1. EMC BACKUP AND RECOVERY SOLUTIONS
Note to Presenter: This presentation is for EMC BRS Sales only to present to customers and prospects. It provides an overview of BRS products, including Avamar, Data Domain, Disk Library, and NetWorker with a focus on market leadership and how they are transforming backup and recovery from tape-based solutions to disk- and network-efficient systems.
Backup to the future

2. Agenda EMC backup and recovery solutions
Backup Recovery Systems (BRS) division profile
The transition from tape to disk
Backup and recovery in the enterprise
Enterprise backup and recovery
EMC NetWorker
EMC Disk Library and Disk Library for mainframe
Deduplication: Enabling next-generation backup
EMC Avamar
EMC Data Domain

3. EMC Backup Recovery Systems Division
Division HQ: Santa Clara, CA
10 R&D locations
2,000 employees
Data protection storage systems
More than 60,000 systems installed
More than 45,000 customers
More than 15,000 PB under protection worldwide
Global sales, support, and services
Approximately 6,000 channel partners

4. EMC Backup and Recovery Market Position
Avamar
#1 deduplication backup software worldwide
8,000 installations
4,400 customers
Data Domain
#1 deduplication storage worldwide
12,000 installations
5,100 customers
Disk Library
#1 virtual tape library (VTL) worldwide
>$1B in sales
NetWorker
Top three enterprise backup software
30,000 customers

5. Backup and Recovery Architectures: In Transition from Tape to Disk
Application Backup
Clients
Backup/Media
Manager
Onsite Backup
Storage
Disaster Recovery
Storage
Backup/Recovery
Architecture
Conventional (Tape-centric)
Home DB
Backup software
Tape
NetWorker
Data Domain
Avamar
Disk Library
Data Protection Advisor
Backup software
VTL
VTL/Tape
Note to Presenter: View now in Slide Show mode for animation.
Backup is an evolving art, and deduplication is driving its current evolution. There are well-established products and players in the market today. There are also transformational products and players in the market. The columns at the top of this graphic show the different parts of the backup topology (Note to Presenter: Click now in Slide Show mode for animation.); the rows illustrate how the EMC products fall into these spaces.
EMC NetWorker and EMC Disk Library were both designed some time ago and are leaders in their respective markets, but both assume a design that incorporates a significant amount of tape management and copying. In many cases, companies who have significant reliance on tape will be best suited to using those products first when redesigning their backup.
In other cases, and more transformationally, EMC Data Domain and Avamar are designed around a more disk-centric approach to backup. With the advantage of deduplication, disk is going to become much more widely used as a backup target. Note as well that EMC Data Protection Advisor is the industry leader in data protection management—providing monitoring, analysis, and reporting across multi-vendor, multi-location environments.
Analyst firm Gartner expects that about 80 percent of all restores in the future will be from disk, not from tape. This process started a long time ago but, with deduplication’s advantages, the transformation is accelerating.
Transformational
(Disk-centric)
Deduplication storage
Backup software
Deduplication backup software and system
Data Protection Management Software
on premise
off premise

6. Backup and Recovery: Hot Spot in the Enterprise
Secular shift from tape- centric to disk/network- centric approaches
Enabler: Massive data deduplication and compression techniques
Unabated growth of enterprise data overwhelms legacy infrastructure
Server virtualization is another catalyst
F1000: What are your top storage pain points?
Deduplication helps optimize many of these initiatives
Source: TheInfoPro, Wave 14 Storage Study, Q2 2010, published August 19, 2010; n=166 (8/11/10 F1000 sample). Note that due to multiple responses per interview, total exceeds 100%.

