1. – R = reportL = leafletWS = workshop

2. Work Package 4 Dietary Assessment Methods: State of the Art Report WP4 partners *University of Cambridge (Lead partner) *German Institute of Human Nutrition *International Agency for Research on Cancer Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht Fundación Vasca de Innovación e Investigación Sanitarias Eesti Geenivaramu, University of Tartu Lund University Umeå Universitet Karolinska Institutet University of Tromsø Paula Stradina kliniská universitátes slimnica Kræftens Bekæmpelse * Authors of the state of the art report

3. September 1st 8:30 – 8:45 am: Welcome and overview of days programme – Heiner Boeing 8:45 – 9:00 am:Review of dietary assessment validation studies – Heather Ward 9:00 – 9:15 am:Review of 24 hour recall studies – Inge Huybrechts 9:15 – 9:30 am: Review of innovative nutritional epidemiology methods –- Anne-Kathrin Illner 9:30 – 10:15 am: Web-based methods – 24-h-recalls - Amy Subar 10:15 – 10:45 am: Web-based methods – 24-h-recalls - Jean Francois Boisvieux 10:45 – 11:15 am: Coffee Break 11:15 – 11:45 am: Web-based methods – Diet history - Elizabeth Spencer 11:45 – 12:15 pm: Web-based methods – the LifeGene study – Sara Christensen 12:15 – 1:15 pm: Lunch 1:15 – 3:45 pm: Discussion of proposed method for IDAMES including selected presentations from the group members - Heiner Boeing 3:45 – 4:15 pm: Coffee break 4:15 – 5:00 pm Summary of discussions and conclusions - Heiner Boeing

4. 13.15 (1.15 p.m.) 13.15 Statistical progress Status and Multiple Source Method (Heiner Boeing) 13.45 24-h-recalls Participation rates telephone administered 24-h-recalls (Dagrun Engeset) Participation rates telephone administered 24-h-recalls (Alison Lennox) 14.15 Propensity type FFQs Participation rates second FFQ (Jakob Linseisen) Participation rates FFQs (Elisabet Wirfält) 14.45 Overall study participation in selected settings Participation rates telephone interview (Paula Jackszyn) Participation rates for prospective studies in the East European context (Andres Metspalu, Valdis Pirags) 15.15 Discussion alternatives Is a workload of two 24-h-recalls and one FFQ feasible for all? (Comments from Anne Tonneland, Göran Hallmans, and Petra Peeters) Is a subgroup assessment sufficient? (Anne-Katrin Illner) 15.45 end of session