1. Sources and Beam Lines of Canadian Light Source Emil Hallin Canadian Light Source (material organized and presented by D.T. Jiang)

2. First Phase CLS Beamlines 7 beam lines are funded and approved by the CLS Facility Advisory Committee (Facility Diagnostic Line #1: BM, visible light) Far IR (BM) Mid IR Spectromicroscopy (BM) Soft X-ray Spectromicroscopy (Elliptical Undulator) SGM (Undulator) VLS-PGM (Undulator) Protein Crystallography (Small Gap in- vacuum U) Hard X-ray microXAFS (Wiggler, Ec=10.7keV)

3. Main Hall Floor plan

4. Mezzanine Level Expansion Zone - Beamlines Lab Reserve Office Reserve Offices & Labs

5. High Resolution Far IR Spectroscopy PI: Bob McKellar: Robert.Mckellar@nrc.ca Wavelength range: 10-200  m, 0.006-0.13 eV, 50-1000 cm -1 Resolution: < 0.001 cm -1 Endstation: –High resolution Fourier Transform spectrometer –Sensitive FIR detectors; liquid He cooled –Gas Phase work: Coolable long-path cell Multi-pass electric discharge cell High temperature absorption cell Supersonic jet expansion chamber –High pressure: diamond anvil cell, focusing optics, bench & alignment tools –Surface & interface studies: UHV chamber, sample preparation and manipulation, 100  m spot size

6. Mid IR Spectromicroscopy Mike Jackson: mike.jackson@nrc.ca Wavelength: 1.5-15  m, 0.08-0.8 eV, 700-6000 cm -1 Spatial resolution: < 5  m

7. IR Beamlines

8. First Mirror Concept

9. 02B1.1 Mid IR Schematic

10. 02B1.1 Mid IR Floor Layout

11. 01B1.1 Far IR Schematic

12. 01B1.1 Far IR Floor Layout

13. Brightness 100 mA

14. Soft X-ray Spectromicroscopy PI Adam Hitchcock: aph@mcmaster.ca Wavelength: 6-60 Angstrom, 250-1900 eV Insertion device: EPU (AppleII, ESRF termination) Infinity corrected entrance slitless PGM with vertical dispersion plane Optics: grating (SX700 style) & zone plate Resolution: 3000 or better Endstation: STXM + PEEM

15. *16.2 (15.0) 177 o 5 1.5 6 M1 M2 G(1-3) PGM 6o6o STXM 3 exit slit 3 3 M4 PEEM 1 PEEM 177 o 6o6o exit slit 1.5 M3 STXM M3 PEEM EPU Feature XES SM Optical Layout

16.  Variable polarization: arbitrary linear 150-2000eV, circular- 100-1000eV  Infinity corrected PGM: STXM at long arm branch (preserved brightness), PEEM (exchangeable) on short (preserve flux)  Nominal energy resolving power 3000, may be increased till 7000  Intensity on sample: STXM-10 8 ph/s at 40nm, PEEM-10 12 ph/s in  40   Stable operation even for CLS 2005 e- beam parameters SM Optical Description

17. SGM and VLS PGM PI T.K. Sham: sham@uwo.ca SGM Wavelengths: 200 – 1900 eV PGM Wavelengths: 5.5 – 250 eV SGM Resolution: 3000 PGM Resolution: 10000 Optics: grating monochromator Endstations: UHV Capabilities: photoemission, XAFS Both preliminary design reports are complete

18. Insertion Devices SGM- 44 mm PPM device ~1.2 m long PGM- 185 mm PPM device ~1.8 m long 1.25 mrad total canting between devices Preliminary designs for both devices complete

19. Protein Crystallography PI Louis Delbaere: Louis.Delbaere@usask.ca Wavelengths: 1.9 – 0.68 Angstrom, 6.5 – 18 keV Resolution: 1.6 x 10 4 using Si(220) Typical Crystal size: 20 – 50  m Design goal: flux of 10 13 photons/sec into a 50 x 100  m area Design will be modeled after beamlines at SBC- CAT and SER-CAT (APS). Preliminary design is almost complete.

20. Protein Crystallography Beamline Layout (Based on the Design of SER-CAT/APS)

21. Small Gap Undulator Brilliance Per =4.5 cm, N=26 (L=1.19m), B 0 =0.843T, K max =3.54

22. Micro-XAFS Superconducting Wiggler Parameters:  = 0.033 m Magnet Period Length N = 35.5Number of Periods B = 1.9 TMagnetic Field K = 5.91K Parameter Front End Aperture: 1 mrad (H) x 0.24 mrad (V) Ray-tracing shows that the XAFS focus is ~1050  horizontal (FWHM) x ~257  vertical (FWHM) in size. The Kirkpatrick-Baez mirror pair reduces this down to ~[14-19]  horizontal (FWHM) x [6-9]  vertical (FWHM), using bent elliptical cylinders. PI De-Tong Jiang: jiang@usask.ca

23. Wiggler Brilliance DTJ Note: This is from the first hybrid design concept, total power SR there would have been 23 kW. Gave up and switched to Superconducting design. The new design is at least another factor of 2 better yet half the total SR power. Smaller SR horizontal fan of course.

