1. 1/37 September 9, 2010 Macao, China Kamoto Report of WGH

2. 2/37 Progresses of WGH AOP 2010Progresses of WGH AOP 2010 New Proposed Projected and WGH AOP 2011 Budget for WGH 2011Budget for WGH 2011

3. 3/37 Date 6 ~ 8 Sept. 2010 Participants 23 from 10 Members (China, DPRKorea, Japan, Laos, Malaysia, Philippines, ROKorea, Thailand, USA, Viet Nam) and ESCAP, TCS

4. 4/37 Objectives 1.To exchange information on priorities and key areas 2.To review progress of the AOP 2010 3.To consolidate achievements of priority projects 4.To identify priority and strategic needs of the TC Members 5.To propose budget for WGH in 2011

5. AOP1: On-the-job Training on Flood Forecasting between TC members AOP2:Urban Flood Risk Management in TC region AOP3: Assessment System of Socio-economic Impacts of Water-related Disasters for Infrastructure AOP4:Hazard Mapping for Sediment-related disasters AOP5: Establishment of Flood Disaster Preparedness Indices 5/37 Progresses of AOPs 2010

6. 6/37 AOP1 On-the-Job Training on Flood Forecasting for TC members  KRA 1, 6 and 7  Driver: Malaysia  Launched in 2002  To be closed in 2010

7. 7/99 OJT Objectives gain knowledge, appreciation and experience on use of the Tank Model for flood forecasting ； gain knowledge, appreciation and experience on use of the Tank Model for flood forecasting ； configure a flood forecasting model based on the Tank Model for a selected catchment in the participant’s country ； configure a flood forecasting model based on the Tank Model for a selected catchment in the participant’s country ； calibrate the Tank Model and preparing the model for operational use in the participant’s respective organization ； calibrate the Tank Model and preparing the model for operational use in the participant’s respective organization ； develop expertise in writing simple macros (MSExcel) to automate model computations – a skill which can be used to customize the model and further enhance the model in the future. develop expertise in writing simple macros (MSExcel) to automate model computations – a skill which can be used to customize the model and further enhance the model in the future.

8. 8/37 Main Benefit to Trainees understand the concept of the Tank Model in simulating flood runoff.understand the concept of the Tank Model in simulating flood runoff. configure and calibrate a Tank Model for a river basin in the participant’s country.configure and calibrate a Tank Model for a river basin in the participant’s country. develop expertise in simple programming techniques which is useful for future continual enhancement of the model which is to be expecteddevelop expertise in simple programming techniques which is useful for future continual enhancement of the model which is to be expected

9. 9/37  The 1 st OJT: 21 Jan – 28 Feb. 2008  The 2 nd OJT: 01– 31 Dec. 2008  The 3 rd OJT: 21 July – 23 Aug. 2009  The 4 th OJT: 12 July~ 06 Aug. 2010

10. 10/37 Participants at the OJTs TC MembersDID 1 st OJT2--Philippines, Vietnam5 2 nd OJT3--China, Laos, Vietnam7 3 rd OJT3--China, Laos, Thailand16 4 th OJT3--China, Laos, Vietnam15 11 trainees from TC Members11 trainees from TC Members 43 trainees for Malaysia43 trainees for Malaysia

11. 11/37 Funding TCTFMalaysia 1 st OJTUS$2000 RM49,870 (~US$14,200) 2 nd OJTUS$3000 RM49,860 (~US$14,200) 3 rd OJTUS$3000 RM49,520 (~US$14,100) 4 th OJTUS$3000 RM49,520 (~US$14,100) TotalUS$11,000US$42,600

12. 12/37 Participating Members (China, Laos, Philippines, Thailand, Vietnam) submit report of OJT to TCS before the end of December, 2010. TCS prepare a thanks-letter to DID, Malaysia before TC 43rd Session.

