1. Mu2e WGM 9/15/2010 R. Ray Mu2e Project manager

2. L2 Systems and Managers R. Ray - Mu2e WGM2 1.2 Accelerator S. Werkema FNAL 1.3 Conventional Construction T. Lackowski FNAL 1.4 Solenoids M. Lamm FNAL 1.5 Muon Channel S. Feher FNAL 1.6 Tracker A.Mukherjee FNAL 1.7 Calorimeter Stefano Miscetti Frascati 1.8 Cosmic Ray Veto C. Dukes UVa. 1.9 Trigger and DAQ M. Bowden FNAL 1.1 Project Management R. Ray FNAL Stefano Miscetti from Frascati has agreed to serve as the L2 Manager for the Calorimeter. We have some catching up to do…

3. ES&H Completed draft of Preliminary HA (required for CD-1) based on input from L2 Managers  32 pages of text.  96 pages of Hazard analysis sheets  Received a number of useful comments from PPD ES&H. Will send to ES&H for comment, but I think that for CD-1 this is good enough. R. Ray - Mu2e WGM3

4. QA Plan Draft Quality Assurance Plan written. Sent to Keith Schuh, PPD QA Representative. Comments incorporated. Meeting with Keith and new Lab QA Engineer to talk about how they can help us. Document probably good enough for CD-1. R. Ray - Mu2e WGM4

5. Acquisition Strategy First draft completed and sent to FSO. Performance parameters defined Alternative and Risk Analysis Recommended Alternative Business and Acquisition Approach – FRA acts as the prime contractor  Major contracts  Special Acquisition Procedures  Performance incentives  Small business approach  Competition Management Structure – IPT Interdependencies and Interfaces R. Ray - Mu2e WGM5

6. AS - Location Alternatives Fermilab High duty factor beam (90%) Least costly of the fully evaluated alternatives Fermilab staff is the most significant stakeholder BNL Lower duty factor (50%) but potentially higher beam power AGS upgrades more expensive than modifications to Fermilab Accelerator complex Integration issues with RICH program funded out of NP. Los Alamos 800 MeV proton beam ideal for producing low energy muon beam with no antiproton contamination. Low duty factor beam (10%) Detector hall, beam modification costs unknown. R. Ray - Mu2e WGM6

7. AS - Life Cycle Costs Similar cost to build detector at any US location. Operating costs similar Fermilab requires construction of detector hall. Accelerator modifications at Fermilab less than AGS upgrade. R. Ray - Mu2e WGM7

8. AS - Technical Alternatives Alternatives for providing proton beam Booster to Recycler to Accumulator to Debuncher to Mu2e Booster to Accumulator to Debuncher to Mu2e  Requires a new transfer line from Booster to Accumulator New dedicated accelerator facility  Non starter. Too expensive. Wait for Project X  Unacceptable delay  Inconsistent with Mission Need Statement Alternatives for Producing a Muon Beam S-shape vs C-shape Transport Solenoid. R. Ray - Mu2e WGM8

9. AS - Technical Alternatives Detector Alternatives Tracking detectors and calorimeters Cosmic ray veto technologies R. Ray - Mu2e WGM9

10. Risk Analysis Scope and definition of project - Low Functional performance – Moderate ES&H – Very low Cost and Schedule – Moderate Workforce issues – High Funding and Budget – Low Interfaces and Integration – Low Safeguards and Security – Low Location and Site Conditions – Very low Stakeholder Issues – Very low R. Ray - Mu2e WGM10

11. CDR Format defined. Preliminary chapters being written. Will meet with L2 mangers next week and provide them with a format and tell them to get started on their chapters.  X.1Introduction  X.2Requirements  X.3Recommended Alternative (includes performance of design, shows how design meets requirements and discusses optimization of design)  X.4Alternatives Considered  X.5Risks  X.6ES&H  X.7Quality Assurance  X.8Value Management  X.9References R. Ray - Mu2e WGM11

12. Accelerator Progress S. Werkema now fully in charge Progress on external beamline design – impacts building location  We think we are now good for CD-1 Requirement on width of proton pulse (in time) revisited  Went from calamity to small problem that we can deal with.  Narrower pulse is better. Tradeoff with momentum aperture of Accumulator.  Possible technical solutions to make the pulse narrower but we have to understand the cost. Won’t do this for CD-1. Progress on understanding shielding requirements for 25 kW operation.  Skyshine  Electronic berm  Service building floor loading for possible additional shielding.  Cost estimates for supplemental shielding, eberm and fences. R. Ray - Mu2e WGM12

13. Locations R. Ray - Mu2e WGM13

14. Solenoid Progress DS in better shape now that we have settled on field requirements. PS and TS continue on good course.  PS – TS interface completed. PS length increased by 67.5 mm to better match fields.  Working to understand mechanical forces in all on-off power scenarios. Working toward magnet CDR that would be sent to vendors as part of an RFI to continue/expand dialogue with industry. Meeting with representative of Babcock Noell next week who will be in the area. R. Ray - Mu2e WGM14

15. Muon Channel Sandor has a large and diverse system that he is managing well. Weekly meetings Most L3 managers in place Recent progress on  external shielding,  vacuum system,  muon beam stop  TS3 collimator  … R. Ray - Mu2e WGM15

16. Conventional Construction Good progress on requirements.  Mature draft of requirements document now available. Meetings with stakeholders Beam line length fixed Building location fixed.  Requires road diversion that will have to be costed. Preparing to bring in A&E firm to help with Conceptual Design. R. Ray - Mu2e WGM16

17. Staffing L2 Managers are doing a good job of identifying L3 managers. For CD-1 I still need  Deputy o Increasing need. I can’t keep up with everything.  Project EE – should have someone on board from PPD soon. o Mu2e, LBNE, CMS all need a Project EE and 3 highly qualified candidates have been identified. o After discussions with the candidates a decision will be made about the best match for each project.  Project Risk Manager o 25% of an FTE at this point. R. Ray - Mu2e WGM17

18. CD-1 R. Ray - Mu2e WGM18 Lehman CD-1 ReviewMarch 1, 2011 Director’s ReviewFeb. 1, 2011 CDR completeJan. 15, 2011 Final cost & schedule and associated documentation. Jan. 15, 2011 L2 CDR contributions submittedDec. 1, 2010 Pre CD-1 Cost and Schedule ReviewNov 15, 2010 Director’s Design ReviewNov. 1, 2010 L2 Design ReviewsOctober, 2010 Time

19. Schedule R. Ray - Mu2e WGM19 CD-1CD-2/ 3a CD-3b

20. Requirements R. Ray - Mu2e WGM20

21. Action Items Get L2 Manager for calorimeter in place – R. Ray  Done. Have to play catch up now. Get moving on Electronics – Ron Ray  Project EE in place soon. Complete set of requirements documents – Miller/Bernstein  Light at the end of the tunnel, but not there yet. Start scheduling L2 design reviews Develop a plan for Directors Design Review and Pre-CD-1 Review R. Ray - Mu2e WGM21