Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byAvis Lyons Modified over 9 years ago
1
Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe in der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Bianca KeilhauerTokyo, February 26th, 2004 Summary and Issues of Workshop, Bad Liebenzell, Dec. 2003
2
4 interesting days in December 2003 39 participants 25 presentations 10 projects ⇒ improvements in understanding the aspects of molecular physics and in experimental measurements http://www.auger.de/events/air-light-03/ Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe in der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Bianca KeilhauerTokyo, February 26th, 2004
3
Bianca KeilhauerTokyo, February 26th, 2004 Fluorescence Light - starting theory - A. N. Bunner: Cosmic Ray Detection by Atmospheric Fluorescence, PhD thesis 1967 Franck-Condon-Principle for absorption and fluorescence
4
Fluorescence from Nitrogen N2+N2+ Data from Bunner (1964) : weighted averages of three experiments with an accuracy of not better than ±30%. Kakimoto et al (1996) : 1.4MeV-1000MeV are mainly used in UHECR experiments. 1st Negative band 2nd Positive band N2N2 M. Nagano
5
Energy Spectrum M. Risse
6
Bianca KeilhauerTokyo, February 26th, 2004 conventional approach: R. Engel E. Marques Idea The „classic“ method of determination of N e (X) is subject to a purely geometrical correction due to the lateral spread of shower particles. Discussion on Fluorescence Yield of an EAS
7
ionization energy approach: R. Engel Bianca KeilhauerTokyo, February 26th, 2004 E. Marques Discussion on Fluorescence Yield of an EAS
8
Ionization energy deposit: problems Assumption - No clear experimental evidence - Precision of energy reconstruction will depend on fluorescence yield data Angular spread and definition of track length dX - Track length along shower axis - Actual track length of particles Energy loss in fluorescence yield experiments - Low energy ( E ≪ E c ): ionization loss - High energy: ionization and radiative losses (small cascades) - Detailed simulation of ionization energy deposit needed Calorimetric energy E cal not equal to total shower energy R. Engel
9
Air light 03 Dependencies Processdependenceparameters Deposed Energy By Ionisation Incident particle Air density E, nature P,T QuenchingQuencher density N 2 or N 2 + T, P O 2, P H 2 O,(λ) Process Decay Time dependenceparameters Fluorescence τFτF Band width λ Internal Quenching τ IQ Temperature T, (λ) Collision Quenching τCτC Molecular speed Air density P, T Measured dependencies today : only E, P and λ Macfly project : P O 2, P H 2 O, (T, nature) Excitation Desexcitation P. Colin
10
Excitation processes The C 3 u electronic state is a forbidden state; it cannot be directly excited by fast charged particles. E lim (C 3 u ) = 11.03 eV P.I. = 15.6 eV W ~ 36 eV M. Fraga H. Brunet, PhD thesis, UPS,Toulouse,1973 Brunet PhD: http://www.auger.de/events/air-light-03/#phd_brunet
11
Fluorescence Light EAS excites N 2 molecules in air 18 transitions in 2P system between 300 and 400 nm 1 transition in 1N system between 300 and 400 nm Calculation follows the principle way suggested by A. Bunner, 1967 ⇒ quantum efficiency of fluorescence = with and B. Keilhauer
12
Fluorescence Efficiency with p/p‘ ν for air (79% N 2 and 21% O 2 ): B. Keilhauer
13
sum in the region 300 – 400 nm 337,1 nm ≙ ① 357,7 nm ≙ ② 391,4 nm ≙ ③ fluorescence efficiency (photons/MeV) height (km) @ 0 km: ① + ② + ③ = 65,7% @ 20 km: ① + ② + ③ = 63,2% 31,8% 25,3% 8,6% 29,2% 23,3% 10,7% Fluorescence Efficiency Profiles B. Keilhauer
14
Electron impact cross sections for N 2 and O 2 Pitchford and Phelps, MagBoltz Qd rot vib ion exc-S exc-T el. att vib ion Dashed curves - excitations Magboltz -CERN M. Fraga
