Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byKenneth Collin Goodman Modified over 9 years ago
1
Study of negative ion surface production in caesium-free H 2 plasma PhD student: Kostiantyn Achkasov Tutors: Gilles Cartry and Alain Simonin 3 rd FUSENET PhD Event in Fusion Science and Engineering in Fusion Science and Engineering University of York, 23 rd - 26 th of July 2013
2
2 Fundamentals 3 rd FUSENET PhD Event in York: 26 th of June 2013 Controlled thermonuclear fusion is one of the most promising future energy sources
3
3 Fundamentals 3 rd FUSENET PhD Event in York: 26 th of June 2013
4
4 Fundamentals ITER is the world's largest experimental tokamak nuclear fusion reactor being built at the south of France Controlled thermonuclear fusion is one of the most promising future energy sources 3 rd FUSENET PhD Event in York: 26 th of June 2013
5
5 Fundamentals ITER is the world's largest experimental tokamak nuclear fusion reactor being built at the south of France Required electron temperature: 10 – 20 keV (~10 8 °C) only 1 keV can be achieved with Ohmic heating Controlled thermonuclear fusion is one of the most promising future energy sources 3 rd FUSENET PhD Event in York: 26 th of June 2013
6
6 Fundamentals ITER is the world's largest experimental tokamak nuclear fusion reactor being built at the south of France Required electron temperature: 10 – 20 keV (~10 8 °C) only 1 keV can be achieved with Ohmic heating Controlled thermonuclear fusion is one of the most promising future energy sources one needs additional heating methods! 3 rd FUSENET PhD Event in York: 26 th of June 2013
7
7 NBI for ITER NBI - neutral beam injection 3 rd FUSENET PhD Event in York: 26 th of June 2013
8
5.3 m 4.7 m 15 m 8 NBI for ITER 17 MW & 1 MeV of neutrals Total weight > 900 tons Calorimeter Bushing RIDNeutralizerIon source and accelerator NBI - neutral beam injection 3 rd FUSENET PhD Event in York: 26 th of June 2013
9
9 Why to use i - ? neutrals of 1 MeV are needed to heat the ITER plasma core and ignite the fusion reactions 3 rd FUSENET PhD Event in York: 26 th of June 2013
10
10 neutrals of 1 MeV are needed to heat the ITER plasma core and ignite the fusion reactions At such an energy: D + →0% D - → 56% of neutralisation efficiency Ion neutralization Why to use i - ? 3 rd FUSENET PhD Event in York: 26 th of June 2013
11
11 Ion neutralization Necessary D - current: ~ 50 A (250 A∙m -2 ) Why to use i - ? neutrals of 1 MeV are needed to heat the ITER plasma core and ignite the fusion reactions At such an energy: D + →0% D - → 56% of neutralisation efficiency 3 rd FUSENET PhD Event in York: 26 th of June 2013
12
12 new large i - source has to be developed! Ion neutralization Necessary D - current: ~ 50 A (250 A∙m -2 ) Why to use i - ? neutrals of 1 MeV are needed to heat the ITER plasma core and ignite the fusion reactions At such an energy: D + →0% D - → 56% of neutralisation efficiency 3 rd FUSENET PhD Event in York: 26 th of June 2013
13
Present i – source 13 i - source concept RF Driver 3 rd FUSENET PhD Event in York: 26 th of June 2013
14
i - surface production with Cs deposition has many drawbacks like diffusion of Cs inside the accelerator is presently the only way to meet ITER requirements 14 RF Driver Present i – source i - source concept 3 rd FUSENET PhD Event in York: 26 th of June 2013
15
Alternative solutions to the use of Cs would be highly valuable for the future fusion i - sources! 15 Present i – source RF Driver i - surface production with Cs deposition has many drawbacks like diffusion of Cs inside the accelerator is presently the only way to meet ITER requirements i - source concept 3 rd FUSENET PhD Event in York: 26 th of June 2013
16
16 Helicon reactor PHISIS H 2 and D 2 plasma P = 20 – 900 W no magnetic field p reactor = 0.2 – 2 Pa capacitively coupled plasma mode Experimental set-up Graphite sample Pump Pyrex tube Antenna Coils Mass Spectrometer Hiden EQP 300 3 rd FUSENET PhD Event in York: 26 th of June 2013
17
17 Experimental set-up Helicon reactor PHISIS H 2 and D 2 plasma P = 20 – 900 W no magnetic field p reactor = 0.2 – 2 Pa capacitively coupled plasma mode 3 rd FUSENET PhD Event in York: 26 th of June 2013
18
18 Langmuir probe Sample Experimental set-up Mass Spectrometer 3 rd FUSENET PhD Event in York: 26 th of June 2013
19
19 Measurement principle V MS Vs Vs VpVp Mass Spectrometer Plasma Sample E 0 3 rd FUSENET PhD Event in York: 26 th of June 2013
20
V MS Vs Vs VpVp Mass Spectrometer Plasma Sample 20 E 0 Negative ion distribution function (NIDF) Measurement principle 3 rd FUSENET PhD Event in York: 26 th of June 2013
21
21 Modeling of the NIDF 3 rd FUSENET PhD Event in York: 26 th of June 2013
22
22 Modeling of the NIDF SRIM: the stopping and range of ions in matter 3 rd FUSENET PhD Event in York: 26 th of June 2013
23
23 Modeling of the NIDF ×× Plasma transmission NIDF of i - emitted by the surface Surface Mass spectrometer transmission 3 rd FUSENET PhD Event in York: 26 th of June 2013
24
24 Modeling of the NIDF SRIM ×× Plasma transmission NIDF of i - emitted by the surface Surface Mass spectrometer transmission 3 rd FUSENET PhD Event in York: 26 th of June 2013
