Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Kaylee McDowell Mathematics Specialization Children’s Development of Mental Representations for Fractions.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Kaylee McDowell Mathematics Specialization Children’s Development of Mental Representations for Fractions."— Presentation transcript:

1 Kaylee McDowell Mathematics Specialization Children’s Development of Mental Representations for Fractions

2 Original Research Question How can the use of manipulatives in conjunction with stories assist 4 th graders’ development of rich mental representations of fractions?

3 Literature Review Many Students Lack Adequate Knowledge of Fractions (Charalambous & Pitta-Pantazi, 2007; Butler et al., 2003) Conceptual v. Procedural Knowledge (NRC, 2001; Ploger and Rooney, 2005) Whole Number Bias (National Research Council (NRC), 2001; Ni & Zhou, 2005) Rich Mental Representations (Cramer & Wyberg, 2009) 0 3/4

4 Research Question How do 4th graders use strategies to represent and solve problems involving fractions following a unit on fractions? How do these strategies compare between students who frequently used physical manipulatives and stories and those who did not?

5 Participants Control Group (CG) 18 students Experimental Curriculum 3 ½ weeks 10 students Investigations Curriculum No stories Fewer physical manipulatives 3 ½ weeks Experimental Group (EG)

6 Manipulative Models (Cramer & Wyberg, 2009; Cramer et al., 2002; NRC, 2001) Area Paper Folding Fraction Circles Length Student Created Fraction Tiles Number Line Set Unifix Cubes

7 Stories Role of Context and Connection to Stories (Whiten & Wilde, 1995; Butler et al., 2003)

8 Data Collection Surveys Attitudes: Beginning and End Stories Pretest & Posttest Concept, Equivalence, Order, Estimation, Operations (Cramer & Wyberg, 2009; Cramer et al., 2002) Interviews 3 students from each group Recorded

9 Survey Results

10

11 Test Results

12 Strategy CG Times Used Percent Correct Percent in Error EG Times Used Percent Correct Percent in Error Long Line 2090%10%3100%-- Grid 3*100%--1753%47% Pictorial Representation560%40%3776%24% Other 1--100%333.5%66.5% Long Line Strategy Grid Strategy Pictorial Representation 1 2 3 1 2 3 2 3 5 3 6 9 2 4 6 6 6 6 += 4 2 6 8 8 8 += Students Use of Strategies

13 Interview Results Based on Denominator Based on Denominator and Numerator 1 4 1 10 8 4 2 3 7 4 Benchmarks/ Equivalence Fraction Relationships Grid Strategy Long Line Strategy CategoryQuestion EG Percent Correct CG Percent Correct Concept1100% 233% 666% Order/Equivalence3100% 466%100% Estimation533%100% 7 Operation866%33% COMMON THEMES Percent of Correct Responses

14 Conclusions Strategies Connected to Understanding Long-Line and Grid Student-created comparison Time to Build Conceptual Knowledge. Manipulatives / Pictures Multiple experiences Number sense Emphasizing the multiplicative nature Relationships among fractions Knowledge of multiples

15 References Bray, W. S. & Abreu-Snachez, L. (2010). Using number sense to compare fractions. Teaching Children Mathematics 17(2), 90-97. Bright, G. W., Behr, M. J., Post, T. R., & Wachsmuth, I. (1988). Identifying fractions on number lines. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 19(3), 215-232. Butler, F. M., Miller, S. P., Crehan, K., Babbitt, B., Pierce, T. (2003). Fraction instruction for students with mathematics disabilities: Comparing two teaching sequences. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice 18(2) 99-111. Charalambous, C., & Pitta-Pantazi, D. (2007). Drawing on a theoretical model to study students’ understandings of fractions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 64(3), 293-316. Cramer, K., Post, T. R., & delMas, R. C. (2002). Initial fraction learning by fourth- and fifth- grade students: A comparison of the effects of using commercial curricula with the effects of using the rational number project curriculum. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 33(2), 111-144. Cramer, K. & Wyberg, T. (2009). Efficacy of different concrete models for teaching part-whole construct for fractions. Mathematical Thinking & Learning 11(4), 226-257. McElligott, M. (2009). The lion’s share: A tale about halving cake and eating it too. New York: Walker. Myller, R. (1991). How big is a foot? New York: Yearling.

16 References Cont. National Research Council. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington DC: National Academy Press. Ni, Y. & Zhou, Y-D. (2005). Teaching and learning fraction and rational numbers: The origins and implications of whole number bias. Educational Psychologist 40(1), 27-52. Ploger, D. & Rooney, M. (2005) Teaching fractions: Rules and research. Teaching Children Mathematics 12(1), 12-17. Russel, S. J. & Economopoulos, K. (Eds.). (2012). Investigations in number, data, and space: Grade four fraction cards and decimal squares. (Vol. 6). Glenview, IL: Pearson. Siebert, D. & Gaskin, N. (2006). Creating, naming, and justifying fractions. Teaching Children Mathematics. 17(2), 394-400. Smith, D. (2011). If the world were a village: A book about the world’s people. Toronto: Kids Can Press. Van de Walle, J. Karp, K. S. & Bay-Williams, J. M. (2010). Elementary and middle school mathematics: Teaching developmentally. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Watanabe, T. (2007). Initial treatment of fractions in Japanese textbooks. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics. 29(2), 41-60. Whitin, D. J. & Wilde, S. (1995). It’s the story that counts: More children’s books for mathematical learning, K- 6. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

17 Questions?


Download ppt "Kaylee McDowell Mathematics Specialization Children’s Development of Mental Representations for Fractions."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google