1. MMOVE Project TWG1 - Brighton, 24/25 February 2009 Identification and collection of the Best Practices Annex 1 BEST PRACTICE Collection Template 1) OBJECTIVES 2) STRUCTURE 3) TEMPLATE DEADLINE

2. MMOVE Project TWG1 - Brighton, 24/25 February 2009 Using both quantitative and qualitative data and analysis, the BP collection will be realized in order to:  Benchmark  Benchmark the process;  Learn  Learn from the previous experiences;  Develop practical data indicators to improve the learning process for the involved organizations;  Promote  Promote the discussion;  Assess the quality of findings; comparable results  Provide more comparable results; practical outcomes  Provide practical outcomes of the project; input MMOVE Policy tool box  Provide input to develop a guide/tool for similar contest (MMOVE Policy tool box); 1) OBJECTIVES

3. MMOVE Project TWG1 - Brighton, 24/25 February 2009 According to this approach, the BP collection will be realized submitting a standardized and shared format/ template, able to collect and gather homogeneous and comparable data, at different levels of detail. For those reasons the Best Practices collection template, structured in three different sections (A, B, C), represents the first tool to present the best practices within the following themes: Communication and awareness raising; Parking and traffic management and control; Public & collective transport; 1) OBJECTIVES

4. MMOVE Project TWG1 - Brighton, 24/25 February 2009 2) STRUCTURE  SECTION A – Background and information data  SECTION B – Urban Mobility and Environmental background  SECTION C – Best Practice Description General content of the section: objective, timing, … Indicator detail Blue call out Green call out

5. MMOVE Project TWG1 - Brighton, 24/25 February 2009 2) STRUCTURE BEST PRACTICES THEMES SELECTED BP N. 1 BP N. 2 MMOVE Please, select one of the following MMOVE themes: Communication & awareness raising; Parking traffic management and control; Public & collective transport;

6. MMOVE Project TWG1 - Brighton, 24/25 February 2009 1) GEOGRAPHYCAL and MORPHOLOGY DATA YEAR Municipality Area Flat (%)Hilly (%)Highland (%) TOTAL (Km2) Seaside Municipality? YE SNO Are there sea ports with ferry terminal? Lakes/inland waterways? YE SNO Are there river ports with ferry terminal? Population (abs. values) Population density (inhabitants /km2) Employment (abs. value) Employment (% value) The number of employee every 100 inhabitants Per capita income (Euro/year)  SECTION A – Background and information data 1/3 2) STRUCTURE To be filled out in preparation of Kick-off Meeting….. …..aimed to comprehend the situation of the Municipality of reference, detailing: geographic and morphological data; relevant mobility policies; socio-economic conditions…

7. MMOVE Project TWG1 - Brighton, 24/25 February 2009  SECTION A – Background and information data 2/3 2) SUSTAINABLE URBAN MOBILITY POLICIES National framework Regional framework Municipality framework Mobility Demand Management: Undertaken Actions Planning Pricing (i.e. pricing mechanism) Marketing & Information (i.e. thematic and awareness campaigns, web tool) Others 2) STRUCTURE ….background information, on the relevant sustainable urban mobility policies and their interconnections…. Focus on the selected Best Practice Themes Describe the actions undertaken to manage and direct the Mobility Demand, including any incentives and/or opportunities for the sustainable urban mobility policies.

8. MMOVE Project TWG1 - Brighton, 24/25 February 2009  SECTION A – Background and information data 3/3 3) SOCIO ECONOMIC DRIVERS YEAR N. Local Active Units in the Municipality (abs. values) Industrial Local Units Trade and services Local Units University/ Centres of Research SchoolTOTAL OF WHICH Public Institution (%) N. Employees per Local Unit (abs. values) – including non Municipality citizens Employees/ Industrial Local Units Employees/Trade and Services Local Units Students per University/ Centres of Research Students per School TOTAL OF WHICH Employees in Public Institution (%) N. Employees per Local Unit (abs. values) – Only Municipality citizens IDEM 2) STRUCTURE To comprehend the Municipality socio-economic conditions…