13. 13/37 AOP2 Urban Flood Risk Management (UFRM) in TC region  KRA 1, 2, 4 and 5  Driver: China  Duration: 2008-2011 (4 years)  On-going project

14. 14/37 Major Footprints 2008 September IWS in Beijing - Proposed by MWR China as a new WGH project 2009 January41 st Annual Session in Cheng Mai - Confirmed as new project - Decision to survey TC WGH Focal Point 2009 SeptemberIWS in Cebu - Introduced results of survey by MWR China 2009 December Telecom of WGH AWG meeting in Macao - Discussed Mechanism and Major activities

15. 15/37 Major Footprints (Cont.) 2010 January 42 nd Annual Session in Singapore - Confirmed as cross-cutting project of TC - Decision to survey 3 Members (China, Japan and R. of Korea) as good practice on UFRM (Side meeting) - Decision to have a Task Force (TF) Meeting - Decision to consult with ESCAP to fund an expert meeting of UFRM and the possibility of contracting consultants to push forward the project. 2010 July Expert (TF) Meeting in Bangkok - Finalize the Roadmap - establishment of the Task Force for UFRM 2010 September 5 th TC IWS in Macao

16. ChinaJapanR. o. Korea WGM WGH WGDRR 16/37 Questionnaire for collecting good practiceQuestionnaire for collecting good practice Progress in 2010 TC Circular Letter to: Shanghai (China) Yokohama (Japan) Ansung (R. of Korea)

17. Good practices in urban flood management a To establish the comprehensive urban flood management strategy To highlight the land use planning. b To enhance meteor-hydrological monitoring, forecasting and warning to provide timely, accurate and all-sided information support to the urban flood management. c To build up various dissemination ways of flood warning information to individual residents e To apply flood hazard/risk map widely as an important technique of urban flood preparedness. d To emphasize on the function of retarding basins and discharge ponds in the urban flood management f

18. 18/37 TC UFRM Expert (TF) MeetingTC UFRM Expert (TF) Meeting UNITED NATIONS ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMISSION FOR ASIA AND THE PACIFIC Strengthening regional cooperation towards flood resilient cities considering climate change: ESCAP/WMO Typhoon Committee Meeting on Urban Flood Risk Management Project 19-20 July 2010 Bangkok

19. 19/37 12 representatives from TC Members: China; Hong Kong, China; Japan; Macao, China; Philippines; Republic of Korea; Thailand and Vietnam; 3 resource persons from International Centre for Water Hazard and Risk Management (ICHARM), Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) and the ESCAP publication on Innovative Strategies for Flood Resilient Cities; 15 representatives from UNDP, UN/ISDR, UNOCHA, ADPC, ESCAP, WMO and TCS. Participants

20. 20/37 Topics for discussion  Project Overview and Information exchange  Mechanism of implementing UFRM  Selection of Pilot Cities for the UFRM  Activities of next steps −Make clearly Objectives, Target areas and Outputs −Roll of Task Force −Roll of National Focal Points in Pilot City −Support groups −Financial Resources

21. 21/37  Background information on UFRM as the cross- cutting project among the 3 TC Working Groups was introduced by Chair of WGH;  The analysis of the questionnaire on good practices of UFRM project of 3 cities: Shanghai, Yokohama and Busan was reported by project leader;  Representatives from Philippines, Viet Nam, Thailand and Macao made the presentation on the impacts of flooding in Manila, Hanoi, Hat Yai and Macao. Project Overview

22. 22/37 Support Groups ESCAP, WMO UFRM TF Chairs Vice-chairs TCS National Focal Point of P.C. TC AWG Typhoon Committee Structure of UFRM project (draft) - Report to TC Session - Guidebook (Pilot Studies) (Recommendations) (Good Practice Inventory) (Useful materials) - Guidance material - Advice - Materials - Analysis -Contribute to other TC Members Observer Coach Player - Consultation - Workshop - Information - Results - Outputs - Advice -Fund Rising - Project Formation Supporter - Advice - Materials - Advice - Materials - Advice - Materials - Fund Mechanism of Implementing UFRM

23. 23/37 The Terms of Reference (TOR) of TF 1.The main objective of the Task Force is to provide technical advisory to the cross cutting project of UFRM, including the following activities: a)Inventory of good practices b)Develop manual for implementation of the project c)Provision of technical advisory for pilot case studies. 2. The Task Force will also create guidance material for UFRM based on the good practices and the pilot city studies, which can be used in other countries.  Objective of Task Force

24. 24/37  Structure and Organization of TF 1)The Task Force consists of the three chairs and vice-chairs of the three Working Groups of TC, and TC Secretariat. 2)The chair of the WGH is the leader of the Task Force. 3)Support Groups which are approved by the Task Force can participate, fund and give advice to the pilot case studies. 4)Activities of Task Force members will be supported by in- kind contribution of Task Force members, however, contributions from donors are to be sought. In kind contribution from TC members and interested partners is encouraged. 5)The Task Force will be coordinated and supported by the Advisory Working Group (AWG) of TC.

