1. KEK meeting – September 2006 J.-C. Brient (LLR) 1 Jean-Claude BRIENT LLR – Ecole Polytechnique LLR – Ecole Polytechnique CALICE status and Plans

2. KEK meeting – September 2006 J.-C. Brient (LLR) 2 ~200 phys./engineers 38+1 laboratories 11 countries +1 !! 3 regions Approved PRC-DESY n°02-01 Presented at PAC-FNAL http://polywww.in2p3.fr/flc/calice.html CIEMAT Madrid is in discussion for joining (meeting 25/26 September at LAL-Orsay)

3. KEK meeting – September 2006 J.-C. Brient (LLR) 3 UK Birmingham, Cambridge, Imperial CL, Manchester, University CL, Royal Holloway UL, Rutherford AL USA Argonne NL, Boston, Univ. Chicago, Texas Univ.Arlington, North Illinois Univ., Univ. Iowa St, Close contact with Fermilab Korea Kangnung NU., Seoul NU., Ewha Univ., Sungkyunkwan U., Yonsei U. Czech Rep Univ. Charles-Prague, IOP-ASCR India BARC-Mumbai Russia ITEP, IHEP-Protvino, LPI, Moscow SU, MEPHI France LAL-Orsay, LAPP-Annecy, LPSC-Grenoble, LLR- Ecole Poly., LPC-Clermont, IPNL-Lyon + contacts with labs China Brazil CERN, + contacts with labs China (Tsinghua) Brazil (San Paulo) CERN, Italy ETC… Italy (Pavia, Pisa), ETC… Who and Where Labos ECAL Labos HCAL Canada McGill Univ., Univ. Of Regina Germany DESY, Univ. Hambourg Belarus Minsk Univ. Japan Japan KOBE Univ., SHINSHU Univ. CIEMAT-Madrid in discussion Spain CIEMAT-Madrid in discussion

4. KEK meeting – September 2006 J.-C. Brient (LLR) 4 ECAL : ECAL : Sampling calorimeter Solution 1 : tungstensilicon tungsten (density) - silicon (pixel size ~ Molière radius) Solution 2 : tungsten - MPPC and scintillator tile/strip Pixels size <1cm² and about 20-30 readout layers (15 to 250 Millions channels) The proposed solutions HCAL Solution 1 : tungsten/Stainless steeldigital readout Sampling calorimeter tungsten/Stainless steel (density) –digital readout (pixel size) Solution 2 : tungsten/Stainless steelscintillator tile Sampling calorimeter tungsten/Stainless steel (density) – scintillator tile (small size) Pixel size 1cm² and about 50 readout layers (~50 Millions channels) Pixels size 16cm² and about 50 readout layers readout by silicon PM !!

5. KEK meeting – September 2006 J.-C. Brient (LLR) 5  A first generation prototypes, which allows to debug the concept and technologies 2001 - 2005  A second generation prototypes, much closer to the final detector 2006 - 2009  Ready for LOI, Proposal etc… in 2010 !! Our plans

6. KEK meeting – September 2006 J.-C. Brient (LLR) 6 First generation prototypes   ECAL ready and in use at test beam   Tile HCAL using SiPM from Russia ready and in use at test beam   Digital HCAL in plan ( waiting for funding !!!)

7. KEK meeting – September 2006 J.-C. Brient (LLR) 7 ECAL DETECTORS MATRIX Korea Czech Russia   Brazil (Unicamp-Sao Paulo)   BARC - India AND Hamamatsu not in the list !! (already some contact, but only with Hamamatsu-France)

8. KEK meeting – September 2006 J.-C. Brient (LLR) 8 TCMT

9. KEK meeting – September 2006 J.-C. Brient (LLR) 9 Cells in red : Signal > 20% of Mip Cells in red : Signal > 50% of Mip

10. KEK meeting – September 2006 J.-C. Brient (LLR) 10 Events at 20 degres Beam enery GeV Angular resolution mrad

11. KEK meeting – September 2006 J.-C. Brient (LLR) 11 June 2006, Installation at CERN H6 test beam area

12. KEK meeting – September 2006 J.-C. Brient (LLR) 12 ECAL (W-Si) Tile HCAL (scint. Tiles–SiPM) Tail Catcher (scint.strip-SiPM)

