1. PROJECT MEMBERS DANIEL GUSTAVSSON DANIEL GUSTAVSSON CECILIA HÅKANSSON CECILIA HÅKANSSON FREDRIK MANNESSON FREDRIK MANNESSON PAVAN KUMAR VADLA PAVAN KUMAR VADLA DANIEL WENDIN DANIEL WENDIN PRINCIPALS SVENSKA BOSTÄDER SVENSKA BOSTÄDER NCC PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT NCC PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT PRINCIPAL PARTNER NETCOORD NETCOORD PROJECT COACH PAWEL WIATR PAWEL WIATR

2. CONTENTS BackgroundGoals Approach to project Identification of services General model Conclusions Problems faced Further tasks Summary

3. BACKGROUND Different companies providing different services on different networks No common communication standard High costs to lay the networks Lock-in effects Difficult to adopt new services Problematical to manage the networks remotely

4. GOALS Identify which services that could be accommodated on a single IP-based network Make a technical specification and calculation of the requirements for such a network Calculate the cost for the network, based on the whole life-cycle for the network

5. APPROACH TO PROJECT Field studies and meetings Contacting companies and institutions Reading material of previous work within the field Web research

6. IDENTIFICATION OF SERVICES Building automation - management & control ~ Ventilation, heating, air conditioning ~ Ventilation, heating, air conditioning ~ Individual measurement of electricity and water ~ Individual measurement of electricity and water ~ Lighting ~ Lighting ~ Fire and security systems ~ Fire and security systems ~ Access control ~ Access control Computer communication TelephonyTelevision Bulletin systems

7. GENERAL MODEL -I

8. GENERAL MODEL - II

9. CONCLUSIONS Non-availability of ideal/standard solution IP solutions for telephony and TV IP solutions for building automation exist to some extent ~ Diversity of solutions Unified solution by putting together separate solutions

10. PROBLEMS FACED Lack of IP-based products Lack of IP-based products ~ IP not always optimal solution ~ Economical issues Regulative and insurance issues Regulative and insurance issues ~ Separate cabling for fire and security systems systems

11. FURTHER TASKS Collect some more information Analyze the information we have ~ Existing solutions – which is most feasible ~ Existing solutions – which is most feasible ~ Which services are compatible ~ Which services are compatible Evaluate limitations on IP-based products Life-cycle cost analysis

12. SUMMARY IP-based solution possible to certain extent Benefits of project ~ Easy accommodation of new services ~ Easy accommodation of new services ~ Avoiding lock-in effects ~ Avoiding lock-in effects ~ Making systems more flexible & compatible with each other ~ Making systems more flexible & compatible with each other Challenges of project ~ Lack of IP-based products ~ No ideal solution