7. EMC NETWORKER

8. NetWorker DB on premise off premise Conventional (Tape-centric)
Application Backup
Clients
Backup/Media
Manager
Onsite Backup
Storage
Disaster Recovery
Storage
Backup/Recovery
Architecture
Conventional (Tape-centric)
Home DB
Backup software
Tape
NetWorker
Data Domain
Avamar
Disk Library
Backup software
VTL
VTL/Tape
Transformational
(Disk-centric)
Deduplication storage
Deduplication backup software and system
Data Protection Management Software
Data Protection Advisor
on premise
off premise

9. NetWorker Backup and Recovery Software
Unified backup software
Common platform
Backup to disk
Backup to tape
Snapshot management
Replication management
Integrated deduplication support
Integrated Avamar client services
Data Domain Boost integration
Simplified, centralized management
Broad, heterogeneous platform support
Enterprise-wide deployment experience
Mid-market to enterprise
Small to very, very large
Today’s data protection solutions need to operate across a very diverse landscape—managing multiple tiers of data protection from tape, to disk, to snaps, across a variety of applications within both physical and virtual environments; and providing comprehensive scheduling and policies for both operational and disaster recovery scenarios.
To drive complexity and cost out of this environment, you need common management. EMC NetWorker has evolved into a powerful application that provides this centralized control and command, or single management interface, necessary to provide greater simplification and seamless management to meet today’s new requirements.

10. Centralized Management
DEDUPLICATION
APPLICATION
SUPPORT
SAP
Oracle
Microsoft
VIRTUALIZATION
Data Domain
Avamar
NetWorker
Cloud
Tape
FILE SYSTEMS AND SERVER RECOVERY
REMOTE AND
BRANCH OFFICES
EMC STORAGE PLATFORMS
Disk Library Family
Centera
VNX Family
Symmetrix

11. NetWorker Differentiation
Centralized control for all backup requirements
Seamless integration with industry’s two leading deduplication solutions
Advanced application and virtual environment support
Reliable recoverability
With more than 25,000 customers relying on it to protect their critical data, NetWorker helps organizations control costs by bringing management and control of the entire information environment into one central offering. NetWorker leverages this centralized, broad protection to bridge the gap between traditional backup and deduplication backup and enables new backup technologies to be introduced nondisruptively into complex IT operations by providing a common platform for both.
Users choose NetWorker because it...
Provides centralized control of traditional and deduplicated backups
Features support for virtual environments
Has industry-leading data deduplication support through integration with Avamar and Data Domain; by leveraging Avamar and Data Domain deduplication, NetWorker helps users reduce the amount of data to back up and dramatically reduces the amount of disk storage needed to retain and protect data—without adding administrative complexity—by providing a common management interface and backup workflow
Provides advanced backup-to-disk capabilities, snapshots, replication, NAS backup to disk, and backup to disk with vault to cloud
Delivers enterprise performance, security, and analytics
Simply put, nothing securely backs up, recovers, and scales like NetWorker
Integrates with EMC RecoverPoint continuous data protection (CDP) and continuous remote replication (CRR)
Provides better recoverability from tape backups by leveraging a future-proof open tape format with better recoverability from damaged tape media

12. EMC DISK LIBRARY

13. EMC Disk Library DB on premise off premise Conventional (Tape-centric)
Application Backup
Clients
Backup/Recovery
Architecture
Backup/Media
Manager
Onsite Backup
Storage
Disaster Recovery
Storage
Conventional (Tape-centric)
Home DB
NetWorker
Tape
Tape
Symantec
Disk Library
VTL
VTL/Tape
TSM
Transformational
(Disk-centric)
Other 3rd Party
Data Domain
Deduplication backup software and system
Avamar
Data Protection Management Software
Data Protection Advisor
on premise
off premise

14. Industry’s most popular virtual tape library
Disk Library DL5200
EMC DISK LIBRARY
Based on proven CLARiiON CX4 array
Nearly 3 PB of logical capacity
1 TB or 2 TB SATA drives
Up to 945 drives in a single array
Enhanced system throughput, up to 10.2 TB per hour
Faster hardware compression
Front-end 8 Gb/s Fibre Channel ports
Improved energy efficiency
High-density drives and Spin Down reduce per-terabyte disk drive energy requirements
New high-density racks—twice the capacity in same footprint
Easy integration into existing infrastructure
Central management with other Disk Library systems
Replication between Disk Library systems
Industry’s most popular virtual tape library