9. MMOVE Project TWG1 - Brighton, 24/25 February 2009 1) URBAN MOBILITY DATA in the MUNICIPALITY YEAR URBAN MOBILITY DEMAND Resident population for daily transfer and destination In the same municipality of residence Outside the municipality of residence Total Transfer off site % (Municipality) Motorization Rate (%) The number of private car every 100 inhabitants Systematic trips compared with the unsystematic one (%) The trips that, on average, each citizen makes during the day SystematicUnsystematic Number of daily trips per capita (%) The number of trips that, on average, each citizen makes during the day Trips Times (%) Minutes taken for the trips NoneUp to 15 minutes Up to 2 daily tripsFrom 16 to 30 minutes From 3 up to 4 daily tripsFrom 31 to 45 minutes Over 4 daily tripsFrom 45 to 60 minutes Over 60 minutes  SECTION B – Urban Mobility and Environmental background 1/5 2) STRUCTURE To be filled out AFTER the Kick-off Meeting, is aimed to comprehend the Urban Mobility situation for the Municipality of reference…regarding: Urban Mobility Demand; Urband Mobility Supply; Environmental background. Created to be aware of the citizens mobility choices and their daily routine…

10. MMOVE Project TWG1 - Brighton, 24/25 February 2009  SECTION B – Urban Mobility and Environmental background 2/5 2) STRUCTURE KM/per capita (%) The average distance covered by each citizen during the day Up to 500 mtSuburban From 500 mt to 2 KmExtra urban Urban>2 Km Modal Split (%) % relating to the different modes of transport considered RailCar (as passenger) TramCarpooling MetroCar-sharing Urban Bus, filobusMotorbike, moped Extra urban BusBike School busBy foot Car (by oneself and as driver)Other Daily mobility distribution (%) Hours 0-22-44-66-88-1010-1212-1414-1616-1818-2020-2222-24 Thinked to be aware of the citizens mobility choices and their daily routine…...besides, identify the mobility demand segments compared to distances, modal split as well the mobility daily distribution

11. MMOVE Project TWG1 - Brighton, 24/25 February 2009  SECTION B – Urban Mobility and Environmental background 3/5 URBAN MOBILITY SUPPLY Municipality road network (TOT Km) LPT Supply (Vehicle*km/inhabitants) Fleet Vehicle Typology (Local Public Transport fleet) DieselNatural GasElectricTOTAL LPT efficiency (Euro/vehicle*Km) LPT effectiveness (Users/ vehicle*Km) Urban PT fare for a single trip (Euro) BUS Lane (TOT Km) Car Park (%) With feeFree Park and Ride Space N.Capacity Cycle Lane (TOT Km) 2) STRUCTURE To analyse the Urband Mobility Supply, respect to infrastructural point of view and LPT services provided… … How much does it cost to provide the Local Public Transport service and use?

12. MMOVE Project TWG1 - Brighton, 24/25 February 2009  SECTION B – Urban Mobility and Environmental background 4/5 Bike Sharing N. Bike N. of Stations N. of Users Does Car-Sharing services exist in the Municipality? YESWith Local Organization YES Supplied at local level, but organized at National level YES Average trips monthly supplied (N.) NO Does Carpooling services exist in the Municipality? YESWith dedicated fast lane YESWith dedicated parking YES With local organization services YES With none dedicated solutions or services YES Number of Users (N.) NONone services 2) STRUCTURE Which kinds of services exist in the Municipality to… ….reduce the number of cars on the road? …. decrease pollution and the need for parking space? ….reduces greenhouse gas emissions? Who are the services promoters? How many citizens use it?

13. MMOVE Project TWG1 - Brighton, 24/25 February 2009  SECTION B – Urban Mobility and Environmental background 5/5 1)ENVIRONMENTAL BACKGROUND NOT GOODMEDIUMGOOD Pollution Noise Congestion Car Accidents 2) STRUCTURE This section has to provide a qualitative self-evaluation according to the European Environmental Policies, like i.e. the Green Paper on urban mobility (COM(2007) 551).

14. MMOVE Project TWG1 - Brighton, 24/25 February 2009  SECTION C – Best Practice Description 1/4 N. 1 BEST PRACTICE DETAILED DESCRIPTION – N. 1 Thematic: Best Practice Themes Ratio and Approach in the Undertaken Action Please explain the reasons which leaded the choice of the specific activities and the undertaken action. Detail the needs and critical points to be faced, the interventions formerly evaluated and if the action comes from a Bottom-up or Top Down approach (citizens participation, direct/indirect involvement, Local Agenda 21, focus group, round tables). Objectives and Target Please describe the focus of the project and primary objectives of intervention, including the target range (i.e. high school student, outliers..) and the expected target value. Financial Resources Please, describe the financial resources, and, if they not coming from the Municipality balance, but from private subjects (patronage, sponsorship..), specify how those resources have been activated. 2) STRUCTURE This section is aimed to provide a detailed description of the Best Practice. Given two best practices for each partner, this session has to be filled out two times according to the Best practices selected themes (BP N. 1 and BP N. 2). To explain the reasons of the undertaken action… the primary objectives, the target range, the expected target value…. the interventions formerly evaluated…, the approach.. Financial Resources …. specify how those resources have been activated….

