Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

ELISA STONE, GEORGE JOHNSON & RYAN SHIBA CAL TEACH BERKELEY UTEACH CONFERENCE MAY 2014 Surviving and Thriving Post-Replication.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "ELISA STONE, GEORGE JOHNSON & RYAN SHIBA CAL TEACH BERKELEY UTEACH CONFERENCE MAY 2014 Surviving and Thriving Post-Replication."— Presentation transcript:

1 ELISA STONE, GEORGE JOHNSON & RYAN SHIBA CAL TEACH BERKELEY UTEACH CONFERENCE MAY 2014 Surviving and Thriving Post-Replication

2 Session Outline I. Maintaining Course Fidelity II. Securing Funding & Taking on New Initiatives III. Program Evaluation & Research IV. Preparing for Leadership Transitions V. Continuing with UTeach Network

3 Introductions  How many of you are in cohort I? II?  How many are in other cohorts, and are here to plan ahead?  Any UTeach Austin representatives?  Others?

4 Context: Cal Teach Berkeley Cohort 1 Courses offered (14-15) 4 Step 1 4 Step 2 5 Step 1/2 3 K&L 3 RM 2 all others Interdepartmental Budget $1 million UC-system wide effort

5 Growth in Course Enrollment

6 Movement through Pipeline YearTotal Unique Students Step 1 Minor/Cre dential 9-10234--1/0 10-11274-774/1 11-12239-4212/10 12-133801636030/11 13-1438822212830/12 14-1550028517540/25

7  How can we balance curriculum development and instructor autonomy with maintaining course fidelity? I.

8 Maintaining Course Fidelity Rationale:  Maintain course objectives  Coherency of course sequence  Campus course approval  CA state accreditation  Alignment with other UTeach campuses

9 Maintaining Course Fidelity Successes:  Regular faculty meetings, 1:1 meetings  UTeach course materials & meetings  Collaboration with Berkeley Graduate School of Education Challenges:  Instructor turnover  New accreditation mandates from state  New funding initiatives

10 Sharing Ideas across UTeach sites

11 Discussion I: Maintaining Course Fidelity  How DO YOU balance curriculum development and instructor autonomy with maintaining course fidelity?

12  What have we found to be effective for securing funding?  How can we take on new initiatives without overextending staff capacity? II.

13 Securing Funding & New Initiatives Successes:  Grants- federal & private foundation  State support for Cal Teach staff; Campus support for instruction  Cross-campus collaborations  Seed money, eg. Strategic plan, UTeach induction, technology Challenges:  Sustaining funding/Long term support  Institutionalizing staff positions  Saying ‘NO’ to great new ideas  Time investment for development, eg. Private donors

14 Discussion II: Funding  What have YOU found to be effective for sustaining funding?  How ARE YOU taking on new initiatives without overextending staff capacity?

15 III.  How can we carve out time for program evaluation and research?

16 Program Evaluation & Research Successes:  Interest from staff and master teachers  Hold regular research meetings to keep projects going  Grad student involvement from School of Education  Awarded experimental credential program status by state Challenges:  Time  Credibility  Data organization & IRB maintenance  Fund raising in this area in particular—we need a dedicated staff member

17 Discussion III.  How DO YOU carve out time for program evaluation and research?

18 IV. Leadership Transitions  At Cal Teach Berkeley:  The Dean for Mathematical & Physical Sciences, who was directly involved with the start of Cal Teach, is stepping down July 1  UC Berkeley has a new Chancellor (last June) and Provost April), neither of whom are from STEM fields  One co-director has been on sabbatical this year  The other co-director is planning a sabbatical in 2015-2016

19 IV. Leadership Transitions  How have other programs fared through such transitions?  How can programs prepare for leadership changes?  Is there an effective model for such transitions?

20 V.  How have we benefited from continued participation in the UTeach network?

21 In final stage of replication:  Implementing student teaching pathway in addition to intern teaching  Attentive to expanding pipeline  In final year, we were asked to put several structures in place that had been challenging for us, eg. Course prerequisites, Step 1/2 combination Post-replication:  Accountable for data collection  Invaluable advice  Access to course websites, workshops, annual meeting, national student organization, & funding opportunities Benefits of UTeach network

22  Other thoughts?


Download ppt "ELISA STONE, GEORGE JOHNSON & RYAN SHIBA CAL TEACH BERKELEY UTEACH CONFERENCE MAY 2014 Surviving and Thriving Post-Replication."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google