15. DL5200 DL5200 Storage CLARiiON CX4-960 Maximum capacity (usable)
1.4 PB
Maximum performance (compressed)
10.2 TB per hour
Fibre Channel connectivity
8 Gb/s
Engines 2
Back-end arrays 1
Drive size
1 TB/2 TB
Active engine failover
Replication
Consolidated media management
Hardware compression
Spin Down

16. Disk Library Differentiation
Industry-leading open systems virtual tape library
More than 500 PB deployed
More than 2,500 customers worldwide
Industry’s most energy-efficient virtual tape library
Drive Spin Down reduces power and cooling costs
Consolidated media management
EMC NetWorker and Symantec NetBackup integrated
Most qualified backup environments
More than three million supported configurations

17. EMC DISK LIBRARY FOR MAINFRAME

18. EMC Disk Library for Mainframe
IBM mainframe
EMC Disk Library for mainframe
True IBM tape emulation
Transparent to mainframe operations
Leverages low-cost SATA II technology
High-performance read and write
Unmatched remote replication capability
EMC-branded product
QA/tested by EMC
Manufactured by EMC
Maintained by EMC
Professional Services by EMC

19. EMC Disk Library for Mainframe Family
DLm120
DLm960
Number of VTEs
1 or 2
1–6
Connectivity
FICON
Number of channels to host
2 or 4
2–12
Number of virtual tape drives
Up to 512
Up to 1,536
Maximum capacity (usable)
9.5 TB–96.5 TB
19.3 TB–1.2 PB
Performance
Up to 400 MB/s
Up to 1.2 GB/s
Number of cabinets 1
2–13 with 1 TB
2–9 with 2 TB
Replication
Hardware compression

20. DLm960 with Deduplication Storage Expansion Option
EMC DISK LIBRARY FOR MAINFRAME
and industry’s most popular deduplication system
Based on proven Data Domain DD880
Nearly 3.5 PBs of logical capacity
System throughput up to 4.3 TB per hour
Hardware compression
Deduplication
Reliability designed for the data center
Multipath for access to all tapes
Data Domain Data Invulnerability Architecture
Call home for support
Easy integration into existing infrastructure
Behaves like a tape library to the application
Low bandwidth replication between disk library systems
No changes to current management process
DLm960
Deduplication Storage
Expansion Option

21. Disk Library for Mainframe Differentiation
Eliminates all issues related to traditional tape handling
Eliminates manual intervention, physical movement of tape cartridges, robotic issues, and single points of failure
Works seamlessly with existing applications
Uses existing tape management processes to automate tape vaulting
Significantly improves performance
Reallocates all of the data to disk and uses smart I/O buffering, allowing potentially significant reductions in batch windows
Extends disaster recovery capabilities to the tape workload
Utilizes array-based replication process over IP to seamlessly move tapes offsite
Provides deduplication for backup and archive workloads
Gain longer onsite retention, optimize replication, and lower overall disk storage costs
Easily scales as the workload increases
No need for additional subsystems, libraries, network connections, etc.

22. EMC AVAMAR AND EMC DATA DOMAIN
Enabling next-generation data protection with deduplication

23. EMC Avamar and EMC Data Domain
Retain, replicate, recover
Deduplicate everything without changing anything
Simplify backup, archiving, and disaster recovery with easy integration across workloads, infrastructures, and backup software
Never back up the same data twice
Revolutionize your backup by moving less data to solve your toughest VMware, NAS, remote office, and desktop/laptop backup challenges
Data Domain Deduplication Storage Systems
Avamar Deduplication Backup Software

