individual and social aspects, it is naturally of interest to psychologists and sociologists among others”.
It is not surprising therefore we have some branches of microlinguistics that show an interdisciplinary nature from their very names:
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

91. 8.1 Psycholinguistics
It investigates the interrelation of language and mind, for example, in processing and producing utterances and in language acquisition.
It also studies language development in the child, such as the theories of language acquisition, biological foundations of language, and a profound aspect—the relationship between language and cognition.
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

92. 8.2 Sociolinguistics
An umbrella term which covers a variety of different interests in language and society, including the social functions of language and the social characteristics of its users.
Sociolinguistics is the study of the characteristics of language varieties, the characteristics of their functions, and the characteristics of their speakers as these three constantly interact and change within a speech community.
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

93. 8.3 Anthropological linguistics
The two disciplines became closely associated in the early days of anthropological fieldwork when anthropologists enlisted the help of linguists to study unwritten languages.
In contrast with other linguists, then, anthropological linguists are interested primarily in the history and structure of formerly unwritten languages.
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

94. Because an unwritten language must be heard in order to be studied, it does not leave any traces once its speakers died off.
Anthropological linguists must begin in the present, with comparisons of contemporary languages. Then they may draw inferences about the kinds of change in language that may have occurred in the past and that may account for similarities and differences observed in the present.
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

95. 8.4 Computational linguistics
An interdisciplinary field which centers around the use of computers to process or produce human language (also known as “natural language”, to distinguish it from computer languages).
To this field, linguistics contributes an understanding of the special properties of language data, and provides theories and descriptions of language structure and use.
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

96. Some current application areas include translating from one language to another (Machine Translation), storing and finding relevant documents in large collections of text (Corpus Linguistics and Information Retrieval), and carrying out various forms of computer mediated communication.
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

97. 9. Important distinctions in linguistics
Descriptive vs. prescriptive
Synchronic vs. diachronic
Langue & parole
Competence and performance
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

98. 9.1 Descriptive vs. prescriptive
Don't say X.
People don't say X.
The first is a prescriptive command, while the second is a descriptive statement.
The distinction lies in prescribing how things ought to be and describing how things are.
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

99. The reason why present-day linguists are so insistent about the distinction between the two types of rules is simply that traditional grammar was very strongly normative in character, e.g. You should never use a double-negative; You should not split the infinitive; etc.
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

100. In the 18th century, all the main European languages were studied prescriptively.
The grammarians then tried to lay down rules for the correct use of language and settle the disputes over usage once and for all.
Some usages were prescribed to be learned by heart, followed accurately or avoided altogether. It was a matter of black or white, right or wrong.
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

101. These attitudes are still with us, though people realize nowadays the facts of usage count more than the authority-made “standards”.
The nature of linguistics as a science determines its preoccupation with description instead of prescription.
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

102. 9.2 Synchronic vs. diachronic
A synchronic description takes a fixed instant (usually, but not necessarily, the present) as its point of observation. Most grammars are of this kind.
Diachronic linguistics is the study of a language through the course of its history.
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

103. 9.3 Langue & parole
Saussure distinguished the linguistic competence of the speaker and the actual phenomena or data of linguistics (utterances) as langue and parole.
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

104. While parole constitutes the immediately accessible data, the linguist's proper object is the langue of each community, the lexicon, grammar, and phonology implanted in each individual by his upbringing in society and on the basis of which he speaks and understands his language.
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

105. 9.4 Competence and performance
This fundamental distinction is discussed by Chomsky in his Aspects of the Theory of Syntax (1965).
A language user's underlying knowledge about the system of rules is called his linguistic competence.
Performance refers to the actual use of language in concrete situations.
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008

106. Chomsky points out that this distinction is related to the langue-parole distinction of Saussure; but he does not accept the view of seeing langue as a mere systematic inventory of items.
For him, competence is closer to the famous German linguist Humboldt's conception, that is, it should refer to the underlying competence as a system of generative processes.
崔建斌：语言学教程（第三版），2008