24. Flux at Sample (Shadow tracing) Photon Energy (keV) Photon Flux (photons/second) @  -probe Focus: [14-19]  horizontal (FWHM) x [6-9]  vertical (FWHM) 51.21 x 10 13 101.94 x 10 13 151.61 x 10 13 209.12 x 10 12 302.36 x 10 11 401.02 x 10 7

25. Micro-XAFS photon flux

26. Summary of CLS BL Status First 7 lines scheduled operation time: Jan. 2004 Preliminary designs for most of the first 7 lines are complete Tendering process has been started on beamline and endstation Instrumentation Phase I Insertion device preliminary designs are completed Front ends conceptual design completed

27. CLS Design Parameters Circumferencem170.88 Periodicity12 Optics x (tune) y  x (natural chromaticity)  y Momentum compaction 10.22 3.26 -13.9 -17.7 0.0038 Straights center Number Length  x (betatron)  y  (dispersion) mmmmmmmm 12 5.2 8.5 4.6 0.15 RFFrequency Total voltage MHz MV 500 2.5 E (energy)GeV2.9 B dipole T1.354 Damping times xyzxyz ms 2.4 3.8 2.7 E-loss/turnMeV0.876 DipolesTotal Rad. SR PowerkW@500mA438 Rad. SR Power per meterkW/m9.76  x (emittance) nm-rad17.8  (energy spread) %0.11 Bunch length (full)ps54

28. CLS Reference Specifications

29. CLS Source Point Sizes and Machine Functions

30. Bending Magnet Brilliance

31. Bending Magnet Total Flux

32. Wiggler Total Flux

33. Small Gap Undulator Flux

34. Cell 6 Block diagram layout Cell 6 includes the following beamlines, none of which are as yet approved: Hard X-ray Microprobe Powder diffraction CSRF DCM replacement

35. Cell 6 Elevation concept layout

36. Cell 7 Block diagram layout

37. Cell 7 Elevation concept (XAFS Center line)

38. Cell 7 Elevation concept (Sidestation)

39. FLUX 100 mA

40. EPU (conceptual design is issued, no significant influence on machine) Front End (Duplex, conceptual design is issued) Following ALS co-development: M1 mirror (Glidcop), PGM, Mirror manipulator for M1-M4: eng. drawings and part order spec. Vacuum chambers and supports for mirrors need to be designed. PEEM (ordered, summer 2002), STXM (engineering design due to April 02) Exit slits, vacuum equipment, electronics, maintenance/ commissioning equipment- commercial SM AutoCAD layout

41. Heat load estimation for CSRF SGM at the CLS

42. Progress Report: (11B1.1) Medium Energy X-ray Facility Beamline (DCM) Updated Calculations 1. Photon flux curves 2. Resolution curves [InSb(111),Si(111)] 3. Resolution from SHADOW Design specification has been written: “Engineering Request for Finite Element Analysis (FEA)/Design of Double Crystal Monochromator beamline crystal cages” Submitted to CLS Engineering (Dan Lowe). Possible Outsourcing: 1. Instrument Design Technology 2. Physical Sciences Laboratory 3. Advanced Design Consulting, Inc. 4. Oxford Danfysik Preliminary design report is still being written. October, 2001  Overlap with Lijun Lu

43. Photon Flux on sample The theoretical photon flux (photons/second) on sample for a 500 mA beam at the Canadian Light Source in 2008. InSb(111) crystals were used in the calculation from 1750-3700 eV, while Si(111) crystals were used above this photon energy. Below ~2100 eV the harmonic filter mirror (M5) was “in” place, while above this photon energy it was assumed to be moved “out”. The two curves illustrate the expected photon flux on sample for the conditions of the carbon filter being “in” place, then “out”.

44. Theoretical resolution (FWHM) and s-polarization peak % reflectivity for Si(111) and InSb(111) crystals The theoretical DCM resolution (FWHM) and s-polarization peak % reflectivity for Si(111) and InSb(111) crystals in parallel orientation (+,-) versus photon energy. The calculated resolutions and reflectivities are based on the combination of both crystals in this configuration.

45. Comparison of resolution at the experimental focus: SHADOW versus XCrystal (XOP) Comparison of the resolution at the experimental focus calculated by SHADOW using a continuous photon energy input, with that from XCrystal (XOP), for 1840 eV. InSb(111) crystals were used in parallel orientation (+,-) for the calculations.

46. Protein Crystallography Endstation