24. Data Reduction/Deduplication: F1000
The “in-use” rating for EMC is now over three-times that of its nearest competitor
Source: TheInfoPro, Wave 14 Storage Study – Q2 2010, published August 19, 2010; n=146 (7/6/10 F1000 sample)

25. Deduplication Impact on Data Size
10–30 times less data stored versus fulls plus incrementals with typical retention policies 10 20 30 1 5 15
Weeks in Use
Data Stored
Deduplication storage
Traditional storage

26. Data Deduplication: Technology Overview
Store more backups in a smaller footprint
Friday Full Backup A B C D E F G
Backup Estimated
Data Logical Reduction Physical
FRIDAY FULL 1 TB 2–4x 250 GB
Mon Incremental A B H
Monday Incremental 100 GB 7–10x 10 GB
A technology overview of data deduplication will help illustrate how you can store more backups in a smaller footprint with Data Domain.
Note to Presenter: Click now in Slide Show mode for animation.
On Friday, the backup application initiates the first full backup of 1 TB, but only 250 GB is stored on Data Domain. This occurs because as the data stream is coming into Data Domain, the system is deduplicating before storing data to disk. On average this results in a two- to four-times reduction in data on a first full backup.
Over the course of the week, 100 GB daily incremental backups result in a seven- to 10-times reduction and only require 10 GB to be stored. As the graphic on the left shows, during the week incremental backups contain data that was already protected from the first full backup.
Finally, on the second Friday, the second full backup contains almost all redundant data. Therefore of the 1 TB backup dataset, only 18 GB needed to be stored.
In total, over the course of a week, 2.4 TB of data was backed up to Data Domain, but the system only required 308 GB of capacity to protect this dataset. Overall, this resulted in a 7.8-times reduction in one week.
Tues Incremental C B I
Tuesday Incremental 100 GB 7–10x 10 GB
Weds Incremental E G J
Wednesday Incremental 100 GB 7–10x 10 GB
Thurs Incremental A C K
Thursday Incremental 100 GB 7–10x 10 GB
Second Friday Full Backup B C D E F L G H
Second FRIDAY FULL 1 TB 50–60x 18 GB
TOTAL 2.4 TB 7.8x 308 GB A B C D E F G H I J K L

27. It’s Not All Deduplication Out There
Regular storage array
1:1
LZ compression
~ 2:1
Single instance storage ~ 3:1
Fixed block ~ 3:1
Variable segment ~20:1
Whitespace reduction
Note to Presenter: View in Slide Show mode for animation.
File level
Fixed blocks, snapshots
Deduplication significantly reduces:
Replication WAN bandwidth
Power
Heat
Cooling
Management
Backup target, variable segment

28. Deduplication Enables Next-Generation Storage Architectures
When did you implement this?
What made you evolve?
Primary Disk
Tape
Storage 2.0
Why did you add SATA?
What did you learn?
Primary Disk
SATA
Tape
Note to Presenter: View in Slide Show mode for animation.
Storage 3.0
Backup/recover plus archive from disk (shrink primary)
Tape: monthly
Primary
Tape
Deduplicate SATA
Before
After
Storage 4.0
Flash for primary
Everything else to deduplicate
Flash
Deduplicate SATA
Before
After

29. EMC AVAMAR

30. Backup and Recovery Architectures: In Transition from Tape to Disk
Application Backup
Clients
Backup/Media
Manager
Onsite Backup
Storage
Disaster Recovery
Storage
Backup/Recovery
Architecture
Conventional (Tape-centric)
Home DB
Backup software
Tape
NetWorker
NetWorker
Backup software
VTL
VTL/Tape
Disk Library
Transformational
(Disk-centric)
NetWorker
Deduplication storage
Data Domain
Deduplication backup software and system
Avamar
Data Protection Management Software
Data Protection Advisor
on premise
off premise

