Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

“Is God Dead?” “Is God Dead?” April 8, 1966. 2References Patrick Glynn, “God, The Evidence”, (1997) Gerald L Schroeder, “The Science of God” (1997) Newsweek.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "“Is God Dead?” “Is God Dead?” April 8, 1966. 2References Patrick Glynn, “God, The Evidence”, (1997) Gerald L Schroeder, “The Science of God” (1997) Newsweek."— Presentation transcript:

1 “Is God Dead?” “Is God Dead?” April 8, 1966

2 2References Patrick Glynn, “God, The Evidence”, (1997) Gerald L Schroeder, “The Science of God” (1997) Newsweek magazine, July 27, 1998, “Science finds God” Time magazine, December 4, 1995, “Evolution’s Big Bang” Various articles from the Internet and CD-ROM encyclopaedias

3 3Topics The Arguments for God Modern Science The Anthropic Principle Darwinism Medical Science Human Wisdom Conclusion

4 4 Tell-tale Signs “The heavens declare the glory of God; And the firmament shows His handiwork.” (Psalm 19:1)

5 5 Tell-tale Signs “ For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead, so that they are without excuse,” (Romans 1:20) “By faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God, so that the things which are seen were not made of things which are visible.” (Hebrews 11:3)

6 6Yet… “God is dead. God remains dead. And we have killed him.” Friedrich Nietzsche, “The Gay Science”, 1882 …killed by rationalism and science

7 7 God cannot be “proved” Atheist Paradigm Theist Paradigm You make your choice of your paradigm BY FAITH. Facts & Observations E = mc 2

8 8 A Diversity of Paradigms Creationists Theistic Evolutionists Theists Atheists Day-Age Gap Theory Darwinists “the world through wisdom did not know God” (1 Corinthians 1:21)

9 9 Faith is required “Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen.” (Hebrews 11:1) “But without faith it is impossible to please Him, for he who comes to God must believe that He is, and that He is a rewarder of those who diligently seek Him.” (Hebrews 11:6) A proven “God” no longer requires faith to be present.

10 10 Faith with reason Not a blind faith “always be ready to give a defense to everyone who asks you a reason for the hope that is in you, with meekness and fear” (2 Peter 3:15) “The fool has said in his heart, “There is no God.”” (Psalm 14:1) –So strong are the evidences that it is considered foolish to deny them.

11 11Objective Not to “prove” the existence of God, but to REASON to FAITH in the existence of God Look at some recent developments in science on the question of God

12 12 Philosophical Arguments for the Existence of God

13 13 Philosophical Arguments Arguments were developed long ago before the advent of “scientific” reasoning Based more on the thought process, appealing to human logical reasoning –Especially the ontological argument –Even the argument that design requires Designer Arguments lack “scientific” method and basis - hence, rejected by modern science

14 14 Philosophical Arguments The Ontological Argument The Intuitive Argument –The Moral Law –The Spiritual Man The Cosmological Argument - argument from “first cause” The Teleological Argument - argument from “final cause”

15 15 The Ontological Argument Think of as perfect an entity as you can possibly conceive –in attributes, intelligence, values, power, etc That entity is “God”. Does “it” exist? If not, it is not perfect enough. Concept of perfection must also necessarily include its existence! Hence, “God” exists. “that than which nothing greater can be conceived” (Anselm)

16 16 The Intuitive Arguments Man’s intelligence exceeds by far the next most intelligent species. Why? Because God made man in His image.

17 17 The Intelligence Gap Then God said, “Let Us make man in Our image, according to Our likeness; let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, over the birds of the air, and over the cattle, over all the earth and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth.” (Genesis 1:26) “I think, therefore I am.” (Descartes)

18 18 The Intuitive Arguments Man is a morally conscious being. Why? Because God put a sense of right and wrong into man. Man is a spiritually conscious being. Why? Because God made him that way.

