Download presentation
1
Solid State Properties
Chapter 4 Solid State Properties
2
Polymer Phases Viscous Liquid Elastomeric Semi-Crystalline Amorphous
Polydimethylsiloxane Tg = -123°C; Tm = -40 °C Elastomeric Polyisoprene Tg = -73 °C Polybutadiene, Tg = -85 °C Polychloroprene, Tg = -50 °C Polyisobutylene, Tg = -70 °C Semi-Crystalline Nylon 6,6, Tg = 50 °C; Tm = 265 °C Poly ethylene terephthalate, Tg = 65 °C; Tm =270 °C Amorphous Glassy Polystyrene Tg = 100 °C Polymethyl methacrylate, Tg = 105 °C
3
Glass phase (hard plastic)
Glass-rubber-liquid Amorphous plastics have a complex thermal profile with 3 typical states: Glass phase (hard plastic) Polystyrene Temperature 3 9 6 7 8 4 5 Leathery phase Tygon (plasticized PVC) Log(stiffness) Pa Rubber phase (elastomer) polyisobutylene Tg Liquid PDMS
4
Mechanical Properties
5
Heat Distortion Temperature
The maximum temperature at which a polymer can be used in rigid material applications is called the softening or heat distortion temperature (HDT). A typical test (plastic sheeting) involves application of a static load, and heating at a rate of 2oC per min. The HDT is defined as the temperature at which the elongation becomes 2%. A: Rigid poly(vinyl chloride) 50 psi load. B: Low-density poly(ethylene) C: Poly(styrene-co-acrylonitrile) 25 psi load. D: Cellulose acetate (Plasticized) 25 psi load.
6
Transient Testing: Resilience of Cured Elastomers
Resilience tests reflect the ability of an elastomeric compound to store and return energy at a given frequency and temperature. Change of rebound resilience (h/ho) with temperature T for: 1. cis-poly(isoprene); 2. poly(isobutylene); 3. poly(chloroprene); 4. poly(methyl methacrylate).
7
Types of Polymers Polymer Family Tree Polyethylene 33% Vinyls 16%
Polypropylene 15% PMMA ABS Nylon Polycarbonate Saturated Polyester PEEK Polyurethane Some are thermosets as well. PVC Not Cross-Linked 90% of market Thermoplastics Will reform when melted Epoxy Melamine Formaldehyde Phenolic Polyester (unsaturated) Polyimide Some are thermoplastic as well. Silicone Urea Formaldehyde Cross-linked 10% of market Thermosets/Elastomers Will not reform Polymer Family Tree
8
Ballpark Comparisons Tensile strengths Polymers: ~ 10 - 100 MPa
Metals: 100’s ’s MPa Elongation Polymers: up to 1000 % in some cases Metals: < 100% Moduli (Elastic or Young’s) Polymers: ~ 10 MPa - 4 GPa Metals: ~ GPa
9
Amorphous v Crystalline Polymers Thermo-mechanical properties
10
Thermal Expansion If a part is to be produced within a close dimensional tolerance, careful consideration of thermal expansion/contraction must be made. Parts are produced in the melt state, and solidify to amorphous or semi-crystalline states. Changes in density must be taken into account when designing the mold.
11
Thermal Expansion
12
Stress Strain Studies
13
Anatomy of a Stress Strain Graph
Elongation = 100% x Initial slope is the Young’s Modulus (E’ or sometimes G) TS = tensile strength y = yield strength Toughness = Energy required to break (area under curve)
14
Compression and Shear vs. Tensile Tests
Stress-strain curves are very dependent on the test method. A modulus determined under compression is generally higher than one derived from a tensile experiment, as shown below for polystyrene. Tensile testing is most sensitive to material flaws and microscopic cracks. Compression tests tend to be characteristic of the polymer, while tension tests are more characteristic of sample flaws. Note also that flexural and shear test modes are commonly employed.