31. Avamar Deduplication backup software and systemVM
End-to-end, software/hardware solution
Integrated system for simple, predictable results
Client-side, global deduplication; within and across clients
Improves backup window, less network load
Backup process minimizes data sent and stored
Reduces network and virtual infrastructure stress
Integrated high availability and reliability
RAIN (redundant array of independent nodes) architecture for high availability and fault tolerance
Recoverability verified daily
Disaster recovery through replication
Flexible deployment options
Avamar Data Store
Avamar Virtual Edition
Agent-only for remote office/branch office (ROBO)
Full backups, every time: one-step recovery
Higher backup success rate and reliability
Increased ROI, lower TCO, less risk

32. Avamar Family CORE PLATFORMS EXAMPLE USE CASES UNIFIED MANAGEMENTVM
EMC Data Protection Advisor
EMC NetWorker
Desktop/Laptop
VMware
Remote/Branch Offices
CLIENTS
EMC Avamar
EMC Avamar Virtual Edition for VMware
EMC Avamar Data Store
NAS/NDMP
Lotus Notes
IBM DB2

33. Avamar Differentiation
Shorter backup windows
Less data moved reduces daily full backup times
Reduces required daily network bandwidth and client stress
Scalable VMware backup for greater server consolidation
Simple management
System deployment is easy, pre-configured, with predictable performance
Streamlined, centralized administration and management of remote backups
Single-step restore
Single-step restore for full backups; no need for full and incrementals
Recoverability guaranteed
Daily integrity checks, RAIN, and replication ensure recoverability, high availability

34. EMC DATA DOMAIN

35. EMC Data Domain DB on premise off premise Conventional (Tape-centric)
Application Backup
Clients
Backup/Recovery
Architecture
Backup/Media
Manager
Onsite Backup
Storage
Disaster Recovery
Storage
Conventional (Tape-centric)
Home DB
NetWorker
Tape
Tape
Symantec
Disk Library
VTL
VTL/Tape
TSM
Transformational
(Disk-centric)
Other 3rd Party
Data Domain
Deduplication backup software and system
Avamar
Data Protection Management Software
Data Protection Advisor
on premise
off premise

36. Data Domain Basics Easy integration with existing environment
Control Tier
Target Tier
Disaster Recovery Tier
Backup and archive applications
CIFS, NFS,
NDMP, DD Boost
Ethernet
Virtual Tape
Library (VTL) over
Fibre Channel
EMC
Symantec
CommVault
Tivoli Software
BakBone Software
Vizioncore
Replication
DD890 appliance
DD890 appliance 2U
2 to 10 ports
10 and 1 Gigabit Ethernet; 8 Gb/s Fibre Channel
RAID 6
Up to 285 TB usable capacity with shelves
2 TB or 1 TB 7.2K rpm SATA hard disk drives in shelf
File system
NVRAM
N+1 fans and redundant, hot-plug power supplies

37. Industry’s Most Scalable Inline Deduplication Systems
Global Deduplication
Array
DD800
Appliance Series
DD Archiver
DD600
Appliance Series
Here’s a look at the latest Data Domain product family, including the recently introduced DD800 series, Data Domain Global Deduplication Array, and Data Domain Archiver (the system for long-term retention of backup and archive data).
DD140 Remote
Office Appliance
Software options:
DD Boost, DD Virtual Tape Library, DD Replicator, DD Retention Lock, and DD Encryption
DD140
DD610
DD630
DD670
DD860
DD890
Global Deduplication Array
DD Archiver
Speed (DD Boost)
490 GB/hr
1.3 TB/hr
2.1 TB/hr
5.4 TB/hr
9.8 TB/hr
14.7 TB/hr
26.3 TB/hr
Speed (other)
450 GB/hr
675 GB/hr
1.1 TB/hr
3.6 TB/hr
5.1 TB/hr
8.1 TB/hr
10.7 TB/hr
4.3 TB/hr
Logical capacity
9–43 TB
40–195 TB
84–420 TB
0.6–2.7 PB
1.4–7.1 PB
2.9–14.2 PB
5.7–28.5 PB
Raw capacity
1.5 TB
Up to 6 TB
Up to 12 TB
Up to 76 TB
Up to 192 TB
Up to 384 TB
Up to 768 TB
Usable capacity
0.86 TB
Up to 3.98 TB
Up to 8.4 TB
Up to 55.9 TB
Up to 142 TB
Up to 285 TB
Up to 570 TB