15
Bianca KeilhauerTokyo, February 26th, 2004 E kin (MeV)< 0.10.1 - 11 -1010 - 100100 -1000> 1000 Contr. (%)10122335173 source e - - gune - from 90 Srbeam from accelerator experiment Arqueros, Madrid, < 30 keV Ulrich, Munich, 12 keV Nagano, Fukui Univ. Waldenmaier, AirLight Gorodetzky, Paris Colin, MacFly 1. phase Fraga, LIP-Lisboa Kemp, Campinas 1. phase 2. phase: medical acc. 5-12 MeV Privitera, AIRFLY, e ± - beam at BTF, 50-750 MeV Colin, MacFly 2. ph., e ± / μ- beam at CERN 25-100 GeV Reil, Flash, e - - beam at SLAC 28 GeV Kemp, 2. ph., e - -beam at LNLS 1.37 GeV
16
Photon yields vs Bethe-Bloch Nagano et al. Astroparticle Phys. (2003) FY seems to be proportional to dE/dx for E > 0.8 MeV. FY seems to be proportional to dE/dx for E > 0.8 MeV. dE/dx grows fast at low energies. Does this relationship hold at very low energy? dE/dx grows fast at low energies. Does this relationship hold at very low energy? F. Arqueros
17
Preliminary set-up: the collision chamber Nd:YAG collision chamber gas inlet Faraday cup or scintillator PMT UV filter photodiode/trigger Digital Scope HV (0 – 30 kV ) vacuum pump Differential pumping (up to 100 mtorr) 1 PMT ORIEL 77348 (single counting) + UV filter Digital scope (1 ns) F. Blanco and M. Ortiz vacuum pump Electron beam features Energy up to 30 KeV. Pulse Rate = 1 – 20 Hz Time width = 20 ns (limited by the laser / plasma). Intensity up to 200 mA peak. Beam diameter 2 mm. Some stability problems !! F. Arqueros
18
Bianca KeilhauerTokyo, February 26th, 2004 High-precision Measurements of Experts for „Particle beam induced light emission“ A. Ulrich Energy deposition in the gas (1 bar Ar) Modelled using the „Casino“ Program P. Drouin, A.R. Couture, R. Gauvin, P. Hovington, P. Horny, H. Demers, Univ. de Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada (2002) Parameters for low energy electron beam excitation: Particle energy:typically 15 keV Foil:300 nm silicon nitride Gas:typically 0.1 to 2 bar Beam currentcw typ. 10 μA av. (0.15 W) or pulsed
19
Usage of the membranes: (principle)Diagnostics and gas system: Time resolved optical spectroscopy Grating monochromators (f=30cm, 0.03 nm resolution 1.order) Wavelength range ~30 nm to 700 nm Time resolution ~10ns beam pulses, ~1ns electronic res. Detectors VUV-PMT,VUV MCP and diode array Sensitivity measurements: two WI-17G Lamps (OSRAM) and D 2 arc-lamps (Cathodeon) Gas pressure 0 to ~ 2 bar (foil: 10 bar) Gas mixing system with hot-metal gas purifiers (rare gases) Capacitive manometers (MKS Baratron) A. Ulrich
20
III. Preliminary results from air Spectra: Overview, 1 bar, ~12 keV electron beam excitation Preliminary result. Needs to checked! Assignment: High resolution spectrum: A. Ulrich
21
Bianca KeilhauerTokyo, February 26th, 2004 E kin (MeV)< 0.10.1 - 11 -1010 - 100100 -1000> 1000 Contr. (%)10122335173 source e - - gune - from 90 Srbeam from accelerator experiment Arqueros, Madrid, < 30 keV Ulrich, Munich, 12 keV Nagano, Fukui Univ. Waldenmaier, AirLight Gorodetzky, Paris Colin, MacFly 1. phase Fraga, LIP-Lisboa Kemp, Campinas 1. phase 2. phase: medical acc. 5-12 MeV Privitera, AIRFLY, e ± - beam at BTF, 50-750 MeV Colin, MacFly 2. ph., e ± / μ- beam at CERN 25-100 GeV Reil, Flash, e - - beam at SLAC 28 GeV Kemp, 2. ph., e - -beam at LNLS 1.37 GeV
22
Electron beam Electron beam 90 Sr ( 28.8y ) β 90 Y ( 64.1h ) 90 Zr β 2.28MeV 3.3MBq average 0.85MeV 99.98% 0.02% 1.75MeV M. Nagano
23
A and B of various bands M. Nagano ⇒ For details: N. Sakaki --- right after this presentation
24
AirLight Experiment Goals precise measurement of the... → pressure dependence → temperature dependence → effect of water vapor → effect of oxygen and argon Filters [nm]: 317, 340, 360, 380, 394, 430, M-UG6 T. Waldenmaier
25