15
Stress Strain Graphs
Chains in neck align along elongation direction: strengthening Elongation by extension of neck
16
Beyond “B”, the yield strength, deformations are plastic
17
Ductility & Elongation (EL)
EL < 5% Brittle EL > 5% Ductile Thermosets = strong & brittle Not Ductile Thermolastics = depends on T
18
Cold Drawing above the Tg
19
TENSILE RESPONSE: • Compare to responses of other polymers:
Stress-strain curves adapted from Fig. 15.1, Callister 6e. Inset figures along elastomer curve (green) adapted from Fig , Callister 6e. (Fig is from Z.D. Jastrzebski, The Nature and Properties of Engineering Materials, 3rd ed., John Wiley and Sons, 1987.) • Compare to responses of other polymers: --brittle response (aligned, cross linked & networked case) --plastic response (semi-crystalline case) 25
20
Elastomer Molecules High entropy Low entropy Low energy High energy
Model of long elastomer molecules, with low degree of cross‑linking: (a) unstretched, and (b) under tensile stress. Low entropy Low energy High energy
22
YOUNG’S MODULI: COMPARISON
Graphite Ceramics Semicond Metals Alloys Composites /fibers Polymers E(GPa) Based on data in Table B2, Callister 6e. Composite data based on reinforced epoxy with 60 vol% of aligned carbon (CFRE), aramid (AFRE), or glass (GFRE) fibers. 13
24
Linear Elasticity: Possion Effect
• Hooke's Law: = E • Poisson's ratio, : metals: ~ 0.33 ceramics: ~0.25 polymers: ~0.40 Units: E: [GPa] or [psi] n: dimensionless Why does have minus sign?
25
Poisson Ratio • Poisson Ratio has a range –1 1/2
Look at extremes No change in aspect ratio: Volume (V = AL) remains constant: V =0. Hence, V = (L A+A L) = So, In terms of width, A = w2, then A/A = 2 w w/w2 = 2w/w = –L/L. Hence, Incompressible solid. Water (almost).
26
Poisson Ratio: materials specific
Metals: Ir W Ni Cu Al Ag Au generic value ~ 1/3 Solid Argon: 0.25 Covalent Solids: Si Ge Al2O3 TiC generic value ~ 1/4 Ionic Solids: MgO 0.19 Silica Glass: 0.20 Polymers: Network (Bakelite) Chain (PE) 0.40 Elastomer: Hard Rubber (Ebonite) (Natural) 0.49
27
Example: Poisson Effect
Tensile stress is applied along cylindrical brass rod (10 mm diameter). Poisson ratio is = 0.34 and E = 97 GPa. Determine load needed for 2.5x10–3 mm change in diameter if the deformation is entirely elastic? Width strain: (note reduction in diameter) x= d/d = –(2.5x10–3 mm)/(10 mm) = –2.5x10–4 Axial strain: Given Poisson ratio z= –x/ = –(–2.5x10–4)/0.34 = +7.35x10–4 Axial Stress: z = Ez = (97x103 MPa)(7.35x10–4) = 71.3 MPa. Required Load: F = zA0 = (71.3 MPa)(5 mm)2 = 5600 N.