13. KEK meeting – September 2006 J.-C. Brient (LLR) 13

14. KEK meeting – September 2006 J.-C. Brient (LLR) 14

15. KEK meeting – September 2006 J.-C. Brient (LLR) 15

16. KEK meeting – September 2006 J.-C. Brient (LLR) 16 GOAL angles0 deg20 deg30 deg45 deg per (k Evt.) angle total284374226882375900 energy: (GeV) 45933250753551250 40347 280311150 30685270550531250 20380110330208100 15201 18124450 10297112594530100 Statistics of the CERN test beam

17. KEK meeting – September 2006 J.-C. Brient (LLR) 17

18. KEK meeting – September 2006 J.-C. Brient (LLR) 18  Test with electron (may be small energy hadron)  test of running with the VFE chip INSIDE the detector  Test beam with AHCAL+ECAL for debugging and … single layer test (new design) …  Test with Hadron CERN ?? Summer 2007 MTBF Fall 2007  Use EUDET funding for the construction of ½ ECAL module with all news developments + Possible Digital HCAL module with all news developments + Possible Digital HCAL module Next steps 2008 – 2010 Second generation prototypes in test beam FNAL ? may be the right time for an alternative ECAL with MPPC and scintillator strips ?

19. KEK meeting – September 2006 J.-C. Brient (LLR) 19 Second generation prototypes   Tile HCAL, ECAL in design, R&D in progress   Digital HCAL in plan ( waiting for funding !!!) (LAL, LLR, LAPP, IPNL, IHEP-Protvino, and CIEMAT ??)

20. KEK meeting – September 2006 Concept : to be the most representative of the final detector module : – –A alveolar composite/tungsten structure with : - same W sampling - 3 columns of cells to have representative cells in the middle of the structure (with thin composite sheets ) - Identical global dimensions (1.5m long) and shape (trapezoidal) - fastening system ECAL/HCAL (include in the design of composite structure) – –15 Detector slabs with FE chips integrated - 1 long and complete slab (L=1.5m) - 14 short slabs to obtain a complete tower of detection (typ. L=30 cm?) and design of compact outlet. Fastening system 3×15 cells Alveolar Structure C/W Complete Tower Long detector slab (1) Short detector slabs (14) Second generation ECAL prototype

21. KEK meeting – September 2006 J.-C. Brient (LLR) 21 Tested at industrial level  Better for mechanical behavior   Better Molière radius  Better for indust. assembling  DAQ based on FPGA  better for VFE  etc… Example of R&D for the for the ECAL Detector Slab

22. KEK meeting – September 2006 J.-C. Brient (LLR) 22 VFE ASIC Data ADC 1G/100Mb Ethernet PHY BOOT CONFIG FE-FPGA Data Format Zero Suppress Protocol/SerDes FPGA Config/Clock Extract Slab FE FPGA PHY VFE ASIC Dat a Clock+Config+Control VFE ASIC VFE ASIC VFE ASIC Conf/ Clock Bunch/Train Timing Config Data Clk detector readout detector readout Example of R&D ECAL, AHCAL, DHCAL A common approach

23. KEK meeting – September 2006 J.-C. Brient (LLR) 23 Tail Catcher ECAL HCAL Electronics Racks Beam Possible setup at FNAL MTBF

24. KEK meeting – September 2006 J.-C. Brient (LLR) 24 Conclusion Conclusion  CALICE is just MANDATORY !!  Due to the lack of funding and Manpower, sharing is a necessity and therefore CALICE is just MANDATORY !!   It is a NO-LOOSER collaboration (at the time of decision, everybody will be already in the good boat)   the progress is important (test beam) and the road map is well established Negative point   LARGE labs are still missing in the collaboration (CERN, FNAL, KEK, LBL )  CALICE is just MANDATORY !!  Due to the lack of funding and Manpower, sharing is a necessity and therefore CALICE is just MANDATORY !!   It is a NO-LOOSER collaboration (at the time of decision, everybody will be already in the good boat)   the progress is important (test beam) and the road map is well established Negative point   LARGE labs are still missing in the collaboration (CERN, FNAL, KEK, LBL )

25. KEK meeting – September 2006 J.-C. Brient (LLR) 25 A major lab is mandatory to organise and manage the work on the silicon wafers for the ECAl W-Si > Discuss with large producers like Hamamatsu !! > Define the protocol of the data quality control (existing expertise and engineering structure and people) (existing expertise and engineering structure and people) > Manage the sharing between smaller labs > …