38. Methodology: Inline versus Post-Process Deduplication
Other activities unimpeded
Predictable
Simpler
INLINE
Deduplication Before Storing
Deduplication
POST- PROCESS
Deduplication After Storing
The more processes, the more resource contention
Copy to tape: Too slow to stream tape
Recovery: Service level agreement predictability
Replication: Poor time-to-disaster-recovery
Deduplication: If interleaved with backup or restore
More administration to fight these issues
Deduplication
Store
3x disk accesses to shared store
One of the most conventional alternatives to the Data Domain inline deduplication storage system approach (shown on the left) is by using a methodology known as post-process (shown on the right). In the post-process architecture, data is stored to a disk before deduplication. Then after it is stored, it is read back internally, deduplicated, and written again to a different area.
Although this approach may sound appealing because it seems as if it would allow for faster backups and the use of less resources, it actually creates two problems:
First, a lot more disk is needed to store the multiple pools of data, and for speed, because most of the other vendor’s deduplication approaches are spindle-bound. Because of this, there’s typically a factor of three or four more disks in a post-process configuration than you’ll see in a Data Domain deployment.
Second, it’s just a lot simpler to use an inline approach. If data is all filtered before it’s stored to disk, then it’s just like a regular storage system—it just writes data; it just reads data. There’s no separate administration involved in managing multiple pools—some with deduplication, some with regular storage—and managing the conditions between them. Less administration in the storage system is always better.

39. Performance: CPU-Centric versus Spindle-Bound
Throughput MB/s 50
1,500
Number of Disk Spindles
100
150
200
Data Domain
Fibre Channel
SATA
Improvement since 2004:
Throughput: 175x
Capacity: 450x
This slide shows how Data Domain systems have been able to continue to lead the market in performance and efficiency.
Unlike other deduplication systems, Data Domain systems deduplicate data inline—during the backup process—so that the data lands on disk already deduplicated, requiring a fraction of the disk space of the original dataset. The Data Domain Stream-Informed Segment Layout (SISL) scaling architecture leverages the continued advancement of CPU performance to add a direct benefit to system throughput scalability.
In comparison, most other deduplication vendors’ systems land data on disk before it is deduplicated. As a result, performance is spindle-bound or disk-bound. Since it takes many disk seeks to determine if data is unique and to sort out and then compress the data, disk-bound systems require either many slower disk drives or slightly fewer faster disk drives to deduplicate and store data.
This slide shows what’s happened in a competitive environment as a result. If vendors are using SATA disk drives, most will need three- or four-times as many drives as a Data Domain system to store the same amount of deduplicated data. In some cases, storage systems use Fibre Channel drives instead of SATA. Although this can decrease the seek time and marginally improve performance, it comes at a significantly higher cost.
Data Domain systems, by being CPU-centric and minimizing disk usage to only what is required to store the actual data, have a smaller footprint. This keeps costs down and enables Data Domain systems to provide a total cost of ownership comparable or lower than tape.
By leveraging continued advances in Intel processor performance, rather than relying on improvements in disk vendor performance, Data Domain systems have been able to increase throughput by 175 times and capacity by 450 times since 2004, while disk-bound vendors’ performance has remained stagnant.
Most
deduplication
vendors

40. Data Domain Differentiation
Maturity
Simple
Consistent
Robust (e.g., policy-driven deduplication replication)
Product concept: purpose-built storage
Inline and simple appliance
System infrastructure
Application independent: backup, archive, and more
Architecture: fast, small, storage of last resort
CPU-centric for price/performance
Data protection from the ground up

41. THANK YOU