15. MMOVE Project TWG1 - Brighton, 24/25 February 2009  SECTION C – Best Practice Description 2/4 Description of the intervention TECHNIQUE Please, describe the manner with which the intervention has been implemented and the information collected (i.e. using the available data and/or entering sample tests). METHOD How to do ACTIVITIES and PROCESS Please describe the implemented tasks, including the chronological order. SKILLS and BODIES INVOLVED Please, describe the skills involved in the interventions (i.e. consultants in mobility, ICT experts) and provide a list of the implicated bodies (i.e. Local public transport providers, enterprises, consortium and/or organization, public/ private bodies, employers..) INCENTIVES Please illustrate any incentives, received or/and made available (i.e. special fare for students/outliers, patronage/sponsorship..) 2) STRUCTURE To provide homogenous and comparable descriptions, describe… the technical aspects of the implemented intervention.. bodies and skills involved.. how the activities have been implemented and outputs carried out… the activities in chronological order… Any incentives?, (i.e. special fare for students/outliers..)…..

16. MMOVE Project TWG1 - Brighton, 24/25 February 2009  SECTION C – Best Practice Description 3/4 Technical Training Course/Training Phase Please explain if the undertaken action was supported by technical courses or training phases, and, if yes, which kind of information and/or abilities have been provided. Transferability Please specify the transferability level (high, medium or low) of the intervention and why. Output This section should give a detailed overview of the outputs realised. Please, describe the outputs in quantitative way compared with the starting context, specifying the direct impact on the Mobility indicators mentioned in SECTION B. Coherence Please describe the coherence of the intervention, according to the urban mobility policies listed in the SESSION A, point 2) “Sustainable urban mobility policies”. Critical points, constraints and further information Please, underline all peculiar aspects and problems you faced during the intervention. 2) STRUCTURE technical courses or training activities? outputs realised…..in quantitative way and compared with the starting context, specifying the direct impact on the Mobility indicators mentioned in SECTION B. The coherence of the intervention, according to the urban mobility policies listed in the SESSION A, point 2) Transferability level.. Any problems and constraints?

17. MMOVE Project TWG1 - Brighton, 24/25 February 2009  SECTION C – Best Practice Description 4/4 2) STRUCTURE Critical Success Factor Relevance (from 1 to 10) Political support and long-term commitment Public awareness Stakeholder Engagement Integrated Policy Funding (national, EU) Existing regional frameworks (Institutional, financial and legal) Public Private Partnership Co-ordinating organisations (on local level) Reporting/monitoring Location or facility eg accessibility of mobility centre Technical capacity of staff Standardised methodology Technology (Innovation and variation) Strategic Planning Experience/dedication (of staff) Conclusion FINALLY! evaluate the efficiency and effectiveness of the actions undertaken…. get an evaluation of the added value achieved.. Any problems for the involvement of the bodies, during the implementation phase? Any divergence from the planned results? Here, score the critical success factors according to their relevance for your experience…

18. MMOVE Project TWG1 - Brighton, 24/25 February 2009 3) TEMPLATE DEADLINE SECTION A – Background and information data SECTION B – Urban Mobility and Environmental background SECTION C – Best Practice Description KICK-OFF MEETING Best Practice Description Pps presentation PPs' MM policies presentation

19. MMOVE Project TWG1 - Brighton, 24/25 February 2009 CONTACTS Erika Fulgenzi Marche Region SVIM – Sviluppo Marche S.p.A Tel. +39.071.28994222 Fax 39.071.28994235 e-mail: efulgenzi@svimspa.itefulgenzi@svimspa.it Giovanni Romanini Marche Region SVIM – Sviluppo Marche S.p.A. Tel. +39.071.28994218 Fax 39.071.28994235 e-mail: gromanini@svimspa.itgromanini@svimspa.it

20. MMOVE Project TWG1 - Brighton, 24/25 February 2009 Thank you for your attention!!