25. 25/37  Reporting of TF The Task Force is required to provide timely progress report at TC session and seek advice when necessary.

26. 26/37 Pilot Cities of UFRM Project  The criteria for selecting pilot cities: 1)Cities which their national focal points are willing to conduct studies and have agreed on using the study result in the guidance material; 2)Cities which were frequently affected by floods or storm surges induced by typhoons; 3)Cities which are socio-economically and environmentally important in their countries, as well as in the region or areas. The pilot case studies will be implemented by national focal points, based on the manual for implementation of the project, with supports from various sources.

27. 27/37  Four pilot Cities and the contact persons: 1)Metro Manila, Philippines, Dr. Susan R. Espinueva, 2)Hanoi, Viet Nam, Ms. Nguyen Lan Chau 3)HatYai, Thailand, Mr. Thosakdi Vanichkajom 4)Macao, China, Mr. TANG Iu Man

28. 28/37 receiving the technical advices in view of reducing urban flood risk in the city in perspectives of meteorology, hydrology, disaster risk reduction as well as TC members such as exchanging the experiences on members’ good practices; potentially receiving financial support to hold workshop on urban flood risk reduction from Support Groups of UFRM; receiving the technical advices and the latest information from TC network on specific topics as requested by the cities; and receiving TC-AWG’s support to liaise with donors on urban flood risk reduction projects formulation.  The Pilot Cities will be benefited by:

29. 29/37 TC is suggested to seek the further technical cooperation or funding support from UN agencies, international organizations, private companies or individuals as Support Groups of UFRM. 1)WMO, ADPC, ADRC, ICHARM and JAXA were initially proposed as support groups of the project; 2)MLIT-Japan, MLTM- RoK, JICA, KOICA, ADB, WB- GFDRR also are suggested as the potential Support Groups, Although we need negotiation in advance. Support Groups of UFRM Project

30. 30/37 excellent opportunity to show their visibility in the TC network; excellent opportunity to introduce their knowledge, technology and system to reduce flood risk in the pilot cities; excellent information on urban flood risk management in the pilot cities in perspectives of meteorology, hydrology, disaster risk reduction as well as their well-planned collaboration, e.g. other TC Members’ good practices; and opportunities to participate in the workshops on urban flood risk reduction which are organized and supported by the Support Groups of UFRM.  The Support Groups will be benefited from:

31. 31/37  September 2010 Task force (TF) prepare and discuss draft guidance material for pilot study; Send invitation of pilot study to TC Members; Send invitation letter to potential support group (SG). Confirmation of Pilot Cities (PC);  January 2011 Finalize of guidance material for pilot study and sent it to PC; Confirmation of SG.  March 2011 PC prepare the implementation plan in consultation with TF; Implementation of pilot study (TF members visit PC).  January 2012 TF reports to the Annual TC Session Timeline of UFRM project

32. ActivitiesPeriod Responsibility - Draft inventory of good practices (information to be provided by Rep. of Korea) July-SeptChina - Task Force (TF) prepare overall plan (draft project document) July-Aug Deadline IWS Task Force (TF) - Send invitation to potential Support Groups (SG) JulyTCS - Resource mobilization (SG) Start in SeptTCS - Confirm Pilot Cities (PC) Sept.TCS - Desk study/Review of PC (starting from September) Sept/DecESCAP - TF prepare and discuss guidance material for pilot study July-Dec TC Session TF - Finalize guidance material for pilot study and send it to PC Jan, 2011TF - PC prepare the plan in consultation with TF March2011TF - TF provide additional information/advice 2011TF - Implement pilot study (TF member visit PC) March, 2011PC - TF report to Annual session Jan 2012TF 32/37 Activities of Next Steps of UFRM

33. 33/37 ESCAP is ready to provide USD 5,000 for consultancy on the desk review of the proposed cities. The money must be spent by the end of this year. ESCAP will seek funding to suppot TF member mission to PC in 2011 Small meeting in June/July...

