1. The Writing of Recommendations for Turing Scholars Alan Kaylor Cline Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Austin February 9, 2013

2. The Writing of Recommendations for Turing Scholars and Dean’s Scholars and universities and many other academic programs Alan Kaylor Cline Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Austin February 9, 2013

3. Letter Writing is topical http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2013/jan /28/application-university-job-reference

4. This is not adversarial

5. We are on the same team

6. This is not adversarial We are on the same team We all want what is best for the applicant

7. This is not adversarial We are on the same team We all want what is best for the applicant At TS we are subject to some constraints

8. Honesty

9. That includes The Whole Truth

10. Honesty That includes The Whole Truth Threats to honesty

11. Honesty That includes The Whole Truth Threats to honesty – privacy

12. Honesty That includes The Whole Truth Threats to honesty – privacy – liability

13. We try to norm using: Current and past student UT records Records of others from their HS Records of others recommended by the same person …

14. We try to norm using: Current and past student UT records Records of others from their HS Records of others recommended by the same person … We try to norm the schools and the letter writers.

15. We try to norm using: Current and past student UT records Records of others from their HS Records of others recommended by the same person … We try to norm the schools and the letter writers. Thus, in the long run exaggerating the qualities of an applicant may hurt other applicants later on.

16. Negative Letter?

17. The effect of a letter admitting that an applicant was marginal will likely result in the rejection of the applicant.

18. Negative Letter? The effect of a letter admitting that an applicant was marginal will likely result in the rejection of the applicant. However By far most applicants are rejected anyway

19. Negative Letter? The effect of a letter admitting that an applicant was marginal will likely result in the rejection of the applicant. However By far most applicants are rejected anyway and For subsequent letters, your word will be golden.

20. Can we – Should we – read between the lines?

21. Paul Grice: we expect people to answer questions with the strongest true and relevant statement. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Grice

22. Can we – Should we – read between the lines? Paul Grice: we expect people to answer questions with the strongest true and relevant statement. “North Carolina State has lost their last two games” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Grice

23. Can we – Should we – read between the lines? Paul Grice: we expect people to answer questions with the strongest true and relevant statement. “North Carolina State has lost their last two games” “John submits his assignments in a timely fashion.” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Grice

24. I like to see them rank the student as strongly as they can (e.g., top x% this year, top 3 in my career), and I like to see specifics: about skills and strengths. The rankings and comparisons are even more helpful if they can say a few words about what other students in the same equivalence class have done (e.g., "as good as students who have gone to Stanford and Princeton"). I would really like to see comparisons against specific named students, but I realize that for most schools, such comparisons are not very useful. If they're writing multiple letters, it'd be good to get rankings or equivalence classes among them, as well, but we never see this unless we specifically ask. Calvin Lin – TS Program Director

25. More specifically… Rank compare to peers and all students in past (with number of years) Address ability to learn on their own Address particularly talent in math, science, and CS Do they do things on their own? – programming projects? – do they extend the given projects? Are they the person of whom others ask questions? Mike Scott – TS Admissions Committee