1. 2-1 Orbitals and energetics Bonding and structure Molecular orbital theory Crystal field theory Ligand field theory Provide fundamental understanding of chemistry dictating radionuclide complexes Structure based on bonding §Coordination important in defining structure àStructure related to spectroscopic behavior àElectron configuration important in structure *d 8 are square planar *d 0 and d 10 tetrahedral

2. 2-2 Coordination number Geometry is strongly influence by coordination number Coordination number 2 §Two geometric possibilities àLinear (D ∞h ) àBent (C 2v ) Coordination number 3 §Planar (D 3h ) §Pyramidal (C 3v ) §Some T-shaped forms (C 2v ) Pu O O N H H H

3. 2-3 Coordination Number Coordination number 3 §Planar (D 3h ) §Pyramidal (C 3v ) §Some T-shaped forms (C 2v ) Found with trivalent central elements §For metal ions, not very common N H H H BH H H

4. 2-4 Coordination Number Coordination number 4 §Formed by C 3 basic geometries §Tetrahedral (T d ) §Square geometry (C 4h ) §One lone pair (C 2v ) C H H H H Xe F F F F

5. 2-5 Coordination Number Coordination number 5 §Trigonal bipyramid (D 3h ) §Square pyramid (C 4v ) Interconvertibility between geometries §Compounds can vary between shapes §Trigonal bipyramid seems to be more common àCommon with metal pentachloride species Cu Cl In Cl

6. 2-6 Coordination Number Coordination number 6 Very common coordination number §Ligands at vertices of octahedron or distorted octahedron àOctahedron (O h ) àTetragonal octahedron (D 4h ) *Elongated or contracted long z axis àRhombic (D 2h ) *Changes along 2 axis àTrigonal distortion (D 3d )

7. 2-7 Coordination Number O h ->D 4h O h ->D 2h O h ->D 3d or

8. 2-8 Higher coordination 7 coordination 8 coordination 9 coordination

9. 2-9

10. 2-10

11. 2-11 Non-linear, less than 2 unique C 3 axis

12. 2-12 Identifying Point Group

13. 2-13

14. 2-14 Point Groups H 2 O point group §Know it is C 2v from table §Symmetry elements  E, C 2 (180° rotation), 2 vertical mirror planes (  v ) *E, C 2,  v,  v ’ NH 3 point group §C 3v point group §Elements  E, C 3 (each N-H), three vertical mirror plane through each N-H (3  v ) *E, C 3, 3  v Apply to identification tree

15. 2-15 Symmetry and vibration a 1 vibration generates a changing dipole moment in the z-direction b 1 vibration generates a changing dipole moment in the x-direction b 2 vibration generates a changing dipole moment in the y-direction a 2 vibration does not generate a changing dipole moment in any direction (no ‘x’, ‘y’ or ‘z’ in the a2 row). Thus, a 1, b 1 and b 2 vibrations give rise to changing dipole moments and are IR active However, a 2 vibrations do not give rise to changing dipole moments and are IR inactive C 2v EC2C2 σ v (xz)σ v (yz) A1A1 1111zx 2, y 2, z 2 A2A2 11 RzRz xy B1B1 11 x, R y xz B2B2 1 1y, R x yz.

16. 2-16 Hard and soft metals and ligands Based on Lewis acid definition §Ligand acts as base, donates electron pair to metal ion Hard metal ion interact with hard bases §Hard ligands N, O, F §Soft ligands P, S, Cl àLigand hardness decreases down a group Hard metals §High positive charges §Small radii §Closed shells or half filled configurations

17. 2-17 Soft or hard metals and ligands Soft metals §Low positive charges §Large ionic radius §Non-closed shell configurations àTend to be on right side of transition series Lanthanides and actinides are hard §Actinides are softer than lanthanides àLigands with soft groups can be used for actinide/lanthanide separations

18. 2-18 Hard Intermediate Soft

19. 2-19 Chelation and stability Ligands with more than 1 complexing functional group §Carbonate, ethylenediamine §Enhanced stability through chelation effect §ethylenediamine binding stronger than 2 ammonia groups àBidentate àTridentate §Ligands can wrap around metal ion forming stronger complex

20. 2-20 EDTA complex

21. 2-21 Effective atomic number Metal bonding can be described with effective atomic number §Number of electrons surrounding metal is effective atomic number àTransitions metal have 9 possible bonds *5 d, 3p, 1 s Ë18 electrons §Possible to have effective atomic number different than 18 àFew d electrons àElectronegative ligands

22. 2-22 Effective atomic number 16 electron §Square planar §d 8 configuration (Au, Pt) Greater than 18 electron §8-10 d electrons Expand metal-ligand interactions to exploit bonding and geometry §Molecular orbital theory §Crystal field theory §Ligand field theory

23. 2-23 Molecular orbital theory Molecular orbitals are comprised from the overlap of atomic orbitals Number of molecular orbitals equals the number of combined atomic orbitals Different type of molecular orbitals §bonding orbital (lower energy) §Non-bonding (same energy as atomic orbitals) §Anti-bonding orbital (higher energy) Electrons enter the lowest orbital available §maximum number of electrons in an orbital is 2 (Pauli Exclusion Principle) §Electrons spread out before pairing up (Hund's Rule)

24. 2-24 Molecular orbital

25. 2-25 Molecular orbitals Sigma, Pi, delta §Gerade and ungerade O and F Li to N