S. Klepser Interference Filters Theory → CWL of filters should be 1-2 nm above the observed wavelength. Effective Transmission Curves → „Effective Transmission Curve“ for every Filter can be averaged. Rel. Error using 0°-Transmission > 20 % Rel. Error using eff. Transmission < 7 %
26
Probes (T, P) Gaz injection “integral” PMT (PMT #2) Plastic scintillator Focusing lensSpectrometer Source : 90 Sr Fluorescence zone Scintillator PMT (PMT #1) Spectrometer PMT (PMT #3) Source holder Bench Diagram PMT #1 below measures the 90Sr spectrum generates gates PMT #2 integral EUSO configuration [300- 400 nm] wavelength PMT #3 in spectrometer 1nm bandwidth G. Lefeuvre
27
Air light 03 Macfly specificities Key point: Real electromagnetic shower study Shower = Σ component electrons ?? Study of new dependencies : Composition and contaminant (Macfly 1) Mainly : O 2 Percentage and Humidity Shower Age (Macfly 2) Event by event measurement: Low electron density like in air shower. P. Colin
28
Results : primary scintillation of N 2 P = 10 5 Pa; T = 296 K; = 9 nm 2 nd pos. system H. Brunet, PhD thesis, UPS, Toulouse, 1973; (2.8 MeV) M. Fraga
29
Quenching by water vapor: 0-0 band intensity decreases with increasing concentration of water vapor. Atmospheric pressure was assumed. M. Fraga Plans for the future Measurement of band intensities of the 2nd positive system as a function of pressure and temperature; Study of the role of water vapor on the light yields and on the emission spectra. Participation in the tests at CERN in the SPS beam facility - proposal submitted by the Annecy group (Ref:MacFly-MEMO-01 of 11/24/2003)
30
Chamber Configurations Radioactive Source Particle Beam e-e- E. Kemp
31
Relative Efficiency Gas Filling: Dry Air → N 2 Y i = N E / N P N E : coincidence excesses N P : particle detector counting i : gas type Y air Y N2 Y N2 / Y air = 5.1± 0.3 Kakimoto et al., NIM 372A, 527 (1996) ~ 5.6 E. Kemp
32
Bianca KeilhauerTokyo, February 26th, 2004 E kin (MeV)< 0.10.1 - 11 -1010 - 100100 -1000> 1000 Contr. (%)10122335173 source e - - gune - from 90 Srbeam from accelerator experiment Arqueros, Madrid, < 30 keV Ulrich, Munich, 12 keV Nagano, Fukui Univ. Waldenmaier, AirLight Gorodetzky, Paris Colin, MacFly 1. phase Fraga, LIP-Lisboa Kemp, Campinas 1. phase 2. phase: medical acc. 5-12 MeV Privitera, AIRFLY, e ± - beam at BTF, 50-750 MeV Colin, MacFly 2. ph., e ± / μ- beam at CERN 25-100 GeV Reil, Flash, e - - beam at SLAC 28 GeV Kemp, 2. ph., e - -beam at LNLS 1.37 GeV
33
Beam monitoring with the calorimeter Calorimeter counts single electrons 1 e- 2 e- 3 e- 4 e- pedest. The calorimeter is used for absolute and relative beam intensity measurement (<1000 e-/bunch) ADC counts Time*24 (s) P. Privitera
34
Energy dependence of fluorescence yield Limited by multiple scattering on 1.5 mm thick exit Al window. The scan went down to 50 MeV. Preliminary N p.e. (fluor.) ADC cal x E/442 UG6 filter The scan was performed several times with consistent results. Positrons (493 MeV) gave same yield within 3% P. Privitera
35
Air light 03 CERN Beam simulation CERN-SPS-X5 : 50 GeV electron beam Macfly1 Macfly2 100 e - of 50 GeV Only 1 e - of 50 GeV Electrons Positrons P. Colin
36
⇒ For details: J.N. Matthews --- right after the coffee break K. Reil
37
Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe in der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Bianca KeilhauerTokyo, February 26th, 2004 Exchange of already existing theoretical knowledge Exchange of practical solutions for experiment „everyday life“ Fruitful discussion, even during night in the cellar Setup of an exchange platform on internet currently under construction http://www.auger.de/events/air-light-03/
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.