34. 34/37 AOP3 AOP3 Assessment System of Socio- economic Impacts of Water-related Disasters for Infrastructure  KRA 1, 2, 4 and 5  Driver: Republic of Korea  Duration: 2008-2012 (5years)  On-going project ---- Korean side is arranging one-day WS. on Jan. 2011

35. 35/37 to establish the assessment system of flood control measuresto establish the assessment system of flood control measures To develop the highly applicable system for international cooperation among m ember countries.To develop the highly applicable system for international cooperation among m ember countries. to analyze socio-economic impacts of fl ood control measures, and to present st andards for selecting an optimal alterna te.to analyze socio-economic impacts of fl ood control measures, and to present st andards for selecting an optimal alterna te. The purpose

36. 36/37 Assessment system construction Integrated and consistent process construction for the assessment and deduction of flood control measures Construction of program and user manual available in domestic and abroad region Objective assessment & deduction Objective assessment and deduction of flood control measures Socio-Economic impact analysis Multilateral consideration of flood damage Construction of independent shell program Integrated Assessment system Suggesting reasonable standards of flood control measures Integrated assessment system completion of flood control measures Expected results

37. 37/37 Investigation of domestic and foreign flood control assessment system and establishment of plans D/B, module, and system construction Damage estimation and economic module construction Flood control assessment system 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Module design of the system and module D/B design Present status analysis & establishment of plans Requirements analysis of users and analysis of structural measures System construction Inside module construction Maintenance and utilization Framing the plans for maintenance and utilization Project schedule

38. 38/37 AOP4 Hazard Mapping for Sediment-related disasters  KRA 1, 2, 4 and 5  Driver: Japan  Duration: 2009-2011  On-going project

39. 39/37 To develop & modify a method to designate area with high risk of sediment-related disasters To apply the method to some pilot areas of TC Member Objective Fig. Conceptual image of identification of area with high risk of sediment- related disaster caused by debris flow. In case of JAPAN Government controls developments in area where are designated as the “Special Sediment- related Disaster Hazard Area”. And government releases information on sediment-related disaster through Internet, TV and so on.

40. 40/37 Progresses 1 st year (2009) –Japan distributed a draft of guideline and opened THD. –Member countries selected model sites. Guideline Help-Desk China Hongkong, China The Philippines Thailand United States Japan

41. 41/37 2 nd year (2010) –Field Training (priot to 5 th TC IWS) –Member countries draw hazardous area in the model sites. –Discuss technical problems at WS. 3rd year (2011) –Members countries make Hazard map. –Publish the guideline to reduce damage of sediment-related disaster and to spread Japanese technique in Typhoon Committee Region. Plan in next year

42. 42/37 AOP5 Establishment of Flood Disaster Preparedness Indices  KRA 1, 2, 4 and 5  Driver: Japan  Duration: 2009~2011  On-going project

43. 43/37 When facing disasters, while role of central government is important, in many countries, assistance from the central government is often insufficient and not timely.When facing disasters, while role of central government is important, in many countries, assistance from the central government is often insufficient and not timely. Therefore enhancing disaster preparedness level of local Governments/communities is the key for flood management, by objectively checking/assessing the basic requirement items.Therefore enhancing disaster preparedness level of local Governments/communities is the key for flood management, by objectively checking/assessing the basic requirement items. It is necessary to develop and apply common and convenient tools to assess and measures the level of flood preparedness level of LGs.It is necessary to develop and apply common and convenient tools to assess and measures the level of flood preparedness level of LGs. There is, however, no well-structured set of widely recognized indicators that can be used for periodical self- assessment by local governments.There is, however, no well-structured set of widely recognized indicators that can be used for periodical self- assessment by local governments. Target: Improvement of disaster preparedness level of local governments

44. 44/37 Development and application of commonly applicable indices possibly by questionnaire survey

45. 45/37 Requirements for FDPI Designed for self and periodical self- assessment by local governmentsDesigned for self and periodical self- assessment by local governments Usable for both developing and developed countriesUsable for both developing and developed countries Should be assessed objectively by available data/information and avoid arbitral evaluation by different evaluatorsShould be assessed objectively by available data/information and avoid arbitral evaluation by different evaluators Indicators need to be appropriately weighed for detecting weakness factorsIndicators need to be appropriately weighed for detecting weakness factors Useful for not only LGs, but also for national governments and donor communities for identifying support needsUseful for not only LGs, but also for national governments and donor communities for identifying support needs For positive spiral of disaster management cycle

46. 46/37 Indicators could be compiled and tested e.g. According to disaster management cycle MITIGATION RESPONSE PREPAREDNESS RECOVERY 1. General questions 2. Mitigation 3. Preparedness 4. Response 5. Recovery