29
Negtive poisson’s ratio
foams
30
Compression Radial n = -1.24 Axial n = 0 Lakes, R. S., "No contractile obligations", Nature, 1992, 358,
31
Anisotropic Materials
1) Compaction of UHMWPE powder 2) Sintering 3) Extrusion
32
Mechanical properties are sensitive to temperature
FIGURE Effect of temperature on the stress-strain curve for cellulose acetate, a thermoplastic. Note the large drop in strength and increase in ductility with a relatively small increase in temperature. Source: After T.S. Carswell and H.K. Nason. Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 5th ed. Kalpakjian • Schmid Prentice Hall,
33
Poly(methyl methacrylate)
34
Lower elastic modulus, yield and ultimate properties
Stress Strain Polymers Metals Ceramics Lower elastic modulus, yield and ultimate properties Greater post-yield deformability Greater failure strain
36
Polymers: Thermal Properties
In the liquid/melt state enough thermal energy for random motion (Brownian motion) of chains Motions decrease as the melt is cooled Motion ceases at “glass transition temperature” Polymer hard and glassy below Tg, rubbery above Tg
37
Polymers: Thermal Properties
Tg Tm semicrystalline log(Modulus) crosslinked linear amorphous Temperature
38
Polymers: Thermal Properties
Stress Strain decreasing temperature or increasing crystallinity
39
Properties depend on amount of cross-linking
Increasing cross-linking Figure M. P. Groover, “Fundamentals of Modern Manufacturing 3/e” John Wiley, 2007
42
Phase diagram for semi-crystalline polymer
43
Polymer Phases Volume Tg Tm Tb Temperature
Polymers don’t exist in gas state; RT for boiling is higher than bond energies Glassy Solids Polystyrene Tg 100 °C PMMA Tg 105 °C Polycarbonate Tg 145 °C Rubber Tg -73 °C Liquid Volume Crystalline Solids Polyethylene Tm 140 °C Polypropylene Tm 160 °C Nylon 6,6 Tm 270 °C Glassy Solid Crystalline Solid Liquids Injection molding & extrusion Polydimethylsiloxane Tm -40 °C Tg Tm Tb Temperature
45
Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC)
46
Modulus versus temperature
47
Viscous Response of Newtonian Liquids
The top plane moves at a constant velocity, v, in response to a shear stress: v A y F Dx There is a velocity gradient (v/y) normal to the area. The viscosity h relates the shear stress, ss, to the velocity gradient. h has S.I. units of Pa s. The shear strain increases by a constant amount over a time interval, allowing us to define a strain rate: Units of s-1 The viscosity can thus be seen to relate the shear stress to the shear rate:
48
Measuring viscosities
1 pascal second = 10 poise = 1,000 millipascal second 10-100,000 cP Requires standards
50
Viscosity of Polymer Melts
Shear thinning behaviour For comparison: h for water is 10-3 Pa s at room temperature. Poly(butylene terephthalate) at 285 ºC
51
h ~ tTGP Scaling of Viscosity: h ~ N3.4 h ~ N3.4 N0 ~ N3.4 Why? 3.4
Data shifted for clarity! 3.4 h ~ tTGP Viscosity is shear-strain rate dependent. Usually measure in the limit of a low shear rate: ho h ~ N3.4 N0 ~ N3.4 Universal behaviour for linear polymer melts Applies for higher N: N>NC Why? G.Strobl, The Physics of Polymers, p. 221
52
Concept of “Chain” Entanglements
If the molecules are sufficient long (N >100 - corresponding to the entanglement mol. wt., Me), they will entangle with each other. Each molecule is confined within a dynamic “tube”. Tube G.Strobl, The Physics of Polymers, p. 283
53
Network of Entanglements
There is a direct analogy between chemical crosslinks in rubbers and “physical” crosslinks that are created by the entanglements. The physical entanglements can support stress (for short periods up to a time tT), creating a “transient” network.
55
An Analogy! There are obvious similarities between a collection of snakes and the entangled polymer chains in a melt. The source of continual motion on the molecular level is thermal energy, of course.
56
“Memory” of Previous State
Poly(styrene) Tg ~ 100 °C
57
Development of Reptation Scaling Theory
Pierre de Gennes (Paris) developed the concept of polymer reptation and derived scaling relationships. Sir Sam Edwards (Cambridge) devised tube models and predictions of the shear relaxation modulus. In 1991, de Gennes was awarded the Nobel Prize for Physics.
