1. Office of Legacy Management 2014 Status Report September 15–18, 2014. Stephen Donivan Laboratory Coordinator The S.M. Stoller Corporation, A subsidiary of Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc. Contract Number DE-LM0000415 ASP 2014 Workshop

2. Office of Legacy Management Organization 2 Office of Business Operations (LM-10.0) Benefits Continuity Team LM-10.1 Archives and Information Management Team LM 10.2 Planning, Budget, and Acquisition Team LM 10.3 HR/Administration Team LM 10.4 Office of Site Operations (LM-20.0) UMTRCA/NVOS Team LM-20.1 RCRA/CERCLA/FUSRAP Team LM-20.2 Asset Management Team LM-20.3 Office of the Director (LM-1)

3. Legacy Management Office Location Map 3

4. Site Count by Regulatory Type and Category 4 TypeSite Count CERCLA/RCRA8 D&D (Decontamination and Decommissioning )5 FUSRAP (Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program ) 29 UMTRCA (Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act ) Title I 30 UMTRCA Title II6 Nevada Offsites9 Other11 Total98 Category 1: Activities typically include records-related activities and stakeholder support. Category 2: Activities typically include routine inspection (any site visit needed to verify the integrity of engineered or institutional barriers) and monitoring/maintenance, records- related activities, and stakeholder support. Category 3: Activities typically include operation and maintenance of active remedial action systems, routine inspection (any site visit needed to verify the integrity of engineered or institutional barriers) and monitoring/maintenance, records-related activities, and stakeholder support.

5. Legacy Management Site Location Map 5

6. CERCLA/RCRA Sites 6 Fernald, OH Site Laboratory for Energy Related Health Research, CA, Site Maxey Flats, KY Monticello, UT, Disposal and Processing Sites Mound, OH, Site Pinellas County, FL, Site Rocky Flats, CO, Site Weldon Spring, MO, Site SiteSamples per Year Fernald1850 Monticello320 Mound550 Pinellas280 Rocky Flats2100 Weldon Spring530

7. Nevada Offsites 7 Amchitka, Alaska Chariot, Alaska Rio Blanco, Colorado Rulison, Colorado Salmon Site, Mississippi Central Nevada Test Area, Nevada Shoal Site, Nevada Gasbuggy Site, New Mexico Gnome-Coach Site, New Mexico Special Analytical Requirements: Actinide isotope analyses of biota samples Carbon-14 and tritium in natural gas samples Accelerator mass spectrometry: C-14, Cl-36, I-129 Low-level tritium by the enrichment method

8. UMTRCA Disposal and Processing Sites 8 There are 36 Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA) Title I and Title II processing or disposal sites managed LM. Twenty-two inactive uranium ore-processing sites were remediated resulting in the creation of 19 disposal cells. These sites are location on or near tribal lands: Mexican Hat, UT; Monument Valley, AZ; Riverton WY; Sherwood, WA; Shiprock, NM.

9. UMTRCA Sites Analytical Challenges 9 Contaminants of Concern: Ammonia Chloride Nitrate Sulfate Metals (As, Cd, Se, Mo, U, V, others) Shiprock Groundwater Sample Results AnalyteAction LevelConcentration, mg/L Manganese2.742.7 Nitrate/Nitrite as N100.07 Selenium0.050.002 Sulfate200013,000 Uranium0.0440.42 Calcium 480 Chloride 640 Magnesium 2000 Potassium 130 Sodium 2900 TDS 24,000

10. Legacy Management Sites 10 There are 98 sites managed by LM. There are 44 sites that have analytical support requirements. There are 40 sites identified for transfer to Legacy Management over the next 10 years.

11. Analytical Services Contracts 11 Analytical services were procured utilizing the ICPT Basic Ordering Agreement along with an LM-specific requirements document. Contracts were awarded March 2008. The total dollar amount of the contracts for FY2013 was 758K. FY2014 estimated total is 770K. Other contracts for special analytical services and site-specific requirements are established as needed.

12. Laboratory Data Errors 12 Common Laboratory Data Quality Errors Samples switched, improperly labeled at log-in or during extraction / digestion. Sample results from multiple analyses at different dilutions are not in agreement indicating a dilution error. Sample analyzed at multiple dilutions. Analyst’s hand-written notes misinterpreted during data entry resulting is a dilution factor error.

13. Laboratory Data Errors 13 Data are from multiple laboratories Data are from multiple sites

14. Data Quality and Defensibility 14 Data Quality Sample integrity Effective procedures and processes Analyses performed correctly Results reported correctly Effective review Data Defensibility Logbooks Procedures Expired standards / calibrations Traceability Qualifications and training

15. Opportunities for Improvement 15 Data Quality Communicate problem areas to the audit team before the audit. Review the laboratory’s customer complaints to identify systematic errors. Prioritize audit areas of review. Data quality first, data defensibility second.

16. DOECAP Participation 16 Legacy Management has three DOECAP auditors, one lead auditor. Quality Assurance Management Systems and General Laboratory Practices Data Quality for Organic Analyses Data Quality for Inorganic and Wet Chemistry Analyses Data Quality for Radiochemistry Analyses Laboratory Information Management Systems/Electronic Data Deliverables Hazardous and Radioactive Materials Management