Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byTheodora Atkins Modified over 9 years ago
1
Dundee City Council Member Workshop on Scrutiny: Organising Scrutiny 02/12/09 Mark McAteer Director of Governance and Performance Management Improvement Service
2
Drivers McIntosh & L.A.P.: Separating DM & scrutiny Executive/cabinet & scrutiny committee(s) & assembly P.R, minority and coalition: Options for governance & scrutiny
3
3 Broad Models The conventional model & adaptations Committees & separate scrutiny committee Executive & scrutiny models
4
The Conventional Model Administration & opposition Committee based: DM & scrutiny (balanced representation: chairs, convenors) Separate Audit Committee: BV as part of remit Periodic meetings for performance review Supported by: Efficiency scrutinies; BV reviews; M/O groups
5
Problems Weak scrutiny of policy (but group, pre-agenda, etc) Limited scrutiny of performance: Why beat yourself up? Marginalisation of opposition: Balance Local ward end of scrutiny strongest but operational, not systematic
6
Committees & Separate Scrutiny Committee Often ‘audit & scrutiny’ Led by opposition not administration but Workload, resourcing & support Party political advantage
7
Cabinet/Executive & Scrutiny Model Separation of DM & scrutiny: Executive & ‘assembly’ Portfolio holders: Rapid decision making Scrutiny or select committees: Policy, implementation, performance All party ‘backbencher’ composition
8
Points Empowerment of executive: Port-mortem scrutiny Assumes frontbench/backbench split not parties Support & resourcing for scrutiny: Chief Officers, advisors, etc.
9
Post PR Coalition & political management: Proportionality & scrutiny MM wards: Implementation, performance, citizens issues Corporate & area level scrutiny Resourcing & support for elected members
10
Key Points All models separate out decision making & scrutiny: political business process & cycle Scrutiny needs to happen at the right level & time to be effective: to add value Scrutiny is of decision & delivery of outcomes: not people Scrutiny needs designed to reflect democratic balance
11
Potential Elements Audit committee Central scrutiny committee: Major decisions & developments; pre decision making Committees sitting quarterly as performance & improvement sub: committees M.M.W. Performance meeting: Open to public Cross cutting M/O groups: Service review; efficiency & productivity; asset management etc
12
Precondition Get the political business process right Responsibility not partisan advantage Good support for elected members
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.