26. 2-26 Molecular orbitals N molecular orbitals from N atomic orbitals §N=8 in period 2 §4 sigma, 4 Pi àPi degenerate bonding and antibonding

27. 2-27 Molecular orbitals Mixture of different atoms §Some bonding characteristics dominate §Nonbonding orbitals àNo Pi from H High occupied electron orbital Lowest unoccupied electron orbital Bond order §Overall shared electron §B=0.5(n-n*)

28. 2-28 Symmetry adapted orbitals Combination of orbitals with symmetry considerations

29. 2-29 Crystal Field Theory Lone pair modeled as point §Repels electrons in d orbital §d orbitals have energy differences due to point àResults in ligand field splitting *About 10 % of metal-ligand interaction *e and t orbitals àIgnores covalent contribution Energy difference is ligand field splitting parameter (Δ o ) §Can be determined from absorption spectrum àe g  t 2g transition

30. 2-30 Crystal Field Theory Ti(OH 2 ) 6 3+ §Absorbance at 500 nm, 20000 cm -1 §1000 cm -1 = 11.96 kJ/mol   0 =239.2 kJ/mol   0 found to vary with ligand àFor metal ion increases with oxidation state and increases down a group I - < Br - < SCN - ~C l- < F - < OH- ~ ONO-<C 2 O 4 2 - < H 2 O < NCS - < EDTA 4- < NH 3 ~ pyr ~ en < bipy < phen < CN - ~CO

31. 2-31 Crystal field theory Ligand field stabilization energies  t 2g stabilized (40 % of  o )  e g increase energy (60 % of  o )  LFSE=(-0.4 t 2g + 0.6 e g )  o àLFSE few % of energy

32. 2-32 Crystal Field Theory Weak and strong field limits §Related to location of 4 th d 4 electron àt 2g 4 or t 2g 3 e g 1 *All in t 2g has coulombic repulsion (P) but promotion to e g need  o energy   o <P *Lower energy if e g is occupied *Weak field *High spin §Low spin for ligands high in series  o and P related to metal and ligand §4d and 5d generally have high fields

33. 2-33 Crystal Field Theory Magnetic properties §Determination of spin state àDiamagnetic *Move out of a magnetic field àParamagnetic *Move into a magnetic field §Dipole moment àSpin only paramagnetism due to quenching of orbital angular momentum with ligand *μ=[N(N+2)] 1/2 μ B ; with μ B = 9.274E-24 JT -1 and N number of unpaired electrons ËFor d 6 N= 4 or 0, depending on spin Accounts for observations on trends §Ionic radius

34. 2-34 Crystal Field Theory T d §Weak field splitting §e lower energy than t àBased on orbital spatial distributions Tetragonal complex §Splitting into 4 levels §Can distort into square planar à4d 8 and 5d 8 Jahn-Teller effect §Distortion of geometry to achieve energy stabilization (see previous) àEnergy of distorted complex lower

35. 2-35 Ligand Field Theory Describes bonding and geometry of coordination complexes §Use of molecular orbital theory for transition metals àCorrelated with geometry to identify similar bonds àIncludes covalent metal-ligand interactions *Overlap of ligand and metal orbitals *Enhanced understanding of origin of energy separation

36. 2-36 Ligand Field Theory d orbital hybrid O h complexes §Six similar bonds, nine valence orbitals §To make six similar bonds, mixing must occur àHybridization of s, p, and 2 d orbitals *d x2-y2, d z2 Ëd 2 sp 3 hybrid Interaction of d orbitals with bonding ligand results in observed properties (magnetic, color)

37. 2-37 Ligand Field Theory nd, n+1s, and n+1p orbitals on the metal overlap with one orbital on each of the six ligands §forms 15 molecular orbitals Six are bonding §energies are lower than original atomic orbitals Six are antibonding with higher energy Three are nonbonding Ligand-field theory describes how s,p, and d orbitals on the metal to overlap with orbitals on the ligand

38. 2-38 d orbital splitting

39. 2-39 Charge transfer Allowed transitions in UV-Visible §Ligand to metal §Metal to ligand Related to redox of metals and ligands §MnO 4 - àO ligands to Mn metal Absorption of radiation involves the transfer of an electron from the donor to an orbital associated with the acceptor. Molar absorptivities from charge-transfer absorption are large (greater that 10,000 L mol-1 cm-1).

40. 2-40 Ligand Field Theory Treats overlaps of ligand and metal orbitals Stems for SALC §Sigma §Combine sigma orbitals for each set àt 2g has no sigma §For molecular orbital combine  C M    C L  La1g §Pi bonding  Donor decrease   àAcceptor increases *Related to electrochemical series

41. 2-41

42. 2-42 Overview Bonding and structure relationships §Understand how coordination number is related to geometry Hard and soft metal interactions §First order estimation of interactions Modeling of orbitals §Molecular orbital theory §Charge Transfer §Ligand field theory àUtility of each concept àExploration of energy difference

43. 2-43 Questions What are the possible geometry for a 5 coordinate compound? Which ligands would be expected to bind strongly with Fe? With Hg? What is the chelate effect? What is the relationship between molecular orbital theory, crystal field theory, and ligand field theory? What does IR and UV-Visible spectroscopy inform about a chemical species? What accounts for color changes in metal-ligand complexes?

44. 2-44 Pop Quiz What make the actinides softer metals than the lanthanides? How can this be exploited for separations?