1. 9 March 2004 Internet2: Priorities for Today & Tomorrow EDUCAUSE Live! Douglas Van Houweling President & CEO, Internet2

2. 2 Overview  Internet2  Strategic Foci  2004 Priorities  Internet2 Future

3. 3 Internet2 Mission  Develop and deploy advanced network applications and technologies, accelerating the creation of tomorrow’s Internet.

4. 4 Internet2 Universities 206 University Members, March 2004

5. 5 Internet2 Partnerships  Internet2 universities are recreating the partnerships that fostered the Internet in its infancy Industry Government International

6. 6 Additional Participation  61 Internet2 Corporate Members  41 Affiliate Members Federal laboratories, regional networks, medical centers, performing arts institutions, etc.  44 International Partners  K-12 schools, libraries, & museums

7. 7 International MoU Map Asia-Pacific AAIREP (Australia) APAN (Asia-Pacific) APAN-KR (Korea) APRU (Asia-Pacific) CERNET, CSTNET, NSFCNET (China) JAIRC (Japan) JUCC (Hong Kong) NECTEC / UNINET (Thailand) SingAREN (Singapore) TAnet2 (Taiwan) Americas CANARIE (Canada) CEDIA (Ecuador) CNTI (Venezuela) CR2net (Costa Rica) CUDI (Mexico) REUNA (Chile) RETINA (Argentina) RNP (Brazil) SENACYT (Panama) Europe-Middle East ARNES (Slovenia) BELNET (Belgium) CARNET (Croatia) CESnet (Czech Republic) DANTE (Europe) DFN-Verein (Germany) GIP RENATER (France) GRNET (Greece) HEAnet (Ireland) HUNGARNET (Hungary) INFN-GARR (Italy) Israel-IUCC (Israel) NORDUnet (Nordic Countries) POL-34 (Poland) RCCN (Portugal) RedIRIS (Spain) RESTENA (Luxembourg) RIPN (Russia) SANET (Slovakia) Stichting SURF (Netherlands) SWITCH (Switzerland) TERENA (Europe) JISC, UKERNA (United Kingdom)

8. 8 Sponsored Education Group Participants

9. 9 Internet2 Today (and Tomorrow) MotivateEnable End-to-end Performance Networks Middleware Applications Services Security

10. 10 Fundamental Questions  What does Internet2 community (and the rest of the world) require from the Internet and its applications?  What should the Internet2 community do to address those requirements?  What specific steps should we take to move forward?

11. 11 Strategic Foci  Address the advanced networking needs and interests of the research & education community  Implement a systems approach towards a scalable advanced networking infrastructure  Provide leadership in the evolution of the Internet  Leverage strategic relationships among academia, industry and government Engage the Federal Cyberinfrastructure Initiative  Catalyze activities that cannot be accomplished by individual organizations International connections  Focus on financially feasible, affordable, and deployable technologies and solutions

12. 12 Internet2 2004 Emphasis  Advanced Network Infrastructure  End to End Performance  Middleware  Security  International Connections  Applications

13. 13 Internet2 Network Infrastructure  Abilene backbone operates at 10 Gbps (OC192) capacity today  GigaPoPs provide regional high-performance aggregation points  Local campus networks provide 100 Mbps to the desktop  National LambdaRail (NLR) will provide access to multiple wavelengths on dedicated national fiber facility  Fiberco provides dark fiber nationwide  Hybrid Optical and Packet Infrastructure (HOPI)

14. 14 Abilene Upgrade – Completed!

16. 16 End-to-End Performance: The Wizard Gap Wizard Gap (ratio has gone from 3:1 to 300:1 in last decade)

17. 17 Middleware http://middleware.internet2.edu/  A layer of software between the network and the applications Authentication Identification Authorization Directories Security

18. 18 Federated Authentication  Scalable, decentralized infrastructure  Critical to a broad range of initiatives  Being adopted and implemented Industry International  Middleware is an increasingly enabling element  Examples: Shibboleth, InCommon Federation  Part of the NSF Middleware Initiative

19. 19 Security  Higher Ed Security Improvement Program Internet2/Educause staff working group Liaison with federal HSD REN ISAC at IU HE chapter for National Strategy Document Best practices dissemination & training R&D on security in hybrid environments  Focus on security and Internet architecture

20. 20 Security  Require network security approaches that: Minimally compromise network performance and allow applications requiring advanced network services to function Sustain, in so far as possible, the end-to-end nature of the Internet architecture  Network security, host software, and middleware become inter-dependent Security at Line Speed (SALSA) steering group Additional staff on assignment from university and corporate members  Engage NSF CyberTrust program

21. 21 International Connections  Now multiple NSF agreements Different regions of the world Different types of connectivity & research  Also various uncoordinated donated infrastructure  Our international partners could work more effectively if they had a coordinated point of contact  Working with our members to prepare a coordinated proposal

22. 22 Applications: Production Infrastructure  Internet2 Commons  InCommon/InQueue middleware federation support  PKI (Public Key Infrastructure) with Dartmouth  Abilene  Voice and Integrated Communications Initiative (VICI)  End-to-End Performance systems  Move maturing applications to production status in order to promote the large-scale adoption of common applications

23. 23 Applications: Extend Work with Discipline Communities  Collaborate with discipline communities and organizations, and address the unique needs of research communities  Support strategic demonstrations that demonstrate the value of advanced networking and member collaborations  Scout for and engage innovative applications to maintain openness to innovation  Help campus CEOs, VPRs and CIOs with their opportunities and responsibilities  Engage in multi-level bi-directional relations with federal agencies

24. 24 The Future  Hybrid Optical and Packet Infrastructure (HOPI) with NLR Understanding and implementing the connectivity architecture of the future  Integrated Middleware & Security  End-to-End Performance  Internet Architecture Assessment Strategic response to the challenges facing the Internet Joint effort starting with MIT and expanding – David Clark leadership

25. 25 Requires Internet2 to Operate in Pasteur’s Quadrant Focus on New Knowledge Creation? Focus on Application? No Yes Edison Bohr Pasteur

26. 26 More Internet2 Information  On the Web www.internet2.edu www.internet2.edu/about/lists.html  Email info@internet2.edu

27. 27