1. Maximizing Reading Gains to Meet AYP Targets: Decision Support Analytics for School Board Providence School District, RI April 2014

2. 22 Presentation Overview Analyzing District Reading Academic Improvement Recommendations 9/9/20152

3. 333 District Reading Achievement Data

4. Reading Challenge 9/9/20154

5. Reading Challenge 9/9/20155

6. Reading Challenge 9/9/20156

7. Reading Challenge 9/9/20157

8. Deployment 9/9/20158

9. Estimated Tiered Intervention Metrics- Elementary * Please note: Core is the total number of students performing at Proficient. 9/9/20159

10. Estimated Tiered Intervention Metrics- Middle and High School * Please note: Core is the total number of students performing at Proficient. 9/9/201510

11. Estimated Tiered Intervention Metrics- School Totals * Please note: Core is total number of students performing at Proficient. 9/9/201511

12. Rhode Island Reading and Math Rigor Risk Rhode Island 2013 GroupNAEPRI StateVariance Grade 4 Reading47.0%69.0%22.0% Grade 8 Reading40.0%77.0%37.0% 9/9/201512

13. Providence, RI– Reading Risk Analysis Commentary for Providence School District, RI: Common Core’s goals of preparing all students to be college and career ready means reading on grade level. Proficiency on NAEP is specifically designed to be reading on grade level. In 2013, the difference between RI’s NECAP reading proficiency and NAEP reading proficiency ranged from 22 to 37 percentage points. This means that the average district in RI might expect a 22 to 37 percentage point decline in reading proficiency under a Common Core test that has reading on grade level as its proficiency cut point. This grid shows the impact of four scenarios on the number of students in Providence School District needing reading intervention. 9/9/201513

14. Why Scholastic Achievement Partners Academic Improvement Services Maximizing Student Gains to Meet AYP Targets Best Practices 20 years, 18,000 classrooms and over 1,200,000 students 9/9/201514

15. Next Practices for Driving Academic Improvement … What We’ve Learned … What the Research Shows Comprehensive Implementation Support and Monitoring Intensive and Tiered Intervention Instructional Excellence for All Teachers Strong Instructional Leaders 360 Degree Needs Assessment and Planning 9/9/201515

16. Planning Success  A focused plan with 2-3 primary goals  The plan is built on a comprehensive assessment of demographic, academic, economic, and human resource needs  Clear milestones that are tied to specific leaders and linked to a progress monitoring system with strong metrics  Adequate personnel and fiscal resources  Be prepared to make mid-course adjustments in these challenging times. 9/9/201516

17. Intensive & Tiered Intervention Assessment Data  Screening, progress monitoring, and summative assessments for all students  Assessments for reading for all students on a single vertical scale to measure both proficiency and growth trajectory Three Tiers for Reading Instruction  Tier #2-3: Intensive intervention treatment in foundational skills for ELL and Special populations  Tier #2: Intervention treatment for students below grade level  Tier #1: Core instruction  All three are linked to coherent K-12 curriculum 9/9/201517

18. Intensive & Tiered Intervention Intensive Implementation Support  Initial training for teachers and academic leaders  Ongoing, job embedded coaching for intervention teachers  Development of a cadre of coaches to build internal capacity to sustain the initiative Progress Monitoring Data  Individualized student skills data  Progress monitoring data  Usage data  Implementation fidelity data  Data that rolls up from student to class to school to district 9/9/201518

19. Professional Learning Instructional Excellence for All Teachers  Tailored approach based on specific teacher growth needs  Focused on high leverage areas  Curriculum  Effective Teaching Practices  Content Area Literacy  Effective Math Instruction  Sustained approach to build internal capacity  Blended model of delivery  Face to face  Job-embedded  Online 9/9/201519

20. Professional Learning Strong Instructional Leadership  Common agreement on a coherent curriculum and instructional goals  Individualized leadership growth plans  Building system-wide leadership capacity  Focus on high leverage leadership practices  Planning and goal setting  Observation  Data Analysis and Decision Making  Strong practices for mentoring and coaching 9/9/201520