47. 1. Before the IWS at Macao; ICHARM, lead organization of this Flood Disaster Preparedness Indices (FDPI) project, had developed a set of disaster preparedness indices (a questionnaire survey including 78 points to be checked). At the same time, ICARM acquired the web site at http://www.fdpi.jp/fdpi/ where proposed questionnaire survey will be taken.http://www.fdpi.jp/fdpi/ 2. During Macao IWS; Japan will present in detail the configuration of questionnaire set together with introduction of the usage of newly-opened web-page from where questionnaire surveys will be taken. TC Members are then requested to cater this info. to disaster managers in many municipalities/communities in each territory. 3. By end-2010; Questionnaire survey will hopefully be participated by numerous number of municipalities/communities in TC members. Answers will be compiled and processed by ICHARM. Municipalities/communities will receive from ICHARM results of overall situation paper for flood preparedness level in TC region, as well as diagnosis report of flood preparedness level of each participating body. Project Timeline for 2010

48. We have just prepared the site http://www.fdpi.jp/fdpi/ -Terms and Condition -78 questions - Confirmation and sending

49. 49/37 New Proposed Projected and WGH AOP 2011

50. 50/37 1. Assessment of the Variability of Water Resources Impacted by Climate Change  KRA:  Proposed driver: Philippines  Proposed in: 2009 at Cebu IWS  New Proposed Project

51. 51/37 To promote the actions of local government bodies/ communities to strengthen the level of preparedness and adaptation measures for problems on water resources impacted by Climate Change. Objective

52. 52/37 Philippine side was encouraged to prepare a proposal for 2010 Integrated Workshop. To be discussed further

53. 2. Satellite-based information utilized on reducing water-related disaster risks  KRA: 1, 4, 5, 6  Driver: ESCAP  Proposed Duration: 2010-2012  New Proposed Project

54. Seek the possibility, find the solution and utilize space- based technology application to water-related DRR. Concept Utilize newly developed space- based technology application to water-related disaster risk reduction (DRR) by the mutual cooperation. Objective

55. Draft project plan First step(2010): Hold a workshop to ---- Share the information of newly developed space-based information technology status and the issues of water-related disaster risks; ---- Seek the utilization possibility of the space- based information technology to reduce water- related disaster risks

56. Second step (2011; draft): ---- Find solutions of the issues Third step (2012; draft): ---- Make the load map and/or handbooks to apply the space-based information Enlarged images of the swollen rivers at Shadan Lund (324 square km, left: August 6, 2010; right: October 2, 2009) provided by JAXA. http://www.eorc.jaxa.jp/ALOS/en/img_up/dis_opt_pakflood_100806.htm

57. Draft topics of the workshop on 7-9 December 2010 @ Bangkok Driver/Cordination: ESCAP Utilization potential of Satellite-based information on reducing water-related risks (JAXA, ICHARM, ….) Issues of water-related disaster management to utilize space-based information (TC members) Discussion to find potential solutions to apply the space-based information.

58. Workshop Concept IFAS Application Satellite-based Information Disaster Risk Management ESCAP/WMO Typhoon Committee /Meteorology WG /Hydrology WG /Disaster Prevention and ｐ reparedness WG GSMaP Sentinel Asia /Disaster images and maps /GFAS web-site /MTSAT web-site Ground-based Information

59. Draft Schedule of the Workshop (i)ICHAM will hold the topics of introduction and usage of Integrated Flood Analysis System (IFAS) taking one and a half day. (ii)JAXA will introduce the Sentinel Asia system which provides the disaster related information and Global Satellite Mapping of Precipitation (GSMaP). Report of the WS will be made at TC Session in Jan. 2011.

60. Preparation Schedule of the Workshop 25 Sept: ESCAP will send the invitation letters to TC members with/without travel cost. 30 Sept: ICHARM will send the invitation letters to candidate agency with/without travel cost. 15 Oct: Close the participant response. 7-9 Dec: The workshop in Bangkok.

61. AOP1:Urban Flood Risk Management in TC region AOP2: Assessment System of Flood Control Measures on Socio-economic Impacts AOP3:Hazard Mapping for Sediment-related disasters AOP4: Establishment of Flood Disaster Preparedness Indices AOP5: Assessment of the Variability of Water Resources Impacted by Climate Change AOP6: Satellite-based information utilized on reducing water-related disaster risks 61/37 WGH AOP 2011 WGH AOP 2011

62. 62/99 Budget for WGH 2010

63. 63/37 Item2011 1 Support to attend Integrated Workshop (IWS) $10,000 2 UFRM TF and PC WS for 3 cities$9000 SubtotalUSD19,000

64. 64/37 Thanks “The Shapers of New Asia” “They include YOU and ME….”