58
Scaling Concepts in Polymer Physics Cornell University Press, 1979
There once was a theorist from France who wondered how molecules dance. “They’re like snakes,” he observed, “As they follow a curve, the large ones Can hardly advance.” D ~ M -2 de Gennes P.G. de Gennes Scaling Concepts in Polymer Physics Cornell University Press, 1979
59
Entanglement Molecular Weights, Me, for Various Polymers
Me (g/mole) Poly(ethylene) 1,250 Poly(butadiene) 1,700 Poly(vinyl acetate) 6,900 Poly(dimethyl siloxane) 8,100 Poly(styrene) 19,000
60
Amorphous Glasses (< Tg)
This is a self siphoning gel. Add a dispersant such as alcohol to separate the resin particles inhibiting the formation of large insoluble lumps. Any water soluble alcohol can be used as long as it is dry. Mix ml of the alcohol with 3 to 4 grams of polyethylene oxide in a clean dry 600-ml beaker. Swirl the mixture to completely wet the resin with alcohol. Add ml of tap water into the mixture “in one pour” and stir until the resin has gelled completely. Pour the gel into a second 600-ml beaker and then back and forth between the two beakers. The gel can be made to siphon by raising one beaker above the other while gradually pouring the gel. Once the gel starts to pull, separate the two beakers and turn the upper vessel vertically. The gel will move up the sidesw of the beaker as a thin film which forms thick strands as it falls. This process can be continued indefinitely. Add 100 ml of water to the empty beaker and swirl to wet the sides. Pour the gel into the water and then back into the original container. The siphoning process speeds up considerably pulling the gel quickly out of the upper beaker. (Even small strands can start the siphoning process emptying the beaker unexpectedly. The gel can be disposed of in the waste paper basket, it’s 99% water. The glassware can be rinsed with plenty of tap water and dried. Tg: 40 carbons in backbone Starting moving in concert
61
Glass transition temperature
62
Rate of cooling affects Tg
63
Polymer Tg ( °C)
64
Polymer Tg ( °C)
65
Factors that affect Tg Polar groups increase packing density; more thermal energy is needed to created volume
66
Factors that affect Tg Other polar vinyl polymer:
67
Factors that affect Tg
68
Factors that affect Tg Main chain stiffness: reduced flexibility
69
Polyarylenes
70
Nylons or polyamides
71
Factors that affect Tg Side Chain Rigidity Long chains plasticize
Anchors to movement
72
Long chains plasticize movements
73
Factors that affect Tg poly(methyl methacrylate)
74
Factors that affect Tg Tacticity
75
Factors that affect Tg Symmetry of substituents
asymmetric symmetric Asymmetric have higher Tg’s
76
Factors that affect Tg: Mw
77
Factors that affect Tg: Crosslinking
78
Factors that affect Tg: Plasticizer
Phthalates
79
Immiscible (Two phase) and miscible (blends) polymers
80
Tg as a function of film thickness
82
Glass Transition Rigid group in backbone Flexible polymer backbone
Steric Hinderance Long plasticizing side groups Symmetrical substituents Polar functionalities Plasticizers
83
Additional Kinds of Transitions
84
Amorphous Polymers Thermo-mechanical properties
85
Crystallinity in Polymers
Maltese cross spherulites Sheaf-like arrangement of lamellae in a blend of polyethylenes System: Polyethylene (PE), Composition: LPE:BPE 3:1 An image of an alkane crystal taken by AFM System: Alkane, Composition: C36H74 An image of a single crystal alkane System: Alkane, Composition: C294H590 Single PE spherulite AFM
87
Thermodynamics of melting and crystallization: First order transitions
88
Amorphous v Crystalline Polymers Thermo-mechanical properties
89
Low density polyethylene (LDPE) 915-929 45-65
Medium density polyethylene (MDPE) High density polyethylene (HDPE) Material Density (kg/m3) % Crystallinity Shrinkage, Stiffness, Tensile strength, Hardness, Heat deflection, Chemical resistance Density Increase Property Impact strength, Ductility Weatherability
