Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Obtaining Evidence through Discovery & Witnesses John W. McReynolds Assistant Chief New York Field Office Antitrust Division U.S. Department of Justice.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Obtaining Evidence through Discovery & Witnesses John W. McReynolds Assistant Chief New York Field Office Antitrust Division U.S. Department of Justice."— Presentation transcript:

1 Obtaining Evidence through Discovery & Witnesses John W. McReynolds Assistant Chief New York Field Office Antitrust Division U.S. Department of Justice John.McReynolds@usdoj.gov

2 Today’s Topics Overview of U.S. Cartel Enforcement Detecting Cartels Investigative Tools & Evidence Gathering

3 “Per Se” Criminal Antitrust Violations Agreements among Horizontal Competitors to: Fix Prices Rig Bids Allocate Markets

4 “Per Se” Criminal Antitrust Violations Price Fixing –Raise, fix or otherwise agree on prices –This includes: Agreeing on discounts Eliminating discounts Fixing credit terms Maintain certain price differentials between different quantities, types or sizes of products Others

5 “Per Se” Criminal Antitrust Violations Bid Rigging –Bid rotation or allocation –Complementary or “cover” bids –Bid suppression

6 “Per Se” Criminal Antitrust Violations Allocation agreements –Specific customers or types of customers –Geographic territories –Type of product

7 Elements of a “Per Se” Antitrust Crime General Intent Agreement is the Crime No Overt Act No Proof of Price Impact

8 U.S. Penalties For offenses committed on or after June 22, 2004 Individuals - 10 Years in jail & $1 million fine Corporations - $100 million fine Alternative Fine = Double Gain or Loss

9 Other Crimes Committed By Antitrust Defendants & Prosecuted By the Antitrust Division Mail & Wire Fraud Conspiracy Tax Evasion Perjury & False Statements Obstruction of Justice

10 DETECTING CARTELS Nature of Crime — Secret Conspiracy Hidden from Law Enforcement and Victims

11 DETECTING CARTELS Conditions Favorable to Collusion Few firms Standardized products High entry costs Products do not have close substitutes Bidding process may be involved Seasonality

12 DETECTING CARTELS Sources of Leads Amnesty & amnesty plus applicants Cooperators in unrelated crimes Other geographic areas Dissatisfied employees Competitors Customers Referrals from other agencies Civil cases Newspapers

13 Key is Proactive Outreach Efforts –Make sure they know who you are Law firms Other agencies & investigators Educate those working directly in the marketplace DETECTING CARTELS

14 What do we tell these groups to look for? –Suspicious statements –Suspicious bid patterns –Suspicious pricing patterns –Suspicious conduct

15 DETECTING CARTELS Suspicious Statements –A customer or territory “belongs” to a supplier –“We don’t sell in that area” –It was a supplier’s “turn” to win –Reference to industry or association price list –Advance knowledge or prediction of a competitor’s prices

16 DETECTING CARTELS Suspicious bid patterns –Same company always wins –Sellers take “turns” winning –Few competitors submit bids –Bids are much higher than previous bids by the same supplier –Bid prices appear to drop whenever a new or infrequent bidder submits a bid

17 DETECTING CARTELS Suspicious pricing patterns –Suppliers charge identical prices –Suppliers increase prices at same time without cost justification –Suppliers are charging higher prices to local customers than to distant customers –Suppliers eliminate discounts

18 DETECTING CARTELS Suspicious conduct –A bidder appears in person to submit bid & also submits a competitor’s bid –A successful bidder repeatedly subcontracts work to competitors that submitted higher bids –Competitors regularly socialize together –Competitors hold meetings or otherwise get together in the vicinity of the procurement offices shortly before bid deadline

19 DETECTING CARTELS Suspicious conduct –Company submits bid for work it can’t do –Bids contain last minute changes –Similar irregularities on bid form

20 INVESTIGATIVE TOOLS & EVIDENCE GATHERING Recordings Documents Interviews

21 INVESTIGATIVE TOOLS & EVIDENCE GATHERING Recordings –Consensual Telephone calls Body wires Video taping –Non Consensual Wiretapping – new legislation

22 INVESTIGATIVE TOOLS & EVIDENCE GATHERING Documents (including computers) –Search & seizures –Subpoenas

23 INVESTIGATIVE TOOLS & EVIDENCE GATHERING Search & seizures –Warrant signed by a judge –Probable cause

24 INVESTIGATIVE TOOLS & EVIDENCE GATHERING Search & seizures: what & where to search –Offices –Homes –Brief cases –Computers

25 INVESTIGATIVE TOOLS & EVIDENCE GATHERING Search & seizures: what to seize –Email with competitors –Correspondence with competitors –Calendars –Meeting notes –Bid documents –Pricing documents

26 INVESTIGATIVE TOOLS & EVIDENCE GATHERING Subpoenas –If no search: same documents Email with competitors Correspondence with competitors Calendars Meeting notes Bid documents Pricing documents

27 INVESTIGATIVE TOOLS & EVIDENCE GATHERING Additional documents –Corporate structure –Information on officers & those with pricing authority Personnel file Wages Calendars & address books Name of secretaries –Financial statements –General ledger, cash disbursements, sales journals –Cancelled checks –Telephone records –Trade association

28 INVESTIGATIVE TOOLS & EVIDENCE GATHERING Form of documents –Originals –In original order –In original folders –Electronic data

29 INVESTIGATIVE TOOLS & EVIDENCE GATHERING Document control –Custodian –Log –Chain of custody Create databases Review promptly Compliance

30 INVESTIGATIVE TOOLS & EVIDENCE GATHERING Interviews –Who –Circumstances

31 INVESTIGATIVE TOOLS & EVIDENCE GATHERING Who to interview –Informants/amnesty applicants –Former employees –Competitors –Customers –Subjects Least culpable companies Lowest level employees

32 INVESTIGATIVE TOOLS & EVIDENCE GATHERING Circumstances of interviews –No notice: drop in interviews –Voluntary: no lawyer –Voluntary: informal immunity, with lawyer –Compelled: formal immunity –Proffer?

33


Download ppt "Obtaining Evidence through Discovery & Witnesses John W. McReynolds Assistant Chief New York Field Office Antitrust Division U.S. Department of Justice."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google