25
25 Modeling of the NIDF SRIM SIMION ×× Plasma transmission NIDF of i - emitted by the surface Surface Mass spectrometer transmission 3 rd FUSENET PhD Event in York: 26 th of June 2013
26
26 good agreement between F’’(E) and F measured (E) Modeling of the NIDF 3 rd FUSENET PhD Event in York: 26 th of June 2013
27
27 good agreement between F’’(E) and F measured (E) SRIM calculation: C-H layer with 30% of hydrogen on the surface Modeling of the NIDF 3 rd FUSENET PhD Event in York: 26 th of June 2013
28
NIDF study of different carbon materials 28 highly oriented pyrolitic graphite (HOPG) 3 rd FUSENET PhD Event in York: 26 th of June 2013
29
29 NIDF study of different carbon materials highly oriented pyrolitic graphite (HOPG) 3 rd FUSENET PhD Event in York: 26 th of June 2013
30
30 F”(E,θ) 30% H NIDF study of different carbon materials highly oriented pyrolitic graphite (HOPG) 3 rd FUSENET PhD Event in York: 26 th of June 2013
31
31 F”(E,θ) 30% H NIDF study of different carbon materials highly oriented pyrolitic graphite (HOPG) 3 rd FUSENET PhD Event in York: 26 th of June 2013
32
32 F”(E,θ) 20% H F”(E,θ) 30% H NIDF study of different carbon materials highly oriented pyrolitic graphite (HOPG) 3 rd FUSENET PhD Event in York: 26 th of June 2013
33
33 H coverage on HOPG decreases with temperature F”(E,θ) 20% H F”(E,θ) 30% H NIDF study of different carbon materials highly oriented pyrolitic graphite (HOPG) 3 rd FUSENET PhD Event in York: 26 th of June 2013
34
34 yield comparison NIDF study of different carbon materials 3 rd FUSENET PhD Event in York: 26 th of June 2013
35
35 yield comparison NIDF study of different carbon materials 3 rd FUSENET PhD Event in York: 26 th of June 2013
36
36 yield comparison NIDF study of different carbon materials % H 3 rd FUSENET PhD Event in York: 26 th of June 2013
37
37 yield comparison NIDF study of different carbon materials % H Boron-doped diamond: BDD 3 rd FUSENET PhD Event in York: 26 th of June 2013
38
38 yield comparison NIDF study of different carbon materials % H biasing problems below 400°C % H Intrinsic diamond: ID 3 rd FUSENET PhD Event in York: 26 th of June 2013
39
39 yield comparison % H Raman spectroscopy: sp 3 /sp 2 BDD sp 3 /sp 2 HOPG biasing problems below 400°C NIDF study of different carbon materials 3 rd FUSENET PhD Event in York: 26 th of June 2013
40
40 sp 3 /sp 2 phase ratio J. Robertson, Materials Science and Engineering, R37 (2002) Raman spectroscopy: sp 3 /sp 2 BDD sp 3 /sp 2 HOPG NIDF study of different carbon materials 3 rd FUSENET PhD Event in York: 26 th of June 2013
41
HOPG gives the highest i - yield at T room ID gives the highest i - yield at elevated T: 500°C Conclusions 41 3 rd FUSENET PhD Event in York: 26 th of June 2013
42
HOPG gives the highest i - yield at T room ID gives the highest i - yield at elevated T: 500°C proper use of MS diagnostic and modeling allows to determine H coverage on the sample surface Conclusions 42 3 rd FUSENET PhD Event in York: 26 th of June 2013
43
HOPG gives the highest i - yield at T room ID gives the highest i - yield at elevated T: 500°C proper use of MS diagnostic and modeling allows to determine H coverage on the sample surface MS combined with Raman spectroscopy shows: the phase ratio sp 3 /sp 2 changes when increasing T which alters the H surface coverage and the i - yield Conclusions 43 3 rd FUSENET PhD Event in York: 26 th of June 2013
44
HOPG gives the highest i - yield at T room ID gives the highest i - yield at elevated T: 500°C proper use of MS diagnostic and modeling allows to determine H coverage on the sample surface MS combined with Raman spectroscopy shows: the phase ratio sp 3 /sp 2 changes when increasing T which alters the H surface coverage and the i - yield New materials with the optimal sp 3 /sp 2 state have to be probed deeper understanding is crucial Conclusions 44 3 rd FUSENET PhD Event in York: 26 th of June 2013
45
Perspectives 45 3 rd FUSENET PhD Event in York: 26 th of June 2013 Next steps prove experimentally the H surface coverage change with T: Infrared Spectroscopy Temperature Programmed Desorption Spectroscopy
46
Perspectives 46 3 rd FUSENET PhD Event in York: 26 th of June 2013 Next steps prove experimentally the H surface coverage change with T: Infrared Spectroscopy Temperature Programmed Desorption Spectroscopy try out new materials: low work-function materials (Gd, Ba,...) large band-gap insulators (Si, GaAs,…)
47
Perspectives 47 Next steps prove experimentally the H surface coverage change with T: Infrared Spectroscopy Temperature Programmed Desorption Spectroscopy try out new materials: low work-function materials (Gd, Ba,...) large band-gap insulators (Si, GaAs,…) 3 rd FUSENET PhD Event in York: 26 th of June 2013 Final steps Final steps Test the chosen material in a real negative ion source (Cybele) equipped with an extraction device and a particle accelerator (MANTIS) in CEA-Cadarache
48
The End Thank you for your attention and time! 48 3 rd FUSENET PhD Event in York: 26 th of June 2013
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.