Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Minnesota Department of Transportation Ombudsman Program 2010 APA Upper Midwest Planning Conference September 22, 2010.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Minnesota Department of Transportation Ombudsman Program 2010 APA Upper Midwest Planning Conference September 22, 2010."— Presentation transcript:

1 Minnesota Department of Transportation Ombudsman Program 2010 APA Upper Midwest Planning Conference September 22, 2010

2 What is an Ombudsman? An Ombudsman is a neutral, informal and independent resource put in place to assist complainants to resolve concerns

3 What Does An Ombudsman Do? Helps resolve problems and concerns by trying to identify and meet interests of all parties Acts in a neutral, informal and independent manner Can escalate an issue Provides feedback to the organization so it can be proactive in resolving issues or avoid similar issues in the future

4 What Will An Ombudsman Not Do? Make or override decisions (only presents options) Advocate for one party or point of view Own any formal process or policy Replace formal processes

5 What is the Process? Contact by - phone, e-mail or website Ombudsman listens and clarifies the issue Ombudsman will conduct informal fact-finding Ombudsman listens to all sides Options are generated Pros and Cons of options are considered Option pursued Commissioner makes decision based on input on Ombudsman process

6 What Are the Benefits of the Process? All parties have an opportunity to be heard A fresh look or perspective is available Expertise in conflict resolution is provided Focus on interests vs. positions Creative options pursued

7 Categories of Issues Heard - Damage - Business Impacts - Noise - Access - Drainage - Ethics/Integrity - Consultant/Contractor Issues - Program Design & Development

8 Possible Resolutions No Change/Education Settlement Changed/Modified Decision Change in Policy or Process Formal Action

9 Challenges Early Intervention Recognize Conflict Contract Specs/Contractor relationships Tech Procedures/Policies Legal

10 Lessons Learned – Public Engagement – Business Impacts – Human Relations – Communication – (How We Make Decisions) – Expectations

11 Case Examples Kaganovich- “Where did my trees go?” Carol Lawrence- “Buy my house” Grant Park- “I want a guardrail” Two Harbors Chamber- “Don’t take our billboard” Pequot Lakes- “You’re ruining my business” Delores Bunker-”Don’t get my feet wet”

12 Kaganovich: Before Our Trees Property line

13 Kaganovich: After

14 Carol Lawrence 62-X-Town 6124

15 Grant Park-Aerial View

16 Grant Park-Car Crash

17 Two Harbors

18 Pequot Lakes- “Bypass/No Bypass”

19 Delores Bunker

20

21 How You Can Use the Ombudsman? Tool – Angry Constituent – Constituents Stuck on a Position – Constrained by Process Advice/Consultation – Public Engagement – Identifying Problem and Issues

22 How You Can Use the Ombudsman? (cont.) Problem Solving – Alternatives – Outside the Box – Adding Expertise Political – Neutral – Reasonable

23 Questions? Deb Ledvina Transportation Ombudsman Deb.ledvina@state.mn.us 651-366-3052 www.dot.state.mn.us/ombudsman


Download ppt "Minnesota Department of Transportation Ombudsman Program 2010 APA Upper Midwest Planning Conference September 22, 2010."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google