90
Thermal Transition Points of Select Polymers
91
Rule of Thumb for Tg’s and Tm’s
For symmetrical polymers: Tg = 0.5 Tm (Kelvin) Polyvinylidene chloride Tg = = 255 K Tm = Tg/0.50 = 255/0.5 = 510 K or 237°C Experimentally Tm = 200 °C For asymmetrical polymers: Tg = 0.66 Tm (Kelvin) Polyvinyl chloride Tg = = 377 K Tm = Tg/0.66 = 354/0.66 = 536 K or 263°C Experimentally Tm = 273 °C
92
Rule of Thumb for Tg’s and Tm’s
Caution: Its just a rule of thumb: Atactic polystyrene Tg = = 377 K Tm = Tg/0.66 = 377/0.66 = 571 K or 298 °C Experimentally Tm = 523 K or 250 °C
93
Crystalline Polymers (really semicrystalline)
Polar functionality
94
Thermodynamic of Crystallization
For melting Sf is positive
95
Intramolecular interactions (Hf) favor crystallization & higher Tm
Van der Waals: 2 kJ/mole Hydrogen bonding 20 kJ/mol
96
Explain why Nylon 6 has a lower Tm than Kevlar
97
Entropic Contributions to Tm
98
Flexible Chains have numerous conformations
Nylon 6
99
Rigid Chains have fewer conformations
Kevlar example
101
Polymer symmetry and Melting Point
102
Molecular Weight Influence on Tm
Melting temperatures of n-alkanes (up to C100) as a function of chain length.
103
Methods for Inducing Crystallization in Polymers
Slow cooling of molten polymer Annealing between Tg and Tm Evaporation of solvent Shear & disintanglement Stretching and alignment of macromolecules
104
Characterization of Crystalline Polymers: Diffraction
105
Rare to get single crystals: Powder XRD or films
106
Polyethylene’s Orthorhombic Unit cell
107
Vinyl Polymer Crystals: Substituents favor helical conformation
108
Characterization of Crystallinity in Polymers
Polymers generally have crystalline and amorphous contributions
109
Lamellar Structure of Polymer crystals
110
Polymer single crystals: Graduate students nightmare
Still lamellar structures
112
Validation of Models
113
Dislocations in Polymer Crystals
114
From singhle crystals to Aggregate structures
115
Polyethylene Spherulites
116
Spherulite Growth from Lamellar crystals
117
Crystalline structures in polymers
TEM of spherulite structure in natural rubber(x30,000). Chain-folded lamellar crystallites (white lines) ~10nm thick extend radially.
118
• % Crystallinity: % of material that is crystalline.
--TS and E often increase with % crystallinity. --Annealing causes crystalline regions to grow. % crystallinity increases.
119
Tensile Response: Brittle & Plastic
Stress-strain curves adapted from Fig. 15.1, Callister 6e. Inset figures along plastic response curve (purple) adapted from Fig , Callister 6e.
120
Amorphous polymer properties do not depend on cooling rate.
Semicrystalline polymer properties depend on final degree of crystallinity, and hence the rate of cooling. Lower % S-Cryst Temperature Tg E Achieved using slower cooling rates. Higher % S-Cryst Cooling rates for semi-crystallines are important!
121
Micrographs of Polymer Spherultes
122
Seeing Maltese Crosses: Polarizing Microscopy
123
Polarizing Optical Microscopy
124
Formation of Ring Pattern: Lamellar Twisting
125
Microfibriallar Morphology
126
Polyethylene Fibers Nucleated on Si-C fibers: Shish-Kebobs
127
Branching on Crystallinity
Which one will be more likely to crystallize?
128
Linear crystallizes easier
(HDPE = linear; LDPE = branched)
130
Nucleation Rates between Tg and Tm
131
Primary Crystallization
132
Quenching Slow Cooling Crystallinity (%) Cooling rate (oC/s) 40 30 20
10 0.01 0.1 1.0 10 100 Cooling rate (oC/s)
133
Early stages of crystallation of PEEK in the presence of a carbon fibre.
134
Effects of Crystallinity
Strength: Stronger & Stiffer Optical: Opaque (scattering by spherulites) Higher density Less Soluble Less Permeable Smaller interchain distances Stronger intermolecular forces
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.