Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

1 Status of SB2009 Rebaselining Proposal Document, Known to the Editor As of 20091202 vers.A N.Toge Check:

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "1 Status of SB2009 Rebaselining Proposal Document, Known to the Editor As of 20091202 vers.A N.Toge Check:"— Presentation transcript:

1 1 Status of SB2009 Rebaselining Proposal Document, Known to the Editor As of 20091202 vers.A N.Toge Check: http://ilc.kek.jp/SB2009/SB20091202A.pdf http://ilc.kek.jp/SB2009/SB20091202A.pdf

2 2 ½. Introduction / Overview (PMs) http://ilc.kek.jp/SB2009/Intro20091201A.docx Formatted Manuscript on the web? –Yes, although still partially in WIP by PMs Remarks –Intro needs minor clean-up –Overview List of what remains the same as RDR? Cavity performance “reserve” issue Classification –PROBABLY OK, IF PMs WORK HARDER

3 3 3. SB2009 Layout (PM + Paterson) http://ilc.kek.jp/SB2009/Layout20091130A.docx Formatted Manuscript on the web? –Yes Author – Editor iteration? –Once Remarks –ML length needs to be stated. –One more critical editing, anyone? Classification –Worry but probably OK

4 4 X.X Parameters (PMs + Toge) http://ilc.kek.jp/SB2009/IntroDraft20091105A.docx http://ilc.kek.jp/SB2009/IntroDraft20091105A.docx Formatted Manuscript on the web? –No Remarks Classification –Given up. –Has been absorbed as part of 2.2.

5 5 4.1 Gradient Issues (Yamamoto) http://ilc.kek.jp/SB2009/SRF20091130D.docx http://ilc.kek.jp/SB2009/SRF20091130D.docx Formatted Manuscript on the web? –Yes, although still partially in WIP by PMs + Experts Remarks –Needs clean-up cavity performance summary –Needs sort out the statements to make in the cavity performance reserve issue Classification –Near the edge. Needs attention.

6 6 4.2/3 Electron and Positron Sources (Brachmann, Clarke) http://ilc.kek.jp/SB2009/Injectors20091202A.docxhttp://ilc.kek.jp/SB2009/Injectors20091202A.docx Formatted Manuscript on the web? –Yes Author – Editor iteration? –E- loop open –E+ iteration done Classification –Likely to be OK, pending authors’ timely response

7 7 4.4 Damping Rings (Guiducci) http://ilc.kek.jp/SB2009/DR20091130A.docxhttp://ilc.kek.jp/SB2009/DR20091130A.docx Formatted Manuscript on the web? –Yes Author – Editor iteration? –Done once Classification –Mostly OK, pending small fixes.

8 8 4.5 RTML (Solyak) http://ilc.kek.jp/SB2009/RTML20091130B.docx http://ilc.kek.jp/SB2009/RTML20091130B.docx Formatted Manuscript on the web? –Yes Author – Editor iteration? –Done once Classification –Mostly OK.

9 9 4.6 ML (Nantista, Fukuda) http://ilc.kek.jp/SB2009/ML20091202A.docxhttp://ilc.kek.jp/SB2009/ML20091202A.docx Formatted Manuscript on the web? –Yes Author – Editor iteration? –Done once Important Comment –Pulse length issue needs to be explained. Classification –Perhaps OK, pending one critical reading.

10 10 4.7 BDS (Seryi) http://ilc.kek.jp/SB2009/BDS20091130B.dochttp://ilc.kek.jp/SB2009/BDS20091130B.doc Formatted Manuscript on the web? –Yes Author – Editor iteration? –Done once. –Minor open issues fixable on the spot. –But what about phys/det inquiry issues? Classification –Likely OK, pending addressing phys/det vs accelerator interaction issues.

11 11 4.8 CFS (Kuchler) http://ilc.kek.jp/SB2009/CFS20091201A.docxhttp://ilc.kek.jp/SB2009/CFS20091201A.docx Formatted Manuscript on the web? –Yes Author – Editor iteration? –Done once. Classification –Likely OK, pending small touch-ups.

12 12 5. Costing (Garbincius) http://ilc.kek.jp/SB2009/Cost20091120A.docx http://ilc.kek.jp/SB2009/Cost20091120A.docx Formatted Manuscript on the web? –Yes Author – Editor iteration? –Done once. –Final text / tables known to be in WIP by the author. Classification –Likely OK, pending guideline clarification by PMs and the work by the author.

13 13 6. Risk Analysis (Ross) http://ilc.kek.jp/SB2009/RiskDraft20091105.docx http://ilc.kek.jp/SB2009/RiskDraft20091105.docx Formatted Manuscript on the web? –No Author – Editor iteration? –No Classification –Major schedule threat

14 14 A. Availability Analysis (MCR/Avail) http://ilc.kek.jp/SB2009/AvailDraft20091104.docxhttp://ilc.kek.jp/SB2009/AvailDraft20091104.docx Formatted Manuscript on the web? –No Author – Editor iteration? –Authors known to be at it. ETA unclear. Classification –Major schedule threat

15 15 Critical Issues ML length –Path length matching known to be addressed –QWT compensation needs to be stated –Energy reserve needs to be stated ML alternate pulsing –Handling of lowE beam in highE in ML needs to be stated Costing Reference –“Starting point” needs to be stated –Summary statements need group-wide confirmation

16 16 Sections Recovering From Crisis (Still needs intense care) Intro / Overview SRF Gradient

17 17 Sections in Crisis Risk analysis Availability

18 18 To Do at DESY Face-to-Face Triage process –Critical open issues  Group-wide or semi-group wide discussion and surgery on the spot. With some follow-up work on subsequent days. –Semi-trivial touch-ups  Identify issues on the spot. Fixes be applied by the primary authors on the fly. With some follow-up work on subsequent days if needed. –~17 subsections x 30 min = 9 hrs.eqv. 1 Full Day + reserve –Time is limited: We need to-the-point and concise-efficient discussion and response. No digressing speech, no tangential commentary, no unproductive ranting, please. Prep and org for AAP –One quarter day


Download ppt "1 Status of SB2009 Rebaselining Proposal Document, Known to the Editor As of 20091202 vers.A N.Toge Check:"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google