19 19 The Moral Being “Gentiles… by nature do the things in the law, these…are a law to themselves, who show the work of the law written in their hearts, their conscience also bearing witness, and between themselves their thoughts accusing or else excusing them” (Romans 2:14-15)

20 20 The Spiritual Dimension “And He has made from one blood every nation of men to dwell on all the face of the earth, … so that they should seek the Lord, in the hope that they might grope for Him and find Him, though He is not far from each one of us;” (Acts 17:26-27)

21 21 The Cosmological Argument Advanced by Thomas Aquinas Cosmology concerned with “first cause”, i.e. origins Reasoning through causal argument (cause-effect relationship) to arrive at first cause. There cannot be an infinite regression of cause-effect. Hence, there is a “first cause”, i.e. a cause which itself is not caused by anything else.

22 22 The Cosmological Argument “First cause” is God, the Originator of all things “Who created God?” Nothing - because we cannot have infinite regression.

23 23 The Cosmological Argument This cosmos is an illusion  It is as real as it can be! This cosmos has always existed  This contradicts the second law of thermodynamics (entropy)! This cosmos came out from nothing  Nothing ever comes from nothing! This cosmos was created by a Creator  The only plausible alternative!

24 24 The Teleological Argument Advanced by philosophers such as Aristotle and Thomas Aquinas Teleology looks at the “final cause”, i.e.the end-product. Examples: –If a flower is end product, it is the final cause of the process of growth from seed to seedling into a plant that blossoms –If man is the end product, he is the final cause of the process of conception, gestation in the womb, and birth

25 25 The Teleological Argument Teleology - the doctrine that states that every design requires the existence of a designer. There is design, law, order and structure in the natural order of things. –A design cannot just materialise - much less beauty in nature without a Designer. –Laws cannot arise from chaos. –Order cannot arise from disorder through random processes. Hence, there must be a Designer - God! E = mc 2

26 26 Which First Cause? Possibilities Final Cause – Law, Order, Structure, Beauty, Design E = mc 2  This world is very real!  Plainly illogical Why should it happen?  Big Bang Entropy  So much Design cannot result from mechanistic chance.  The one and only logical option

27 27 Paley’s Watchmaker William Paley, 1743-1805

28 28 The Advance & Retreat of Naturalism

29 29 The March of Naturalism Advance started in the Renaissance In tune with the rise of Modern Science Tremendous boost in the Age of Enlightenment (19th century) “Advances” in multiple disciplines cast grave questions about God Each “advance” reinforced those made in other areas, thus strengthening the case against theism

30 30 Modern Science Strictly in accordance to mechanistic principle - no purposive principles in nature, no gods, no design No inherent moral or ethical laws - no absolute guiding principles; Man becomes ethical through heredity and the environment Death is the end Dr William Provine, historian of science, Cornell University, “Evolution and the Foundation of Ethics”, 1988

31 31 Scientific Rationality “The way science arrives at its beliefs is quite different from that of medieval theology.... Science starts, not from large assumptions, but from particular facts discovered by observation and experiment.” (Bertrand Russell, 1935) Hence, rejection of all that is not testable But does science answer everything and leave no room for faith?

32 32 An All-Front Assault Physical Sciences Biology Philosophy 5th Column Psychology Frontal Assault Rear Assault Flank Assault

33 33 The 5th Column The wolves in the midst of sheep (Acts 20:29-30) Modern religionists who deny: The Deity of Christ The Inspiration of the Bible Miracles of the Bible

34 34Besieged Abandonment of theism in face of fierce offensive by modernists Exclusion of Creation from school curriculum A world growing more atheistic Christianity besieged In 1966, Time asked “Is God Dead?”

35 35 Theism’s Counter-Offensive After 4 centuries of being beleaguered, theism gaining acceptance again Growing wealth of scientific data pointing to divine agency Growing support from believing scientists Modernists increasingly put on defensive footing

36 36 Modernism in Retreat Contributing Factors The Decline of Naturalism The Anthropic Principle The Death of Darwinism Intelligent Design Lessons from Medical Science Failure of Human Wisdom


Download ppt "“Is God Dead?” “Is God Dead?” April 8, 1966. 2References Patrick Glynn, “God, The Evidence”, (1997) Gerald L Schroeder, “The Science of God” (1997) Newsweek."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google