Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byEileen Owen Modified over 9 years ago
2
Ethics Three “random” chats “knowing doing gap”
3
Categories of normative sciences Logic — things that are true Aesthetics — things that are admirable Ethics — things that are good
4
Heroic figures in ethics Aristotle — definitions Kant — criteria Perry — personal –versus communitarian Rawls — operational Professional — liability Habermas — dialogue Küng — empirical Various schemes: environmental, feminist, power, etc
5
William Perry Levels of intellectual sophistication Ethical development
6
Dualism 1-3 1 Assumption of dualistic structure of world taken for granted, unexamined 2 Truth exists, but not all authorities are knowledgeable 3 Absolute truth has not been discovered, yet
7
Multiplicity 4-6 4 Knowledge is not secure but is any person’s 5 Knowledge is always changing or subject to change
8
Commitment to realism 6-9 6 Knowledge is not something that is external and definite but something that each individual constructs
9
Initial commitment 7 Knowledge is the world view one has constructed from learning and experience, along with the ethical implications of this view 8 Knowledge is a creative resolution between uncertainty and the need to act 9 Individual must break through to new perspectives and discard those no longer useful
10
Perry summary 9 levels 1-3 absolute 4-~6 relative ~6-9 personal
11
Professional ethics Avoiding legal problems Privacy, permission
12
Purpose Ends Means Rationalisable –E.g., historical, economic Objective/subjective
13
Ethics v meta-ethics Environmental ethics Sadism Marxism (ideology & false consciousness) Feminism Hedonism Virtue ethics Utilitarianism
14
continued… Deontology Consequentialism Situation ethics Monism v pluralism Utilitarianism Virtue ethics
15
continued… Relativism Absolutism –Universalism –Realism –Absolutism (Perry position 1!) Machiavelli –Private –Public
16
HCI stances Standards IS09471 User’s task Usability Cost-effectiveness Metrics. Empirical Design Enjoyment
17
‘Usability’ as applied ethics Kant’s categorical imperative Reciprocity –Help lines? –Bug reports? –User participation? (evaluation…)
18
Kant Criterion Some ‘nice’ principles –E.g., reciprocity, universalisability
19
Küng’s 6 rules Solving problems: don’t create greater problems Burden of proof: demonstrate avoids human or environmental damage Common good: e.g., benefits the community, for a period Urgency: e.g., survival more important than privacy
20
…continued Ecology: system more important than individuals Reversibility: system must be reversible, removable, not cause dependency
21
Post-marxist critical theory One dimensional man (Marcuse) –“I shop therefore I am” Atomised (Lyotard) –What is choice/democracy when you have 500 channels of TV?
22
What I want Operational ethics Bridge ‘knowing-doing gap’
23
Justice Distributive Restorative Punitive Political
24
Aristotle’s view Doing good for others Only virtue you can’t fake
25
Justice by programming Fair chocolate bar
26
John Rawls Justice Veil of ignorance Creating a just world Creating a just system
27
Conclusions Ethics v politics CS is politics Get involved!
28
Next lecture — Thursday 2pm An ethical debate on tags and tagging
29
Where from? Communitarian Individual Artificial
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.