Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Harmonics Problems in Distribution Systems Case Study AEP Texas Central Company Scott Lee, Reliability Engineer.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Harmonics Problems in Distribution Systems Case Study AEP Texas Central Company Scott Lee, Reliability Engineer."— Presentation transcript:

1 Harmonics Problems in Distribution Systems Case Study AEP Texas Central Company Scott Lee, Reliability Engineer

2

3 SYMPTOMS OF A PROBLEM  Residential customer calls complaining of problems with electronics: TV, thermostat – AC, motors making strange noises  Serviceman and Operations Tech troubleshoot and have transformer replaced because of unusual humming and arcing sounds from coil  New transformer makes the same sound, customer still has problems – call the engineer  Tech goes to new pipe plant down the road and finds 2000kVA pad transformer making same noise

4  Houston based company built a pipe coating and storage plant in George West to better serve the Eagle Ford Shale area  Two 1000kW induction furnaces to heat and coat 2 inch to 24 inch diameter casing with fusion bonded epoxy  Two solid state 6-pulse rectifiers and step up transformers provide variable frequency 4kV power to induction coils For more info... see texisle.com and ajaxtocco.com THE SOURCE

5 INSTALLATION  Previously during the plant planning stages, AEP provided system, line, and transformer impedances to drive manufacturer for design. Distance and PQ were discussed.  3 miles of distribution feeder was upgraded with 477MCM aluminum, with a total length of 6.4 miles  Drive manufacturer wanted two 1500kVA or one 3000kVA transformer, we supplied one 2000kVA. They were also very insistent on our transformer meeting their specs. Actual peak is 1380kW.  A 1000kVA pad was installed for other plant power that peaks at 600kW  AEP standard for three phase padmounts is wye-wye  IEEE-519 requirements were not discussed, customer did not tell us the inverter was a 6-pulse drive

6 George West Sub 138/12kV 9.4 MVA Plant  * Residence  Feeder upgraded to 477, 6.4 circuits miles from sub to customer

7  1000kW  500 Hz  Variable Frequency  6-pulse rectifier  No filtering  Water cooled

8

9

10  PMI recorders installed at plant transformer and at residential customer. Set to record harmonics and capture waveforms.  Voltage THD at pipe plant on secodary, 14%  Voltage THD at residential secondary, 5.1% PMI stands for Power Monitors Incorporated, see www.powermonitors.com, iVs-3 and Eagle 440www.powermonitors.com MEASUREMENTS

11 3rd 12.4% THD-Voltage 7th 11 th 13th 5th 23.4% THD-Amps 2000 kVA Padmount 6-Pulse Drive 5th 7th 11th Unfiltered, running at 1550kVA

12 12.4% THD-V 23.4% THD-A Unfiltered, 2000kVA Padmount, 6-Pulse Drive

13 THE FIX  Met with pipe company and drive manufacturer to request they install filtering and comply with IEEE-519 (5% THD limit on voltage)  Move other distribution customers in area to another feeder  Drive manufacturers said they would install passive filters (reactors and capacitors) but parts would have a 14 week lead time plus engineering and installation time  I countered to pipe company that this was unacceptable, and offered three filter manufacturers with on the shelf parts that offered active filtering and engineering support.  Recomended MTE Matrix Pure Sine active filters, Schaffner EMC ECOsine active filters, and TCI H5 active filters.

14  There was a debate over passive versus active, but after some research, I pressed the customer to go with active filters because of the varying load and the possibility of hitting resonance with a passive unit, also recommend a 5% line reactor which is standard for 6 pulse drives  The customer chose a vendor, and we had several phone conferences about what to install, and what would be acceptable with AEP  The vendor chosen was Schaffner EMC and the ECOsine FN3420 filter with additional 5% reactors For more info... List location or contact for specification (or other related documents) THE FIX cont.

15  Schaffner EMC ECOsine filter injects up to 300 amps of current  Compensates for harmonic currents  Compensates for reactive current  Can choose percentage of overall current dedicated to each harmonic  Two installed with 5% reactor ahead of each drive

16  Before at 1850 amps of load:  Voltage THD 12.6% Current THD 23%  After at 2150 amps of load:  Voltage THD 5.5% Current THD 8.8%  After at 1320 amps of load:  Voltage THD 7% Current THD 5%  Adjacent Transformer Voltage THD 3.5%

17 Total Load 1800 amps HarmonicAmpsAmps with Filter 5 th 42749 7 th 22560 11 th 11352 13 th 6059 THD-V from 12.2% to 8.1%

18 2300A rms 5.9% THD-V 9.6% THD-A 8.4% THD-V 24.2% THD-A Neutral volts and amps Testing, filter on and off ---------  Filter off

19 Waveforms showing commutation notching 6.9% THD-voltage 5% THD-current 1300 amps

20 UG Residence, one mile from pipe plant, plant running at 7% THD-V 3.5% THD-V 3 rd, 7 th, and 5th V I

21  Not below 5% THD on voltage at meter  Filtering has done all it can do  Work with drive manufacturer to control commutation notching using saturating reactors on SCRs to speed gate closing

22  Should have required drive manufacturer to meet IEEE 519 standard  Get a written proposal from drive manufacturer on how they will meet the standard  Use delta primary transformer to trap Triplen harmonics, this is 2.7% of total  Recommend active filtering  Recommend 12 pulse drives or technology to reduce commutation notching IN RETROSPECT

23


Download ppt "Harmonics Problems in Distribution Systems Case Study AEP Texas Central Company Scott Lee, Reliability Engineer."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google